The Experts below are selected from a list of 41343 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Robert Salais - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A presentation of the French “économie des conventions”. Application to Labour issues
2001Co-Authors: Robert SalaisAbstract:This paper presents the main assumptions of the French research on the "economie des conventions" toward an anglo-saxon audience. It applies that framework to Labour issues and, specifically, the formalisation of the Labour Relation.
-
A presentation of the French “économie des conventions”. Application to Labour issues
2001Co-Authors: Robert SalaisAbstract:This paper presents the main assumptions of the French research on the "économie des conventions" toward an anglo-saxon audience. It applies that framework to Labour issues and, specifically, the formalisation of the Labour Relation.
Tod D. Rutherford - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Scaling up by law? Canadian Labour law, the nation-state and the case of the British Columbia Health Employees Union
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2012Co-Authors: Tod D. RutherfordAbstract:This paper examines the Canadian Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling in favour of the Health Employees Union (HEU) versus the British Columbia government. Based on international Labour law, this ruling recognised collective bargaining as part of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. While recent research in human and Labour geography on Labour law and the state have emphasised its contingent, topological and site-based nature I argue: (i) that this case reflects how Canadian unions became deeply embedded in post-war hegemonic splicings of law and space and the state’s role in the reproduction of the wage-Labour Relation and (ii) while the HEU’s struggles and the use of international law contest such splicings, these are still sharply inflected by existing nation-state legal systems that remain both relatively resilient and ambivalent about Labour rights. The HEU case thus reveals that scaling up by law may not protect worker interests if Labour is otherwise weak.
Julie Valentin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Modes d'ajustement à la crise: des Relations professionnelles sous tensions
2014Co-Authors: Coralie Perez, Nadine Thevenot, Nathalie Berta, Delphine Brochard, Noélie Delahaie, Sophie Jallais, Corinne Perraudin, Catherine Sauviat, Julie ValentinAbstract:This research has been done in the context of the REPONSE (2010-2011) post survey. The interviews aimed at characterizing the companies' adjustment processes to the 2008 crisis and how they have been discussed, negotiated or forced by management direction. The methodology is built on two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The first one consists in a firms' typology grounded on the statistical exploitation of the survey matched to SINAPSE (which the information on firms' short term work uses) and DMMO (which gives information on workers moves); the second one is qualitative based on case studies of 15 companies mainly industrial. The typology shows up the specific combinations of employment and retributions adjustmentss of 4000 establishments of 10 or more workers of the non-agricultural sectors between 2008 and 2010. The fieldwork was done on a sample of establishments representative of the different types of adjustments combination. It gives important insights on the decision making process and how workers experienced it. Job preservation of permanent workers and the maintenance of the level of the retributions appeared to be key factors for workers to give their consent to the adjustments. But, often, these agreements relied on workers return on internal flexibility on working time, internal mobility, wages increases' rules which workers representative may find difficult to go back after the recovery. Labour Relation appears to have become more and more pliable.
-
COMPANIES' ADJUSTMENT PROCESSES TO THE 2008 CRISIS: EMPLOYMENT RelationS UNDER PRESSURE
2014Co-Authors: Coralie Perez, Nadine Thevenot, Nathalie Berta, Delphine Brochard, Noélie Delahaie, Sophie Jallais, Corinne Perraudin, Catherine Sauviat, Julie ValentinAbstract:This research has been done in the context of the REPONSE (2010-2011) post survey. The interviews aimed at characterizing the companies’ adjustment processes to the 2008 crisis and how they have been discussed, negotiated or forced by the management direction. The methodology is built on two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The first one consists in a firms’ typology grounded on the statistical exploitation of the survey matched to SINAPSE (which the information on firms’ short term work uses) and DMMO (which gives information on workers moves); the second one is qualitative based on case studies of 15 companies mainly industrial. The typology shows up the specific combinations of employment and retributions adjustments of 4000 establishments of 10 or more workers of the nonagricultural sectors between 2008 and 2010. The fieldwork was done on a sample of establishments representative of the different types of adjustments combination. It gives important insights on the decision making process and how workers experienced it. Job preservation of permanent workers and the maintenance of the level of the retributions appeared to be key factors for workers to give their consent to the adjustments. But, often, these agreements relied on workers return on internal flexibility on working time, internal mobility, wages increases’ rules which workers representative may find difficult to go back after the recovery. Labour Relation appears to have become more and more pliable.
-
Companies' Adjustment Processes To The 2008 Crisis : Employment Relations Under Pressure [Modes d'ajustement à la crise : des Relations professionnelles sous tensions]
2014Co-Authors: Coralie Perez, Nadine Thevenot, Nathalie Berta, Delphine Brochard, Noélie Delahaie, Sophie Jallais, Corinne Perraudin, Catherine Sauviat, Julie ValentinAbstract:This research has been done in the context of the REPONSE (2010-2011) post survey. The interviews aimed at characterizing the companies' adjustment processes to the 2008 crisis and how they have been discussed, negotiated or forced by the management direction. The methodology is built on two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The first one consists in a firms' typology grounded on the statistical exploitation of the survey matched to SINAPSE (which the information on firms' short term work uses) and DMMO (which gives information on workers moves); the second one is qualitative based on case studies of 15 companies mainly industrial. The typology shows up the specific combinations of employment and retributions adjustments of 4000 establishments of 10 or more workers of the nonagricultural sectors between 2008 and 2010. The fieldwork was done on a sample of establishments representative of the different types of adjustments combination. It gives important insights on the decision making process and how workers experienced it. Job preservation of permanent workers and the maintenance of the level of the retributions appeared to be key factors for workers to give their consent to the adjustments. But, often, these agreements relied on workers return on internal flexibility on working time, internal mobility, wages increases' rules which workers representative may find difficult to go back after the recovery. Labour Relation appears to have become more and more pliable.
Coralie Perez - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Modes d'ajustement à la crise: des Relations professionnelles sous tensions
2014Co-Authors: Coralie Perez, Nadine Thevenot, Nathalie Berta, Delphine Brochard, Noélie Delahaie, Sophie Jallais, Corinne Perraudin, Catherine Sauviat, Julie ValentinAbstract:This research has been done in the context of the REPONSE (2010-2011) post survey. The interviews aimed at characterizing the companies' adjustment processes to the 2008 crisis and how they have been discussed, negotiated or forced by management direction. The methodology is built on two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The first one consists in a firms' typology grounded on the statistical exploitation of the survey matched to SINAPSE (which the information on firms' short term work uses) and DMMO (which gives information on workers moves); the second one is qualitative based on case studies of 15 companies mainly industrial. The typology shows up the specific combinations of employment and retributions adjustmentss of 4000 establishments of 10 or more workers of the non-agricultural sectors between 2008 and 2010. The fieldwork was done on a sample of establishments representative of the different types of adjustments combination. It gives important insights on the decision making process and how workers experienced it. Job preservation of permanent workers and the maintenance of the level of the retributions appeared to be key factors for workers to give their consent to the adjustments. But, often, these agreements relied on workers return on internal flexibility on working time, internal mobility, wages increases' rules which workers representative may find difficult to go back after the recovery. Labour Relation appears to have become more and more pliable.
-
COMPANIES' ADJUSTMENT PROCESSES TO THE 2008 CRISIS: EMPLOYMENT RelationS UNDER PRESSURE
2014Co-Authors: Coralie Perez, Nadine Thevenot, Nathalie Berta, Delphine Brochard, Noélie Delahaie, Sophie Jallais, Corinne Perraudin, Catherine Sauviat, Julie ValentinAbstract:This research has been done in the context of the REPONSE (2010-2011) post survey. The interviews aimed at characterizing the companies’ adjustment processes to the 2008 crisis and how they have been discussed, negotiated or forced by the management direction. The methodology is built on two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The first one consists in a firms’ typology grounded on the statistical exploitation of the survey matched to SINAPSE (which the information on firms’ short term work uses) and DMMO (which gives information on workers moves); the second one is qualitative based on case studies of 15 companies mainly industrial. The typology shows up the specific combinations of employment and retributions adjustments of 4000 establishments of 10 or more workers of the nonagricultural sectors between 2008 and 2010. The fieldwork was done on a sample of establishments representative of the different types of adjustments combination. It gives important insights on the decision making process and how workers experienced it. Job preservation of permanent workers and the maintenance of the level of the retributions appeared to be key factors for workers to give their consent to the adjustments. But, often, these agreements relied on workers return on internal flexibility on working time, internal mobility, wages increases’ rules which workers representative may find difficult to go back after the recovery. Labour Relation appears to have become more and more pliable.
-
Companies' Adjustment Processes To The 2008 Crisis : Employment Relations Under Pressure [Modes d'ajustement à la crise : des Relations professionnelles sous tensions]
2014Co-Authors: Coralie Perez, Nadine Thevenot, Nathalie Berta, Delphine Brochard, Noélie Delahaie, Sophie Jallais, Corinne Perraudin, Catherine Sauviat, Julie ValentinAbstract:This research has been done in the context of the REPONSE (2010-2011) post survey. The interviews aimed at characterizing the companies' adjustment processes to the 2008 crisis and how they have been discussed, negotiated or forced by the management direction. The methodology is built on two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The first one consists in a firms' typology grounded on the statistical exploitation of the survey matched to SINAPSE (which the information on firms' short term work uses) and DMMO (which gives information on workers moves); the second one is qualitative based on case studies of 15 companies mainly industrial. The typology shows up the specific combinations of employment and retributions adjustments of 4000 establishments of 10 or more workers of the nonagricultural sectors between 2008 and 2010. The fieldwork was done on a sample of establishments representative of the different types of adjustments combination. It gives important insights on the decision making process and how workers experienced it. Job preservation of permanent workers and the maintenance of the level of the retributions appeared to be key factors for workers to give their consent to the adjustments. But, often, these agreements relied on workers return on internal flexibility on working time, internal mobility, wages increases' rules which workers representative may find difficult to go back after the recovery. Labour Relation appears to have become more and more pliable.
Huang Zhanyu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
New features of rights safeguard in trade union at colleges and universities——Change of Labour Relation and trade union's focus of work and orientation of role
Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2006Co-Authors: Huang ZhanyuAbstract:In the system of market economy,the Labour Relation at colleges and universities has changed greatly.The trade union cadres should update their conception as soon as possible,adjust the focus of work,strengthen the coordination of Labour Relation,safeguard the legal rights of faculty and staff,so as to increase the cohesion of trade union and take the road of trade union development of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
