The Experts below are selected from a list of 82374 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jinyu Hu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a network analysis of Leadership Theory the infancy of integration
Journal of Management, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D. Meuser, Jessica E. Dinh, Robert C. Liden, Jinyu Hu, William L. Gardner, Robert G LordAbstract:We investigated the status of Leadership Theory integration by reviewing 14 years of published research (2000 through 2013) in 10 top journals (864 articles). The authors of these articles examined 49 Leadership approaches/theories, and in 293 articles, 3 or more of these Leadership approaches were included in their investigations. Focusing on these articles that reflected relatively extensive integration, we applied an inductive approach and used graphic network analysis as a guide for drawing conclusions about the status of Leadership Theory integration. All 293 articles included in the analysis identified 1 focal Theory that was integrated with 2 or more supporting Leadership theories. The 6 Leadership approaches most often appearing as the focal Theory were transformational Leadership, charismatic Leadership, strategic Leadership, Leadership and diversity, participative/shared Leadership, and the trait approach to Leadership. On the basis of inductive reflections on our analysis, we make two key observations. First, the 49 focal Leadership theories qualify as middle-range theories that are ripe for integration. Second, drawing from social network Theory, we introduce the term “theoretical neighborhood” to describe the focal theoretical networks. Our graphical inductive analyses reveal potential connections among neighboring middle-range Leadership theories that merit investigation and, hence, identify promising future directions for achieving greater theoretical integration. We provide an online supplement with 10 additional Leadership Theory graphs and analyses: Leadership in teams and decision groups, ethical Leadership, leader and follower cognitions, Leadership emergence, Leadership development, emotions and Leadership, implicit Leadership, leader-member exchange, authentic Leadership, and identity and identification process theories of Leadership.
-
Leadership Theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives
Leadership Quarterly, 2014Co-Authors: Jessica E. Dinh, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, Robert G Lord, William L. Gardner, Jinyu HuAbstract:Scholarly research on the topic of Leadership has witnessed a dramatic increase over the last decade, resulting in the development of diverse Leadership theories. To take stock of established and developing theories since the beginning of the new millennium, we conducted an extensive qualitative review of Leadership Theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organizational Science, and Personnel Psychology. We then combined two existing frameworks (Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney, & Cogliser, 2010; Lord & Dinh, 2012) to provide a process-oriented framework that emphasizes both forms of emergence and levels of analysis as a means to integrate diverse Leadership theories. We then describe the implications of the findings for future Leadership research and Theory. © 2013.
Robert G Lord - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a network analysis of Leadership Theory the infancy of integration
Journal of Management, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D. Meuser, Jessica E. Dinh, Robert C. Liden, Jinyu Hu, William L. Gardner, Robert G LordAbstract:We investigated the status of Leadership Theory integration by reviewing 14 years of published research (2000 through 2013) in 10 top journals (864 articles). The authors of these articles examined 49 Leadership approaches/theories, and in 293 articles, 3 or more of these Leadership approaches were included in their investigations. Focusing on these articles that reflected relatively extensive integration, we applied an inductive approach and used graphic network analysis as a guide for drawing conclusions about the status of Leadership Theory integration. All 293 articles included in the analysis identified 1 focal Theory that was integrated with 2 or more supporting Leadership theories. The 6 Leadership approaches most often appearing as the focal Theory were transformational Leadership, charismatic Leadership, strategic Leadership, Leadership and diversity, participative/shared Leadership, and the trait approach to Leadership. On the basis of inductive reflections on our analysis, we make two key observations. First, the 49 focal Leadership theories qualify as middle-range theories that are ripe for integration. Second, drawing from social network Theory, we introduce the term “theoretical neighborhood” to describe the focal theoretical networks. Our graphical inductive analyses reveal potential connections among neighboring middle-range Leadership theories that merit investigation and, hence, identify promising future directions for achieving greater theoretical integration. We provide an online supplement with 10 additional Leadership Theory graphs and analyses: Leadership in teams and decision groups, ethical Leadership, leader and follower cognitions, Leadership emergence, Leadership development, emotions and Leadership, implicit Leadership, leader-member exchange, authentic Leadership, and identity and identification process theories of Leadership.
-
Leadership Theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives
Leadership Quarterly, 2014Co-Authors: Jessica E. Dinh, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, Robert G Lord, William L. Gardner, Jinyu HuAbstract:Scholarly research on the topic of Leadership has witnessed a dramatic increase over the last decade, resulting in the development of diverse Leadership theories. To take stock of established and developing theories since the beginning of the new millennium, we conducted an extensive qualitative review of Leadership Theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organizational Science, and Personnel Psychology. We then combined two existing frameworks (Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney, & Cogliser, 2010; Lord & Dinh, 2012) to provide a process-oriented framework that emphasizes both forms of emergence and levels of analysis as a means to integrate diverse Leadership theories. We then describe the implications of the findings for future Leadership research and Theory. © 2013.
William L. Gardner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Authentic Leadership Theory: The case for and against
The Leadership Quarterly, 2021Co-Authors: William L. Gardner, Elizabeth P. Karam, Mats Alvesson, Katja EinolaAbstract:Abstract Scholarly and practitioner interest in the topic of authentic Leadership has grown dramatically over the past two decades. Running parallel to this interest, however, have been a number of concerns regarding the conceptual and methodological underpinnings for research on the construct. In this exchange of letters, the cases for and against the current authentic Leadership Theory are made. Through a dialogue, several areas of common ground are identified, as well as focal areas where the cases for and against the utility of authentic Leadership Theory for scholars and practitioners sharply diverge. Suggestions for future theorizing and research that reflect areas of common ground are advanced, along with divergent perspectives on how research on authenticity and Leadership should proceed. Despite their differences, both author teams found the dialogue in itself to be a healthy process for Theory development and encourage constructive future dialogue on other areas where theoretical perspectives diverge.
-
a network analysis of Leadership Theory the infancy of integration
Journal of Management, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D. Meuser, Jessica E. Dinh, Robert C. Liden, Jinyu Hu, William L. Gardner, Robert G LordAbstract:We investigated the status of Leadership Theory integration by reviewing 14 years of published research (2000 through 2013) in 10 top journals (864 articles). The authors of these articles examined 49 Leadership approaches/theories, and in 293 articles, 3 or more of these Leadership approaches were included in their investigations. Focusing on these articles that reflected relatively extensive integration, we applied an inductive approach and used graphic network analysis as a guide for drawing conclusions about the status of Leadership Theory integration. All 293 articles included in the analysis identified 1 focal Theory that was integrated with 2 or more supporting Leadership theories. The 6 Leadership approaches most often appearing as the focal Theory were transformational Leadership, charismatic Leadership, strategic Leadership, Leadership and diversity, participative/shared Leadership, and the trait approach to Leadership. On the basis of inductive reflections on our analysis, we make two key observations. First, the 49 focal Leadership theories qualify as middle-range theories that are ripe for integration. Second, drawing from social network Theory, we introduce the term “theoretical neighborhood” to describe the focal theoretical networks. Our graphical inductive analyses reveal potential connections among neighboring middle-range Leadership theories that merit investigation and, hence, identify promising future directions for achieving greater theoretical integration. We provide an online supplement with 10 additional Leadership Theory graphs and analyses: Leadership in teams and decision groups, ethical Leadership, leader and follower cognitions, Leadership emergence, Leadership development, emotions and Leadership, implicit Leadership, leader-member exchange, authentic Leadership, and identity and identification process theories of Leadership.
-
Leadership Theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives
Leadership Quarterly, 2014Co-Authors: Jessica E. Dinh, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, Robert G Lord, William L. Gardner, Jinyu HuAbstract:Scholarly research on the topic of Leadership has witnessed a dramatic increase over the last decade, resulting in the development of diverse Leadership theories. To take stock of established and developing theories since the beginning of the new millennium, we conducted an extensive qualitative review of Leadership Theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organizational Science, and Personnel Psychology. We then combined two existing frameworks (Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney, & Cogliser, 2010; Lord & Dinh, 2012) to provide a process-oriented framework that emphasizes both forms of emergence and levels of analysis as a means to integrate diverse Leadership theories. We then describe the implications of the findings for future Leadership research and Theory. © 2013.
-
authentic Leadership Theory and practice origins effects and development
2005Co-Authors: William L. Gardner, Bruce J. Avolio, Fred O. WalumbwaAbstract:Preface. (B.J. Avolio, W.L. Gardner, F.O. Walumbwa). Advancements to Authentic Leadership Development Theory. Veritable Authentic Leadership: Emergence, Functioning and Impacts. (A. Chan, S.T. Hannah, W.L. Gardner). Moral Leadership: Explicating the Moral Component of Authentic Leadership. (S.T. Hannah, P.B. Lester, G.R.Vogelgesang). Developing Transparent Relationships through Humor in the Authentic Leader-Follower Relationship. (L. Hughes). The Differential Effects of Socialized and Personalized Leadership on Group Social Capital. (P. Varella, M. Javidan, D. Waldman). Leader Political Skill and Authentic Leadership. (C. Douglas, G.R. Ferris, P.L. Perrewe). The Internal Theatre of the Authentic Leader: Integrating Cognitive, Affective, Conative and Spiritual Facets of Authentic Leadership. (K. Klenke). In Search of Authenticity: Spiritual Leadership Theory as a Source for Future Theory, Research, and Practice on Authentic Leadership. (L.W. (Jody) Fry, J.L. Whittington). Leadership Intervention Research. Where are We? The Status of Leadership Intervention Research: A Meta-analytic Summary. (R.J. Reichard, B.J. Avolio). Measuring Authentic Leadership. Authentic Leadership Measurement and Development: Challenges and Suggestions. (A. Chan). Perceptions of Authentic Leadership: Exploratory Studies. Leader Authenticity Markers: Findings from a Study of Perceptions of African-American Political Leaders. (T.L. Pittinsky, C.J. Tyson). Follower Emotional Reactions to Authentic and Inauthentic Leadership Influence. (M.T. Dasborough, N.M. Ashkanasy). Moving Forward. Resiliency Development of Organizations, Leaders and Employees: Multi-Level Theory Building for Sustained Performance. (C.M. Youssef, F. Luthans). Authentic Leadership in In Extremis Settings: A Concept for Extraordinary Leaders in Exceptional Situations. (T.A. Kolditz, D.M. Brazil). Authentic Development: Leadership Development Level and Executive Effectiveness. (K.M. Eigel, K.W. Kuhnert). Authentic Leadership Development: Emergent Themes and Future Directions. (W.L. Gardner, B.J. Avolio, F.O. Walumbwa).
Jessica E. Dinh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a network analysis of Leadership Theory the infancy of integration
Journal of Management, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D. Meuser, Jessica E. Dinh, Robert C. Liden, Jinyu Hu, William L. Gardner, Robert G LordAbstract:We investigated the status of Leadership Theory integration by reviewing 14 years of published research (2000 through 2013) in 10 top journals (864 articles). The authors of these articles examined 49 Leadership approaches/theories, and in 293 articles, 3 or more of these Leadership approaches were included in their investigations. Focusing on these articles that reflected relatively extensive integration, we applied an inductive approach and used graphic network analysis as a guide for drawing conclusions about the status of Leadership Theory integration. All 293 articles included in the analysis identified 1 focal Theory that was integrated with 2 or more supporting Leadership theories. The 6 Leadership approaches most often appearing as the focal Theory were transformational Leadership, charismatic Leadership, strategic Leadership, Leadership and diversity, participative/shared Leadership, and the trait approach to Leadership. On the basis of inductive reflections on our analysis, we make two key observations. First, the 49 focal Leadership theories qualify as middle-range theories that are ripe for integration. Second, drawing from social network Theory, we introduce the term “theoretical neighborhood” to describe the focal theoretical networks. Our graphical inductive analyses reveal potential connections among neighboring middle-range Leadership theories that merit investigation and, hence, identify promising future directions for achieving greater theoretical integration. We provide an online supplement with 10 additional Leadership Theory graphs and analyses: Leadership in teams and decision groups, ethical Leadership, leader and follower cognitions, Leadership emergence, Leadership development, emotions and Leadership, implicit Leadership, leader-member exchange, authentic Leadership, and identity and identification process theories of Leadership.
-
Leadership Theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives
Leadership Quarterly, 2014Co-Authors: Jessica E. Dinh, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, Robert G Lord, William L. Gardner, Jinyu HuAbstract:Scholarly research on the topic of Leadership has witnessed a dramatic increase over the last decade, resulting in the development of diverse Leadership theories. To take stock of established and developing theories since the beginning of the new millennium, we conducted an extensive qualitative review of Leadership Theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organizational Science, and Personnel Psychology. We then combined two existing frameworks (Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney, & Cogliser, 2010; Lord & Dinh, 2012) to provide a process-oriented framework that emphasizes both forms of emergence and levels of analysis as a means to integrate diverse Leadership theories. We then describe the implications of the findings for future Leadership research and Theory. © 2013.
Jeremy D. Meuser - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a network analysis of Leadership Theory the infancy of integration
Journal of Management, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D. Meuser, Jessica E. Dinh, Robert C. Liden, Jinyu Hu, William L. Gardner, Robert G LordAbstract:We investigated the status of Leadership Theory integration by reviewing 14 years of published research (2000 through 2013) in 10 top journals (864 articles). The authors of these articles examined 49 Leadership approaches/theories, and in 293 articles, 3 or more of these Leadership approaches were included in their investigations. Focusing on these articles that reflected relatively extensive integration, we applied an inductive approach and used graphic network analysis as a guide for drawing conclusions about the status of Leadership Theory integration. All 293 articles included in the analysis identified 1 focal Theory that was integrated with 2 or more supporting Leadership theories. The 6 Leadership approaches most often appearing as the focal Theory were transformational Leadership, charismatic Leadership, strategic Leadership, Leadership and diversity, participative/shared Leadership, and the trait approach to Leadership. On the basis of inductive reflections on our analysis, we make two key observations. First, the 49 focal Leadership theories qualify as middle-range theories that are ripe for integration. Second, drawing from social network Theory, we introduce the term “theoretical neighborhood” to describe the focal theoretical networks. Our graphical inductive analyses reveal potential connections among neighboring middle-range Leadership theories that merit investigation and, hence, identify promising future directions for achieving greater theoretical integration. We provide an online supplement with 10 additional Leadership Theory graphs and analyses: Leadership in teams and decision groups, ethical Leadership, leader and follower cognitions, Leadership emergence, Leadership development, emotions and Leadership, implicit Leadership, leader-member exchange, authentic Leadership, and identity and identification process theories of Leadership.
-
Leadership Theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives
Leadership Quarterly, 2014Co-Authors: Jessica E. Dinh, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, Robert G Lord, William L. Gardner, Jinyu HuAbstract:Scholarly research on the topic of Leadership has witnessed a dramatic increase over the last decade, resulting in the development of diverse Leadership theories. To take stock of established and developing theories since the beginning of the new millennium, we conducted an extensive qualitative review of Leadership Theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organizational Science, and Personnel Psychology. We then combined two existing frameworks (Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney, & Cogliser, 2010; Lord & Dinh, 2012) to provide a process-oriented framework that emphasizes both forms of emergence and levels of analysis as a means to integrate diverse Leadership theories. We then describe the implications of the findings for future Leadership research and Theory. © 2013.