The Experts below are selected from a list of 72 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Julius Kuhl - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
intuition und Logik Der Forschung in Der psychologie
1990Co-Authors: Julius KuhlAbstract:Mit Heinz Heckhausen haben wir nicht nur einen Der bedeutendsten deutschen Psychologen Der Nachkriegszeit, sonDern auch eine Forscherpersonlichkeit verloren, die uns eine besonDere Art vorgelebt hat, sein Leben einem Der komplexesten Forschungsgegenstande uberhaupt zu widmen, dem Verhalten des Menschen. Heckhausens vielfaltige Beitrage zur Entwicklungs-, Motivations- und Volitionspsychologie sowie sein Forschungspolitisches Engagement sind inzwischen vielerorts gewurdigt worden. Ich mochte einen Aspekt seiner Forscherpersonlichkeit lebendig werden lassen, Der auf eine implizite wissenschaftstheoretische Position hinweist, die fur die Psychologie und ganz besonDers fur die Motivations- und Volitionspsychologie ganz neue Impulse ermoglicht. Obwohl ich hoffe, zeigen zu konnen, wie sehr meine wissenschaftstheoretischen Reflexionen auf den Einfluβ Heinz Heckhausens zuruckgehen, bin ich fur die spezifische Gestalt, die sie in meinem Entwurf erhalten, naturlich allein verantwortlich.
Artur Koterski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Rise and Fall of Falsificationism in the Light of Neurath’s Criticism 1
Explanation Prediction and Confirmation, 2011Co-Authors: Artur KoterskiAbstract:At the peak of his career, Karl Popper wrote he was still waiting for a simple and clear criticism of the theses of his Logik Der Forschung (hereafter: LdF) and in one of his last interviews he claimed that all critical arguments were no good. However, already Otto Neurath’s 1935 review contained serious counterarguments against falsificationism. Since Popper’s doctrine was unDer intensive reconstruction for decades, we may ask if at any stage falsificationism was able to meet Neurath’s objections.
Robin Haunschild - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper
Scientometrics, 2019Co-Authors: Lutz Bornmann, K. Brad Wray, Robin HaunschildAbstract:In recent years, the full text of papers are increasingly available electronically which opens up the possibility of quantitatively investigating citation contexts in more detail. In this study, we introduce a new form of citation analysis, which we call citation concept analysis (CCA). CCA is intended to reveal the cognitive impact certain concepts—published in a highly-cited landmark publication—have on the citing authors. It counts the number of times the concepts are mentioned (cited) in the citation context of citing publications. We demonstrate the method using three classical highly cited books: (1) The structure of scientific revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn, (2) The logic of scientific discovery—Logik Der Forschung: Zur Erkenntnistheorie Der moDernen Naturwissenschaft in German—, and (3) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge by Karl R. Popper. It is not surprising—as our results show—that Kuhn’s “paradigm” concept seems to have had a significant impact. What is surprising is that our results indicate a much larger impact of the concept “paradigm” than Kuhn’s other concepts, e.g., “scientific revolution”. The paradigm concept accounts for about 40% of the concept-related citations to Kuhn’s work, and its impact is resilient across all disciplines and over time. With respect to Popper, “falsification” is the most used concept Derived from his books. Falsification is the cornerstone of Popper’s critical rationalism.
Herbert Keuth - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
karl popper Logik Der Forschung
2007Co-Authors: Herbert KeuthAbstract:Die Logik Der Forschung ist Poppers Hauptwerk. Sie entstand in Der AuseinanDersetzung mit dem Neopositivismus des Wiener Kreises. Sein Abgrenzungskriterium loste Wittgensteins Sinnkriterium ab und seine Losung des Basisproblems beendete die Protokollsatzdebatte. Er zeigt, dass Theorien nicht beweisbar, sonDern fehlbare Vermutungen sind. Die Erkenntnistheorie versteht er als Methodologie. Sie soll die Prufbarkeit unserer Theorien sichern, damit wir aus Versuch und Irrtum lernen konnen.
Kay Herrmann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
rezension von k popper Logik Der Forschung zur erkenntnistheorie Der moDernen naturwissenschaft 1935
2019Co-Authors: Kay HerrmannAbstract:Zur Erkenntnistheorie Der moDernen Naturwissenschaft. 8°. VI u. 248 S. Berlin 1935. Julius Springer. Geh. RM 13.50.
