The Experts below are selected from a list of 3606 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Rick M. Odland - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Subcondylar Mandible Fractures: A Review and Analysis of Outcomes
    The Laryngoscope, 2011
    Co-Authors: Lindsay S. Eisler, Rick M. Odland
    Abstract:

    800.790.4001 Lindsay Eisler MD University of Minnresota Email: eisle003@umn.edu Objective: Identify patients treated for subcondylar Mandible Fracture, review complications, compare treatment groups, and compare outcomes of patients treated with different modalities. Setting: Level 1 trauma center Methods: Retrospective review and outcome study of 300 patients . Results: Ninety three patients had isolated subcondylar Fractures and two hundred and seven had a subcondylar Fracture and an additional Mandible Fracture. All patients’ charts were reviewed for mechanism of injury, presence of additional Mandible or facial Fractures, treatment plan, complications, and average follow up. Patients were divided into treatment groups; conservative, maxillomandibular fixation, and open reduction internal fixation. Averages of Fracture measurements were determined for each treatment group. All patients were sent follow up questionnaires. The questionnaires addressed range of motion, function, occlusion, temporomandibular joint problem, static and dynamic pain, compliance with treatment, facial appearance and overall satisfaction with results. The questionnaires had a four point scoring system. Summary: No significant difference was observed between treatment groups, suggesting that displacement of Fracture from mandibular condyle did not dictate treatment plan. Results from the returned questionnaires showed overall satisfied with their post operative range of motion, function, appearance, and occlusion. Patients overall did not suffer from problems with the temporomandibular joint. Patients did however endorse both static and dynamic pain. Overall patients were satisfied with their post treatment results. Subcondylar Mandible Fractures: A Review and Analysis of Outcomes

Shipchandler, Taha Z. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Management of Mandible Fracture in 150 Children Across 7 Years in a US Tertiary Care Hospital
    'American Medical Association (AMA)', 2019
    Co-Authors: Kao Richard, Rabbani, Cyrus C., Patel, Janaki M., Parkhurst, Samantha M., Mantravadi Avinash, Ting, Jonathan Y., Sim, Michael W., Koehler Karl, Shipchandler, Taha Z.
    Abstract:

    Importance: Pediatric Mandible Fractures are the most common pediatric facial Fracture requiring hospitalization, but data are lacking on management methods, outcomes, and complications. Objective: To analyze management methods, outcomes, and complications of pediatric Mandible Fractures at an urban academic tertiary care center. Design, setting, and participants: Single-institution cohort study conducted at 2 urban level 1 pediatric trauma centers including all patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with Mandible Fractures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Fractures were treated by multispecialty surgical teams. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2018, and March 1, 2018. Main outcomes and measures: Fracture distributions, mechanisms, treatment methods, complications, and follow-up. Results: Of 150 patients with 310 total Mandible Fractures, the mean (SD) age was 12.8 (4.6) years; 108 (72.0%) were male; 107 (71.3%) were white; and 109 (72.7%) had 2 or more Mandible Fractures. There were 78 condylar or subcondylar Fractures (60 patients), 75 ramus or angle Fractures (69 patients), 69 body Fractures (62 patients), 78 symphyseal or parasymphyseal Fractures (76 patients), and 10 coronoid Fractures (10 patients). The most common mechanisms of injury were assault and battery, motor vehicle collisions, falls or play, and sports-related mechanisms. Thirty-eight (25%) patients were treated with observation and a soft diet. Children 12 years and older were more likely to receive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (P = .02). Of 112 patients treated with surgery, 63 (56.2%) were treated with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), 24 (21.4%) received ORIF, and 20 (17.9%) received both MMF and ORIF. Nonabsorbable plating was used in all but 1 of the ORIF procedures. Five of 44 (11.4%) patients receiving ORIF or ORIF and MMF had follow-up beyond 6 months, and 8 of the 44 (18.2%) had documented plating hardware removal; hardware was in place for a mean (SD) 180 (167) days. Sixty of the 150 patients (40.0%) had some form of follow-up, a mean (SD) 90 (113) days total after initial presentation. Thirteen patients experienced complications, for a total complication rate of 8.7%. Conclusions and relevance: Conservative management, using MMF and a soft diet, was favored for most operative pediatric Mandible Fractures. Open reduction internal fixation with titanium plating was less commonly used. Outcomes were favorable despite a lack of consistent follow-up. Level of evidence: 4

Lindsay S. Eisler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Subcondylar Mandible Fractures: A Review and Analysis of Outcomes
    The Laryngoscope, 2011
    Co-Authors: Lindsay S. Eisler, Rick M. Odland
    Abstract:

    800.790.4001 Lindsay Eisler MD University of Minnresota Email: eisle003@umn.edu Objective: Identify patients treated for subcondylar Mandible Fracture, review complications, compare treatment groups, and compare outcomes of patients treated with different modalities. Setting: Level 1 trauma center Methods: Retrospective review and outcome study of 300 patients . Results: Ninety three patients had isolated subcondylar Fractures and two hundred and seven had a subcondylar Fracture and an additional Mandible Fracture. All patients’ charts were reviewed for mechanism of injury, presence of additional Mandible or facial Fractures, treatment plan, complications, and average follow up. Patients were divided into treatment groups; conservative, maxillomandibular fixation, and open reduction internal fixation. Averages of Fracture measurements were determined for each treatment group. All patients were sent follow up questionnaires. The questionnaires addressed range of motion, function, occlusion, temporomandibular joint problem, static and dynamic pain, compliance with treatment, facial appearance and overall satisfaction with results. The questionnaires had a four point scoring system. Summary: No significant difference was observed between treatment groups, suggesting that displacement of Fracture from mandibular condyle did not dictate treatment plan. Results from the returned questionnaires showed overall satisfied with their post operative range of motion, function, appearance, and occlusion. Patients overall did not suffer from problems with the temporomandibular joint. Patients did however endorse both static and dynamic pain. Overall patients were satisfied with their post treatment results. Subcondylar Mandible Fractures: A Review and Analysis of Outcomes

Kao Richard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Management of Mandible Fracture in 150 Children Across 7 Years in a US Tertiary Care Hospital
    'American Medical Association (AMA)', 2019
    Co-Authors: Kao Richard, Rabbani, Cyrus C., Patel, Janaki M., Parkhurst, Samantha M., Mantravadi Avinash, Ting, Jonathan Y., Sim, Michael W., Koehler Karl, Shipchandler, Taha Z.
    Abstract:

    Importance: Pediatric Mandible Fractures are the most common pediatric facial Fracture requiring hospitalization, but data are lacking on management methods, outcomes, and complications. Objective: To analyze management methods, outcomes, and complications of pediatric Mandible Fractures at an urban academic tertiary care center. Design, setting, and participants: Single-institution cohort study conducted at 2 urban level 1 pediatric trauma centers including all patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with Mandible Fractures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Fractures were treated by multispecialty surgical teams. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2018, and March 1, 2018. Main outcomes and measures: Fracture distributions, mechanisms, treatment methods, complications, and follow-up. Results: Of 150 patients with 310 total Mandible Fractures, the mean (SD) age was 12.8 (4.6) years; 108 (72.0%) were male; 107 (71.3%) were white; and 109 (72.7%) had 2 or more Mandible Fractures. There were 78 condylar or subcondylar Fractures (60 patients), 75 ramus or angle Fractures (69 patients), 69 body Fractures (62 patients), 78 symphyseal or parasymphyseal Fractures (76 patients), and 10 coronoid Fractures (10 patients). The most common mechanisms of injury were assault and battery, motor vehicle collisions, falls or play, and sports-related mechanisms. Thirty-eight (25%) patients were treated with observation and a soft diet. Children 12 years and older were more likely to receive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (P = .02). Of 112 patients treated with surgery, 63 (56.2%) were treated with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), 24 (21.4%) received ORIF, and 20 (17.9%) received both MMF and ORIF. Nonabsorbable plating was used in all but 1 of the ORIF procedures. Five of 44 (11.4%) patients receiving ORIF or ORIF and MMF had follow-up beyond 6 months, and 8 of the 44 (18.2%) had documented plating hardware removal; hardware was in place for a mean (SD) 180 (167) days. Sixty of the 150 patients (40.0%) had some form of follow-up, a mean (SD) 90 (113) days total after initial presentation. Thirteen patients experienced complications, for a total complication rate of 8.7%. Conclusions and relevance: Conservative management, using MMF and a soft diet, was favored for most operative pediatric Mandible Fractures. Open reduction internal fixation with titanium plating was less commonly used. Outcomes were favorable despite a lack of consistent follow-up. Level of evidence: 4

Junwoo Park - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a clinical study of Mandible Fracture for 10 years at chuncheon city
    Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2009
    Co-Authors: Kyoungsoo Kim, Heein Kang, Yongkab Kil, Jaeseong Kim, Young Lee, Hyunsoo Seo, Soonmin Hong, Junwoo Park
    Abstract:

    The population were increased by industrialization and urbanization of the modern society and social activities of the person were rapid increased too. Subsequently the number of motor vehicle accident, sports accident and industrial accident were increased, resulting in the number of oral and maxillofacial trauma were increased. Because of the Mandible relatively protruded among the facial bone, the most frequent associated oral and maxillofacial injuries was Mandible Fracture in the trauma center setting. A clinical study on 411 patients with mandibular Fracture who visited in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chun-chon Sacred Heart Hospital during 10 years(1997-2006) was done by analysing sex, age, mode, Fracture site and treatment method