The Experts below are selected from a list of 16191 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jo Spangaro - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Interpretative phenomenological analysis of young people\u27s lived experiences of therapeutic residential care
'Wiley', 2021Co-Authors: Kor Kenny, Fernandez Elizabeth, Jo SpangaroAbstract:Concerns of maltreatment and poor outcomes persist in residential care despite numerous government inquiries and recommendations. Young people in residential care continue to be the most vulnerable and Marginalized Group in the out-of-home care population. Young people\u27s voices are also underrepresented in research. Existing studies predominantly focus on service evaluations in which individual voices of young people are overshadowed by adults\u27 perspectives. Other studies examine the perspectives of young people in out-of-home care as a homogenous population, limiting understandings of the subjective experiences of young people in residential care. This study focused exclusively on young people\u27s lived experiences in Australian therapeutic residential care, utilizing interpretative phenomenological analysis. The young people in this study revealed experiences of peer victimization, ambiguous loss and uncertainty during transitions. These findings suggest that more work is required in order to provide safe and healing environments and experiences for young people in therapeutic residential care. Each individual voice captured in this study offers valuable insights into how residential care practitioners can strengthen practice to enhance protection, engagement, connection with families and leaving care support
-
Interpretative phenomenological analysis of young people\u27s lived experiences of therapeutic residential care
'Sociological Research Online', 2020Co-Authors: Kor Kenny, Fernandez Elizabeth, Jo SpangaroAbstract:2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Concerns of maltreatment and poor outcomes persist in residential care despite numerous government inquiries and recommendations. Young people in residential care continue to be the most vulnerable and Marginalized Group in the out-of-home care population. Young people\u27s voices are also underrepresented in research. Existing studies predominantly focus on service evaluations in which individual voices of young people are overshadowed by adults\u27 perspectives. Other studies examine the perspectives of young people in out-of-home care as a homogenous population, limiting understandings of the subjective experiences of young people in residential care. This study focused exclusively on young people\u27s lived experiences in Australian therapeutic residential care, utilizing interpretative phenomenological analysis. The young people in this study revealed experiences of peer victimization, ambiguous loss and uncertainty during transitions. These findings suggest that more work is required in order to provide safe and healing environments and experiences for young people in therapeutic residential care. Each individual voice captured in this study offers valuable insights into how residential care practitioners can strengthen practice to enhance protection, engagement, connection with families and leaving care support
Kor Kenny - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Interpretative phenomenological analysis of young people\u27s lived experiences of therapeutic residential care
'Wiley', 2021Co-Authors: Kor Kenny, Fernandez Elizabeth, Jo SpangaroAbstract:Concerns of maltreatment and poor outcomes persist in residential care despite numerous government inquiries and recommendations. Young people in residential care continue to be the most vulnerable and Marginalized Group in the out-of-home care population. Young people\u27s voices are also underrepresented in research. Existing studies predominantly focus on service evaluations in which individual voices of young people are overshadowed by adults\u27 perspectives. Other studies examine the perspectives of young people in out-of-home care as a homogenous population, limiting understandings of the subjective experiences of young people in residential care. This study focused exclusively on young people\u27s lived experiences in Australian therapeutic residential care, utilizing interpretative phenomenological analysis. The young people in this study revealed experiences of peer victimization, ambiguous loss and uncertainty during transitions. These findings suggest that more work is required in order to provide safe and healing environments and experiences for young people in therapeutic residential care. Each individual voice captured in this study offers valuable insights into how residential care practitioners can strengthen practice to enhance protection, engagement, connection with families and leaving care support
-
Interpretative phenomenological analysis of young people\u27s lived experiences of therapeutic residential care
'Sociological Research Online', 2020Co-Authors: Kor Kenny, Fernandez Elizabeth, Jo SpangaroAbstract:2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Concerns of maltreatment and poor outcomes persist in residential care despite numerous government inquiries and recommendations. Young people in residential care continue to be the most vulnerable and Marginalized Group in the out-of-home care population. Young people\u27s voices are also underrepresented in research. Existing studies predominantly focus on service evaluations in which individual voices of young people are overshadowed by adults\u27 perspectives. Other studies examine the perspectives of young people in out-of-home care as a homogenous population, limiting understandings of the subjective experiences of young people in residential care. This study focused exclusively on young people\u27s lived experiences in Australian therapeutic residential care, utilizing interpretative phenomenological analysis. The young people in this study revealed experiences of peer victimization, ambiguous loss and uncertainty during transitions. These findings suggest that more work is required in order to provide safe and healing environments and experiences for young people in therapeutic residential care. Each individual voice captured in this study offers valuable insights into how residential care practitioners can strengthen practice to enhance protection, engagement, connection with families and leaving care support
Christopher Chaves - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
involvement development and retention theoretical foundations and potential extensions for adult community college students
Community College Review, 2006Co-Authors: Christopher ChavesAbstract:The aim of this article is to orient those interested in adult community college student research to a wide array of discourses and theoretical tools that can help us understand the underlying complexity of the problems faced by this often-Marginalized Group. Reviewed are categories of theory about student involvement and engagement, student development, and adult learning that should inform how we educate adult community college students. This article concludes with a discussion of how all these theories, taken together, can improve adult education in community colleges.
Michael Thai - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
public perceptions of prejudice research the double edged sword faced by Marginalized Group researchers
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2021Co-Authors: Michael Thai, Morgana Lizziowilson, Hema Preya SelvanathanAbstract:Abstract Researchers from Marginalized Groups often make important social scientific discoveries about prejudice, particularly when they are members of the Group under investigation (e.g., women studying sexism, Black Americans studying racism). But is the scientific integrity and validity of their work perceived differently by virtue of their membership in the Marginalized Group? Across three survey experiments conducted in the domains of weight stigma, racism, and sexism research (total N = 1317), we find that researchers from a Marginalized Group whose research focuses on prejudice against their inGroup face a double-edged sword. On one hand, they are perceived as having greater psychological standing and expertise in the research area owing to their personal experience and insight into the processes they are researching. This, in turn, facilitates greater trust in, and perceived legitimacy of, their research. On the other hand, their research is simultaneously considered less trustworthy and legitimate because it is perceived as being motivated by a vested interest, in terms of having a personal agenda in the research. These findings demonstrate the competing biases that affect public perceptions of Marginalized Group researchers and their work in the area of prejudice.
Gladys E Ibanez - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
age sex race ethnicity sexual orientation intersectionality of Marginalized Group identities and enacted hiv related stigma among people living with hiv in florida
Aids and Behavior, 2019Co-Authors: Angel B Algarin, Zhi Zhou, Christa L Cook, Robert L Cook, Gladys E IbanezAbstract:HIV-related stigma is associated with many negative health outcomes among people living with HIV (PLHIV). The theory of intersectionality suggests that the interactions of social identities affect PLHIV’s experiences of stigma. This study aims to identify individual and interactive Marginalized-Group identities correlated with enacted HIV-related stigma among PLHIV in Florida. The sample (n = 932) was majority male (66.6%), Black (58.5%), and non-Latino (80.2%) with 53% reporting experiences of HIV-related stigma. In multinomial regression models, the interaction between race and ethnicity was significant where non-White Latinos had higher odds of experiencing high levels of enacted stigma [AOR (CI) 7.71 (2.41, 24.73), p < 0.001] compared to white non-Latinos. Additionally, racial minorities were less likely to have experienced moderate or high levels of enacted stigma [AOR (CI) 0.47 (0.31, 0.72), p < 0.001; AOR (CI) 0.39 (0.22, 0.70), p = 0.002, respectively]. Moreover, women had higher odds of experiencing high levels of enacted stigma [AOR (CI) 2.04 (1.13, 3.67), p = 0.018]. The results suggest that intersectionality is important to consider in HIV-related stigma research and future interventions.