The Experts below are selected from a list of 2031 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Michelle Fortier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a Motivational Consequence
    Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
    Co-Authors: John Kowal, Michelle Fortier
    Abstract:

    Abstract The purpose of this study was to test a Motivational model based on Vallerand's (1997) Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. This model incorporates situational and contextual Motivational variables, and was tested using a time-lagged design. Master's level swimmers (N = 104) completed a questionnaire on two separate occasions. At Time 1, situational social factors (perceptions of success and perceptions of the Motivational climate), situational Motivational mediators (perceptions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness), situational motivation, and flow were assessed immediately following a swim practice. Contextual measures of these same variables were assessed at Time 2, 1 week later, with the exception of flow. Results of a path analysis supported numerous links in the hypothesized model. Findings are discussed in light of research and theory on motivation and flow.

John Kowal - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a Motivational Consequence
    Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
    Co-Authors: John Kowal, Michelle Fortier
    Abstract:

    Abstract The purpose of this study was to test a Motivational model based on Vallerand's (1997) Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. This model incorporates situational and contextual Motivational variables, and was tested using a time-lagged design. Master's level swimmers (N = 104) completed a questionnaire on two separate occasions. At Time 1, situational social factors (perceptions of success and perceptions of the Motivational climate), situational Motivational mediators (perceptions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness), situational motivation, and flow were assessed immediately following a swim practice. Contextual measures of these same variables were assessed at Time 2, 1 week later, with the exception of flow. Results of a path analysis supported numerous links in the hypothesized model. Findings are discussed in light of research and theory on motivation and flow.

Paige J Pope - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • on the nature and function of scoring protocols used in sport motivation research an empirical study of the behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire
    Journal of Exercise Movement and Sport, 2014
    Co-Authors: Philip M Wilson, Diane E Mack, Katie E Gunnell, Sarah Deck, Paige J Pope
    Abstract:

    Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different scoring protocols used with the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ; Lonsdale et al., 2008) across varied outcomes. The BRSQ is a 24-item self-report instrument designed to assess motives that regulate sport participation using Organismic Integration Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2002) as a guiding framework. Methods: University-based female rugby players ( N = 168; M age = 20.36 years) completed self-report instruments assessing sport motivation (BRSQ) and Motivational Consequences (concentration, positive/negative affect, and self-rated performance) using a non-experimental, cross-sectional research design. Results: Effect sizes varied with different BRSQ scoring protocols ( R 2 adj . = 0.01-0.44). Regression models using the Relative Autonomy Index or Autonomous/Controlled motives as predictor variables consistently accounted for less variance than item-aggregation models irrespective of the Motivational Consequence serving as the criterion variable of interest. Integrated regulation was the strongest correlate of concentration ( r 12 = 0.43) and self-rated game performance ( r 12 = 0.37) with intrinsic motivation the strongest correlate of positive affect (0.56). External and introjected regulation were both equally correlated with increased negative affect ( r 12 ’s = 0.34). Discussion: Self-determined yet extrinsic sources of behavioural regulation appear to be an important Motivational resource for athletes competing in sport. The variability and differing conclusions evident when adopting BRSQ scoring protocols may result in confusion for researchers and practitioners. Scoring protocols used in sport motivation research employing the BRSQ represent a key consideration for researchers using OIT to disentangle the Motivational basis of adaptive sport participation. Acknowledgments: Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Philip M Wilson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • on the nature and function of scoring protocols used in sport motivation research an empirical study of the behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire
    Journal of Exercise Movement and Sport, 2014
    Co-Authors: Philip M Wilson, Diane E Mack, Katie E Gunnell, Sarah Deck, Paige J Pope
    Abstract:

    Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different scoring protocols used with the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ; Lonsdale et al., 2008) across varied outcomes. The BRSQ is a 24-item self-report instrument designed to assess motives that regulate sport participation using Organismic Integration Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2002) as a guiding framework. Methods: University-based female rugby players ( N = 168; M age = 20.36 years) completed self-report instruments assessing sport motivation (BRSQ) and Motivational Consequences (concentration, positive/negative affect, and self-rated performance) using a non-experimental, cross-sectional research design. Results: Effect sizes varied with different BRSQ scoring protocols ( R 2 adj . = 0.01-0.44). Regression models using the Relative Autonomy Index or Autonomous/Controlled motives as predictor variables consistently accounted for less variance than item-aggregation models irrespective of the Motivational Consequence serving as the criterion variable of interest. Integrated regulation was the strongest correlate of concentration ( r 12 = 0.43) and self-rated game performance ( r 12 = 0.37) with intrinsic motivation the strongest correlate of positive affect (0.56). External and introjected regulation were both equally correlated with increased negative affect ( r 12 ’s = 0.34). Discussion: Self-determined yet extrinsic sources of behavioural regulation appear to be an important Motivational resource for athletes competing in sport. The variability and differing conclusions evident when adopting BRSQ scoring protocols may result in confusion for researchers and practitioners. Scoring protocols used in sport motivation research employing the BRSQ represent a key consideration for researchers using OIT to disentangle the Motivational basis of adaptive sport participation. Acknowledgments: Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Diane E Mack - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • on the nature and function of scoring protocols used in sport motivation research an empirical study of the behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire
    Journal of Exercise Movement and Sport, 2014
    Co-Authors: Philip M Wilson, Diane E Mack, Katie E Gunnell, Sarah Deck, Paige J Pope
    Abstract:

    Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different scoring protocols used with the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ; Lonsdale et al., 2008) across varied outcomes. The BRSQ is a 24-item self-report instrument designed to assess motives that regulate sport participation using Organismic Integration Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2002) as a guiding framework. Methods: University-based female rugby players ( N = 168; M age = 20.36 years) completed self-report instruments assessing sport motivation (BRSQ) and Motivational Consequences (concentration, positive/negative affect, and self-rated performance) using a non-experimental, cross-sectional research design. Results: Effect sizes varied with different BRSQ scoring protocols ( R 2 adj . = 0.01-0.44). Regression models using the Relative Autonomy Index or Autonomous/Controlled motives as predictor variables consistently accounted for less variance than item-aggregation models irrespective of the Motivational Consequence serving as the criterion variable of interest. Integrated regulation was the strongest correlate of concentration ( r 12 = 0.43) and self-rated game performance ( r 12 = 0.37) with intrinsic motivation the strongest correlate of positive affect (0.56). External and introjected regulation were both equally correlated with increased negative affect ( r 12 ’s = 0.34). Discussion: Self-determined yet extrinsic sources of behavioural regulation appear to be an important Motivational resource for athletes competing in sport. The variability and differing conclusions evident when adopting BRSQ scoring protocols may result in confusion for researchers and practitioners. Scoring protocols used in sport motivation research employing the BRSQ represent a key consideration for researchers using OIT to disentangle the Motivational basis of adaptive sport participation. Acknowledgments: Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada