The Experts below are selected from a list of 19038 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Colin Agur - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Negotiated Order the fourth amendment telephone surveillance and social interactions 1878 1968
Information & Culture, 2013Co-Authors: Colin AgurAbstract:In the United States the words “telephone surveillance” bring to mind contemporary security concerns about smart phone tracking, the NSA warrantless wiretapping scandal, and the telecommunications provisions of the Patriot Act. Yet telephone surveillance is as old as telephony itself, dating back to the nearly simultaneous commercialization of the telephone and phonograph. This article examines telephone surveillance by American law enforcement agencies from the inception of telephone service to the passage of the Federal Wiretap Law in 1968, focusing on the challenges an advancing, proliferating, and shrinking technology posed for Fourth Amendment law. To highlight the technological, institutional, and cultural interactions that have shaped Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, the article deploys Jack Balkin's theory of cultural software and Anslem Strauss's concept of a Negotiated Order and brings together major cases, federal legislation, and evidence of government surveillance. The article argues that duri...
-
Negotiated Order the fourth amendment telephone surveillance and social interactions 1878 1968
Social Science Research Network, 2013Co-Authors: Colin AgurAbstract:In the US, the words ‘telephone surveillance’ bring to mind contemporary security concerns about smart phone tracking, the NSA warrantless wiretapping scandal, and the telecommunications provisions of the Patriot Act. Yet telephone surveillance is as old as telephony itself, dating back to the nearly simultaneous commercialization of the telephone and phonograph in 1878. First put to use by users, so they would have a written record of business meetings held over the phone, recOrders were later put to use by police for surreptitious recording of criminal suspects’ conversations. This article examines telephone surveillance by American law enforcement agencies from the inception of telephone service to the passage of the Federal Wiretap Law in 1968, focusing on the challenges an advancing, proliferating, and shrinking technology posed for Fourth Amendment law. To highlight the technological, institutional and cultural interactions that have shaped Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, the article deploys Jack Balkin’s theory of cultural software and Anslem Strauss’s concept of a Negotiated Order, and brings together major cases, federal legislation, and evidence of government surveillance. The article shows how telephone surveillance brought the Fourth Amendment into prominence and inspired many of its most contentious debates; the article argues that during the first 90 years of telephone usage in America, laws on search and seizure developed not from constitutional consistency or logic, but as the result of a complex negotiation process involving new media and human agency.
Lori Rosenkopf - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Keeping Steady as She Goes: A Negotiated Order Perspective on Technological Evolution
Organization Studies, 2012Co-Authors: Gina Dokko, Amit Nigam, Lori RosenkopfAbstract:A central idea in the theory of technology cycles is that social and political mechanisms are most important during the selection of a dominant design, and that eras of incremental change are socially uninteresting periods in which innovation is driven by technological momentum and elaboration of the dominant design. In this essay, we overturn the ontological assumption that social Order is inherently stable, drawing on Anselm Strauss’s concept of Negotiated Order to analyze the persistence of a dominant design as a social accomplishment: an outcome of ongoing processes that reinforce or challenge a socially Negotiated Order. Thus, we shift focus from battles over standards to periods of normal innovation. We extend the technology cycles model to explain social dynamics in periods of incremental change, and to make predictions specifying how contextual conditions in standards-setting organizations affect social interaction, leading to reinforcement or challenge to a socio-technical Order.
Gina Dokko - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Keeping Steady as She Goes: A Negotiated Order Perspective on Technological Evolution
Organization Studies, 2012Co-Authors: Gina Dokko, Amit Nigam, Lori RosenkopfAbstract:A central idea in the theory of technology cycles is that social and political mechanisms are most important during the selection of a dominant design, and that eras of incremental change are socially uninteresting periods in which innovation is driven by technological momentum and elaboration of the dominant design. In this essay, we overturn the ontological assumption that social Order is inherently stable, drawing on Anselm Strauss’s concept of Negotiated Order to analyze the persistence of a dominant design as a social accomplishment: an outcome of ongoing processes that reinforce or challenge a socially Negotiated Order. Thus, we shift focus from battles over standards to periods of normal innovation. We extend the technology cycles model to explain social dynamics in periods of incremental change, and to make predictions specifying how contextual conditions in standards-setting organizations affect social interaction, leading to reinforcement or challenge to a socio-technical Order.
Amit Nigam - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Keeping Steady as She Goes: A Negotiated Order Perspective on Technological Evolution
Organization Studies, 2012Co-Authors: Gina Dokko, Amit Nigam, Lori RosenkopfAbstract:A central idea in the theory of technology cycles is that social and political mechanisms are most important during the selection of a dominant design, and that eras of incremental change are socially uninteresting periods in which innovation is driven by technological momentum and elaboration of the dominant design. In this essay, we overturn the ontological assumption that social Order is inherently stable, drawing on Anselm Strauss’s concept of Negotiated Order to analyze the persistence of a dominant design as a social accomplishment: an outcome of ongoing processes that reinforce or challenge a socially Negotiated Order. Thus, we shift focus from battles over standards to periods of normal innovation. We extend the technology cycles model to explain social dynamics in periods of incremental change, and to make predictions specifying how contextual conditions in standards-setting organizations affect social interaction, leading to reinforcement or challenge to a socio-technical Order.
Harm Rutten - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the product and process of referral optimizing general practitioner medical specialist interaction through information technology
International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2007Co-Authors: Roland Bal, Femke Mastboom, Han Paul Spiers, Harm RuttenAbstract:With the growing complexities of health care delivery in western industrialized countries, the need for inter-organizational communication is increasingly emphasized. In this paper, we focus on a system - ZorgDomein - that was developed to optimize GP-medical specialist communication. Contrary to the notion of 'shared' or 'integrated care' that often assumes a 'seamless' health care, we will focus on the Negotiated Order of GP-specialist cooperation, showing the precarious localized arrangements that allow both a bridging and a separation of professional activities concerning patient care. Furthermore, we analyze how ZorgDomein changes the arrangements to maintain a working Order. The main focus of the article is on the way GP-specialist referrals are on the one hand conceptualized as discrete events of information sharing, while on the other hand are part of a process of care. We will argue that in standardization attempts by national and local actors, embodied within the technology, information exchange between first and secondary care is made into a product. This conceptualization and materialization neglects the process in which this information comes about or is being created. We discuss the consequences of this for the design and use of the technology.
