The Experts below are selected from a list of 150 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Yuliya Lierler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
constraint answer set solver ezcsp and why integration schemas matter
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 2017Co-Authors: Marcello Balduccini, Yuliya LierlerAbstract:Researchers in answer set programming and constraint programming have spent significant efforts in the development of hybrid languages and solving algorithms combining the strengths of these traditionally separate fields. These efforts resulted in a new research area: constraint answer set programming. Constraint answer set programming languages and systems proved to be successful at providing declarative, yet efficient solutions to problems involving hybrid reasoning tasks. One of the main contributions of this paper is the first comprehensive account of the constraint answer set language and solver EZCSP, a mainstream representative of this research area that has been used in various successful applications. We also develop an extension of the transition systems proposed by Nieuwenhuis et al. in 2006 to capture Boolean satisfiability solvers. We use this extension to describe the EZCSP algorithm and prove formal claims about it. The design and algorithmic details behind EZCSP clearly demonstrate that the development of the hybrid systems of this kind is challenging. Many questions arise when one faces various design choices in an attempt to maximize system’s benefits. One of the key decisions that a developer of a hybrid solver makes is settling on a particular integration schema within its implementation. Thus, another important contribution of this paper is a thorough case study based on EZCSP, focused on the various integration schemas that it provides.
-
constraint answer set solver ezcsp and why integration schemas matter
arXiv: Artificial Intelligence, 2017Co-Authors: Marcello Balduccini, Yuliya LierlerAbstract:Researchers in answer set programming and constraint programming have spent significant efforts in the development of hybrid languages and solving algorithms combining the strengths of these traditionally separate fields. These efforts resulted in a new research area: constraint answer set programming. Constraint answer set programming languages and systems proved to be successful at providing declarative, yet efficient solutions to problems involving hybrid reasoning tasks. One of the main contributions of this paper is the first comprehensive account of the constraint answer set language and solver EZCSP, a mainstream representative of this research area that has been used in various successful applications. We also develop an extension of the transition systems proposed by Nieuwenhuis et al. in 2006 to capture Boolean satisfiability solvers. We use this extension to describe the EZCSP algorithm and prove formal claims about it. The design and algorithmic details behind EZCSP clearly demonstrate that the development of the hybrid systems of this kind is challenging. Many questions arise when one faces various design choices in an attempt to maximize system's benefits. One of the key decisions that a developer of a hybrid solver makes is settling on a particular integration schema within its implementation. Thus, another important contribution of this paper is a thorough case study based on EZCSP, focused on the various integration schemas that it provides. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
-
on the relation of constraint answer set programming languages and algorithms
National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012Co-Authors: Yuliya LierlerAbstract:Recently a logic programming language AC was proposed by Mellarkod et al. (2008) to integrate answer set programming (ASP) and constraint logic programming. Similarly, Gebser et al. (2009) proposed a CLINGCON language integrating ASP and finite domain constraints. These languages allow new efficient inference algorithms that combine traditional ASP procedures and other methods in constraint programming. Inthis paper we show that a transition system introduced by Nieuwenhuis et al. (2006) to model SAT solvers can be extended to model the "hybrid" ACSOLVER algorithm by Mellarkod et al. developed for simple AC programs and the CLINGCON algorithm by Gebser et al. for clingcon programs. We define weakly-simple programs and show how the introduced transition systems generalize the ACSOLVER and CLINGCON algorithms to such programs. Finally, we state the precise relation between AC and CLINGCON languages and the ACSOLVER and CLINGCON algorithms.
Jiménez-pacheco Pedro - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
La rebelión del espacio vivido
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2018Co-Authors: Jiménez-pacheco PedroAbstract:The dissertation arises from the awakening of Henri Lefebvre’s work, both in social sciences with Marxist approach and urban studies interested in social issues. This scientific and institutional recovery of Lefebvre's work has operated differently in the Anglo-Saxon and Hispanic research, particularly in the last decade, specializing his ideas, purifying them, and consequently rendering them inoperative. Thus, the thesis confronts the difficulties of a dispersed and overlooked work in the academic tradition and the political praxis; which poses a triple challenge: the non-dogmatic assembly of the Lefebvre’s contributions examined as whole in motion throughout his life, following the wake of a science of the use of space; the filling of a theoretical gap marginally claimed by the academic urbanism during the neoliberal project urbanization; and the applicability of a Lefebvrian matrix in the analysis of capitalist urbanization in the global city. In order to follow effectively his ideas (always regarding the lived space), it is designed an open system to a plurality of approaches and methods that collaborate in the development of the thesis; which is organized by the progress of the genealogical and critical-pedagogical phases, supported by an epistemological base of two sections in Lefebvre’s itinerary: 1939-1968 (Chapter 1) and 1968-1978 (Chapter 2). This phase defines the theoretical object “social space”, deepening in the concepts that provide greater originality and radicality to its potential unity. In the genealogical phase (Chapter 3) two arguments are deployed to place Lefebvre’s ideas from the perspective of a critical space theory: The feedback between Lefebvre and the architectural practice and its influence in the French and European context (post-war–70s) facilitate a doctrinal exchange with the Polish architect Oskar Hansen (Team X), which is translated as a “form of the possible” in the Juliusz Slowacki Housing Estate built in Lublin (1963-66). And, the genealogical dialectical reconstruction shows the roots of two dissenting traditions: on one side, by the effervescence relationship with Constant Nieuwenhuys and Guy Debord; and on the other, by a series of interests that coincide in the itineraries of D. Harvey and M. Castells. The critical-pedagogical phase assumes that it is possible to apply the theoretical apparatus exposed to concrete urban processes in the world city, which implies the pedagogical confrontation of the Lefebvrian matrix with a specific reality in the centre (Ciutat Vella) and periphery (Prat Vermell) of Barcelona, verifying the effectiveness of the theoretical apparatus in guiding the architect through an ordered transdisciplinary path in the urban spatial analysis; through which historical research allows a contextualized reading of the neoliberal program in the political economy of space. Consequently, the limits of municipal planning are revealed in contradiction with urbanistic planning legislation and policy in the face of the great wave of global financial flows; and it builds on the theoretical-critical apparatus with a global approach to local struggles, which have difficulty to integrate due to their visions parcelled of the urban problematic. Thus, the actual dominance of the real estate–financialized circuit in capitalist urbanization and its destructive action in the residential sphere in Barcelona is explained, its consequences on the use of social space and on the urban planning devices that seek to domesticate it, closing the contestation gaps or co-opting it. The evidence of the circuit structures and its contradictions with the reformist planning encourages a strategy of urban offensive, that reveals the radical social space counter-project to the neoliberal production of space, renewing the principles of the (de facto) right to the city in view of a general program of public action engaged to a differential urban world.Esta tesis surge del despertar de la obra de Henri Lefebvre tanto en las ciencias sociales de enfoque marxista como en los estudios urbanos interesados por lo social. Su recuperación científica e institucional ha operado de modo distinto en el mundo anglosajón e hispano, en particular en la última década, especializando sus ideas, purificándolas, y en consecuencia volviéndolas inoperantes. Así, se afronta las dificultades de una obra dispersa y soslayada en la tradición académica y la praxis política; lo que plantea un triple reto: el ensamblaje no dogmático del pensamiento de Lefebvre como un todo en movimiento a lo largo de su vida, siguiendo la estela de una ciencia del uso del espacio; el llenado de un vacío teórico apenas reclamado por el urbanismo académico durante la urbanización del proyecto neoliberal; y la aplicabilidad de una matriz lefebvriana en el análisis de la urbanización capitalista en la ciudad global. Para seguir eficazmente sus ideas, siempre en torno al espacio vivido, se diseña un sistema abierto a una pluralidad de enfoques y métodos que colaboran en el desarrollo de la tesis; la cual se organiza por el progreso de las fases genealógica y crítico-pedagógica, sustentadas por una base epistemológica de dos tramos en su itinerario: 1939-1968 (Cap. 1) y 1968-1978 (Cap. 2). Esta fase busca definir el objeto teórico “espacio social”, profundizando en los conceptos que le proporcionan mayor originalidad y radicalidad a su unidad potencial. En la fase genealógica (Cap. 3) se despliegan dos argumentos para situar las ideas de Lefebvre desde la perspectiva de una teoría del espacio–crítica: a) La retroalimentación entre él y la práctica arquitectónica y su influencia en el contexto francés y europeo (posguerra–70s) facilitan un intercambio doctrinal con el arquitecto polaco Oskar Hansen (Team X), que se traduce como una “forma de lo posible” en el conjunto de vivienda estatal Juliusz Słowacki construido en Lublin (1963-66). b) La reconstrucción dialéctica de su genealogía indica las raíces de dos tradiciones disidentes: en un caso, por la efervescencia de la relación con Constant Nieuwenhuys y Guy Debord; y en otro, por una serie de intereses coincidentes en los itinerarios de D. Harvey y M. Castells. La fase crítico-pedagógica (Cap. 4) asume que es posible aplicar el aparato teórico expuesto a procesos urbanos concretos en la ciudad mundial, lo que implica la confrontación pedagógica de la matriz lefebvriana con una realidad específica en el centro (Ciutat Vella) y periferia (Prat Vermell) de Barcelona, comprobando la eficacia de la unidad teórica para guiar al arquitecto por una vía transdisciplinar ordenada en el análisis espacial urbano; en la cual, la investigación histórica permite una lectura contextualizada del programa neoliberal en la economía política del espacio. De ese modo, se desvelan los límites de la planificación Municipal en contradicción con la legislación y política urbanísticas frente a la gran ola de flujos financieros globales y se intenta dotar de un aparato teóricocrítico de enfoque global a las luchas locales, con dificultades para integrarse debido a sus visiones parceladas de la problemática urbana. Así pues, se explica el actual dominio del circuito inmobiliario–financierizado en la urbanización capitalista y su acción destructiva en el ámbito residencial en Barcelona, sus consecuencias sobre el uso del espacio social y sobre los dispositivos de planeamiento que buscan domesticarlo, cerrando las brechas de contestación o cooptándola. La evidencia de las estructuras del circuito y sus contradicciones con el planeamiento reformista alientan una estrategia de ofensiva urbana, orientadora del contra-proyecto del “espacio social radical” a la producción neoliberal del espacio, renovando los principios de un derecho a la ciudad (de facto) con vistas a un programa de acción pública comprometido con un mundo urbano diferencial
-
La rebelión del espacio vivido
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2018Co-Authors: Jiménez-pacheco PedroAbstract:The dissertation arises from the awakening of Henri Lefebvre’s work, both in social sciences with Marxist approach and urban studies interested in social issues. This scientific and institutional recovery of Lefebvre's work has operated differently in the Anglo-Saxon and Hispanic research, particularly in the last decade, specializing his ideas, purifying them, and consequently rendering them inoperative. Thus, the thesis confronts the difficulties of a dispersed and overlooked work in the academic tradition and the political praxis; which poses a triple challenge: the non-dogmatic assembly of the Lefebvre’s contributions examined as whole in motion throughout his life, following the wake of a science of the use of space; the filling of a theoretical gap marginally claimed by the academic urbanism during the neoliberal project urbanization; and the applicability of a Lefebvrian matrix in the analysis of capitalist urbanization in the global city. In order to follow effectively his ideas (always regarding the lived space), it is designed an open system to a plurality of approaches and methods that collaborate in the development of the thesis; which is organized by the progress of the genealogical and critical-pedagogical phases, supported by an epistemological base of two sections in Lefebvre’s itinerary: 1939-1968 (Chapter 1) and 1968-1978 (Chapter 2). This phase defines the theoretical object “social space”, deepening in the concepts that provide greater originality and radicality to its potential unity. In the genealogical phase (Chapter 3) two arguments are deployed to place Lefebvre’s ideas from the perspective of a critical space theory: The feedback between Lefebvre and the architectural practice and its influence in the French and European context (post-war–70s) facilitate a doctrinal exchange with the Polish architect Oskar Hansen (Team X), which is translated as a “form of the possible” in the Juliusz Slowacki Housing Estate built in Lublin (1963-66). And, the genealogical dialectical reconstruction shows the roots of two dissenting traditions: on one side, by the effervescence relationship with Constant Nieuwenhuys and Guy Debord; and on the other, by a series of interests that coincide in the itineraries of D. Harvey and M. Castells. The critical-pedagogical phase assumes that it is possible to apply the theoretical apparatus exposed to concrete urban processes in the world city, which implies the pedagogical confrontation of the Lefebvrian matrix with a specific reality in the centre (Ciutat Vella) and periphery (Prat Vermell) of Barcelona, verifying the effectiveness of the theoretical apparatus in guiding the architect through an ordered transdisciplinary path in the urban spatial analysis; through which historical research allows a contextualized reading of the neoliberal program in the political economy of space. Consequently, the limits of municipal planning are revealed in contradiction with urbanistic planning legislation and policy in the face of the great wave of global financial flows; and it builds on the theoretical-critical apparatus with a global approach to local struggles, which have difficulty to integrate due to their visions parcelled of the urban problematic. Thus, the actual dominance of the real estate–financialized circuit in capitalist urbanization and its destructive action in the residential sphere in Barcelona is explained, its consequences on the use of social space and on the urban planning devices that seek to domesticate it, closing the contestation gaps or co-opting it. The evidence of the circuit structures and its contradictions with the reformist planning encourages a strategy of urban offensive, that reveals the radical social space counter-project to the neoliberal production of space, renewing the principles of the (de facto) right to the city in view of a general program of public action engaged to a differential urban world.Esta tesis surge del despertar de la obra de Henri Lefebvre tanto en las ciencias sociales de enfoque marxista como en los estudios urbanos interesados por lo social. Su recuperación científica e institucional ha operado de modo distinto en el mundo anglosajón e hispano, en particular en la última década, especializando sus ideas, purificándolas, y en consecuencia volviéndolas inoperantes. Así, se afronta las dificultades de una obra dispersa y soslayada en la tradición académica y la praxis política; lo que plantea un triple reto: el ensamblaje no dogmático del pensamiento de Lefebvre como un todo en movimiento a lo largo de su vida, siguiendo la estela de una ciencia del uso del espacio; el llenado de un vacío teórico apenas reclamado por el urbanismo académico durante la urbanización del proyecto neoliberal; y la aplicabilidad de una matriz lefebvriana en el análisis de la urbanización capitalista en la ciudad global. Para seguir eficazmente sus ideas, siempre en torno al espacio vivido, se diseña un sistema abierto a una pluralidad de enfoques y métodos que colaboran en el desarrollo de la tesis; la cual se organiza por el progreso de las fases genealógica y crítico-pedagógica, sustentadas por una base epistemológica de dos tramos en su itinerario: 1939-1968 (Cap. 1) y 1968-1978 (Cap. 2). Esta fase busca definir el objeto teórico “espacio social”, profundizando en los conceptos que le proporcionan mayor originalidad y radicalidad a su unidad potencial. En la fase genealógica (Cap. 3) se despliegan dos argumentos para situar las ideas de Lefebvre desde la perspectiva de una teoría del espacio–crítica: a) La retroalimentación entre él y la práctica arquitectónica y su influencia en el contexto francés y europeo (posguerra–70s) facilitan un intercambio doctrinal con el arquitecto polaco Oskar Hansen (Team X), que se traduce como una “forma de lo posible” en el conjunto de vivienda estatal Juliusz Słowacki construido en Lublin (1963-66). b) La reconstrucción dialéctica de su genealogía indica las raíces de dos tradiciones disidentes: en un caso, por la efervescencia de la relación con Constant Nieuwenhuys y Guy Debord; y en otro, por una serie de intereses coincidentes en los itinerarios de D. Harvey y M. Castells. La fase crítico-pedagógica (Cap. 4) asume que es posible aplicar el aparato teórico expuesto a procesos urbanos concretos en la ciudad mundial, lo que implica la confrontación pedagógica de la matriz lefebvriana con una realidad específica en el centro (Ciutat Vella) y periferia (Prat Vermell) de Barcelona, comprobando la eficacia de la unidad teórica para guiar al arquitecto por una vía transdisciplinar ordenada en el análisis espacial urbano; en la cual, la investigación histórica permite una lectura contextualizada del programa neoliberal en la economía política del espacio. De ese modo, se desvelan los límites de la planificación Municipal en contradicción con la legislación y política urbanísticas frente a la gran ola de flujos financieros globales y se intenta dotar de un aparato teóricocrítico de enfoque global a las luchas locales, con dificultades para integrarse debido a sus visiones parceladas de la problemática urbana. Así pues, se explica el actual dominio del circuito inmobiliario–financierizado en la urbanización capitalista y su acción destructiva en el ámbito residencial en Barcelona, sus consecuencias sobre el uso del espacio social y sobre los dispositivos de planeamiento que buscan domesticarlo, cerrando las brechas de contestación o cooptándola. La evidencia de las estructuras del circuito y sus contradicciones con el planeamiento reformista alientan una estrategia de ofensiva urbana, orientadora del contra-proyecto del “espacio social radical” a la producción neoliberal del espacio, renovando los principios de un derecho a la ciudad (de facto) con vistas a un programa de acción pública comprometido con un mundo urbano diferencial.Postprint (published version
Marcello Balduccini - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
constraint answer set solver ezcsp and why integration schemas matter
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 2017Co-Authors: Marcello Balduccini, Yuliya LierlerAbstract:Researchers in answer set programming and constraint programming have spent significant efforts in the development of hybrid languages and solving algorithms combining the strengths of these traditionally separate fields. These efforts resulted in a new research area: constraint answer set programming. Constraint answer set programming languages and systems proved to be successful at providing declarative, yet efficient solutions to problems involving hybrid reasoning tasks. One of the main contributions of this paper is the first comprehensive account of the constraint answer set language and solver EZCSP, a mainstream representative of this research area that has been used in various successful applications. We also develop an extension of the transition systems proposed by Nieuwenhuis et al. in 2006 to capture Boolean satisfiability solvers. We use this extension to describe the EZCSP algorithm and prove formal claims about it. The design and algorithmic details behind EZCSP clearly demonstrate that the development of the hybrid systems of this kind is challenging. Many questions arise when one faces various design choices in an attempt to maximize system’s benefits. One of the key decisions that a developer of a hybrid solver makes is settling on a particular integration schema within its implementation. Thus, another important contribution of this paper is a thorough case study based on EZCSP, focused on the various integration schemas that it provides.
-
constraint answer set solver ezcsp and why integration schemas matter
arXiv: Artificial Intelligence, 2017Co-Authors: Marcello Balduccini, Yuliya LierlerAbstract:Researchers in answer set programming and constraint programming have spent significant efforts in the development of hybrid languages and solving algorithms combining the strengths of these traditionally separate fields. These efforts resulted in a new research area: constraint answer set programming. Constraint answer set programming languages and systems proved to be successful at providing declarative, yet efficient solutions to problems involving hybrid reasoning tasks. One of the main contributions of this paper is the first comprehensive account of the constraint answer set language and solver EZCSP, a mainstream representative of this research area that has been used in various successful applications. We also develop an extension of the transition systems proposed by Nieuwenhuis et al. in 2006 to capture Boolean satisfiability solvers. We use this extension to describe the EZCSP algorithm and prove formal claims about it. The design and algorithmic details behind EZCSP clearly demonstrate that the development of the hybrid systems of this kind is challenging. Many questions arise when one faces various design choices in an attempt to maximize system's benefits. One of the key decisions that a developer of a hybrid solver makes is settling on a particular integration schema within its implementation. Thus, another important contribution of this paper is a thorough case study based on EZCSP, focused on the various integration schemas that it provides. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
Nijman H.l.i. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Prevalence of MID/BIF and trauma in patients in Functional Assertive Community Treatment teams in the Netherlands: Association to global functioning and mental state
2017Co-Authors: Nieuwenhuis J.g., Smits H., Mulder C.l., Noorthoorn E.o., Naarding P., Te B. Boekhorst, Penterman E.j.m., Nijman H.l.i., Callaghan P., Oud N.Abstract:Little is known of the prevalence of Moderate Intellectual Disability and Borderline Intellectual Functioning (MID/BIF) in the chronic and serious mentally ill (SMI) patients. A recent study on two admission wards for general psychiatry in the Netherlands results showed 43.8% of the patients to be at risk of MID/BIF (Nieuwenhuis et al. 2017), as assessed with the Screener for Intelligence Intelligence Learning Disabilities (SCIL, Kaal, Nijman & Moonen, 2015). From the scarce literature we know people with MID/BIF living at home have more serious psychiatric problems those without MBID (Hasiotis, et al. 2008, Wieland et al, 2014). Several studies also show people with MID/BIF are more at risk to traumatic life experiences. Violence, sexual and physical abuse against people with a disability is widespread, especially to people with ID (Hatton and Emmerson 2004, Focht-New et al, 2008, Vadysinge A.N. et al, 2017, Lan-Ping Lin et al. 2009 )
-
Prevalence of MID/BIF and trauma in patients in Functional Assertive Community Treatment teams in the Netherlands: Association to global functioning and mental state
Amsterdam : Oud Consultancy, 2017Co-Authors: Nieuwenhuis J.g., Smits H., Mulder C.l., Noorthoorn E.o., Naarding P., Te B. Boekhorst, Penterman E.j.m., Nijman H.l.i.Abstract:Item does not contain fulltextLittle is known of the prevalence of Moderate Intellectual Disability and Borderline Intellectual Functioning (MID/BIF) in the chronic and serious mentally ill (SMI) patients. A recent study on two admission wards for general psychiatry in the Netherlands results showed 43.8% of the patients to be at risk of MID/BIF (Nieuwenhuis et al. 2017), as assessed with the Screener for Intelligence Intelligence Learning Disabilities (SCIL, Kaal, Nijman & Moonen, 2015). From the scarce literature we know people with MID/BIF living at home have more serious psychiatric problems those without MBID (Hasiotis, et al. 2008, Wieland et al, 2014). Several studies also show people with MID/BIF are more at risk to traumatic life experiences. Violence, sexual and physical abuse against people with a disability is widespread, especially to people with ID (Hatton and Emmerson 2004, Focht-New et al, 2008, Vadysinge A.N. et al, 2017, Lan-Ping Lin et al. 2009 ).10th European Congress on Violence in Clinical Psychiatry (Dublin, Ireland, 26 - 28 October 2017
Nieuwenhuis J.g. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Prevalence of MID/BIF and trauma in patients in Functional Assertive Community Treatment teams in the Netherlands: Association to global functioning and mental state
2017Co-Authors: Nieuwenhuis J.g., Smits H., Mulder C.l., Noorthoorn E.o., Naarding P., Te B. Boekhorst, Penterman E.j.m., Nijman H.l.i., Callaghan P., Oud N.Abstract:Little is known of the prevalence of Moderate Intellectual Disability and Borderline Intellectual Functioning (MID/BIF) in the chronic and serious mentally ill (SMI) patients. A recent study on two admission wards for general psychiatry in the Netherlands results showed 43.8% of the patients to be at risk of MID/BIF (Nieuwenhuis et al. 2017), as assessed with the Screener for Intelligence Intelligence Learning Disabilities (SCIL, Kaal, Nijman & Moonen, 2015). From the scarce literature we know people with MID/BIF living at home have more serious psychiatric problems those without MBID (Hasiotis, et al. 2008, Wieland et al, 2014). Several studies also show people with MID/BIF are more at risk to traumatic life experiences. Violence, sexual and physical abuse against people with a disability is widespread, especially to people with ID (Hatton and Emmerson 2004, Focht-New et al, 2008, Vadysinge A.N. et al, 2017, Lan-Ping Lin et al. 2009 )
-
Prevalence of MID/BIF and trauma in patients in Functional Assertive Community Treatment teams in the Netherlands: Association to global functioning and mental state
Amsterdam : Oud Consultancy, 2017Co-Authors: Nieuwenhuis J.g., Smits H., Mulder C.l., Noorthoorn E.o., Naarding P., Te B. Boekhorst, Penterman E.j.m., Nijman H.l.i.Abstract:Item does not contain fulltextLittle is known of the prevalence of Moderate Intellectual Disability and Borderline Intellectual Functioning (MID/BIF) in the chronic and serious mentally ill (SMI) patients. A recent study on two admission wards for general psychiatry in the Netherlands results showed 43.8% of the patients to be at risk of MID/BIF (Nieuwenhuis et al. 2017), as assessed with the Screener for Intelligence Intelligence Learning Disabilities (SCIL, Kaal, Nijman & Moonen, 2015). From the scarce literature we know people with MID/BIF living at home have more serious psychiatric problems those without MBID (Hasiotis, et al. 2008, Wieland et al, 2014). Several studies also show people with MID/BIF are more at risk to traumatic life experiences. Violence, sexual and physical abuse against people with a disability is widespread, especially to people with ID (Hatton and Emmerson 2004, Focht-New et al, 2008, Vadysinge A.N. et al, 2017, Lan-Ping Lin et al. 2009 ).10th European Congress on Violence in Clinical Psychiatry (Dublin, Ireland, 26 - 28 October 2017