The Experts below are selected from a list of 12 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
V.s. Sunderam - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Network based high performance concurrent computing. Progress report, [FY 1991]
1991Co-Authors: V.s. SunderamAbstract:The overall objectives of this project are to investigate research issues pertaining to programming tools and efficiency issues in network based concurrent computing systems. The basis for these efforts is the PVM project that evolved during my visits to Oak Ridge Laboratories under the DOE Faculty Research Participation program; I continue to collaborate with researchers at Oak Ridge on some portions of the project.
-
Network based high performance concurrent computing
1991Co-Authors: V.s. SunderamAbstract:The overall objectives of this project are to investigate research issues pertaining to programming tools and efficiency issues in network based concurrent computing systems. The basis for these efforts is the PVM project that evolved during my visits to Oak Ridge Laboratories under the DOE Faculty Research Participation program; I continue to collaborate with researchers at Oak Ridge on some portions of the project.
D.w. Dunford - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Incorporation of Current ICRP Recommendations in the GENMOD Internal Dosimetry Code
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1998Co-Authors: Richard B. Richardson, D.w. DunfordAbstract:Genmod was initially developed by Johnson and Dunford to perform internal dose assessments and evaluate bioassay data using the methods described by the ICRP in Publications 26 and 30. The mainframe code, Genmod-MF was modified to implement the ICRP's new lung model, new weighting factors and new values for specific effective energy (SEE) available from M. Cristy and K. F. Eckerman, Oak Ridge Laboratories. Organ equivalent doses and effective dose for selected radionuclides employing the ICRP 30 general organ model have been verified, for ingestion and inhalation cases, against current ICRP publications, the internal dosimetry code LUDEP and mainframe codes. The PC version of Genmod has been rewritten to operate under the MS-Windows95 system. A demonstration package has been developed that calculates doses and provides graphics for radionuclides where the ICRP's general organ model is appropriate. Data will be presented showing the differences and similarities in dose conversion factors using the ICRP 26/30 methodology and recommendations in ICRP Publication 60 onwards.
Richard B. Richardson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Incorporation of Current ICRP Recommendations in the GENMOD Internal Dosimetry Code
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1998Co-Authors: Richard B. Richardson, D.w. DunfordAbstract:Genmod was initially developed by Johnson and Dunford to perform internal dose assessments and evaluate bioassay data using the methods described by the ICRP in Publications 26 and 30. The mainframe code, Genmod-MF was modified to implement the ICRP's new lung model, new weighting factors and new values for specific effective energy (SEE) available from M. Cristy and K. F. Eckerman, Oak Ridge Laboratories. Organ equivalent doses and effective dose for selected radionuclides employing the ICRP 30 general organ model have been verified, for ingestion and inhalation cases, against current ICRP publications, the internal dosimetry code LUDEP and mainframe codes. The PC version of Genmod has been rewritten to operate under the MS-Windows95 system. A demonstration package has been developed that calculates doses and provides graphics for radionuclides where the ICRP's general organ model is appropriate. Data will be presented showing the differences and similarities in dose conversion factors using the ICRP 26/30 methodology and recommendations in ICRP Publication 60 onwards.
Denis Eckert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
DNA Repair: A changing geography? (1964–2008)
DNA Repair, 2013Co-Authors: Marion Maisonobe, Giuseppina Giglia-mari, Denis EckertAbstract:Abstract This article aims to explain the current state of DNA Repair studies’ global geography by focusing on the genesis of the community. Bibliometric data is used to localize scientific activities related to DNA Repair at the city level. The keyword “DNA Repair” was introduced first by American scientists. It started to spread after 1964 that is to say, after P. Howard-Flanders (Yale University), P. Hanawalt (Stanford University) and R. Setlow (Oak Ridge Laboratories) found evidence for Excision Repair mechanisms. It was the first stage in the emergence of an autonomous scientific community. In this article, we will try to assess to what extent the geo-history of this scientific field is determinant in understanding its current geography. In order to do so, we will localize the places where the first “DNA Repair” publications were signed fifty years ago and the following spatial diffusion process, which led to the current geography of the field. Then, we will focus on the evolution of the research activity of “early entrants” in relation to the activity of “latecomers”. This article is an opportunity to share with DNA Repair scientists some research results of a dynamic field in Science studies: spatial scientometrics.
Marion Maisonobe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
DNA Repair: A changing geography? (1964–2008)
DNA Repair, 2013Co-Authors: Marion Maisonobe, Giuseppina Giglia-mari, Denis EckertAbstract:Abstract This article aims to explain the current state of DNA Repair studies’ global geography by focusing on the genesis of the community. Bibliometric data is used to localize scientific activities related to DNA Repair at the city level. The keyword “DNA Repair” was introduced first by American scientists. It started to spread after 1964 that is to say, after P. Howard-Flanders (Yale University), P. Hanawalt (Stanford University) and R. Setlow (Oak Ridge Laboratories) found evidence for Excision Repair mechanisms. It was the first stage in the emergence of an autonomous scientific community. In this article, we will try to assess to what extent the geo-history of this scientific field is determinant in understanding its current geography. In order to do so, we will localize the places where the first “DNA Repair” publications were signed fifty years ago and the following spatial diffusion process, which led to the current geography of the field. Then, we will focus on the evolution of the research activity of “early entrants” in relation to the activity of “latecomers”. This article is an opportunity to share with DNA Repair scientists some research results of a dynamic field in Science studies: spatial scientometrics.
