Online Experiment

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 68496 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Pete Lunn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • motivating social distancing during the covid 19 pandemic an Online Experiment
    Social Science & Medicine, 2020
    Co-Authors: Pete Lunn, Shane Timmons, Cameron Belton, Martina Barjakova, Hannah Julienne, Ciaran Lavin
    Abstract:

    Abstract Rationale Maintaining social distance during the COVID-19 pandemic can save lives. We therefore set out to test communication strategies to promote social distancing. Objective We aimed to test two novel public health messages against a control message. The first was designed to exploit the “identifiable victim” effect by highlighting the risk of transmission to identifiable vulnerable persons. The second sought to counteract intuitive underestimation of exponential transmission. Method In total, 500 Irish adults undertook a pre-registered, Online Experiment. They were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two treatment groups. The control group viewed a current poster that encouraged a 2-m separation between people. The two treatment groups saw posters of similar design, but with narrative messages describing how an individual had infected a specific vulnerable person or multiple other people. Later questions measured intentions to undertake three specific types of social interaction over the coming days and the stated acceptability of three other types of social interaction. Pilot work had identified these six behaviors as “marginal” – people were unsure whether they were advisable. Results Participants in the treatment conditions were more cautious about undertaking the behaviors and less accepting of them. This positive effect occurred despite participants rating the treatment posters as likely to be less effective and memorable than the control poster. Conclusions Messages that invoke thoughts of infecting vulnerable people or large numbers of people can motivate social distancing and, hence, help to limit the spread of COVID-19. Stated public evaluations (obtained via focus groups or surveys) may underestimate the actual effectiveness of such emotional messages.

  • motivating social distancing during the covid 19 pandemic an Online Experiment
    Research Papers in Economics, 2020
    Co-Authors: Pete Lunn, Shane Timmons, Cameron Belton, Martina Barjakova, Hannah Julienne, Ciaran Lavin
    Abstract:

    Maintaining social distance during the COVID-19 pandemic can save lives. We therefore set out to test communication strategies to promote social distancing. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Henk J Van Waarde - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Ciaran Lavin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • motivating social distancing during the covid 19 pandemic an Online Experiment
    Social Science & Medicine, 2020
    Co-Authors: Pete Lunn, Shane Timmons, Cameron Belton, Martina Barjakova, Hannah Julienne, Ciaran Lavin
    Abstract:

    Abstract Rationale Maintaining social distance during the COVID-19 pandemic can save lives. We therefore set out to test communication strategies to promote social distancing. Objective We aimed to test two novel public health messages against a control message. The first was designed to exploit the “identifiable victim” effect by highlighting the risk of transmission to identifiable vulnerable persons. The second sought to counteract intuitive underestimation of exponential transmission. Method In total, 500 Irish adults undertook a pre-registered, Online Experiment. They were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two treatment groups. The control group viewed a current poster that encouraged a 2-m separation between people. The two treatment groups saw posters of similar design, but with narrative messages describing how an individual had infected a specific vulnerable person or multiple other people. Later questions measured intentions to undertake three specific types of social interaction over the coming days and the stated acceptability of three other types of social interaction. Pilot work had identified these six behaviors as “marginal” – people were unsure whether they were advisable. Results Participants in the treatment conditions were more cautious about undertaking the behaviors and less accepting of them. This positive effect occurred despite participants rating the treatment posters as likely to be less effective and memorable than the control poster. Conclusions Messages that invoke thoughts of infecting vulnerable people or large numbers of people can motivate social distancing and, hence, help to limit the spread of COVID-19. Stated public evaluations (obtained via focus groups or surveys) may underestimate the actual effectiveness of such emotional messages.

  • motivating social distancing during the covid 19 pandemic an Online Experiment
    Research Papers in Economics, 2020
    Co-Authors: Pete Lunn, Shane Timmons, Cameron Belton, Martina Barjakova, Hannah Julienne, Ciaran Lavin
    Abstract:

    Maintaining social distance during the COVID-19 pandemic can save lives. We therefore set out to test communication strategies to promote social distancing. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Howard Kunreuther - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • all by myself testing descriptive social norm nudges to increase flood preparedness among homeowners
    Social Science Research Network, 2020
    Co-Authors: Jantsje M Mol, W Wouter J Botzen, Julia Blasch, Elissa Kranzler, Howard Kunreuther
    Abstract:

    Nudges based on social norms (norm-nudges) can be compelling behavioral interventions compared to traditional interventions such as taxes and regulations, but they do not work in all circumstances. We tested two empirical norm-nudge frames in an Online Experiment on taking measures for flood preparedness with large samples of homeowners (N =1805) in two European countries, to evaluate the possible interactions between norm-nudge effectiveness, individual characteristics and intercultural differences. We contrasted these norm-nudge treatments with a control and norm focusing treatment by asking respondents to express their beliefs about what other respondents would do before making a decision relevant to their own payoff. We find no evidence of a treatment effect, suggesting that our social norm-nudges do not affect flood preparedness in the context of a flood risk investment game.

Peter John - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.