Online Survey Tool

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 20154 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Erin Wilson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparative effectiveness report: Online Survey Tools
    Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2010
    Co-Authors: Daniel Gottliebson, Natasha Layton, Erin Wilson
    Abstract:

    Purpose. A group of Australian researchers seeking an accessible Online Survey Tool discovered to their concern that most commercially available Survey Tools are not actually ‘useable’ by a significant number of assistive technology users.Method. Comparative effectiveness analysis of 11 popular Survey Tools. A bespoke Survey Tool was subsequently created to meet all accessibility guidelines and useability criteria as determined by the wide range of assistive technology users with whom the research team was working.Results. Many Survey Tools claim accessibility status but this does not reflect the actual situation. Only one Survey met all compliance points; however, it was limited by inflexible layout and few options for question types; some Surveys proved unusable by screen reader. All Surveys reviewed represented a compromise between accessibility and breadth of functionality.Conclusion. It would appear the voices of a proportion of people living with disability are absent from the data collected by surv...

Kristin Yeager - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Jenifer O. Corn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Investigating the quality of the school technology needs assessment (STNA) 3.0: A validity and reliability study
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2010
    Co-Authors: Jenifer O. Corn
    Abstract:

    Schools and districts should use a well-designed needs assessment to inform important decisions about a range of technology program areas. Presently, there is a lack of valid and reliable instruments available and accessible to schools to effectively assess their educational needs to better design and evaluate their projects and initiatives. The School Technology Needs Assessment (STNA) is a free, user-friendly Online Survey Tool that meets this need for planning and formative evaluation of technology projects in educational settings. This study used existing data from a robust sample ( n  = 1918) of educators from across North Carolina to examine the reliability and validity of STNA. A collective review of study results including the literature review, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistently reliability analysis indicated that STNA was a high-quality instrument.

Jeffrey A. Houser - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • A New State of Surveillance? Applying Michel Foucault to Modern Motherhood
    Surveillance & Society, 2010
    Co-Authors: Angie C. Henderson, Sandra M Harmon, Jeffrey A. Houser
    Abstract:

    This project analyzed how "New Momism" (Douglas and Michaels 2004) is perpetuated among contemporary mothers. Previous work has argued that New Momism is most powerfully represented through the media. Our results indicate that New Momism is also practiced intensively on an interpersonal level via Michel Foucault's (1975) Panoptic stage of punishment: post-structuralist surveillance. We analyzed data from a snowball sample of 323 mothers through an Online Survey Tool. Results indicate that while the media remains an important influence, the strongest predictors of New Momism are surveillance of fellow moms and surveillance of self through guilt. Results are discussed in light of Foucault's conceptualization of post-structuralist surveillance.

Daniel Gottliebson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparative effectiveness report: Online Survey Tools
    Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2010
    Co-Authors: Daniel Gottliebson, Natasha Layton, Erin Wilson
    Abstract:

    Purpose. A group of Australian researchers seeking an accessible Online Survey Tool discovered to their concern that most commercially available Survey Tools are not actually ‘useable’ by a significant number of assistive technology users.Method. Comparative effectiveness analysis of 11 popular Survey Tools. A bespoke Survey Tool was subsequently created to meet all accessibility guidelines and useability criteria as determined by the wide range of assistive technology users with whom the research team was working.Results. Many Survey Tools claim accessibility status but this does not reflect the actual situation. Only one Survey met all compliance points; however, it was limited by inflexible layout and few options for question types; some Surveys proved unusable by screen reader. All Surveys reviewed represented a compromise between accessibility and breadth of functionality.Conclusion. It would appear the voices of a proportion of people living with disability are absent from the data collected by surv...