The Experts below are selected from a list of 23445 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ingunn Marie Holmen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Safety Management in Norwegian Fish Farming: Current Status, Challenges, and Further Improvements
Safety and Health at Work, 2020Co-Authors: Trine Thorvaldsen, Kristine Vedal Størkersen, Trond Kongsvik, Ingunn Marie HolmenAbstract:Abstract Background Safety management is required to ensure health and safety of Personnel in Norwegian fish farming. However, few studies have addressed the status and practical relevance of this risk-reducing measure. Methods This article provides new knowledge through interviews with 35 employees at different company levels, addressing perceptions of various safety management activities according to managers and Operational Personnel. Results Interviews show that managers and Operational Personnel at the fish farms agree that the quantity of measures aimed to improve safety have increased in recent years. However, some activities are perceived to have ha higher practical relevance than others. In general, measures that fit well with the practical reality are well received by the employees at the fish farms. Conclusion Suggested improvements include involving Operational Personnel in design of procedures, considering all risk dimensions that may affect occupational health and safety, and challenging the value of specific safety activities based on a detailed knowledge of the distinctive characteristics of work practice in fish farming.
Trine Thorvaldsen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Safety Management in Norwegian Fish Farming: Current Status, Challenges, and Further Improvements
Safety and Health at Work, 2020Co-Authors: Trine Thorvaldsen, Kristine Vedal Størkersen, Trond Kongsvik, Ingunn Marie HolmenAbstract:Abstract Background Safety management is required to ensure health and safety of Personnel in Norwegian fish farming. However, few studies have addressed the status and practical relevance of this risk-reducing measure. Methods This article provides new knowledge through interviews with 35 employees at different company levels, addressing perceptions of various safety management activities according to managers and Operational Personnel. Results Interviews show that managers and Operational Personnel at the fish farms agree that the quantity of measures aimed to improve safety have increased in recent years. However, some activities are perceived to have ha higher practical relevance than others. In general, measures that fit well with the practical reality are well received by the employees at the fish farms. Conclusion Suggested improvements include involving Operational Personnel in design of procedures, considering all risk dimensions that may affect occupational health and safety, and challenging the value of specific safety activities based on a detailed knowledge of the distinctive characteristics of work practice in fish farming.
Jan Hayes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
use of safety barriers in Operational safety decision making
Safety Science, 2012Co-Authors: Jan HayesAbstract:Operational Personnel in complex hazardous industries are regularly called upon to make decisions that balance the production and safety objectives of their organisation. Regulations and industry standards focus on defining and complying with operating limits of various kinds as the primary method of achieving the right balance. Such limits remove the need in many cases for in-the-moment judgements about safety and production priorities. Focussing solely on the compliance with a pre-defined envelope underestimates the direct contribution to safety from Operational managers based on their professional judgement. Research in a chemical plant, a nuclear power station and an air navigation service provider has identified a "line in the sand" approach taken by experienced operating Personnel when abnormal situations arise. In developing these situation-specific self-imposed limits, Operational managers focus on the status of safety barriers, rather than considering risk from first principles. This approach could form the basis of a new procedure, which lays out the process to be followed in determining how best to proceed (similar to job safety analysis or permit to work). This would acknowledge that such decisions are necessary, assist Operational Personnel in making better choices and open such decisions to appropriate audit and scrutiny. Language: en
-
Use of safety barriers in Operational safety decision making
Safety Science, 2012Co-Authors: Jan HayesAbstract:Abstract Operational Personnel in complex hazardous industries are regularly called upon to make decisions that balance the production and safety objectives of their organisation. Regulations and industry standards focus on defining and complying with operating limits of various kinds as the primary method of achieving the right balance. Such limits remove the need in many cases for in-the-moment judgements about safety and production priorities. Focussing solely on the compliance with a pre-defined envelope underestimates the direct contribution to safety from Operational managers based on their professional judgement. Research in a chemical plant, a nuclear power station and an air navigation service provider has identified a “line in the sand” approach taken by experienced operating Personnel when abnormal situations arise. In developing these situation-specific self-imposed limits, Operational managers focus on the status of safety barriers, rather than considering risk from first principles. This approach could form the basis of a new procedure, which lays out the process to be followed in determining how best to proceed (similar to job safety analysis or permit to work). This would acknowledge that such decisions are necessary, assist Operational Personnel in making better choices and open such decisions to appropriate audit and scrutiny.
Trond Kongsvik - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Safety Management in Norwegian Fish Farming: Current Status, Challenges, and Further Improvements
Safety and Health at Work, 2020Co-Authors: Trine Thorvaldsen, Kristine Vedal Størkersen, Trond Kongsvik, Ingunn Marie HolmenAbstract:Abstract Background Safety management is required to ensure health and safety of Personnel in Norwegian fish farming. However, few studies have addressed the status and practical relevance of this risk-reducing measure. Methods This article provides new knowledge through interviews with 35 employees at different company levels, addressing perceptions of various safety management activities according to managers and Operational Personnel. Results Interviews show that managers and Operational Personnel at the fish farms agree that the quantity of measures aimed to improve safety have increased in recent years. However, some activities are perceived to have ha higher practical relevance than others. In general, measures that fit well with the practical reality are well received by the employees at the fish farms. Conclusion Suggested improvements include involving Operational Personnel in design of procedures, considering all risk dimensions that may affect occupational health and safety, and challenging the value of specific safety activities based on a detailed knowledge of the distinctive characteristics of work practice in fish farming.
Kristine Vedal Størkersen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Safety Management in Norwegian Fish Farming: Current Status, Challenges, and Further Improvements
Safety and Health at Work, 2020Co-Authors: Trine Thorvaldsen, Kristine Vedal Størkersen, Trond Kongsvik, Ingunn Marie HolmenAbstract:Abstract Background Safety management is required to ensure health and safety of Personnel in Norwegian fish farming. However, few studies have addressed the status and practical relevance of this risk-reducing measure. Methods This article provides new knowledge through interviews with 35 employees at different company levels, addressing perceptions of various safety management activities according to managers and Operational Personnel. Results Interviews show that managers and Operational Personnel at the fish farms agree that the quantity of measures aimed to improve safety have increased in recent years. However, some activities are perceived to have ha higher practical relevance than others. In general, measures that fit well with the practical reality are well received by the employees at the fish farms. Conclusion Suggested improvements include involving Operational Personnel in design of procedures, considering all risk dimensions that may affect occupational health and safety, and challenging the value of specific safety activities based on a detailed knowledge of the distinctive characteristics of work practice in fish farming.