The Experts below are selected from a list of 195 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ferreira, Guilherme José Bolzani De Campos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Principais caracteres da osteologia craniana de Milvago chimango (Vieillot, 1816) e Milvago chimachima (Vieillot, 1816) (Aves: Falconidae)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2015Co-Authors: Guzzi Anderson, Santos, Antonia Marques Dos, Santos, Juliana Dias Dos, Donatelli, Reginaldo José, Ferreira, Guilherme José Bolzani De CamposAbstract:http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2015v28n3p107Knowledge of details of the cranial osteology of Milvago chimango and M. chimachima helps to ensure the monophyly of genus when compared to other birds and falcons. We conducted a study using skulls of three Milvago chimango and three Milvago chimachima specimens from the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History's Division of Birds. The cranial descriptions were comparative and illustrated by photos from the dorsal, ventral, and lateral flow perspectives. The studied species were then compared with falcons and other birds. Milvago chimango possesses several unique characters, including: the ratio of the distance from the distal portion of the lacrimal Bone to the orbital arc, and from the orbital arc to the buccal arc is (1/5); absence of transpalate processes; lack of dorsal process on the pterygoid Bone; more robust skull; paraoccipital Bone more developed laterally; lacrimal Bone smaller and more rostral; Palatine Bone approximately twice as wide; ethmoide Bone more robust and long. In M. chimachima, the distinguishing features are: presence of projections at the caudal end of the Palatine Bone; developed dorsal process of the pterygoid Bone; temporal fossa more tapered dorsoventrally; transverse nuchal crest outlined and visible; nostril closer to the frontonasal suture. Cranial osteology successfully provided diagnostic characters of each species and gender compared to other birds and falcons. to the installation of large enterprises or environmental protection areas. alic'>seedlings.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2015v28n3p107O detalhamento da osteologia craniana de Milvago chimango e M. chimachima, contribui para assegurar a monofilia do gênero quando comparado a outras aves e a outros falconídeos. O estudo foi realizado com os crânios de três espécimes de Milvago chimango e três de Milvago chimachima, pertencentes a Divisão de Aves do Museu de História Natural Smithsonian Institution. A descrição craniana foi comparativa e ilustrada por fotos nas vistas: dorsal, ventral, caudal e lateral; sendo as espécies estudas comparados com Falconideos e algumas outras aves. Os caracteres exclusivos de M. chimango são: razão entre a distância da porção distal do osso lacrimal ao arco da órbita e deste até a arco jugal é de 1/5; ausência dos processos transpalatinos; ausência do processo dorsal do osso pterigoide; crânio mais robusto; osso paraoccipital mais desenvolvido laterolateralmente; osso lacrimal menor e mais rostral; osso palatino aproximadamente duas vezes mais largo; osso ectetmoide mais robusto e longo. Em M. chimachima são: presença de projeções na extremidade caudal do osso palatino; desenvolvido processo dorsal do osso pterigoide; fossa temporal mais afilada dorsoventralmente; crista nucal transversa delineada e visível; narina mais próxima à sutura frontonasal. A osteologia craniana forneceu caracteres diagnósticos de cada uma das espécies e do gênero, quando comparados a outras aves e aos falconídeos
Guilherme Jose Bolzani De Campos Ferreira - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
principais caracteres da osteologia craniana de milvago chimango vieillot 1816 e milvago chimachima vieillot 1816 aves falconidae
Biotemas, 2015Co-Authors: Anderson Guzzi, Antonia Marques Dos Santos, Juliana Dias Dos Santos, Reginaldo Jose Donatelli, Guilherme Jose Bolzani De Campos FerreiraAbstract:Knowledge of details of the cranial osteology of Milvago chimango and M. chimachima helps to ensure the monophyly of genus when compared to other birds and falcons. We conducted a study using skulls of three Milvago chimango and three Milvago chimachima specimens from the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History's Division of Birds. The cranial descriptions were comparative and illustrated by photos from the dorsal, ventral, and lateral flow perspectives. The studied species were then compared with falcons and other birds. Milvago chimango possesses several unique characters, including: the ratio of the distance from the distal portion of the lacrimal Bone to the orbital arc, and from the orbital arc to the buccal arc is (1/5); absence of transpalate processes; lack of dorsal process on the pterygoid Bone; more robust skull; paraoccipital Bone more developed laterally; lacrimal Bone smaller and more rostral; Palatine Bone approximately twice as wide; ethmoide Bone more robust and long. In M. chimachim a, the distinguishing features are: presence of projections at the caudal end of the Palatine Bone; developed dorsal process of the pterygoid Bone; temporal fossa more tapered dorsoventrally; transverse nuchal crest outlined and visible; nostril closer to the frontonasal suture. Cranial osteology successfully provided diagnostic characters of each species and gender compared to other birds and falcons. to the installation of large enterprises or environmental protection areas. alic'>seedlings.
Guzzi Anderson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Principais caracteres da osteologia craniana de Milvago chimango (Vieillot, 1816) e Milvago chimachima (Vieillot, 1816) (Aves: Falconidae)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2015Co-Authors: Guzzi Anderson, Santos, Antonia Marques Dos, Santos, Juliana Dias Dos, Donatelli, Reginaldo José, Ferreira, Guilherme José Bolzani De CamposAbstract:http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2015v28n3p107Knowledge of details of the cranial osteology of Milvago chimango and M. chimachima helps to ensure the monophyly of genus when compared to other birds and falcons. We conducted a study using skulls of three Milvago chimango and three Milvago chimachima specimens from the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History's Division of Birds. The cranial descriptions were comparative and illustrated by photos from the dorsal, ventral, and lateral flow perspectives. The studied species were then compared with falcons and other birds. Milvago chimango possesses several unique characters, including: the ratio of the distance from the distal portion of the lacrimal Bone to the orbital arc, and from the orbital arc to the buccal arc is (1/5); absence of transpalate processes; lack of dorsal process on the pterygoid Bone; more robust skull; paraoccipital Bone more developed laterally; lacrimal Bone smaller and more rostral; Palatine Bone approximately twice as wide; ethmoide Bone more robust and long. In M. chimachima, the distinguishing features are: presence of projections at the caudal end of the Palatine Bone; developed dorsal process of the pterygoid Bone; temporal fossa more tapered dorsoventrally; transverse nuchal crest outlined and visible; nostril closer to the frontonasal suture. Cranial osteology successfully provided diagnostic characters of each species and gender compared to other birds and falcons. to the installation of large enterprises or environmental protection areas. alic'>seedlings.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2015v28n3p107O detalhamento da osteologia craniana de Milvago chimango e M. chimachima, contribui para assegurar a monofilia do gênero quando comparado a outras aves e a outros falconídeos. O estudo foi realizado com os crânios de três espécimes de Milvago chimango e três de Milvago chimachima, pertencentes a Divisão de Aves do Museu de História Natural Smithsonian Institution. A descrição craniana foi comparativa e ilustrada por fotos nas vistas: dorsal, ventral, caudal e lateral; sendo as espécies estudas comparados com Falconideos e algumas outras aves. Os caracteres exclusivos de M. chimango são: razão entre a distância da porção distal do osso lacrimal ao arco da órbita e deste até a arco jugal é de 1/5; ausência dos processos transpalatinos; ausência do processo dorsal do osso pterigoide; crânio mais robusto; osso paraoccipital mais desenvolvido laterolateralmente; osso lacrimal menor e mais rostral; osso palatino aproximadamente duas vezes mais largo; osso ectetmoide mais robusto e longo. Em M. chimachima são: presença de projeções na extremidade caudal do osso palatino; desenvolvido processo dorsal do osso pterigoide; fossa temporal mais afilada dorsoventralmente; crista nucal transversa delineada e visível; narina mais próxima à sutura frontonasal. A osteologia craniana forneceu caracteres diagnósticos de cada uma das espécies e do gênero, quando comparados a outras aves e aos falconídeos
Anderson Guzzi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
principais caracteres da osteologia craniana de milvago chimango vieillot 1816 e milvago chimachima vieillot 1816 aves falconidae
Biotemas, 2015Co-Authors: Anderson Guzzi, Antonia Marques Dos Santos, Juliana Dias Dos Santos, Reginaldo Jose Donatelli, Guilherme Jose Bolzani De Campos FerreiraAbstract:Knowledge of details of the cranial osteology of Milvago chimango and M. chimachima helps to ensure the monophyly of genus when compared to other birds and falcons. We conducted a study using skulls of three Milvago chimango and three Milvago chimachima specimens from the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History's Division of Birds. The cranial descriptions were comparative and illustrated by photos from the dorsal, ventral, and lateral flow perspectives. The studied species were then compared with falcons and other birds. Milvago chimango possesses several unique characters, including: the ratio of the distance from the distal portion of the lacrimal Bone to the orbital arc, and from the orbital arc to the buccal arc is (1/5); absence of transpalate processes; lack of dorsal process on the pterygoid Bone; more robust skull; paraoccipital Bone more developed laterally; lacrimal Bone smaller and more rostral; Palatine Bone approximately twice as wide; ethmoide Bone more robust and long. In M. chimachim a, the distinguishing features are: presence of projections at the caudal end of the Palatine Bone; developed dorsal process of the pterygoid Bone; temporal fossa more tapered dorsoventrally; transverse nuchal crest outlined and visible; nostril closer to the frontonasal suture. Cranial osteology successfully provided diagnostic characters of each species and gender compared to other birds and falcons. to the installation of large enterprises or environmental protection areas. alic'>seedlings.
Lai-ping Zhong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Additional file 2: of Computed tomographic features of adenoid cystic carcinoma in the palate
2019Co-Authors: Tong-chao Zhao, Ying Liu, Yi-ran Tan, Min-jun Dong, Qi Sun, Li-zhen Wang, Lai-ping ZhongAbstract:Examples of computed tomographic features of adenoid cystic carcinoma in the palate. Computed tomographic features were identified in contrast-enhanced images. Examples of cases: the black arrow indicating: (A) Palatine Bone destruction, (B) nasal cavity involvement and maxillary Bone destruction, (C) pterygoPalatine fossa involvement, (D) foramen rotundum involvement, (E) cavernous sinus involvement. (TIF 10087 kb
-
Computed tomographic features of adenoid cystic carcinoma in the palate
BMC, 2019Co-Authors: Tong-chao Zhao, Ying Liu, Yi-ran Tan, Min-jun Dong, Qi Sun, Li-zhen Wang, Lai-ping ZhongAbstract:Abstract Background To evaluate the computed tomographic features and create a prediction model for clinical diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in the palate with intact mucosa. Methods From March 2016 to May 2018, 102 patients with palatal tumors and intact mucosa, including 28 patients with a pathological diagnosis of ACC after surgery, were enrolled in this study. The patients’ clinical symptoms, computed tomographic features and pathological diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. Independent predictors of ACC were determined by using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression, and the discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was evaluated, and internal validation was performed. Results Univariate analysis of patients showed that ACC patients were more likely than non-ACC patients to be older (P = 0.019); to have Palatine Bone destruction (P