The Experts below are selected from a list of 4635 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Wouter Vandenabeele - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • public Personnel policies and hrm developments within the field and in the long history of the egpa study group on public Personnel Policy
    Public Administration in Europe, 2019
    Co-Authors: Lotte Bogh Andersen, Peter Leisink, Wouter Vandenabeele
    Abstract:

    The field of Public Personnel Policies and HRM analyses how active leadership and HRM strategies can motivate employees and ultimately improve in public organizations in diverse contexts. Key changes have been the relative emphasis on performance versus motivation in itself and the methods used in scientific investigations. A key message is that the methodological pluralism has increased significantly over time. It is a field with high impact on Policy makers and institutions through publications and public talks. In addition to discussing these issues, the chapter begins to answer the following question: What will characterize public Personnel Policy research and practice in 40 years from now?

Lawrence Kapp - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2012
    Co-Authors: Catherine A. Theohary, David F. Burrelli, Lawrence Kapp, Don J. Jansen
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Recent military operations in Iraq and ongoing operations in Afghanistan, along with the operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest in a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2013. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. These include end strengths, pay raises, health care, sexual assault, issues related to the repeal of the Don t Ask, Don t Tell Policy, as well as less prominent issues that nonetheless generate significant public interest. This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include language concerning appropriations, veterans affairs, tax implications of Policy choices, or any discussion of separately introduced legislation. Some issues were addressed in the FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report R41874, FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues, coordinated by David F. Burrelli. Those issues that were considered previously are designated with a * in the relevant section titles of this report.

  • fy2012 national defense authorization act selected military Personnel Policy issues
    2012
    Co-Authors: David F. Burrelli, Don J. Jansen, Charles A. Henning, Lawrence Kapp
    Abstract:

    This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include language concerning appropriations, veterans' affairs, tax implications of Policy choices, or any discussion of separately introduced legislation.

  • FY2011 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2010
    Co-Authors: Charles A. Henning, Don J. Jansen, David F. Burrelli, Lawrence Kapp
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest in a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House-passed and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2011. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. It includes background information and a discussion of the issue, along with a table that contains an explanation of the bill (H.R. 5136) passed by the House on May 28, 2010. The table and the report will be updated upon passage in the Senate, again upon completion of the Conference Committee action, and a final edition will be released when the NDAA is signed into law. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided.

  • FY2010 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2010
    Co-Authors: Don J. Jansen, Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning
    Abstract:

    This report discusses military Personnel issues that typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2010. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process.

  • FY2009 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2008
    Co-Authors: Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning, Richard A. Best
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of what the Bush Administration terms the Global War on Terror, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest and support for a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) selected a number of the military Personnel issues that Congress considered as it deliberated the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009. In each case, this report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. It includes background information and a discussion of the issue, along with a table that contains a comparison of the bill (H.R. 5658) passed by the House on May 22, 2008, the bill (S. 3001) passed by the Senate on September 17, 2008, and the final version (S. 3001) passed by the House on September 24, 2008 and by the Senate on September 27, 2008. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided. Note: some issues were addressed in the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report RL34169 concerning that legislation. Those issues that were previously considered in CRS Report RL34169 are designated with a * in the relevant section titles of this report.

David F. Burrelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2012
    Co-Authors: Catherine A. Theohary, David F. Burrelli, Lawrence Kapp, Don J. Jansen
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Recent military operations in Iraq and ongoing operations in Afghanistan, along with the operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest in a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2013. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. These include end strengths, pay raises, health care, sexual assault, issues related to the repeal of the Don t Ask, Don t Tell Policy, as well as less prominent issues that nonetheless generate significant public interest. This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include language concerning appropriations, veterans affairs, tax implications of Policy choices, or any discussion of separately introduced legislation. Some issues were addressed in the FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report R41874, FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues, coordinated by David F. Burrelli. Those issues that were considered previously are designated with a * in the relevant section titles of this report.

  • fy2012 national defense authorization act selected military Personnel Policy issues
    2012
    Co-Authors: David F. Burrelli, Don J. Jansen, Charles A. Henning, Lawrence Kapp
    Abstract:

    This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include language concerning appropriations, veterans' affairs, tax implications of Policy choices, or any discussion of separately introduced legislation.

  • FY2011 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2010
    Co-Authors: Charles A. Henning, Don J. Jansen, David F. Burrelli, Lawrence Kapp
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest in a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House-passed and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2011. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. It includes background information and a discussion of the issue, along with a table that contains an explanation of the bill (H.R. 5136) passed by the House on May 28, 2010. The table and the report will be updated upon passage in the Senate, again upon completion of the Conference Committee action, and a final edition will be released when the NDAA is signed into law. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided.

  • FY2010 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2010
    Co-Authors: Don J. Jansen, Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning
    Abstract:

    This report discusses military Personnel issues that typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2010. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process.

  • FY2009 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2008
    Co-Authors: Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning, Richard A. Best
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of what the Bush Administration terms the Global War on Terror, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest and support for a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) selected a number of the military Personnel issues that Congress considered as it deliberated the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009. In each case, this report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. It includes background information and a discussion of the issue, along with a table that contains a comparison of the bill (H.R. 5658) passed by the House on May 22, 2008, the bill (S. 3001) passed by the Senate on September 17, 2008, and the final version (S. 3001) passed by the House on September 24, 2008 and by the Senate on September 27, 2008. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided. Note: some issues were addressed in the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report RL34169 concerning that legislation. Those issues that were previously considered in CRS Report RL34169 are designated with a * in the relevant section titles of this report.

Charles A. Henning - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • fy2012 national defense authorization act selected military Personnel Policy issues
    2012
    Co-Authors: David F. Burrelli, Don J. Jansen, Charles A. Henning, Lawrence Kapp
    Abstract:

    This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include language concerning appropriations, veterans' affairs, tax implications of Policy choices, or any discussion of separately introduced legislation.

  • FY2011 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2010
    Co-Authors: Charles A. Henning, Don J. Jansen, David F. Burrelli, Lawrence Kapp
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest in a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House-passed and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2011. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. It includes background information and a discussion of the issue, along with a table that contains an explanation of the bill (H.R. 5136) passed by the House on May 28, 2010. The table and the report will be updated upon passage in the Senate, again upon completion of the Conference Committee action, and a final edition will be released when the NDAA is signed into law. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided.

  • FY2010 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2010
    Co-Authors: Don J. Jansen, Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning
    Abstract:

    This report discusses military Personnel issues that typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) selected a number of the military Personnel issues considered in deliberations on the House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2010. This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process.

  • FY2009 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2008
    Co-Authors: Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning, Richard A. Best
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of what the Bush Administration terms the Global War on Terror, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest and support for a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) selected a number of the military Personnel issues that Congress considered as it deliberated the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009. In each case, this report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to Personnel Policy. It includes background information and a discussion of the issue, along with a table that contains a comparison of the bill (H.R. 5658) passed by the House on May 22, 2008, the bill (S. 3001) passed by the Senate on September 17, 2008, and the final version (S. 3001) passed by the House on September 24, 2008 and by the Senate on September 27, 2008. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided. Note: some issues were addressed in the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report RL34169 concerning that legislation. Those issues that were previously considered in CRS Report RL34169 are designated with a * in the relevant section titles of this report.

  • FY 2009 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues
    2008
    Co-Authors: Lawrence Kapp, David F. Burrelli, Charles A. Henning, Richard A. Best
    Abstract:

    Abstract : Military Personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of what the Bush Administration terms the Global War on Terror, along with the emerging operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest and support for a wide range of military Personnel policies and issues. CRS selected a number of issues considered by Congress as it considers a National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009. In each case, a brief synopsis is provided that includes background information, a comparison of the House passed provisions (H.R. 5658) and the provisions reported by the Senate Armed Services Committee (S. 3001), if any, and a brief discussion of the issue. Where appropriate, other CRS products are identified to provide more detailed background information and analysis of the issue. For each issue, a CRS analyst is identified and contact information is provided. Note: some issues were addressed in the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report RL34169 concerning that legislation. Those issues that were previously considered in CRS Report RL34169 are designated with a "a*" in the relevant section titles of this report. This report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include appropriations, veterans affairs, tax implications of Policy choices or any discussion of separately introduced legislation.

Lotte Bogh Andersen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • public Personnel policies and hrm developments within the field and in the long history of the egpa study group on public Personnel Policy
    Public Administration in Europe, 2019
    Co-Authors: Lotte Bogh Andersen, Peter Leisink, Wouter Vandenabeele
    Abstract:

    The field of Public Personnel Policies and HRM analyses how active leadership and HRM strategies can motivate employees and ultimately improve in public organizations in diverse contexts. Key changes have been the relative emphasis on performance versus motivation in itself and the methods used in scientific investigations. A key message is that the methodological pluralism has increased significantly over time. It is a field with high impact on Policy makers and institutions through publications and public talks. In addition to discussing these issues, the chapter begins to answer the following question: What will characterize public Personnel Policy research and practice in 40 years from now?