The Experts below are selected from a list of 324 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Richard Pettigrew - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Transformative Experience and the Knowledge Norms for Action
Becoming Someone New, 2020Co-Authors: Richard PettigrewAbstract:In this chapter, Richard Pettigrew continues his defense of the Fine-Graining Response to L. A. Paul’s critique of decision theory, arguing that it meets a new challenge from Sarah Moss’s probabilistic knowledge framework. The strategy of the Fine-Graining Response is to treat uncertainty about one’s post-transformation preferences just like decision theory standardly treats uncertainty about the world. After reviewing the dialectic between himself and Paul, Pettigrew examines Moss’s argument that the potential for transformation blocks the kind of probabilistic knowledge she claims is necessary for rational decision. He distinguishes ways in which Moss’s argument both comports with and diverges from Paul’s. Finally, he defends the possibility of forming the kinds of justified credences needed for the Fine-Graining Response, and that this is sufficient for rational choices regarding transformation.
-
A Note on Deterministic Updating and van Fraassen's symmetry argument for Conditionalization
Philosophical Studies, 2020Co-Authors: Richard PettigrewAbstract:AbstractIn a recent paper, Pettigrew (Philos Stud, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01377-y) argues that the pragmatic and epistemic arguments for Bayesian updating are based on an unwarranted assumption, which he calls deterministic updating, and which says that your updating plan should be deterministic. In that paper, Pettigrew did not consider whether the symmetry arguments due to Hughes and van Fraassen make the same assumption (Hughes and van Fraassen in: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. pp. 851–869, 1984; van Fraassen in: Rescher N (ed) Scientific inquiry in philosophical perspective. University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 183–223, 1987). In this note, I show that they do.
-
A note on deterministic updating and van Fraassen’s symmetry argument for conditionalization
Philosophical Studies, 2020Co-Authors: Richard PettigrewAbstract:In a recent paper, Pettigrew (Philos Stud, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01377-y ) argues that the pragmatic and epistemic arguments for Bayesian updating are based on an unwarranted assumption, which he calls deterministic updating, and which says that your updating plan should be deterministic. In that paper, Pettigrew did not consider whether the symmetry arguments due to Hughes and van Fraassen make the same assumption (Hughes and van Fraassen in: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. pp. 851–869, 1984; van Fraassen in: Rescher N (ed) Scientific inquiry in philosophical perspective. University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 183–223, 1987). In this note, I show that they do.
-
Oxford Scholarship Online - Making Things Right
Oxford Scholarship Online, 2018Co-Authors: Richard PettigrewAbstract:Pettigrew focuses on trade-off objections to epistemic consequentialism. Such objections are similar to familiar objections from ethics where an intuitively wrong action (e.g., killing a healthy patient) leads to a net gain in value (e.g., saving five other patients). The objection to the epistemic consequentialist concerns cases where adopting an intuitively wrong belief leads to a net gain in epistemic value. Pettigrew defends the epistemic consequentialist against such objections by accepting that the unintuitive verdicts of consequentialism are unintuitive, but offering an error theory for why these intuitions do not show the view to be false.
Andrew Pettigrew - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm: A Reprise
Journal of Management Studies, 2012Co-Authors: Andrew PettigrewAbstract:This article returns to address the strengths and limitations of Pettigrew 1985 and 1987. It then responds to two of the main deficiencies of those publications. These are the failure to link context to process to outcome in those studies and in process scholarship more generally and the limited treatment of the method of process analysis offered by Pettigrew in 1985 and 1987. The article then compares and contrasts the methods of five additional process scholars; Mintzberg, Burgelman, Langley, Van de Ven and Eisenhardt to highlight developments in the conduct of process research since the mid and late 1980’s and to identify a set of pointers for the conduct of future process research.
-
Innovative forms of organizing : international perspectives
2003Co-Authors: Andrew Pettigrew, Richard Whittington, Leif Melin, Carlos J. Sanchez-runde, Frans Van Den Bosch, Winfried Ruigrok, Tsuyoshi NumagamiAbstract:Innovative Forms of Organizing - Andrew M Pettigrew and Silvia Massini Trends in Europe, Japan and the USA in the 1990s PART ONE: ORGANIZING/STRATEGIZING The Challenge of Organizing/Strategizing - Richard Whittington and Leif Melin Leadership - Leona Achtenhagen, Leif Melin, Tomas M[um]ullern and Thomas Ericson The Role of Interactive Strategizing Learning and Continuous Change in Innovating Organizations - Leona Achtenhagen, Leif Melin and Tomas M[um]ullern A Cognitive Perspective on Strategizing/Organizing - Marjolijn S Dijksterhuis, Frans A J van den Bosch and Henk W Volberta PART TWO: COMPLEMENTARITIES, CHANGE AND PERFORMANCE Complementarities Thinking - Richard Whittington and Andrew M Pettigrew Complementarities in Organizational Innovation and Performance - Silvia Massini and Andrew M Pettigrew Evidence from the INNFORM Survey Complementarities in Action - Andrew M Pettigrew and Richard Whittington Organizational Change and Performance in BP and Unilever 1985-2002 Complementary Change - Evelyn M Fenton and Andrew M Pettigrew Towards Global Integration in Four Professional Service Organizations PART THREE: MANAGING DUALITIES IN THE INNOVATING ORGANIZATION Managing Dualities - Carlos J Sanchez-Runde and Andrew M Pettigrew People Management Dualities - Carlos J Sanchez-Runde, Silvia Massini and Javier Quintanilla Convergence and Divergence of Organizing - Arie Y Lewin, Silvia Massini, Winfried Ruigrok and Tsuyoshi Numagami Moderating Effect of Nation State Innovative Forms of Organizing - Leona Achtenhagen and Leif Melin Managing the Homogeneity-Heterogeneity Duality PART FOUR: CONCLUSION Innovative Forms of Organizing - Andrew M Pettigrew Progress Performance and Process Co-Producing Knowledge and the Challenges of International Collaborative Research - Andrew M Pettigrew
-
Andrew Pettigrew on Executives and Strategy: An Interview wtih Ken Starkey
European Management Journal, 2002Co-Authors: Andrew PettigrewAbstract:The fourth of our ‘Crosstalk: Interviews and Transatlantic Exchanges’, hosted by the European Management Journal and the Academy of Management Executive, features Andrew Pettigrew of Warwick University and Donald Hambrick of Columbia University, New York, two academics well-steeped in organizational change and innovation. Andrew Pettigrew has early experience in sociology and anthropology and brings to the study of organizational change and performance, and executives and strategy in corporations, a unique perspective strengthened by many projects in these fields. His most recent research is, in fact, transatlantic in nature, studying new forms of organization and performance in top US and European firms, as well as those in Japan. His interview has provoked energetic comments and reply which we publish in this issue of EMJ. Professor Pettigrew was questioned at Warwick by Kenneth Starkey of the University of Nottingham. Commentaries by Constantinos Markides and Andrew Van de Ven.
Emma Wilson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Standing the test of time
2016Co-Authors: Emma WilsonAbstract:Jim Pettigrew reflects on a whirlwind year of meeting remarkable and inspiring CAs around the world, and presiding over an Institute in great health and with a bright future
-
Jim Pettigrew: Collective wisdom in the ICAS family
2015Co-Authors: Emma WilsonAbstract:Jim Pettigrew on the power of sharing knowledge and experience, and the insights that can be gained from the ICAS mentoring programme
-
Bright future for accountancy as young CAs shine
2015Co-Authors: Emma WilsonAbstract:Jim Pettigrew is inspired by the changing profile of ICAS as young professionals join, attend events and use their skills for the greater good.
-
Why CAs will never be replaced by robots
2015Co-Authors: Emma WilsonAbstract:The automation of repetitive ‘bean-counting’ tasks enables CAs to move up the value chain, argues Jim Pettigrew | News | ICAS
-
When FDs speak, the wise should listen
2015Co-Authors: Emma WilsonAbstract:Jim Pettigrew considers what the Finance Directors' Survey results means for the profession
Dwight D. Simons - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Archaeological Investigations at Tucker Hill, Lake County, Oregon - eScholarship
Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 1999Co-Authors: James Hutchins, Dwight D. SimonsAbstract:Tucker Hill is located in the Lake Abert- Chewaucan Marsh Basin in Lake County, Oregon. In 1995, as part of the requirements associated with the permitting process for a mining company to conduct a perlite quarrying operation, the authors conducted a cultural resources inventory of the upper slopes and top of Tucker Hill (Hutchins 1995), as well as a program of archaeological testing for 13 sites located on and around Tucker Hill (Hutchins et al. 1996). Evidence derived from archaeological survey and site testing provided what the authors believe to be a representative view of the types of sites occurring on the Tucker Hill landform. Studies of lowland sites in the Lake Abert-Chewaucan Marsh Basin have been conducted by Oetting and Pettigrew (1985, 1987), Pettigrew (1985), and Oetting (1988, 1989,1990a, 1990b), but this investigation of Tucker Hill is one of very few archaeological studies of upland sites in this vicinity.
-
Archaeological Investigations at Tucker Hill, Lake County, Oregon
Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 1999Co-Authors: James Hutchins, Dwight D. SimonsAbstract:Tucker Hill is located in the Lake Abert- Chewaucan Marsh Basin in Lake County, Oregon. In 1995, as part of the requirements associated with the permitting process for a mining company to conduct a perlite quarrying operation, the authors conducted a cultural resources inventory of the upper slopes and top of Tucker Hill (Hutchins 1995), as well as a program of archaeological testing for 13 sites located on and around Tucker Hill (Hutchins et al. 1996). Evidence derived from archaeological survey and site testing provided what the authors believe to be a representative view of the types of sites occurring on the Tucker Hill landform. Studies of lowland sites in the Lake Abert-Chewaucan Marsh Basin have been conducted by Oetting and Pettigrew (1985, 1987), Pettigrew (1985), and Oetting (1988, 1989,1990a, 1990b), but this investigation of Tucker Hill is one of very few archaeological studies of upland sites in this vicinity.
John Wigglesworth - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Non-eliminative Structuralism, Fregean Abstraction, and Non-rigid Structures
Erkenntnis, 2018Co-Authors: John WigglesworthAbstract:Linnebo and Pettigrew (Philos Q 64:267–283, 2014) have recently developed a version of non-eliminative mathematical structuralism based on Fregean abstraction principles. They recognize that this version of structuralism is vulnerable to the well-known problem of non-rigid structures. This paper offers a solution to the problem for this version of structuralism. The solution involves expanding the languages used to describe mathematical structures. We then argue that this solution is philosophically acceptable to those who endorse mathematical structuralism based on Fregean abstraction principles.