The Experts below are selected from a list of 170562 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Pingping Weng - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Spatial differences in the influence of science Popularization resources development on the energy consumption carbon footprint in provincial regions of China
Energy Sustainability and Society, 2018Co-Authors: Gang Ding, Yu Ding, Pingping WengAbstract:BackgroundScience Popularization resources development is an important means to improve public scientific literacy and has a crucial influence on the formation of public consumption habits, patterns and concepts, and ultimately on the energy consumption carbon footprint.MethodsBased on panel data from the provincial regions in China from 2010 to 2014, this paper measures the energy consumption carbon footprint in provincial regions using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methods and builds a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to evaluate the levels of science Popularization resources development in provincial regions by using the global entropy method. Then, the mechanisms of influence on the energy consumption carbon footprint and the levels of science Popularization resources development in the provincial regions of China are analyzed and measured.ResultsThe results showed that science Popularization resources development could significantly lower the energy consumption carbon footprint; from 2010 to 2014, the lowering effect of science Popularization resources development on the energy consumption carbon footprint in the major east, middle, and west provincial regions showed a weakening trend, with a greater lowering amplitude in the east than in the middle and west regions and narrowing spatial differences among them; at present, this influence works best in the west region followed by the middle and east regions.ConclusionsThe results imply that we should give full attention to science Popularization resources development to lower the energy consumption carbon footprint in China. In addition, focus should be given to the west region of China and construction mechanisms for science Popularization resources that are built with flexible adoptions of means such as a combination of government guidance and market mechanisms, as well as joint construction by government and society.
Gang Ding - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Spatial differences in the influence of science Popularization resources development on the energy consumption carbon footprint in provincial regions of China
Energy Sustainability and Society, 2018Co-Authors: Gang Ding, Yu Ding, Pingping WengAbstract:BackgroundScience Popularization resources development is an important means to improve public scientific literacy and has a crucial influence on the formation of public consumption habits, patterns and concepts, and ultimately on the energy consumption carbon footprint.MethodsBased on panel data from the provincial regions in China from 2010 to 2014, this paper measures the energy consumption carbon footprint in provincial regions using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methods and builds a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to evaluate the levels of science Popularization resources development in provincial regions by using the global entropy method. Then, the mechanisms of influence on the energy consumption carbon footprint and the levels of science Popularization resources development in the provincial regions of China are analyzed and measured.ResultsThe results showed that science Popularization resources development could significantly lower the energy consumption carbon footprint; from 2010 to 2014, the lowering effect of science Popularization resources development on the energy consumption carbon footprint in the major east, middle, and west provincial regions showed a weakening trend, with a greater lowering amplitude in the east than in the middle and west regions and narrowing spatial differences among them; at present, this influence works best in the west region followed by the middle and east regions.ConclusionsThe results imply that we should give full attention to science Popularization resources development to lower the energy consumption carbon footprint in China. In addition, focus should be given to the west region of China and construction mechanisms for science Popularization resources that are built with flexible adoptions of means such as a combination of government guidance and market mechanisms, as well as joint construction by government and society.
Yu Ding - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Spatial differences in the influence of science Popularization resources development on the energy consumption carbon footprint in provincial regions of China
Energy Sustainability and Society, 2018Co-Authors: Gang Ding, Yu Ding, Pingping WengAbstract:BackgroundScience Popularization resources development is an important means to improve public scientific literacy and has a crucial influence on the formation of public consumption habits, patterns and concepts, and ultimately on the energy consumption carbon footprint.MethodsBased on panel data from the provincial regions in China from 2010 to 2014, this paper measures the energy consumption carbon footprint in provincial regions using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methods and builds a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to evaluate the levels of science Popularization resources development in provincial regions by using the global entropy method. Then, the mechanisms of influence on the energy consumption carbon footprint and the levels of science Popularization resources development in the provincial regions of China are analyzed and measured.ResultsThe results showed that science Popularization resources development could significantly lower the energy consumption carbon footprint; from 2010 to 2014, the lowering effect of science Popularization resources development on the energy consumption carbon footprint in the major east, middle, and west provincial regions showed a weakening trend, with a greater lowering amplitude in the east than in the middle and west regions and narrowing spatial differences among them; at present, this influence works best in the west region followed by the middle and east regions.ConclusionsThe results imply that we should give full attention to science Popularization resources development to lower the energy consumption carbon footprint in China. In addition, focus should be given to the west region of China and construction mechanisms for science Popularization resources that are built with flexible adoptions of means such as a combination of government guidance and market mechanisms, as well as joint construction by government and society.
Pablo Jensen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Popularization by argentine researchers the activities and motivations of conicet scientists
Public Understanding of Science, 2011Co-Authors: Pablo Kreimer, Luciano Levin, Pablo JensenAbstract:This paper presents the findings of a survey on Popularization activities by 1700 scientists in Argentina. The tool used for this research was a questionnaire containing 21 questions on discipline, age, status in hierarchy, intensity of Popularization activity, motives, difficulties and opinions on public issues and science policy. Our analysis of the data shows that patterns of public Popularization in Argentina do not substantially differ from those found in two advanced countries, namely France and the United Kingdom. This situation contrasts with the strong differences found in research practices in “central” and “peripheral” countries.
-
CNRS researchers' Popularization activities: a progress report
Journal of Science Communication, 2007Co-Authors: Pablo Jensen, Yves CroissantAbstract:We have analyzed the Popularization activities undertaken by ten thousand CNRS researchers by means of their annual reports for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. This is the first time that such an extensive statistical study on science Popularization practices is carried out. Our main findings are : - the majority of researchers is not involved in Popularization (51% has not done any Popularization over the three-year period, two thirds have been involved in no more than one Popularization action). - Popularization practices are extremely diverse, both at the individual level (we have identified three subpopulations that feature distinctive attitudes towards Popularization), and at the level of scientific disciplines (researchers in Humanities are twice as active as the average), as well as in laboratories or geographical regions. - the number of actions reported in 2005 greatly increased compared to 2004 (+ 26%), while they slightly diminished in 2006.
Patrycja Juszczyk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the tourism sector s development and Popularization of sharing economy the impact on cooperation
2020Co-Authors: Dagmara Wójcik, Patrycja Klimas, Katarzyna Czernekmarszalek, Patrycja JuszczykAbstract:The paper aims at analyzing the role of acceleration of tourism sector development (observable due to the Popularization of SE) in intra-sectoral cooperation. To test the above assumption, we carried out the quantitative research on 368 randomly selected Polish tourism companies. The positive impact of acceleration of tourism sector’s development on intra-sectoral cooperation was identified using two separate analytical approaches, i.e., regression analysis and structural equation modeling. The results show that the influence is significant and positive, however, rather weak. Furthermore, it seems that intra-sectoral cooperation is driven rather by the acceleration of tourism sector’s development conditioned either by Popularization of ICT or by tourism companies’ development than by the acceleration of tourism sector conditioned either by Popularization of experience tourism or by development of tourism companies’ innovation outputs.
-
The Tourism Sector’s Development and Popularization of Sharing Economy. The Impact on Cooperation
Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0, 2019Co-Authors: Dagmara Wójcik, Patrycja Klimas, Katarzyna Czernek-marszałek, Patrycja JuszczykAbstract:The paper aims at analyzing the role of acceleration of tourism sector development (observable due to the Popularization of SE) in intra-sectoral cooperation. To test the above assumption, we carried out the quantitative research on 368 randomly selected Polish tourism companies. The positive impact of acceleration of tourism sector’s development on intra-sectoral cooperation was identified using two separate analytical approaches, i.e., regression analysis and structural equation modeling. The results show that the influence is significant and positive, however, rather weak. Furthermore, it seems that intra-sectoral cooperation is driven rather by the acceleration of tourism sector’s development conditioned either by Popularization of ICT or by tourism companies’ development than by the acceleration of tourism sector conditioned either by Popularization of experience tourism or by development of tourism companies’ innovation outputs.
