The Experts below are selected from a list of 3828 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Kapil Chandra Agarwal - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
powerful scientific Projective Technique kaneha tir ψ uses an integrated and intensified ψ entangled quantum computing
International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2016Co-Authors: Kapil Chandra AgarwalAbstract:We present scientific basis of Kapil-Neha Total Internal Reflection Quantum Mechanical Projection Wave function Ψ Technique (KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique). KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique uses an integrated computing approach of quantum entanglement for brain’s functioning, programming, training and development. This Technique simultaneously stimulates and applies forces/correlations on trillions of elements of fine neural networks of different sections of human brain. As a result, those elements process/entangle/correlate information among each other by ‘intensified and integrated quantum-mechanical evanescent wave tunnelling of their neuro-energy wave function potentials into neighbouring neurons and cerebrospinal fluid. This Technique is so powerful that under healthy environmental conditions – it can even regenerate/repair brain’s undeveloped/damaged neuron fine tissues/ neural-network. Experiments suggest that under suitable conditions of quantum-growth, KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique has shown neurogenesis ‘possible’ even in adulthood age. KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique is a revolutionary invention in the field of quantum-biophysics, mental-assessment, clinical-diagnosis, quantum-entanglement, quantum super-computing, neurogenesis, and non-destructive medical surgeries. It also provides ‘firm-evidences’ about quantum computing nature of human brain using electromagnetic wave signals.
-
Powerful Scientific Projective Technique KANEHA-TIR-Ψ uses an “Integrated and Intensified-Ψ Entangled Quantum Computing”
2016Co-Authors: Kapil Chandra AgarwalAbstract:We present scientific basis of Kapil-Neha Total Internal Reflection Quantum Mechanical Projection Wave function Ψ Technique (KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique). KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique uses an integrated computing approach of quantum entanglement for brain’s functioning, programming, training and development. This Technique simultaneously stimulates and applies forces/correlations on trillions of elements of fine neural networks of different sections of human brain. As a result, those elements process/entangle/correlate information among each other by ‘intensified and integrated quantum-mechanical evanescent wave tunnelling of their neuro-energy wave function potentials into neighbouring neurons and cerebrospinal fluid. This Technique is so powerful that under healthy environmental conditions – it can even regenerate/repair brain’s undeveloped/damaged neuron fine tissues/ neural-network. Experiments suggest that under suitable conditions of quantum-growth, KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique has shown neurogenesis ‘possible’ even in adulthood age. KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique is a revolutionary invention in the field of quantum-biophysics, mental-assessment, clinical-diagnosis, quantum-entanglement, quantum super-computing, neurogenesis, and non-destructive medical surgeries. It also provides ‘firm-evidences’ about quantum computing nature of human brain using electromagnetic wave signals.
-
Powerful Projective Technique: KANEHA-TIR-Ψ
International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2016Co-Authors: Neha Agarwal, Kapil Chandra AgarwalAbstract:We present a new type of powerful Projective method called KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique. This Technique connects traditional projection methods with cognitive and affective domains of persons under projection by processes of introspection, total internal reflection (TIR), structuralism and gestaltism. The multiple TIR processes of thoughts, ideas and their repetitive modifications, synthesis using individual differences, analysis and evaluation by introspection, structuralism and gestaltism processes result into extremely purified and refined outputs. This Technique found very useful, result-oriented and productive for various kinds of diagnosis, personality measurements, personality development, training and brain programming purposes. i-KANEHA-TIR-Ψ Projective Technique delivered quite good, justified and reproducible results among different situations, environments, and cultures. We propose its industrial applications for designing branch-programmed instructions for training and assessments of academic and industrial professionals.
Maurizio Pompili - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Projective Technique testing approach to the understanding of psychological pain in suicidal and non suicidal psychiatric inpatients
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Isabella Berardelli, Salvatore Sarubbi, Alessandra Spagnoli, Chiara Fina, Elena Rogante, Denise Erbuto, Marco Innamorati, David Lester, Maurizio PompiliAbstract:Psychological pain is a core clinical factor for understanding suicide, independently from depression. The aim of this study is to assess the role of psychological pain on suicide risk and to evaluate the relationship between psychache and different psychiatric disorders. We conducted the present cross-sectional study on 291 inpatients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. We administered Shneidman’s Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (PPAS) for the assessment of mental pain and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) for the assessment of suicide risk. There was a significant association between current psychache and worst-ever psychache and suicide risk in inpatients affected by a depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Furthermore, we found a significant difference in current psychache between inpatients with major depressive disorder and inpatients with schizophrenia and in worst-ever psychache between inpatients with bipolar disorder and inpatients with schizophrenia, with lower scores in inpatients with schizophrenia. The assessment of psychache appears to be useful for predicting suicidal risk and should be used routinely for identifying and treating suicide risk in clinical practice.
Clive R Boddy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
from brand image research to teaching assessment using a Projective Technique borrowed from marketing research to aid an understanding of teaching effectiveness
Quality Assurance in Education, 2004Co-Authors: Clive R BoddyAbstract:This paper describes how a simple qualitative market research Technique using a Projective device called a bubble drawing can be used as a useful feedback device to gain an understanding of students' views of the teaching effectiveness of a market research lecture. Comparisons are made with feedback gained from teaching observations and insights drawn from this. Some areas for further research are suggested.
Kelly Andrews - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
i think other parents might using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol
Drug and Alcohol Review, 2015Co-Authors: Sandra C. Jones, Christopher A. Magee, Kelly AndrewsAbstract:Introduction and Aims A growing body of research indicates parental supply of alcohol to children and adolescents is common. The present study aimed to examine parents' reasons for supplying alcohol to adolescents that they may find hard to articulate or not be consciously aware of. Design and Methods A Projective methodology was used, whereby respondents were asked to explain the thoughts and motivations of a gender-matched parent in a scenario in which the parent did or did not provide alcohol to their teenage child. Respondents were 97 mothers and 83 fathers of teenagers who completed an anonymous online survey. Open-ended responses were coded thematically; t-tests were used to compare quantitative responses between the scenarios. Results The quantitative analysis found the parent who provided alcohol was less likely to be seen as making sure their child was safe and educating them about boundaries, but more likely to be seen as being a friend as well as a parent and (for females only) making sure their child fits in with others. The open-ended responses showed explanations for not providing alcohol most commonly focused on ensuring the child's safety, obeying the law, and setting rules and boundaries, and for providing alcohol focused on ensuring the child fit in with peers and beliefs about harm minimisation. Discussion and Conclusions The findings suggest that these respondents (parents) harboured a number of misperceptions about underage drinking and experienced conflicts in weighing up the perceived benefits of providing alcohol to their children against the risks of adolescent drinking. [Jones SC, Magee C, Andrews K. ‘I think other parents might. …’: Using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015;34:531–9]
-
'I think other parents might. …': Using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol.
Drug and alcohol review, 2015Co-Authors: Sandra C. Jones, Christopher A. Magee, Kelly AndrewsAbstract:Introduction and Aims A growing body of research indicates parental supply of alcohol to children and adolescents is common. The present study aimed to examine parents' reasons for supplying alcohol to adolescents that they may find hard to articulate or not be consciously aware of. Design and Methods A Projective methodology was used, whereby respondents were asked to explain the thoughts and motivations of a gender-matched parent in a scenario in which the parent did or did not provide alcohol to their teenage child. Respondents were 97 mothers and 83 fathers of teenagers who completed an anonymous online survey. Open-ended responses were coded thematically; t-tests were used to compare quantitative responses between the scenarios. Results The quantitative analysis found the parent who provided alcohol was less likely to be seen as making sure their child was safe and educating them about boundaries, but more likely to be seen as being a friend as well as a parent and (for females only) making sure their child fits in with others. The open-ended responses showed explanations for not providing alcohol most commonly focused on ensuring the child's safety, obeying the law, and setting rules and boundaries, and for providing alcohol focused on ensuring the child fit in with peers and beliefs about harm minimisation. Discussion and Conclusions The findings suggest that these respondents (parents) harboured a number of misperceptions about underage drinking and experienced conflicts in weighing up the perceived benefits of providing alcohol to their children against the risks of adolescent drinking. [Jones SC, Magee C, Andrews K. ‘I think other parents might. …’: Using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015;34:531–9]
Sandra C. Jones - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
i think other parents might using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol
Drug and Alcohol Review, 2015Co-Authors: Sandra C. Jones, Christopher A. Magee, Kelly AndrewsAbstract:Introduction and Aims A growing body of research indicates parental supply of alcohol to children and adolescents is common. The present study aimed to examine parents' reasons for supplying alcohol to adolescents that they may find hard to articulate or not be consciously aware of. Design and Methods A Projective methodology was used, whereby respondents were asked to explain the thoughts and motivations of a gender-matched parent in a scenario in which the parent did or did not provide alcohol to their teenage child. Respondents were 97 mothers and 83 fathers of teenagers who completed an anonymous online survey. Open-ended responses were coded thematically; t-tests were used to compare quantitative responses between the scenarios. Results The quantitative analysis found the parent who provided alcohol was less likely to be seen as making sure their child was safe and educating them about boundaries, but more likely to be seen as being a friend as well as a parent and (for females only) making sure their child fits in with others. The open-ended responses showed explanations for not providing alcohol most commonly focused on ensuring the child's safety, obeying the law, and setting rules and boundaries, and for providing alcohol focused on ensuring the child fit in with peers and beliefs about harm minimisation. Discussion and Conclusions The findings suggest that these respondents (parents) harboured a number of misperceptions about underage drinking and experienced conflicts in weighing up the perceived benefits of providing alcohol to their children against the risks of adolescent drinking. [Jones SC, Magee C, Andrews K. ‘I think other parents might. …’: Using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015;34:531–9]
-
'I think other parents might. …': Using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol.
Drug and alcohol review, 2015Co-Authors: Sandra C. Jones, Christopher A. Magee, Kelly AndrewsAbstract:Introduction and Aims A growing body of research indicates parental supply of alcohol to children and adolescents is common. The present study aimed to examine parents' reasons for supplying alcohol to adolescents that they may find hard to articulate or not be consciously aware of. Design and Methods A Projective methodology was used, whereby respondents were asked to explain the thoughts and motivations of a gender-matched parent in a scenario in which the parent did or did not provide alcohol to their teenage child. Respondents were 97 mothers and 83 fathers of teenagers who completed an anonymous online survey. Open-ended responses were coded thematically; t-tests were used to compare quantitative responses between the scenarios. Results The quantitative analysis found the parent who provided alcohol was less likely to be seen as making sure their child was safe and educating them about boundaries, but more likely to be seen as being a friend as well as a parent and (for females only) making sure their child fits in with others. The open-ended responses showed explanations for not providing alcohol most commonly focused on ensuring the child's safety, obeying the law, and setting rules and boundaries, and for providing alcohol focused on ensuring the child fit in with peers and beliefs about harm minimisation. Discussion and Conclusions The findings suggest that these respondents (parents) harboured a number of misperceptions about underage drinking and experienced conflicts in weighing up the perceived benefits of providing alcohol to their children against the risks of adolescent drinking. [Jones SC, Magee C, Andrews K. ‘I think other parents might. …’: Using a Projective Technique to explore parental supply of alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015;34:531–9]
-
motivational factors in the food buying behaviour of parents of pre school age children a Projective Technique study
2005Co-Authors: Gary I Noble, Sandra C. Jones, Danielle McvieAbstract:There is growing concern over childhood obesity levels around the world with many overweight children developing into obese adults. Research shows that the food choices of young children are determined largely by parents and that many parents are aware of what constitutes ‘healthy’ food yet continue to purchase ‘unhealthy’ food for their children’s consumption. This study explores this apparent paradox by identifying the motivations of parents of pre-school children in the purchase of both ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ food in the context of a supermarket shopping experience. Data was collected from 116 respondents using Projective story and photograph Techniques and then coded and analysed using the constant comparative method. What this study labels as ‘good parenting’ emerged as the main motivational force leading to the purchase of healthy food. In contrast, this study suggests the purchase of unhealthy “treats” or “bribes” is explained through the concept of ‘expediency’. Both good parenting and expediency have a number of dimensions that are capable of explaining variations in the food decisions of individual respondents in this study. Implications of the study’s findings are discussed in the context of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and an identification of the salient beliefs that may underlie the attitudes and behaviour of some parents. The paper concludes by suggesting that social marketing campaigns targeted at the belief structures of parents may have a far greater impact on the current childhood obesity problem than just nutritional education programs.
