The Experts below are selected from a list of 12297 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Nicholas S Vonortas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Intellectual Property Protection mechanisms in research partnerships
Research Policy, 2006Co-Authors: Henry R. Hertzfeld, Albert N. Link, Nicholas S VonortasAbstract:A set of US-based companies is investigated regarding the effectiveness of intellectual Property Protection mechanisms (IPPMs) in the formation of research partnerships. Patents are the most frequently used IPPM to protect both background and foreground knowledge in partnerships. Other IPPMs are used to protect know-how, especially in the early, forming stages of a partnership. Existing IP titles are quite useful when negotiating new partnerships. IPR negotiations are reported to be more complex in horizontal partnerships and when universities are involved. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
-
intellectual Property Protection mechanisms in research partnerships
Papers on Entrepreneurship Growth and Public Policy, 2004Co-Authors: Henry R. Hertzfeld, Albert N. Link, Nicholas S VonortasAbstract:A set of U.S.-based companies is investigated regarding the effectiveness of intellectual Property Protection mechanisms (IPPMs) in the formation of research partnerships. Patents are the most frequently used IPPM to protect both background and foreground knowledge in partnerships. Other IPPMs are used to protect know-how, especially in the early, forming stages of a partnership. Existing IP titles are quite useful when negotiating new partnerships. IPR negotiations are reported to be more complex in horizontal partnerships and when universities are involved.
S. Kanwar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Does intellectual Property Protection spur technological change?
Oxford Economic Papers, 2003Co-Authors: S. KanwarAbstract:Of the diverse factors motivating technological change, one factor that has received increasing attention in the recent past has been the Protection of intellectual Property rights. Given fairly recent changes in the international policy ethos where a regime of stronger intellectual Property Protection has become a fait accompli for most developing countries (and the developed too), it is of some significance to ask whether more stringent Protection of intellectual Property does indeed encourage innovation. And this is the question which this paper examines, utilising cross-country panel data on R&D investment, patent Protection and other country-specific characteristics spanning the period 1981-95. The evidence unambiguously indicates the significance of intellectual Property rights as incentives for spurring innovation.
Robert E Evenson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
does intellectual Property Protection spur technological change
Oxford Economic Papers, 2003Co-Authors: Sunil Kanwar, Robert E EvensonAbstract:Of the diverse factors motivating technological change, one factor that has received increasing attention in the recent past has been the Protection of intellectual Property rights. Given fairly recent changes in the international policy ethos where a regime of stronger intellectual Property Protection has become a fait accompli for most developing countries, it is of some significance to ask whether more stringent Protection of intellectual Property does indeed encourage innovation. And this is the question which this paper examines, utilising cross-country panel data on R&D investment, patent Protection and other country-specific characteristics spanning the period 1981-1990. The evidence unambiguously indicates the significance of intellectual Property rights as incentives for spurring innovation.
Sunil Kanwar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Location of Overseas Research and Development and Intellectual Property Protection
Journal of Development Studies, 2012Co-Authors: Sunil KanwarAbstract:Do multinationals distinguish between locations on the basis of the local intellectual Property laws, in conducting their overseas research and development? We seek to address this question using data on US multinationals spanning the period 1977--2004. Particular care is taken to capture the host location enforcement environment of intellectual Property Protection. For our sample and time frame, we find that stronger intellectual Property Protection is not important in determining overseas research and development by these multinationals. The results are robust to disaggregation of the Protection measure into its component indices, as well as to disaggregation of overseas research and development by industry. Instead, host country market size and human capital resources are found to be consistently important in explaining the location of overseas research and development.
-
does intellectual Property Protection spur technological change
Oxford Economic Papers, 2003Co-Authors: Sunil Kanwar, Robert E EvensonAbstract:Of the diverse factors motivating technological change, one factor that has received increasing attention in the recent past has been the Protection of intellectual Property rights. Given fairly recent changes in the international policy ethos where a regime of stronger intellectual Property Protection has become a fait accompli for most developing countries, it is of some significance to ask whether more stringent Protection of intellectual Property does indeed encourage innovation. And this is the question which this paper examines, utilising cross-country panel data on R&D investment, patent Protection and other country-specific characteristics spanning the period 1981-1990. The evidence unambiguously indicates the significance of intellectual Property rights as incentives for spurring innovation.
Henry R. Hertzfeld - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Intellectual Property Protection mechanisms in research partnerships
Research Policy, 2006Co-Authors: Henry R. Hertzfeld, Albert N. Link, Nicholas S VonortasAbstract:A set of US-based companies is investigated regarding the effectiveness of intellectual Property Protection mechanisms (IPPMs) in the formation of research partnerships. Patents are the most frequently used IPPM to protect both background and foreground knowledge in partnerships. Other IPPMs are used to protect know-how, especially in the early, forming stages of a partnership. Existing IP titles are quite useful when negotiating new partnerships. IPR negotiations are reported to be more complex in horizontal partnerships and when universities are involved. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
-
intellectual Property Protection mechanisms in research partnerships
Papers on Entrepreneurship Growth and Public Policy, 2004Co-Authors: Henry R. Hertzfeld, Albert N. Link, Nicholas S VonortasAbstract:A set of U.S.-based companies is investigated regarding the effectiveness of intellectual Property Protection mechanisms (IPPMs) in the formation of research partnerships. Patents are the most frequently used IPPM to protect both background and foreground knowledge in partnerships. Other IPPMs are used to protect know-how, especially in the early, forming stages of a partnership. Existing IP titles are quite useful when negotiating new partnerships. IPR negotiations are reported to be more complex in horizontal partnerships and when universities are involved.
