The Experts below are selected from a list of 312 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Benjamin N Breyer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Pubic Hair grooming and sexually transmitted infections a clinic based cross sectional survey
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2020Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Kirkpatrick B Fergus, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Benjamin Cedars, Anthony Enriquez, Nnenaya A Mmonu, Stephanie E Cohen, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:BACKGROUND: Pubic Hair grooming has been correlated with a self-reported history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We examined this relationship further in a cross-sectional survey of patients attending an urban STI clinic in San Francisco in 2018. METHODS: Pubic Hair grooming practices and detailed sexual histories were obtained. Sexually transmitted infections were confirmed via laboratory diagnosis or physical examination by a licensed provider. RESULTS: 314 individuals completed the survey. The median age of participants was 31. In total, there were 247 (80%) men, 58 (19%) women, and five (2%) transgender participants. Of the 247 men, 177 (72%) identified as gay or bisexual. 257/314 (82%) patients reported Pubic Hair grooming within the past three months. Seventy-eight (25%) patients were diagnosed with a new STI during their visit. There were no significant associations between reporting any anal or genital grooming and being diagnosed with an STI. However, anal groomers were three times as likely to be diagnosed with a rectal STI after adjustment (aOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.5) compared to genital only groomers and non-groomers. Participants who report removing all of their Pubic Hair more than six times within the past year had higher prevalence of genital STIs (33.3% 6-10 times; 28.6% >10 times) compared to participants who never groom all of their Pubic Hair (15.3%, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between recent grooming and genital STIs. Anal grooming was associated with rectal STIs in gay and bisexual men.
-
prevalence of Pubic Hair grooming related injuries and identification of high risk individuals in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2017Co-Authors: Matthew D Truesdale, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Isabel E Allen, Molly Elmerdewitt, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Importance Pubic Hair grooming is a common practice that can lead to injury and morbidity. Objective To identify demographic and behavioral risk factors associated with Pubic Hair grooming–related injuries to characterize individuals with high risk of injury and develop recommendations for safe grooming practices. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study conducted a national survey of noninstitutionalized US adults (aged 18-65 years). The web-based survey was conducted through a probability-based web panel designed to be representative of the US population. Data were collected in January 2014 and analyzed from August 1, 2016, through February 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Grooming-related injury history (yes or no), high-frequency injuries (>5 lifetime injuries), and injury requiring medical attention. Results Among the 7570 participants who completed the survey (4198 men [55.5%] and 3372 women [44.5%]; mean (SD) age, 41.9 [18.9] years), 5674 of 7456 (76.1%) reported a history of grooming (66.5% of men and 85.3% of women [weighted percentages]). Grooming-related injury was reported by 1430 groomers (weighted prevalence, 25.6%), with more women sustaining an injury than men (868 [27.1%] vs 562 [23.7%];P = .01). Laceration was the most common injury sustained (818 [61.2%]), followed by burn (307 [23.0%]) and rashes (163 [12.2%]). Common areas for grooming-related injury for men were the scrotum (378 [67.2%]), penis (196 [34.8%]), and pubis (162 [28.9%]); for women, the pubis (445 [51.3%]), inner thigh (340 [44.9%]), labia majora (369 [42.5%]), and perineum (115 [13.2%]). After adjustment for age, duration of grooming, Hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequency, men who removed all their Pubic Hair 11 times or more during their lifespan had an increased risk for grooming injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.28-3.01;P = .002) and were prone to repeated high-frequency injuries (AOR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.01-7.52;P Conclusions and Relevance Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing all Pubic Hair) are independent risk factors for injury. The present data may help identify injury-prone groomers and lead to safer grooming practices.
-
prevalence and motivation Pubic Hair grooming among men in the united states
American Journal of Men's Health, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Tami S Rowen, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular Pubic Hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their Pubic Hair groom the Hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, Pubic Hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of Pubic Hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.
-
correlation between Pubic Hair grooming and stis results from a nationally representative probability sample
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Matthew D Truesdale, Isabel E Allen, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Objective STIs are the most common infections among adults. Concurrently, Pubic Hair grooming is prevalent. Small-scale studies have demonstrated a relationship between Pubic Hair grooming and STIs. We aim to examine this relationship in a large sample of men and women. Design We conducted a probability survey of US residents aged 18–65 years. The survey ascertained self-reported Pubic Hair grooming practices, sexual behaviours and STI history. We defined extreme grooming as removal of all Pubic Hair more than 11 times per year and high-frequency grooming as daily/weekly trimming. Cutaneous STIs included herpes, human papillomavirus, syphilis and molluscum. Secretory STIs included gonorrhoea, chlamydia and HIV. We analysed lice separately. Results Of 7580 respondents who completed the survey, 74% reported grooming their Pubic Hair, 66% of men and 84% of women. After adjusting for age and lifetime sexual partners, ever having groomed was positively associated with a history of self-reported STIs (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2), including cutaneous STIs (OR 2.6; CI 1.8 to 3.7), secretory STIs (OR 1.7; CI 1.3 to 2.2) and lice (OR 1.9; CI 1.3 to 2.9). These positive associations were stronger for extreme groomers (OR 4.4; CI 2.9 to 6.8) and high-frequency groomers (OR 3.5; CI 2.3 to 5.4) with cutaneous STIs, and for non-extreme groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.0) and low-frequency groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.1) with lice. Conclusions Among a representative sample of US residents, Pubic Hair grooming was positively related to self-reported STI history. Further research is warranted to gain insight into STI risk-reduction strategies.
-
Pubic Hair grooming prevalence and motivation among women in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2016Co-Authors: Tami S Rowen, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is an increasingly prevalent trend. Several studies have sought to characterize its prevalence, associated demographics, and motivations.To characterize current Pubic Hair grooming practices in the United States.In this cross-sectional study, a nationally representative survey was conducted in January 2013 of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States via the GfK Group (formerly Knowledge Networks) panel members. Data analysis was performed from November to December 2015.A questionnaire examining Pubic Hair grooming habits.Demographic characteristics and motivations associated with Pubic Hair grooming.A total of 3372 women were surveyed. Fifty-six women did not answer the grooming question; consequently, 3316 women were included in the analysis. Of these women, 2778 (83.8%) reported Pubic Hair grooming and 538 (16.2%) reported never grooming. On multivariate regression, several factors associated with grooming were found. When compared with younger women (aged 18-24 years), women aged 45 through 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.49; P = .01) and those older than 55 years (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.34; P = .003) were significantly less likely to groom. Women with some college (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.65-6.84; P = .001) or a bachelor's degree (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.17-4.88; P = .02) were more likely to have groomed. Race was also significantly associated with grooming, with all groups reporting less grooming when compared with white women. No association was found between grooming and income, relationship status, or geographic location.This study provides a nationally representative assessment of contemporary female Pubic Hair grooming habits. Demographic differences in grooming were found, which may reflect cultural variations in preference related to Pubic Hair. Health care professionals and those who provide grooming services can use this information to better counsel patients and understand grooming practices.
Thomas W Gaither - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Pubic Hair grooming and sexually transmitted infections a clinic based cross sectional survey
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2020Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Kirkpatrick B Fergus, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Benjamin Cedars, Anthony Enriquez, Nnenaya A Mmonu, Stephanie E Cohen, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:BACKGROUND: Pubic Hair grooming has been correlated with a self-reported history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We examined this relationship further in a cross-sectional survey of patients attending an urban STI clinic in San Francisco in 2018. METHODS: Pubic Hair grooming practices and detailed sexual histories were obtained. Sexually transmitted infections were confirmed via laboratory diagnosis or physical examination by a licensed provider. RESULTS: 314 individuals completed the survey. The median age of participants was 31. In total, there were 247 (80%) men, 58 (19%) women, and five (2%) transgender participants. Of the 247 men, 177 (72%) identified as gay or bisexual. 257/314 (82%) patients reported Pubic Hair grooming within the past three months. Seventy-eight (25%) patients were diagnosed with a new STI during their visit. There were no significant associations between reporting any anal or genital grooming and being diagnosed with an STI. However, anal groomers were three times as likely to be diagnosed with a rectal STI after adjustment (aOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.5) compared to genital only groomers and non-groomers. Participants who report removing all of their Pubic Hair more than six times within the past year had higher prevalence of genital STIs (33.3% 6-10 times; 28.6% >10 times) compared to participants who never groom all of their Pubic Hair (15.3%, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between recent grooming and genital STIs. Anal grooming was associated with rectal STIs in gay and bisexual men.
-
prevalence of Pubic Hair grooming related injuries and identification of high risk individuals in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2017Co-Authors: Matthew D Truesdale, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Isabel E Allen, Molly Elmerdewitt, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Importance Pubic Hair grooming is a common practice that can lead to injury and morbidity. Objective To identify demographic and behavioral risk factors associated with Pubic Hair grooming–related injuries to characterize individuals with high risk of injury and develop recommendations for safe grooming practices. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study conducted a national survey of noninstitutionalized US adults (aged 18-65 years). The web-based survey was conducted through a probability-based web panel designed to be representative of the US population. Data were collected in January 2014 and analyzed from August 1, 2016, through February 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Grooming-related injury history (yes or no), high-frequency injuries (>5 lifetime injuries), and injury requiring medical attention. Results Among the 7570 participants who completed the survey (4198 men [55.5%] and 3372 women [44.5%]; mean (SD) age, 41.9 [18.9] years), 5674 of 7456 (76.1%) reported a history of grooming (66.5% of men and 85.3% of women [weighted percentages]). Grooming-related injury was reported by 1430 groomers (weighted prevalence, 25.6%), with more women sustaining an injury than men (868 [27.1%] vs 562 [23.7%];P = .01). Laceration was the most common injury sustained (818 [61.2%]), followed by burn (307 [23.0%]) and rashes (163 [12.2%]). Common areas for grooming-related injury for men were the scrotum (378 [67.2%]), penis (196 [34.8%]), and pubis (162 [28.9%]); for women, the pubis (445 [51.3%]), inner thigh (340 [44.9%]), labia majora (369 [42.5%]), and perineum (115 [13.2%]). After adjustment for age, duration of grooming, Hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequency, men who removed all their Pubic Hair 11 times or more during their lifespan had an increased risk for grooming injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.28-3.01;P = .002) and were prone to repeated high-frequency injuries (AOR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.01-7.52;P Conclusions and Relevance Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing all Pubic Hair) are independent risk factors for injury. The present data may help identify injury-prone groomers and lead to safer grooming practices.
-
prevalence and motivation Pubic Hair grooming among men in the united states
American Journal of Men's Health, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Tami S Rowen, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular Pubic Hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their Pubic Hair groom the Hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, Pubic Hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of Pubic Hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.
-
correlation between Pubic Hair grooming and stis results from a nationally representative probability sample
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Matthew D Truesdale, Isabel E Allen, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Objective STIs are the most common infections among adults. Concurrently, Pubic Hair grooming is prevalent. Small-scale studies have demonstrated a relationship between Pubic Hair grooming and STIs. We aim to examine this relationship in a large sample of men and women. Design We conducted a probability survey of US residents aged 18–65 years. The survey ascertained self-reported Pubic Hair grooming practices, sexual behaviours and STI history. We defined extreme grooming as removal of all Pubic Hair more than 11 times per year and high-frequency grooming as daily/weekly trimming. Cutaneous STIs included herpes, human papillomavirus, syphilis and molluscum. Secretory STIs included gonorrhoea, chlamydia and HIV. We analysed lice separately. Results Of 7580 respondents who completed the survey, 74% reported grooming their Pubic Hair, 66% of men and 84% of women. After adjusting for age and lifetime sexual partners, ever having groomed was positively associated with a history of self-reported STIs (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2), including cutaneous STIs (OR 2.6; CI 1.8 to 3.7), secretory STIs (OR 1.7; CI 1.3 to 2.2) and lice (OR 1.9; CI 1.3 to 2.9). These positive associations were stronger for extreme groomers (OR 4.4; CI 2.9 to 6.8) and high-frequency groomers (OR 3.5; CI 2.3 to 5.4) with cutaneous STIs, and for non-extreme groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.0) and low-frequency groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.1) with lice. Conclusions Among a representative sample of US residents, Pubic Hair grooming was positively related to self-reported STI history. Further research is warranted to gain insight into STI risk-reduction strategies.
-
Pubic Hair grooming prevalence and motivation among women in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2016Co-Authors: Tami S Rowen, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is an increasingly prevalent trend. Several studies have sought to characterize its prevalence, associated demographics, and motivations.To characterize current Pubic Hair grooming practices in the United States.In this cross-sectional study, a nationally representative survey was conducted in January 2013 of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States via the GfK Group (formerly Knowledge Networks) panel members. Data analysis was performed from November to December 2015.A questionnaire examining Pubic Hair grooming habits.Demographic characteristics and motivations associated with Pubic Hair grooming.A total of 3372 women were surveyed. Fifty-six women did not answer the grooming question; consequently, 3316 women were included in the analysis. Of these women, 2778 (83.8%) reported Pubic Hair grooming and 538 (16.2%) reported never grooming. On multivariate regression, several factors associated with grooming were found. When compared with younger women (aged 18-24 years), women aged 45 through 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.49; P = .01) and those older than 55 years (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.34; P = .003) were significantly less likely to groom. Women with some college (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.65-6.84; P = .001) or a bachelor's degree (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.17-4.88; P = .02) were more likely to have groomed. Race was also significantly associated with grooming, with all groups reporting less grooming when compared with white women. No association was found between grooming and income, relationship status, or geographic location.This study provides a nationally representative assessment of contemporary female Pubic Hair grooming habits. Demographic differences in grooming were found, which may reflect cultural variations in preference related to Pubic Hair. Health care professionals and those who provide grooming services can use this information to better counsel patients and understand grooming practices.
Charles E Osterberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
prevalence of Pubic Hair grooming related injuries and identification of high risk individuals in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2017Co-Authors: Matthew D Truesdale, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Isabel E Allen, Molly Elmerdewitt, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Importance Pubic Hair grooming is a common practice that can lead to injury and morbidity. Objective To identify demographic and behavioral risk factors associated with Pubic Hair grooming–related injuries to characterize individuals with high risk of injury and develop recommendations for safe grooming practices. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study conducted a national survey of noninstitutionalized US adults (aged 18-65 years). The web-based survey was conducted through a probability-based web panel designed to be representative of the US population. Data were collected in January 2014 and analyzed from August 1, 2016, through February 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Grooming-related injury history (yes or no), high-frequency injuries (>5 lifetime injuries), and injury requiring medical attention. Results Among the 7570 participants who completed the survey (4198 men [55.5%] and 3372 women [44.5%]; mean (SD) age, 41.9 [18.9] years), 5674 of 7456 (76.1%) reported a history of grooming (66.5% of men and 85.3% of women [weighted percentages]). Grooming-related injury was reported by 1430 groomers (weighted prevalence, 25.6%), with more women sustaining an injury than men (868 [27.1%] vs 562 [23.7%];P = .01). Laceration was the most common injury sustained (818 [61.2%]), followed by burn (307 [23.0%]) and rashes (163 [12.2%]). Common areas for grooming-related injury for men were the scrotum (378 [67.2%]), penis (196 [34.8%]), and pubis (162 [28.9%]); for women, the pubis (445 [51.3%]), inner thigh (340 [44.9%]), labia majora (369 [42.5%]), and perineum (115 [13.2%]). After adjustment for age, duration of grooming, Hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequency, men who removed all their Pubic Hair 11 times or more during their lifespan had an increased risk for grooming injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.28-3.01;P = .002) and were prone to repeated high-frequency injuries (AOR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.01-7.52;P Conclusions and Relevance Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing all Pubic Hair) are independent risk factors for injury. The present data may help identify injury-prone groomers and lead to safer grooming practices.
-
prevalence and motivation Pubic Hair grooming among men in the united states
American Journal of Men's Health, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Tami S Rowen, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular Pubic Hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their Pubic Hair groom the Hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, Pubic Hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of Pubic Hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.
-
correlation between Pubic Hair grooming and stis results from a nationally representative probability sample
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Matthew D Truesdale, Isabel E Allen, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Objective STIs are the most common infections among adults. Concurrently, Pubic Hair grooming is prevalent. Small-scale studies have demonstrated a relationship between Pubic Hair grooming and STIs. We aim to examine this relationship in a large sample of men and women. Design We conducted a probability survey of US residents aged 18–65 years. The survey ascertained self-reported Pubic Hair grooming practices, sexual behaviours and STI history. We defined extreme grooming as removal of all Pubic Hair more than 11 times per year and high-frequency grooming as daily/weekly trimming. Cutaneous STIs included herpes, human papillomavirus, syphilis and molluscum. Secretory STIs included gonorrhoea, chlamydia and HIV. We analysed lice separately. Results Of 7580 respondents who completed the survey, 74% reported grooming their Pubic Hair, 66% of men and 84% of women. After adjusting for age and lifetime sexual partners, ever having groomed was positively associated with a history of self-reported STIs (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2), including cutaneous STIs (OR 2.6; CI 1.8 to 3.7), secretory STIs (OR 1.7; CI 1.3 to 2.2) and lice (OR 1.9; CI 1.3 to 2.9). These positive associations were stronger for extreme groomers (OR 4.4; CI 2.9 to 6.8) and high-frequency groomers (OR 3.5; CI 2.3 to 5.4) with cutaneous STIs, and for non-extreme groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.0) and low-frequency groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.1) with lice. Conclusions Among a representative sample of US residents, Pubic Hair grooming was positively related to self-reported STI history. Further research is warranted to gain insight into STI risk-reduction strategies.
-
Pubic Hair grooming prevalence and motivation among women in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2016Co-Authors: Tami S Rowen, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is an increasingly prevalent trend. Several studies have sought to characterize its prevalence, associated demographics, and motivations.To characterize current Pubic Hair grooming practices in the United States.In this cross-sectional study, a nationally representative survey was conducted in January 2013 of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States via the GfK Group (formerly Knowledge Networks) panel members. Data analysis was performed from November to December 2015.A questionnaire examining Pubic Hair grooming habits.Demographic characteristics and motivations associated with Pubic Hair grooming.A total of 3372 women were surveyed. Fifty-six women did not answer the grooming question; consequently, 3316 women were included in the analysis. Of these women, 2778 (83.8%) reported Pubic Hair grooming and 538 (16.2%) reported never grooming. On multivariate regression, several factors associated with grooming were found. When compared with younger women (aged 18-24 years), women aged 45 through 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.49; P = .01) and those older than 55 years (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.34; P = .003) were significantly less likely to groom. Women with some college (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.65-6.84; P = .001) or a bachelor's degree (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.17-4.88; P = .02) were more likely to have groomed. Race was also significantly associated with grooming, with all groups reporting less grooming when compared with white women. No association was found between grooming and income, relationship status, or geographic location.This study provides a nationally representative assessment of contemporary female Pubic Hair grooming habits. Demographic differences in grooming were found, which may reflect cultural variations in preference related to Pubic Hair. Health care professionals and those who provide grooming services can use this information to better counsel patients and understand grooming practices.
-
035 prevalence and motivation for Pubic Hair removal among women in the united states
The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2016Co-Authors: Tami S Rowen, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular Pubic Hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their Pubic Hair groom the Hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, Pubic Hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of Pubic Hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.
Jan Deprest - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
to shave or not to shave Pubic Hair removal and its association with relational and sexual satisfaction in women and men
The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2019Co-Authors: Paul Enzlin, Kaat Bollen, Sofia Prekatsounaki, Liesbeth Hidalgo, Leen Aerts, Jan DeprestAbstract:Abstract Background Pubic Hair removal (PHR) is a widespread practice that entails certain health risks; however, there remains a lack of scientific information on the prevalence and antecedents of PHR, as well as on its association with sexual behavior and relational satisfaction. Aims To explore women’s and men’s attitudes regarding PHR and their PHR practices and the associations with demographic, relational, and sexual characteristics. Methods A total of 2,687 men and 1,735 women living in Flanders (the Northern part of Belgium) completed an online survey. Participants ranged in age from 15 to 60+ years; they self-identified as heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual and reported various relationship statuses. Main Outcome Measures Demographic items (ie, age, religion, partner relationship status), sexuality-related items (ie, sexual activity, sexual orientation, age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners), PHR items (ie, reasons, inclination to have or not have sex after PHR, perceived partner preferences, partner’s PHR), and relationship satisfaction, assessed with the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire. Results Fewer men (39.1%) than women (80.3%) reported (partially) removing their Pubic Hair. In both men and women, the practice was associated with age, sexual activity, relationship status, and partner’s PHR practice and expectations. In men, sexual and relationship satisfaction were correlated with their partner’s PHR practices and whether these were in line with the men’s expectations. In women, sexual and relationship satisfaction were mostly correlated with whether both partner’s expectations were met. Although both men and women reported that the reasons for PHR were related to their sexual experiences and to their partner’s preference, only women reported that PHR was a way to enhance feelings of femininity. Finally, the reasons for not engaging in PHR were related to partner preferences and side effects. Conclusion PHR is a widespread practice and seems strongly associated with personal, partner-related, sexual, and relational factors. Strategies to prevent men and women from being confronted with health risks should take all these factors into account. Enzlin P, Bollen K, Prekatsounaki S, et al. “To Shave or Not to Shave”: Pubic Hair Removal and Its Association with Relational and Sexual Satisfaction in Women and Men. J Sex Med 2019;16:954–962.
Mohannad A Awad - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
prevalence of Pubic Hair grooming related injuries and identification of high risk individuals in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2017Co-Authors: Matthew D Truesdale, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Isabel E Allen, Molly Elmerdewitt, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Importance Pubic Hair grooming is a common practice that can lead to injury and morbidity. Objective To identify demographic and behavioral risk factors associated with Pubic Hair grooming–related injuries to characterize individuals with high risk of injury and develop recommendations for safe grooming practices. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study conducted a national survey of noninstitutionalized US adults (aged 18-65 years). The web-based survey was conducted through a probability-based web panel designed to be representative of the US population. Data were collected in January 2014 and analyzed from August 1, 2016, through February 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Grooming-related injury history (yes or no), high-frequency injuries (>5 lifetime injuries), and injury requiring medical attention. Results Among the 7570 participants who completed the survey (4198 men [55.5%] and 3372 women [44.5%]; mean (SD) age, 41.9 [18.9] years), 5674 of 7456 (76.1%) reported a history of grooming (66.5% of men and 85.3% of women [weighted percentages]). Grooming-related injury was reported by 1430 groomers (weighted prevalence, 25.6%), with more women sustaining an injury than men (868 [27.1%] vs 562 [23.7%];P = .01). Laceration was the most common injury sustained (818 [61.2%]), followed by burn (307 [23.0%]) and rashes (163 [12.2%]). Common areas for grooming-related injury for men were the scrotum (378 [67.2%]), penis (196 [34.8%]), and pubis (162 [28.9%]); for women, the pubis (445 [51.3%]), inner thigh (340 [44.9%]), labia majora (369 [42.5%]), and perineum (115 [13.2%]). After adjustment for age, duration of grooming, Hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequency, men who removed all their Pubic Hair 11 times or more during their lifespan had an increased risk for grooming injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.28-3.01;P = .002) and were prone to repeated high-frequency injuries (AOR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.01-7.52;P Conclusions and Relevance Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing all Pubic Hair) are independent risk factors for injury. The present data may help identify injury-prone groomers and lead to safer grooming practices.
-
prevalence and motivation Pubic Hair grooming among men in the united states
American Journal of Men's Health, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Tami S Rowen, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular Pubic Hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their Pubic Hair groom the Hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, Pubic Hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of Pubic Hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.
-
correlation between Pubic Hair grooming and stis results from a nationally representative probability sample
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2017Co-Authors: Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Matthew D Truesdale, Isabel E Allen, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Objective STIs are the most common infections among adults. Concurrently, Pubic Hair grooming is prevalent. Small-scale studies have demonstrated a relationship between Pubic Hair grooming and STIs. We aim to examine this relationship in a large sample of men and women. Design We conducted a probability survey of US residents aged 18–65 years. The survey ascertained self-reported Pubic Hair grooming practices, sexual behaviours and STI history. We defined extreme grooming as removal of all Pubic Hair more than 11 times per year and high-frequency grooming as daily/weekly trimming. Cutaneous STIs included herpes, human papillomavirus, syphilis and molluscum. Secretory STIs included gonorrhoea, chlamydia and HIV. We analysed lice separately. Results Of 7580 respondents who completed the survey, 74% reported grooming their Pubic Hair, 66% of men and 84% of women. After adjusting for age and lifetime sexual partners, ever having groomed was positively associated with a history of self-reported STIs (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2), including cutaneous STIs (OR 2.6; CI 1.8 to 3.7), secretory STIs (OR 1.7; CI 1.3 to 2.2) and lice (OR 1.9; CI 1.3 to 2.9). These positive associations were stronger for extreme groomers (OR 4.4; CI 2.9 to 6.8) and high-frequency groomers (OR 3.5; CI 2.3 to 5.4) with cutaneous STIs, and for non-extreme groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.0) and low-frequency groomers (OR 2.0; CI 1.3 to 3.1) with lice. Conclusions Among a representative sample of US residents, Pubic Hair grooming was positively related to self-reported STI history. Further research is warranted to gain insight into STI risk-reduction strategies.
-
Pubic Hair grooming prevalence and motivation among women in the united states
JAMA Dermatology, 2016Co-Authors: Tami S Rowen, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is an increasingly prevalent trend. Several studies have sought to characterize its prevalence, associated demographics, and motivations.To characterize current Pubic Hair grooming practices in the United States.In this cross-sectional study, a nationally representative survey was conducted in January 2013 of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States via the GfK Group (formerly Knowledge Networks) panel members. Data analysis was performed from November to December 2015.A questionnaire examining Pubic Hair grooming habits.Demographic characteristics and motivations associated with Pubic Hair grooming.A total of 3372 women were surveyed. Fifty-six women did not answer the grooming question; consequently, 3316 women were included in the analysis. Of these women, 2778 (83.8%) reported Pubic Hair grooming and 538 (16.2%) reported never grooming. On multivariate regression, several factors associated with grooming were found. When compared with younger women (aged 18-24 years), women aged 45 through 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.49; P = .01) and those older than 55 years (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.34; P = .003) were significantly less likely to groom. Women with some college (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.65-6.84; P = .001) or a bachelor's degree (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.17-4.88; P = .02) were more likely to have groomed. Race was also significantly associated with grooming, with all groups reporting less grooming when compared with white women. No association was found between grooming and income, relationship status, or geographic location.This study provides a nationally representative assessment of contemporary female Pubic Hair grooming habits. Demographic differences in grooming were found, which may reflect cultural variations in preference related to Pubic Hair. Health care professionals and those who provide grooming services can use this information to better counsel patients and understand grooming practices.
-
035 prevalence and motivation for Pubic Hair removal among women in the united states
The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2016Co-Authors: Tami S Rowen, Thomas W Gaither, Mohannad A Awad, Charles E Osterberg, Alan W Shindel, Benjamin N BreyerAbstract:Pubic Hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular Pubic Hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their Pubic Hair groom the Hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, Pubic Hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of Pubic Hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.
