Publishing Process

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 3765 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Maureen L Ambrose - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • RETRACTED - Ethics and Integrity in the Publishing Process: Myths, Facts, and a Roadmap
    Management and Organization Review, 2020
    Co-Authors: Marshall Schminke, Maureen L Ambrose
    Abstract:

    Integrity provides the foundation for most scholarly endeavours, including research and Publishing. Authors, reviewers, and editors share responsibility for creating and maintaining the system in which we conduct and publish our work. However, research and Publishing are complicated Processes. A single research effort may involve multiple authors, hundreds of participants, and a variety of skills and tools that play out over the course of months or even years. Ethical challenges may arise at any point along the way, so it is not surprising that both new and experienced scholars often struggle to understand and maintain the ethical standards expected of them. This article highlights some of the main challenges scholars face and provides initial guidance for seeking solutions. But most importantly, it sets the stage for this Special Editors' Forum on research and Publishing ethics.

  • retraction statement for ethics and integrity of the Publishing Process myths facts and a roadmap by marshall schminke and maureen l ambrose
    Management and Organization Review, 2014
    Co-Authors: Anne S Tsui, Arie Y Lewin, Marshall Schminke, Maureen L Ambrose
    Abstract:

    The above article from Management and Organization Review , published online 7 SEP 2011, has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal's outgoing Editor-in-Chief Anne Tsui, the journal's incoming Editor-in-Chief Arie Y. Lewin, and John Wiley & Sons Asia Pty Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to unattributed overlap with work previously published in Academy of Management Review , 34(4): 586–591: ‘Editor's comments: The better angels of our nature – Ethics and integrity in Publishing Process’ by Marshall Schminke. The editors and authors joindy wrote a letter, available below, to explain the Process used to come to the retraction decision. The purpose of this letter is to explain the circumstances and reasons for the retraction of the paper ‘Ethics and integrity of the Publishing Process: Myths, facts, and a roadmap’ by Schminke and Ambrose in Management and Organization Review (MOR) , Volume 7 issue 3, pages 397 to 406, November 2011. Retraction of a published paper due to self-plagiarism is an unpleasant if not painful experience for both journal editors and authors. Self-plagiarism means that authors have used materials in another paper (whether published or in working paper format) without attributing the source of the materials or ideas. In this instance, the materials being self-plagiarized are from an earlier editorial written by the lead author. Self-plagiarism is in violation of publication ethics, according to the Committee of Publication Ethics' guidelines on suspected plagiarism ( http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/plagiarism%20B_0.pdf ).

  • ethics and integrity in the Publishing Process myths facts and a roadmap
    Management and Organization Review, 2011
    Co-Authors: Marshall Schminke, Maureen L Ambrose
    Abstract:

    Integrity provides the foundation for most scholarly endeavours, including research and Publishing. Authors, reviewers, and editors share responsibility for creating and maintaining the system in which we conduct and publish our work. However, research and Publishing are complicated Processes. A single research effort may involve multiple authors, hundreds of participants, and a variety of skills and tools that play out over the course of months or even years. Ethical challenges may arise at any point along the way, so it is not surprising that both new and experienced scholars often struggle to understand and maintain the ethical standards expected of them. This article highlights some of the main challenges scholars face and provides initial guidance for seeking solutions. But most importantly, it sets the stage for this Special Editors' Forum on research and Publishing ethics.

Glenn Ellison - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the slowdown of the economics Publishing Process
    Journal of Political Economy, 2002
    Co-Authors: Glenn Ellison
    Abstract:

    Over the last three decades there has been a dramatic slowdown of the publication Process at top economics journals. A substantial part is due to journals' requiring more extensive revisions. Various explanations are considered: democratization of the review Process, increases in the complexity of papers, growth of the profession, and cost and benefit arguments. Changes in the profession are examined using time-series data. Connections between these changes and the slowdown are examined using paper-level data. There is evidence for some explanations, but most of the slowdown remains unexplained. Changes may reflect evolving social norms.

  • the slowdown of the economics Publishing Process
    National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000
    Co-Authors: Glenn Ellison
    Abstract:

    Over the last three decades there has been a dramatic increase in the length of time necessary to publish a paper in a top economics journal. This paper documents the slowdown and notes that a substantial part is due to an increasing tendency of journals to require that papers be extensively revised prior to acceptance. A variety of potential explanations for the slowdown are considered: simple cost and benefit arguments; a democratization of the Publishing Process; increases in the complexity of papers; the growth of the profession; and an evolution of preferences for different aspects of paper quality. Various time series are examined for evidence that the economics profession has changed along these dimensions. Paper-level data on review times is used to assess connections between underlying changes in the profession and changes in the review Process. It is difficult to attribute much of the slowdown to observable changes in the economics profession. Evolving social norms may play a role.

Rong Yihong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the mathematical models of the periodical literature Publishing Process
    Information Processing and Management, 2000
    Co-Authors: Yu Guang, Yu Daren, Rong Yihong
    Abstract:

    Abstract Based on a theoretical analysis, the paper establishes the mathematical models of the periodical Publishing Process: a continuous model and a discrete model — a group of difference equations, which is derived from the former. The validity of the models is demonstrated by a particular solution of the continuous model at steady state. To some degree, the paper provides an effective mathematical tool for the quantitative study of the periodical literature Publishing Process.

Marshall Schminke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • RETRACTED - Ethics and Integrity in the Publishing Process: Myths, Facts, and a Roadmap
    Management and Organization Review, 2020
    Co-Authors: Marshall Schminke, Maureen L Ambrose
    Abstract:

    Integrity provides the foundation for most scholarly endeavours, including research and Publishing. Authors, reviewers, and editors share responsibility for creating and maintaining the system in which we conduct and publish our work. However, research and Publishing are complicated Processes. A single research effort may involve multiple authors, hundreds of participants, and a variety of skills and tools that play out over the course of months or even years. Ethical challenges may arise at any point along the way, so it is not surprising that both new and experienced scholars often struggle to understand and maintain the ethical standards expected of them. This article highlights some of the main challenges scholars face and provides initial guidance for seeking solutions. But most importantly, it sets the stage for this Special Editors' Forum on research and Publishing ethics.

  • retraction statement for ethics and integrity of the Publishing Process myths facts and a roadmap by marshall schminke and maureen l ambrose
    Management and Organization Review, 2014
    Co-Authors: Anne S Tsui, Arie Y Lewin, Marshall Schminke, Maureen L Ambrose
    Abstract:

    The above article from Management and Organization Review , published online 7 SEP 2011, has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal's outgoing Editor-in-Chief Anne Tsui, the journal's incoming Editor-in-Chief Arie Y. Lewin, and John Wiley & Sons Asia Pty Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to unattributed overlap with work previously published in Academy of Management Review , 34(4): 586–591: ‘Editor's comments: The better angels of our nature – Ethics and integrity in Publishing Process’ by Marshall Schminke. The editors and authors joindy wrote a letter, available below, to explain the Process used to come to the retraction decision. The purpose of this letter is to explain the circumstances and reasons for the retraction of the paper ‘Ethics and integrity of the Publishing Process: Myths, facts, and a roadmap’ by Schminke and Ambrose in Management and Organization Review (MOR) , Volume 7 issue 3, pages 397 to 406, November 2011. Retraction of a published paper due to self-plagiarism is an unpleasant if not painful experience for both journal editors and authors. Self-plagiarism means that authors have used materials in another paper (whether published or in working paper format) without attributing the source of the materials or ideas. In this instance, the materials being self-plagiarized are from an earlier editorial written by the lead author. Self-plagiarism is in violation of publication ethics, according to the Committee of Publication Ethics' guidelines on suspected plagiarism ( http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/plagiarism%20B_0.pdf ).

  • ethics and integrity in the Publishing Process myths facts and a roadmap
    Management and Organization Review, 2011
    Co-Authors: Marshall Schminke, Maureen L Ambrose
    Abstract:

    Integrity provides the foundation for most scholarly endeavours, including research and Publishing. Authors, reviewers, and editors share responsibility for creating and maintaining the system in which we conduct and publish our work. However, research and Publishing are complicated Processes. A single research effort may involve multiple authors, hundreds of participants, and a variety of skills and tools that play out over the course of months or even years. Ethical challenges may arise at any point along the way, so it is not surprising that both new and experienced scholars often struggle to understand and maintain the ethical standards expected of them. This article highlights some of the main challenges scholars face and provides initial guidance for seeking solutions. But most importantly, it sets the stage for this Special Editors' Forum on research and Publishing ethics.

Stefanie Lapka - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Publishing Process - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts