The Experts below are selected from a list of 318 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Theodore S. Lawrence - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parp1 trapping and dna replication stress enhance radiosensitization with combined wee1 and parp inhibitors
Molecular Cancer Research, 2017Co-Authors: Leslie A Parsels, David Karnak, Joshua D Parsels, Qiang Zhang, Jonathan Velezpadilla, Zachery R Reichert, Daniel R Wahl, Jonathan Maybaum, Mark J Oconnor, Theodore S. LawrenceAbstract:KRAS mutations in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cause increased levels of DNA damage and replication stress, suggesting that inhibition of the DNA damage response (DDR) is a promising strategy for radiosensitization of NSCLC. This study investigates the ability of a WEE1 inhibitor (AZD1775) and a PARP inhibitor (olaparib) to radiosensitize KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells and tumors. In addition to inhibiting the DDR, these small-molecule inhibitors of WEE1 and PARP induce DNA replication stress via nucleotide exhaustion and PARP trapping, respectively. As monotherapy, AZD1775 or olaparib alone modestly radiosensitized a panel of KRAS-mutant NSCLC lines. The combination of agents, however, significantly increased radiosensitization. Furthermore, AZD1775-mediated radiosensitization was rescued by nucleotide repletion, suggesting a mechanism involving AZD1775-mediated replication stress. In contrast, radiosensitization by the combination of AZD1775 and olaparib was not rescued by nucleosides. Whereas both veliparib, a PARP inhibitor that does not efficiently trap PARP1 to chromatin, and PARP1 depletion radiosensitized NSCLC cells as effectively as olaparib, which does efficiently trap PARP, only olaparib potentiated AZD1775-mediated radiosensitization. Taken together, these mechanistic data demonstrate that although nucleotide depletion is sufficient for radiosensitization by WEE1 inhibition alone, and inhibition of PARP catalytic activity is sufficient for radiosensitization by olaparib alone, PARP1 trapping is required for enhanced radiosensitization by the combination of WEE1 and PARP inhibitors. Implications: This study highlights DNA replication stress caused by nucleotide depletion and PARP1 trapping as an important mechanism of radiosensitization in KRAS-mutant tumors and supports further development of DNA replication as a therapeutic target. Mol Cancer Res; 16(2); 222–32. ©2017 AACR.
-
abstract 519 combined inhibition of wee1 and parp1 radiosensitizes kras mutant non small cell lung cancers via inhibition of dsb repair
Cancer Research, 2016Co-Authors: Leslie A Parsels, Theodore S. Lawrence, David Karnak, Joshua D Parsels, Zachery R Reichert, Jonathan Maybaum, Meredith A MorganAbstract:Mutant KRAS is found in approximately 30% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Despite the use of radiation (RT) therapy for the treatment of locally advanced disease, local recurrence remains an issue. The observation that mutations in KRAS lead to both replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) suggests these cancers may have a greater reliance on DNA damage response pathways and therefore may be preferentially radiosensitized by therapies targeting DNA repair. In this study, we investigated the combined inhibition of WEE1 and PARP1 using the small molecule inhibitors, AZD1775 and olaparib, respectively as a radiosensitizing strategy in KRAS mutant NSCLC. We began by comparing radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib, in KRAS isogenic H1703 lung cancer cells and found that KRAS mutant cells were preferentially radiosensitized (ER, enhancement ratio 1.8) compared to KRAS wild type cells (ER 1.4). Combined WEE1 and PARP1 inhibition also radiosensitized KRAS mutant Calu-6 and NCI-H23 lung cancer cells (ER 1.9 and 1.5, respectively). These findings were further confirmed in vivo: Calu-6 tumor xenografts were significantly radiosensitized by AZD1775+olaparib, as evidenced by an 11 day delay in tumor volume doubling time relative to RT treatment. Given that WEE1 and PARP1 function to prevent and manage replication stress, respectively, we hypothesized that radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib results from persistent replication stress. While replication stress did contribute to AZD1775-mediated radiosensitization in Calu-6 cells, as evidenced by pan-nuclear γH2AX staining, and the ability of exogenous nucleosides to protect cells from radiosensitization by AZD1775 alone, nucleosides had little effect on radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib. These results suggest that replication stress is not required for radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib. As WEE1 and PARP1 both promote repair of radiation-induced DNA damage, we hypothesized that radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib results from persistent, unrepaired DSBs. Assessment of the kinetics of DSB repair by γH2AX flow cytometry demonstrated that while total γH2AX levels in cells treated with RT alone had returned to control levels within 24 h, AZD1775+olaparib treatment significantly delayed the resolution of γH2AX following RT, with 44.8% or 46.2% of Calu-6 or KRAS mutant H1703 cells, respectively remaining γH2AX-positive 24 h post-RT. This delay corresponded with the inhibition of radiation-induced RAD51 foci by AZD1775, indicating inhibition of homologous recombination repair. Taken together these data demonstrate the efficacy of combined inhibition of WEE1 and PARP1 with radiation in KRAS mutant lung cancer. Furthermore, these results suggest that although replication stress occurs in response to AZD1775 and olaparib, persistent DSBs are the cause of radiosensitization. Citation Format: Leslie A. Parsels, David Karnak, Joshua D. Parsels, Zachery Reichert, Jonathan Maybaum, Theodore S. Lawrence, Meredith Ann Morgan. Combined inhibition of WEE1 and PARP1 radiosensitizes KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancers via inhibition of DSB repair. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 519.
-
selective radiosensitization of p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells by combined inhibition of chk1 and parp1
Cell Cycle, 2011Co-Authors: Sean M Vance, Theodore S. Lawrence, Leslie A Parsels, Joshua D Parsels, Jonathan Maybaum, Erqi Liu, Lili Zhao, Jeffrey L Brown, Meredith A MorganAbstract:We have recently shown that inhibition of HRR (homologous recombination repair) by Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) inhibition radiosensitizes pancreatic cancer cells and others have demonstrated that Chk1 inhibition selectively sensitizes p53 mutant tumor cells. Furthermore, PARP1 [poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1] inhibitors dramatically radiosensitize cells with DNA double strand break repair defects. Thus, we hypothesized that inhibition of HRR (mediated by Chk1 via AZD7762) and PARP1 [via olaparib (AZD2281)] would selectively sensitize p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells to radiation. We also used 2 isogenic p53 cell models to assess the role of p53 status in cancer cells and intestinal epithelial cells to assess overall cancer specificity. DNA damage response and repair were assessed by flow cytometry, γH2AX, and an HRR reporter assay. We found that the combination of AZD7762 and olaparib produced significant radiosensitization in p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells and in all of the isogenic cancer cell lines. The magnitude of radiosensitization by AZD7762 and olaparib was greater in p53 mutant cells compared with p53 wild type cells. Importantly, normal intestinal epithelial cells were not radiosensitized. The combination of AZD7762 and olaparib caused G 2 checkpoint abrogation, inhibition of HRR, and persistent DNA damage responses. These findings demonstrate that the combination of Chk1 and PARP1 inhibition selectively radiosensitizes p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells. Furthermore, these studies suggest that inhibition of HRR by Chk1 inhibitors may be a useful strategy for selectively inducing a BRCA1/2 'deficient-like' phenotype in p53 mutant tumor cells, while sparing normal tissue.
-
radiosensitization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by a smac mimetic compound sm 164 requires activation of caspases
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2011Co-Authors: Jie Yang, Theodore S. Lawrence, Meredith A Morgan, Mary A. Davis, Donna Mceachern, Longchuan Bai, Jonathan T Sebolt, Haiying Sun, Shaomeng Wang, Yi SunAbstract:Chemoradiation is the treatment of choice for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, radioresistance, which contributes to local recurrence, remains a significant therapeutic problem. In this study, we characterized SM-164, a small SMAC mimetic compound that promotes degradation of cIAP-1 (also known as BIRC2) and releases active caspases from XIAP inhibitory binding, as a radiosensitizing agent in HNSCC cells. We found that SM-164 at nanomolar concentrations induced radiosensitization in some HNSCC cell lines in a manner dependent on intrinsic sensitivity to caspase activation and apoptosis induction. Blockage of caspase activation via siRNA knockdown or a pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk largely abrogated SM-164 radiosensitization. On the other hand, the resistant lines with a high level of BCL-2 that blocks caspase activation and apoptosis induction became sensitive to radiation upon BCL-2 knockdown. Mechanistic studies revealed that SM-164 radiosensitization in sensitive cells was associated with NFκB activation and TNFα secretion, followed by activation of caspases-8 and -9, leading to enhanced apoptosis. Finally, SM-164 also radiosensitized human tumor xenograft, while causing minimal toxicity. Thus, SM-164 is a potent Radiosensitizer via a mechanism involving caspase activation and holds promise for future clinical development as a novel class of Radiosensitizer for the treatment of a subset of head and neck cancer patients.
-
Radiosensitization by gemcitabine.
Oncology, 1999Co-Authors: Theodore S. Lawrence, Avraham Eisbruch, Cornelius J. Mcginn, Marc T. Fields, Donna S. ShewachAbstract:Gemcitabine is a potent Radiosensitizer in both laboratory studies and in the clinic. Initial laboratory studies showed that gemcitabine radiosensitizes a wide variety of rodent and human tumor cells in culture. Maximum
Hua Guan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
LINCS gene expression signature analysis revealed bosutinib as a Radiosensitizer of breast cancer cells by targeting eIF4G1.
International journal of molecular medicine, 2021Co-Authors: Da-fei Xie, Ping-kun Zhou, Xiao-dan Liu, Xiaoyao Yin, Bo Huang, Hua GuanAbstract:Radioresistance is the predominant cause for radiotherapy failure and disease progression, resulting in increased breast cancer‑associated mortality. Using gene expression signature analysis of the Library of Integrated Network‑Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the aim of the present study was to systematically identify potential candidate Radiosensitizers from known drugs. The similarity of integrated gene expression signatures between irradiated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 γ 1 (eIF4G1)‑silenced breast cancer cells and known drugs was measured using enrichment scores (ES). Drugs with positive ES were selected as potential Radiosensitizers. The radiosensitizing effects of the candidate drugs were analyzed in breast cancer cell lines (MCF‑7, MX‑1 and MDA‑MB‑231) using CCK‑8 and colony formation assays following exposure to ionizing radiation. Cell apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry. The expression levels of eIF4G1 and DNA damage response (DDR) proteins were analyzed by western blotting. Bosutinib was identified as a promising Radiosensitizer, as its administration markedly reduced the dosage required both for the drug and for ionizing radiation, which may be associated with fewer treatment‑associated adverse reactions. Moreover, combined treatment of ionizing radiation and bosutinib significantly increased cell killing in all three cell lines, compared with ionizing radiation or bosutinib alone. Among the three cell lines, MX‑1 cells were identified as the most sensitive to both ionizing radiation and bosutinib. Bosutinib markedly downregulated the expression of eIF4G1 in a dose‑dependent manner and also reduced the expression of DDR proteins (including ATM, XRCC4, ATRIP, and GADD45A). Moreover, eIF4G1 was identified as a key target of bosutinib that may regulate DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Thus, bosutinib may serve as a potential candidate Radiosensitizer for breast cancer therapy.
-
LINCS gene expression signatures analysis revealed bosutinib as a Radiosensitizer of breast cancer cells by targeting eIF4G1
2020Co-Authors: Ping-kun Zhou, Da-fei Xie, Xiao-dan Liu, Xiaoyao Yin, Bo Huang, Hua GuanAbstract:Abstract Radioresistance represents the predominant cause for radiotherapy failure and disease progression, resulting in increased breast cancer mortality. Through gene expression signatures analyses of Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the present study aimed to identify potential candidate Radiosensitizers from known drugs systematically. The similarity of integrated gene expression signatures between irradiated eIF4G1-silenced breast cancer cells and known drugs was measured by enrichment scores. Drugs with positive enrichment scores were selected as potential Radiosensitizers. The radiosensitizing effects of the candidate Radiosensitizers were analyzed in breast cancer cells (MCF-7, MX-1, and MDA-MB-231) by CCK-8 assays and colony-forming capability after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cell apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. Expressions of eIF4G1 and a series of DNA damage response proteins were analyzed by Western blot assays. Bosutinib was proposed to be a promising Radiosensitizer as its administration markedly reduced the dosages of both the drug and ionizing radiation and was associated with fewer adverse drug reactions. The combined treatment with ionizing radiation and bosutinib significantly increased the cells killing potency in all three cell lines as compared to ionizing radiation or bosutinib alone. MX-1 cells were revealed to be the most sensitive to both ionizing radiation and bosutinib among the three cell lines. Bosutinib noticeably downregulated the expression of eIF4G1 in a dose-dependent manner and also reduced the expression of DNA damage response proteins (including ATM, XRCC4, ATRIP, and GADD45a). Moreover, eIF4G1 could be a key target of bosutinib through which it regulates DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Thus, taken together, bosutinib may serve as a potential candidate Radiosensitizer for breast cancer therapy.
Meredith A Morgan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
abstract 519 combined inhibition of wee1 and parp1 radiosensitizes kras mutant non small cell lung cancers via inhibition of dsb repair
Cancer Research, 2016Co-Authors: Leslie A Parsels, Theodore S. Lawrence, David Karnak, Joshua D Parsels, Zachery R Reichert, Jonathan Maybaum, Meredith A MorganAbstract:Mutant KRAS is found in approximately 30% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Despite the use of radiation (RT) therapy for the treatment of locally advanced disease, local recurrence remains an issue. The observation that mutations in KRAS lead to both replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) suggests these cancers may have a greater reliance on DNA damage response pathways and therefore may be preferentially radiosensitized by therapies targeting DNA repair. In this study, we investigated the combined inhibition of WEE1 and PARP1 using the small molecule inhibitors, AZD1775 and olaparib, respectively as a radiosensitizing strategy in KRAS mutant NSCLC. We began by comparing radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib, in KRAS isogenic H1703 lung cancer cells and found that KRAS mutant cells were preferentially radiosensitized (ER, enhancement ratio 1.8) compared to KRAS wild type cells (ER 1.4). Combined WEE1 and PARP1 inhibition also radiosensitized KRAS mutant Calu-6 and NCI-H23 lung cancer cells (ER 1.9 and 1.5, respectively). These findings were further confirmed in vivo: Calu-6 tumor xenografts were significantly radiosensitized by AZD1775+olaparib, as evidenced by an 11 day delay in tumor volume doubling time relative to RT treatment. Given that WEE1 and PARP1 function to prevent and manage replication stress, respectively, we hypothesized that radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib results from persistent replication stress. While replication stress did contribute to AZD1775-mediated radiosensitization in Calu-6 cells, as evidenced by pan-nuclear γH2AX staining, and the ability of exogenous nucleosides to protect cells from radiosensitization by AZD1775 alone, nucleosides had little effect on radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib. These results suggest that replication stress is not required for radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib. As WEE1 and PARP1 both promote repair of radiation-induced DNA damage, we hypothesized that radiosensitization by AZD1775+olaparib results from persistent, unrepaired DSBs. Assessment of the kinetics of DSB repair by γH2AX flow cytometry demonstrated that while total γH2AX levels in cells treated with RT alone had returned to control levels within 24 h, AZD1775+olaparib treatment significantly delayed the resolution of γH2AX following RT, with 44.8% or 46.2% of Calu-6 or KRAS mutant H1703 cells, respectively remaining γH2AX-positive 24 h post-RT. This delay corresponded with the inhibition of radiation-induced RAD51 foci by AZD1775, indicating inhibition of homologous recombination repair. Taken together these data demonstrate the efficacy of combined inhibition of WEE1 and PARP1 with radiation in KRAS mutant lung cancer. Furthermore, these results suggest that although replication stress occurs in response to AZD1775 and olaparib, persistent DSBs are the cause of radiosensitization. Citation Format: Leslie A. Parsels, David Karnak, Joshua D. Parsels, Zachery Reichert, Jonathan Maybaum, Theodore S. Lawrence, Meredith Ann Morgan. Combined inhibition of WEE1 and PARP1 radiosensitizes KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancers via inhibition of DSB repair. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 519.
-
selective radiosensitization of p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells by combined inhibition of chk1 and parp1
Cell Cycle, 2011Co-Authors: Sean M Vance, Theodore S. Lawrence, Leslie A Parsels, Joshua D Parsels, Jonathan Maybaum, Erqi Liu, Lili Zhao, Jeffrey L Brown, Meredith A MorganAbstract:We have recently shown that inhibition of HRR (homologous recombination repair) by Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) inhibition radiosensitizes pancreatic cancer cells and others have demonstrated that Chk1 inhibition selectively sensitizes p53 mutant tumor cells. Furthermore, PARP1 [poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1] inhibitors dramatically radiosensitize cells with DNA double strand break repair defects. Thus, we hypothesized that inhibition of HRR (mediated by Chk1 via AZD7762) and PARP1 [via olaparib (AZD2281)] would selectively sensitize p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells to radiation. We also used 2 isogenic p53 cell models to assess the role of p53 status in cancer cells and intestinal epithelial cells to assess overall cancer specificity. DNA damage response and repair were assessed by flow cytometry, γH2AX, and an HRR reporter assay. We found that the combination of AZD7762 and olaparib produced significant radiosensitization in p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells and in all of the isogenic cancer cell lines. The magnitude of radiosensitization by AZD7762 and olaparib was greater in p53 mutant cells compared with p53 wild type cells. Importantly, normal intestinal epithelial cells were not radiosensitized. The combination of AZD7762 and olaparib caused G 2 checkpoint abrogation, inhibition of HRR, and persistent DNA damage responses. These findings demonstrate that the combination of Chk1 and PARP1 inhibition selectively radiosensitizes p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells. Furthermore, these studies suggest that inhibition of HRR by Chk1 inhibitors may be a useful strategy for selectively inducing a BRCA1/2 'deficient-like' phenotype in p53 mutant tumor cells, while sparing normal tissue.
-
radiosensitization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by a smac mimetic compound sm 164 requires activation of caspases
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2011Co-Authors: Jie Yang, Theodore S. Lawrence, Meredith A Morgan, Mary A. Davis, Donna Mceachern, Longchuan Bai, Jonathan T Sebolt, Haiying Sun, Shaomeng Wang, Yi SunAbstract:Chemoradiation is the treatment of choice for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, radioresistance, which contributes to local recurrence, remains a significant therapeutic problem. In this study, we characterized SM-164, a small SMAC mimetic compound that promotes degradation of cIAP-1 (also known as BIRC2) and releases active caspases from XIAP inhibitory binding, as a radiosensitizing agent in HNSCC cells. We found that SM-164 at nanomolar concentrations induced radiosensitization in some HNSCC cell lines in a manner dependent on intrinsic sensitivity to caspase activation and apoptosis induction. Blockage of caspase activation via siRNA knockdown or a pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk largely abrogated SM-164 radiosensitization. On the other hand, the resistant lines with a high level of BCL-2 that blocks caspase activation and apoptosis induction became sensitive to radiation upon BCL-2 knockdown. Mechanistic studies revealed that SM-164 radiosensitization in sensitive cells was associated with NFκB activation and TNFα secretion, followed by activation of caspases-8 and -9, leading to enhanced apoptosis. Finally, SM-164 also radiosensitized human tumor xenograft, while causing minimal toxicity. Thus, SM-164 is a potent Radiosensitizer via a mechanism involving caspase activation and holds promise for future clinical development as a novel class of Radiosensitizer for the treatment of a subset of head and neck cancer patients.
Raymond E Meyn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Niraparib (MK-4827), a novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitor, radiosensitizes human lung and breast cancer cells.
Oncotarget, 2014Co-Authors: Kathleen Bridges, Carolyn A Buser, Thomas A Buchholz, Carlo Toniatti, Huifeng Liu, Raymond E MeynAbstract:// Kathleen A. Bridges 1 , Carlo Toniatti 2 , Carolyn A. Buser 3 , Huifeng Liu 1 , Thomas A. Buchholz 4 , and Raymond E. Meyn 1 1 Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 2 IRBM/Merck Research Laboratories Rome, Italy 3 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Upper Gwynedd, Pennsylvania 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Correspondence: Raymond E. Meyn, email: // Keywords : Radiation, PARP, MK-4827, DNA damage, niraparib Received : May 5, 2014 Accepted : June 7, 2014 Published : June 9, 2014 Abstract The aim of this study was to assess niraparib (MK-4827), a novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, for its ability to radiosensitize human tumor cells. Human tumor cells derived from lung, breast and prostate cancers were tested for radiosensitization by niraparib using clonogenic survival assays. Both p53 wild-type and p53-defective lines were included. The ability of niraparib to alter the repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) was determined using detection of γ-H2AX foci and RAD51 foci. Clonogenic survival analyses indicated that micromolar concentrations of niraparib radiosensitized tumor cell lines derived from lung, breast, and prostate cancers independently of their p53 status but not cell lines derived from normal tissues. Niraparib also sensitized tumor cells to H 2 O 2 and converted H 2 O 2 -induced single strand breaks (SSBs) into DSBs during DNA replication. These results indicate that human tumor cells are significantly radiosensitized by the potent and selective PARP-1 inhibitor, niraparib, in the in vitro setting. The mechanism of this effect appears to involve a conversion of sublethal SSBs into lethal DSBs during DNA replication due to the inhibition of base excision repair by the drug. Taken together, our findings strongly support the clinical evaluation of niraparib in combination with radiation.
-
mk 1775 a novel wee1 kinase inhibitor radiosensitizes p53 defective human tumor cells
Clinical Cancer Research, 2011Co-Authors: Kathleen Bridges, Hiroshi Hirai, Carolyn A Buser, Colin Brooks, Thomas A Buchholz, Jessica M Molkentine, Kathryn A Mason, Raymond E MeynAbstract:Purpose: Radiotherapy is commonly used to treat a variety of solid tumors. However, improvements in the therapeutic ratio for several disease sites are sorely needed, leading us to assess molecularly targeted therapeutics as Radiosensitizers. The aim of this study was to assess the wee1 kinase inhibitor, MK-1775, for its ability to radiosensitize human tumor cells. Experimental Design: Human tumor cells derived from lung, breast, and prostate cancers were tested for radiosensitization by MK-1775 using clonogenic survival assays. Both p53 wild-type and p53-defective lines were included. The ability of MK-1775 to abrogate the radiation-induced G 2 block, thereby allowing cells harboring DNA lesions to prematurely progress into mitosis, was determined using flow cytometry and detection of γ-H2AX foci. The in vivo efficacy of the combination of MK-1775 and radiation was assessed by tumor growth delay experiments using a human lung cancer cell line growing as a xenograft tumor in nude mice. Results: Clonogenic survival analyses indicated that nanomolar concentrations of MK-1775 radiosensitized p53-defective human lung, breast, and prostate cancer cells but not similar lines with wild-type p53. Consistent with its ability to radiosensitize, MK-1775 abrogated the radiation-induced G 2 block in p53-defective cells but not in p53 wild-type lines. MK-1775 also significantly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of radiation in vivo as shown in tumor growth delay studies, again for p53-defective tumors. Conclusions: These results indicate that p53-defective human tumor cells are significantly radiosensitized by the potent and selective wee1 kinase inhibitor, MK-1775, in both the in vitro and in vivo settings. Taken together, our findings strongly support the clinical evaluation of MK-1775 in combination with radiation. Clin Cancer Res; 17(17); 5638–48. ©2011 AACR .
-
histone deacetylase inhibitors radiosensitize human melanoma cells by suppressing dna repair activity
Clinical Cancer Research, 2005Co-Authors: Anupama Munshi, John F Kurland, Takashi Nishikawa, Toshimitsu Tanaka, Marvette L Hobbs, Susan L Tucker, Sheikh M Ismail, Craig W Stevens, Raymond E MeynAbstract:Purpose: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have emerged recently as promising anticancer agents. They arrest cells in the cell cycle and induce differentiation and cell death. The antitumor activity of HDAC inhibitors has been linked to their ability to induce gene expression through acetylation of histone and nonhistone proteins. However, it has recently been suggested that HDAC inhibitors may also enhance the activity of other cancer therapeutics, including radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of HDAC inhibitors to radiosensitize human melanoma cells in vitro. Experimental Design: A panel of HDAC inhibitors that included sodium butyrate (NaB), phenylbutyrate, tributyrin, and trichostatin A were tested for their ability to radiosensitize two human melanoma cell lines (A375 and MeWo) using clonogenic cell survival assays. Apoptosis and DNA repair were measured by standard assays. Results: NaB induced hyperacetylation of histone H4 in the two melanoma cell lines and the normal human fibroblasts. NaB radiosensitized both the A375 and MeWo melanoma cell lines, substantially reducing the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2), whereas it had no effect on the normal human fibroblasts. The other HDAC inhibitors, phenylbutyrate, tributyrin, and trichostatin A had significant radiosensitizing effects on both melanoma cell lines tested. NaB modestly enhanced radiation-induced apoptosis that did not correlate with survival but did correlate with functional impairment of DNA repair as determined based on the host cell reactivation assay. Moreover, NaB significantly reduced the expression of the repair-related genes Ku70 and Ku86 and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in melanoma cells at the protein and mRNA levels. Normal human fibroblasts showed no change in DNA repair capacity or levels of DNA repair proteins following NaB treatment. We also examined γ-H2AX phosphorylation as a marker of radiation response to NaB and observed that compared with controls, γ-H2AX foci persisted long after ionizing exposure in the NaB-treated cells. Conclusions: HDAC inhibitors radiosensitize human tumor cells by affecting their ability to repair the DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation and that γ-H2AX phosphorylation can be used as a predictive marker of radioresponse.
Da-fei Xie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
LINCS gene expression signature analysis revealed bosutinib as a Radiosensitizer of breast cancer cells by targeting eIF4G1.
International journal of molecular medicine, 2021Co-Authors: Da-fei Xie, Ping-kun Zhou, Xiao-dan Liu, Xiaoyao Yin, Bo Huang, Hua GuanAbstract:Radioresistance is the predominant cause for radiotherapy failure and disease progression, resulting in increased breast cancer‑associated mortality. Using gene expression signature analysis of the Library of Integrated Network‑Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the aim of the present study was to systematically identify potential candidate Radiosensitizers from known drugs. The similarity of integrated gene expression signatures between irradiated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 γ 1 (eIF4G1)‑silenced breast cancer cells and known drugs was measured using enrichment scores (ES). Drugs with positive ES were selected as potential Radiosensitizers. The radiosensitizing effects of the candidate drugs were analyzed in breast cancer cell lines (MCF‑7, MX‑1 and MDA‑MB‑231) using CCK‑8 and colony formation assays following exposure to ionizing radiation. Cell apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry. The expression levels of eIF4G1 and DNA damage response (DDR) proteins were analyzed by western blotting. Bosutinib was identified as a promising Radiosensitizer, as its administration markedly reduced the dosage required both for the drug and for ionizing radiation, which may be associated with fewer treatment‑associated adverse reactions. Moreover, combined treatment of ionizing radiation and bosutinib significantly increased cell killing in all three cell lines, compared with ionizing radiation or bosutinib alone. Among the three cell lines, MX‑1 cells were identified as the most sensitive to both ionizing radiation and bosutinib. Bosutinib markedly downregulated the expression of eIF4G1 in a dose‑dependent manner and also reduced the expression of DDR proteins (including ATM, XRCC4, ATRIP, and GADD45A). Moreover, eIF4G1 was identified as a key target of bosutinib that may regulate DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Thus, bosutinib may serve as a potential candidate Radiosensitizer for breast cancer therapy.
-
LINCS gene expression signatures analysis revealed bosutinib as a Radiosensitizer of breast cancer cells by targeting eIF4G1
2020Co-Authors: Ping-kun Zhou, Da-fei Xie, Xiao-dan Liu, Xiaoyao Yin, Bo Huang, Hua GuanAbstract:Abstract Radioresistance represents the predominant cause for radiotherapy failure and disease progression, resulting in increased breast cancer mortality. Through gene expression signatures analyses of Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the present study aimed to identify potential candidate Radiosensitizers from known drugs systematically. The similarity of integrated gene expression signatures between irradiated eIF4G1-silenced breast cancer cells and known drugs was measured by enrichment scores. Drugs with positive enrichment scores were selected as potential Radiosensitizers. The radiosensitizing effects of the candidate Radiosensitizers were analyzed in breast cancer cells (MCF-7, MX-1, and MDA-MB-231) by CCK-8 assays and colony-forming capability after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cell apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. Expressions of eIF4G1 and a series of DNA damage response proteins were analyzed by Western blot assays. Bosutinib was proposed to be a promising Radiosensitizer as its administration markedly reduced the dosages of both the drug and ionizing radiation and was associated with fewer adverse drug reactions. The combined treatment with ionizing radiation and bosutinib significantly increased the cells killing potency in all three cell lines as compared to ionizing radiation or bosutinib alone. MX-1 cells were revealed to be the most sensitive to both ionizing radiation and bosutinib among the three cell lines. Bosutinib noticeably downregulated the expression of eIF4G1 in a dose-dependent manner and also reduced the expression of DNA damage response proteins (including ATM, XRCC4, ATRIP, and GADD45a). Moreover, eIF4G1 could be a key target of bosutinib through which it regulates DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Thus, taken together, bosutinib may serve as a potential candidate Radiosensitizer for breast cancer therapy.
