Redesign

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 137355 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Michelle M Kelly - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • multi stakeholder collaboration in the Redesign of family centered rounds process
    Applied Ergonomics, 2015
    Co-Authors: Pascale Carayon, Randi Cartmill, Yaqiong Li, Julie A Plotkin, Michelle M Kelly
    Abstract:

    A human factors approach to healthcare system Redesign emphasizes the involvement of multiple healthcare stakeholders (e.g., patients and families, healthcare providers) in the Redesign process. This study explores the experience of multiple stakeholders with collaboration in a healthcare system Redesign project. Interviews were conducted with ten stakeholder representatives who participated in the Redesign of the family-centered rounds process in a pediatric hospital. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using a phenomenological approach. A model of collaborative healthcare system Redesign was developed, which defined four phases (i.e., setup of the Redesign team, preparation for meetings, collaboration in meetings, follow-up after meetings) and two outcomes (i.e., team outcomes, Redesign outcomes) of the collaborative process. Challenges to multi-stakeholder collaboration in healthcare system Redesign, such as need to represent all relevant stakeholders, scheduling of meetings and managing different perspectives, were identified.

  • facilitators and barriers to multi stakeholder collaboration in the Redesign of the family centered rounds process
    58th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society HFES 2014, 2014
    Co-Authors: Pascale Carayon, Randi Cartmill, Yaqiong Li, Michelle M Kelly
    Abstract:

    A human factors approach to healthcare system Redesign emphasizes the involvement of multiple stakeholders in the process. This study identifies work system factors facilitating and hindering the collaboration of multiple stakeholders in a healthcare system Redesign project. We interviewed 10 stakeholders participating in the Redesign of the family-centered rounds process in a pediatric hospital, and conducted qualitative content analysis of the interview transcripts using the work system model of Smith and Carayon-Sainfort (1989). Various facilitators and barriers to stakeholder collaboration in healthcare system Redesign were identified, such as personal characteristics, team characteristics, organizational structure and culture. Results of this study can be used to improve the process used to Redesign healthcare work systems and processes that involve multiple stakeholders.

Mohsen Attaran - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Information technology and business‐process Redesign
    Business Process Management Journal, 2003
    Co-Authors: Mohsen Attaran
    Abstract:

    Business‐process Redesigns (BPR) and information technology (IT) are natural partners, yet this relationship has not been fully exploited. Those organizations that have used IT to reengineer processes have benefited enormously. This article argues that those aspiring to do business process Redesign must begin to apply the capabilities of information technology. Process Redesign is not always successful and almost always accompanied by pain or at least unpleasant side effects. Many companies have undertaken reengineering efforts only to abandon them with little or no positive result. How can you increase the odds for success? Here are a few lessons from the front.

  • Information technology and business-process Redesign
    Business Process Management Journal, 2003
    Co-Authors: Mohsen Attaran
    Abstract:

    Business-process Redesigns (BPR) and information technology (IT) are natural partners, yet this relationship has not been fully exploited. Those organizations that have used IT to reengineer processes have benefited enormously. This article argues that those aspiring to do business process Redesign must begin to apply the capabilities of information technology. Process Redesign is not always successful and almost always accompanied by pain or at least unpleasant side effects. Many companies have undertaken reengineering efforts only to abandon them with little or no positive result. How can you increase the odds for success? Here are a few lessons from the front.

Pascale Carayon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • multi stakeholder collaboration in the Redesign of family centered rounds process
    Applied Ergonomics, 2015
    Co-Authors: Pascale Carayon, Randi Cartmill, Yaqiong Li, Julie A Plotkin, Michelle M Kelly
    Abstract:

    A human factors approach to healthcare system Redesign emphasizes the involvement of multiple healthcare stakeholders (e.g., patients and families, healthcare providers) in the Redesign process. This study explores the experience of multiple stakeholders with collaboration in a healthcare system Redesign project. Interviews were conducted with ten stakeholder representatives who participated in the Redesign of the family-centered rounds process in a pediatric hospital. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using a phenomenological approach. A model of collaborative healthcare system Redesign was developed, which defined four phases (i.e., setup of the Redesign team, preparation for meetings, collaboration in meetings, follow-up after meetings) and two outcomes (i.e., team outcomes, Redesign outcomes) of the collaborative process. Challenges to multi-stakeholder collaboration in healthcare system Redesign, such as need to represent all relevant stakeholders, scheduling of meetings and managing different perspectives, were identified.

  • facilitators and barriers to multi stakeholder collaboration in the Redesign of the family centered rounds process
    58th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society HFES 2014, 2014
    Co-Authors: Pascale Carayon, Randi Cartmill, Yaqiong Li, Michelle M Kelly
    Abstract:

    A human factors approach to healthcare system Redesign emphasizes the involvement of multiple stakeholders in the process. This study identifies work system factors facilitating and hindering the collaboration of multiple stakeholders in a healthcare system Redesign project. We interviewed 10 stakeholders participating in the Redesign of the family-centered rounds process in a pediatric hospital, and conducted qualitative content analysis of the interview transcripts using the work system model of Smith and Carayon-Sainfort (1989). Various facilitators and barriers to stakeholder collaboration in healthcare system Redesign were identified, such as personal characteristics, team characteristics, organizational structure and culture. Results of this study can be used to improve the process used to Redesign healthcare work systems and processes that involve multiple stakeholders.

Ned Kock - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Representation Type Preferences in Operational Business Process Redesign: A Quasi-Experimental Field Investigation
    International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications, 2011
    Co-Authors: Ned Kock
    Abstract:

    This paper reports on a quasi-experimental field study in which business process Redesign groups in four different US organizations used two different business process representation types. One of the representation types emphasized an activity flow or workflow view of business processes, which appears to currently be the most prevalent in actual operational-level business process Redesign projects; the other emphasized a communication flow view. The study suggests that, contrary to assumptions likely underlying most of the current business process Redesign practice, communication flow-oriented representations of business processes are perceived by those involved in their Redesign as significantly more useful in the following aspects than activity flow-oriented representations: identification of opportunities for process improvement, application of process Redesign guidelines, visualization of process changes, and development of generic information technology solutions to implement new business processes. Important implications for managers and researchers stemming from these results are discussed.

  • Representation Type Preferences in Operational Business Process Redesign
    Strategic Adoption of Technological Innovations, 1
    Co-Authors: Ned Kock
    Abstract:

    This paper reports on a quasi-experimental field study in which business process Redesign groups in four different US organizations used two different business process representation types. One of the representation types emphasized an activity flow (or workflow) view of business processes, which appears to currently be the most prevalent in actual operational-level business process Redesign projects; the other emphasized a communication flow view. The study suggests that, contrary to assumptions likely underlying most of the current business process Redesign practice, communication flow-oriented representations of business processes are perceived by those involved in their Redesign as significantly more useful in the following aspects than activity flow-oriented representations: identification of opportunities for process improvement, application of process Redesign guidelines, visualization of process changes, and development of generic information technology solutions to implement new business processes. Important implications for managers and researchers stemming from these results are discussed.

Luca Zaccarian - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Stubborn and Dead-Zone Redesign for Nonlinear Observers and Filters
    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2020
    Co-Authors: Daniele Astolfi, Angelo Alessandri, Luca Zaccarian
    Abstract:

    We propose a Redesign paradigm for stable estima-tors by introducing a saturation or a dead-zone nonlinearity with adaptive thresholds on the output injection term. Such nonlin-earities allow improving the sensitivity to measurement noise in different scenarios (impulsive disturbances or persistent noise such as sensor bias), while preserving the asymptotic convergence properties of the original observer. These Redesigns apply to a broad class of state estimators, including linear observers, observers for input-affine systems, observers for Lipschitz systems , observers based on the circle criterion, high-gain observers, standard and extended Kalman filters. Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of both the stubborn and dead-zone Redesigns.