The Experts below are selected from a list of 8766 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Veerasathpurush Allareddy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal Regeneration in Humans
Journal of Periodontology, 2013Co-Authors: Satheesh Elangovan, Gustavo Avilaortiz, Georgia K. Johnson, Nadeem Y Karimbux, Veerasathpurush AllareddyAbstract:BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews represent the highest form of evidence in the current hierarchy of evidence-based dentistry. Critical analysis of published systematic reviews may help to analyze their strengths and weaknesses and to identify areas that need future improvement. The aim of this overview is to determine and compare the quality of systematic reviews published in the field of periodontal Regeneration using established checklists, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to retrieve reviews on periodontal Regeneration in Humans. A total of 14 systematic reviews were selected using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMSTAR guidelines. Each article was given an AMSTAR total score, based on the number of AMSTAR criteria that were fulfilled. The quality of included reviews was further assessed using a checklist proposed in 2003. RESULTS: Only one of the selected systematic reviews satisfied all the AMSTAR guidelines, whereas two reviews satisfied just two of the 11 items. This study shows that published systematic reviews on periodontal Regeneration exhibit significant structural and methodologic variability. Quality assessment using the additional checklist further confirmed the variability in the way systematic reviews were conducted and/or reported. CONCLUSION: Consideration of guidelines for quality assessment, such as AMSTAR, when designing and conducting systematic reviews may increase the validity and clinical applicability of future reviews.
-
Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on Periodontal Regeneration in Humans
Journal of periodontology, 2012Co-Authors: Satheesh Elangovan, Georgia K. Johnson, Nadeem Y Karimbux, Gustavo Avila-ortiz, Veerasathpurush AllareddyAbstract:Background: Systematic reviews represent the highest form of evidence in the current hierarchy of evidence-based dentistry. Critical analysis of published systematic reviews may help to analyze their strengths and weaknesses and to identify areas that need future improvement. The aim of this overview is to determine and compare the quality of systematic reviews published in the field of periodontal Regeneration using established checklists, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines.Methods: A systematic search was conducted to retrieve reviews on periodontal Regeneration in Humans. A total of 14 systematic reviews were selected using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMSTAR guidelines. Each article was given an AMSTAR total score, based on the number of AMSTAR criteria that were fulfilled. The quality of included reviews was further assessed using a checklist proposed in 2003.Results: Onl...
Satheesh Elangovan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal Regeneration in Humans
Journal of Periodontology, 2013Co-Authors: Satheesh Elangovan, Gustavo Avilaortiz, Georgia K. Johnson, Nadeem Y Karimbux, Veerasathpurush AllareddyAbstract:BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews represent the highest form of evidence in the current hierarchy of evidence-based dentistry. Critical analysis of published systematic reviews may help to analyze their strengths and weaknesses and to identify areas that need future improvement. The aim of this overview is to determine and compare the quality of systematic reviews published in the field of periodontal Regeneration using established checklists, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to retrieve reviews on periodontal Regeneration in Humans. A total of 14 systematic reviews were selected using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMSTAR guidelines. Each article was given an AMSTAR total score, based on the number of AMSTAR criteria that were fulfilled. The quality of included reviews was further assessed using a checklist proposed in 2003. RESULTS: Only one of the selected systematic reviews satisfied all the AMSTAR guidelines, whereas two reviews satisfied just two of the 11 items. This study shows that published systematic reviews on periodontal Regeneration exhibit significant structural and methodologic variability. Quality assessment using the additional checklist further confirmed the variability in the way systematic reviews were conducted and/or reported. CONCLUSION: Consideration of guidelines for quality assessment, such as AMSTAR, when designing and conducting systematic reviews may increase the validity and clinical applicability of future reviews.
-
Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on Periodontal Regeneration in Humans
Journal of periodontology, 2012Co-Authors: Satheesh Elangovan, Georgia K. Johnson, Nadeem Y Karimbux, Gustavo Avila-ortiz, Veerasathpurush AllareddyAbstract:Background: Systematic reviews represent the highest form of evidence in the current hierarchy of evidence-based dentistry. Critical analysis of published systematic reviews may help to analyze their strengths and weaknesses and to identify areas that need future improvement. The aim of this overview is to determine and compare the quality of systematic reviews published in the field of periodontal Regeneration using established checklists, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines.Methods: A systematic search was conducted to retrieve reviews on periodontal Regeneration in Humans. A total of 14 systematic reviews were selected using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMSTAR guidelines. Each article was given an AMSTAR total score, based on the number of AMSTAR criteria that were fulfilled. The quality of included reviews was further assessed using a checklist proposed in 2003.Results: Onl...
Xiangyou Hu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
reticulon proteins emerging players in neurodegenerative diseases
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2006Co-Authors: Xiangyou HuAbstract:Reticulons (RTNs) are a group of integral membrane proteins that have a uniquely conserved C-terminal domain named RHD. in mammalian genomes, transcripts are produced from four genes, rtn1 to rtn4, under the regulation of tissue or cell-type-specific expression. The presence of alternative promoters for gene expression and multiple cryptic splicing sites have resulted in large numbers of genes/proteins that are classified among the reticulon family. Although this family exists in almost all eukaryotes, only the rtn4 gene product, Nogo (RTN4), has gained relatively more in-depth attention. Despite predominant localization in the endoplasmic reticulum, Nogo on the cell surface appears to play a critical role as an inhibitory molecule for axonal growth and Regeneration in Humans and rodents. Recently, studies have expanded the biological functions of RTNs to other facets including modulating the enzymatic activity of β-secretase in Alzheimer’s disease. in this review, we summarize the accumulated findings concerning the structural and functional aspects of RTNs and speculate on their linkage to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases.
-
Reticulon proteins: emerging players in neurodegenerative diseases.
Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2006Co-Authors: Xiangyou HuAbstract:Reticulons (RTNs) are a group of integral membrane proteins that have a uniquely conserved C-terminal domain named RHD. in mammalian genomes, transcripts are produced from four genes, rtn1 to rtn4, under the regulation of tissue or cell-type-specific expression. The presence of alternative promoters for gene expression and multiple cryptic splicing sites have resulted in large numbers of genes/proteins that are classified among the reticulon family. Although this family exists in almost all eukaryotes, only the rtn4 gene product, Nogo (RTN4), has gained relatively more in-depth attention. Despite predominant localization in the endoplasmic reticulum, Nogo on the cell surface appears to play a critical role as an inhibitory molecule for axonal growth and Regeneration in Humans and rodents. Recently, studies have expanded the biological functions of RTNs to other facets including modulating the enzymatic activity of beta-secretase in Alzheimer's disease. in this review, we summarize the accumulated findings concerning the structural and functional aspects of RTNs and speculate on their linkage to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases.
Geoffrey C Farrell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The effects of partial hepatectomy on serum sex steroids in Humans.
Hepatology, 1992Co-Authors: Christopher Liddle, Michael Hollands, J. Miles Little, Geoffrey C FarrellAbstract:in both rats and Humans, partial hepatectomy results in a substantial increase in serum estradiol concentrations. Because mammalian liver of both sexes contains estrogen receptor, it has been suggested that this surge in serum estrogen concentration may initiate or facilitate liver Regeneration. We have reexamined the potential role of sex steroids in human liver Regeneration by measuring serum estradiol and testosterone concentrations in men and postmenopausal women before and after hepatic resection. The results were compared with those obtained in patients subjected to other forms of major surgery. in both men and postmenopausal women, serum estradiol levels increased after partial hepatectomy. However, the magnitude of increase was not related to the amount of liver removed. Moreover, similar increases occurred in patients undergoing other major surgical procedures not involving the liver. Serum testosterone concentrations decreased in men and increased in postmenopausal women undergoing all forms of surgery. It is concluded that effects of partial hepatectomy on serum sex steroid levels are nonspecific and probably related to stress. These observations diminish the likelihood that such changes are an important factor in the control of liver Regeneration in Humans. (Hepatology 1992;15:623–628).
Franz E. Weber - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effect of rhbmp 2 on guided bone Regeneration in Humans
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2003Co-Authors: Ronald E. Jung, Roland Glauser, P. Schärer, Christoph H. F. Hämmerle, Hermann F. Sailer, Franz E. WeberAbstract:The aim of the present clinical study was to test whether or not the addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) to a xenogenic bone substitute mineral (Bio-Oss) will improve guided bone Regeneration therapy regarding bone volume, density and maturation. in 11 partially edentulous patients, 34 Branemark implants were placed at two different sites in the same jaw (five maxillae, six mandibles) requiring lateral ridge augmentation. The bone defects were randomly assigned to test and control treatments: the test and the control defects were both augmented with the xenogenic bone substitute and a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide). At the test sites, the xenogenic bone substitute mineral was coated with rhBMP-2 in a lyophilization process. Following implant insertion (baseline), the peri-implant bone defect height was measured from the implant shoulder to the first implant-bone contact. After an average healing period of 6 months (SD 0.17, range 5.7-6.2), the residual defects were again measured and trephine burs were used to take 22 bone biopsies from the augmented regions. The healing period was uneventful except for one implant site that showed a wound dehiscence, which spontaneously closed after 4 weeks. Later at reentry, all implants were stable. At baseline, the mean defect height was 7.0 mm (SD 2.67, range 3-12 mm) at test and 5.8 mm (SD 1.81, range 3-8 mm) at control sites. At reentry, the mean defect height decreased to 0.2 mm (SD 0.35, range 0-1 mm) at test sites (corresponding to 96% vertical defect fill) and to 0.4 mm (SD 0.66, range 0-2 mm) at the control site (vertical defect fill of 91%). Reduction in defect height from baseline to reentry for both test and control sites was statistically significant (Wilcoxon P<0.01). Histomorphometric analysis showed an average area density of 37% (SD 11.2, range 23-51%) newly formed bone at test sites and 30% (SD 8.9, range 18-43%) at control sites. The fraction of mineralized bone identified as mature lamellar bone amounted to 76% (SD 14.4, range 47.8-94%) at test compared to 56% (SD 18.3, range 31.6-91.4%) at control sites (paired t-test P<0.05). At BMP-treated sites 57% (SD 16.2, range 29-81%) and at control sites 30% (SD 22.6, range 0-66%) of the surface of the bone substitute particles were in direct contact with newly formed bone (paired t-test P<0.05). It is concluded that the combination of the xenogenic bone substitute mineral with rhBMP-2 can enhance the maturation process of bone Regeneration and can increase the graft to bone contact in Humans. rhBMP-2 has the potential to predictably improve and accelerate guided bone Regeneration therapy.
-
Effect of rhBMP-2 on guided bone Regeneration in Humans
Clinical oral implants research, 2003Co-Authors: Ronald E. Jung, Roland Glauser, P. Schärer, Christoph H. F. Hämmerle, Hermann F. Sailer, Franz E. WeberAbstract:The aim of the present clinical study was to test whether or not the addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) to a xenogenic bone substitute mineral (Bio-Oss) will improve guided bone Regeneration therapy regarding bone volume, density and maturation. in 11 partially edentulous patients, 34 Branemark implants were placed at two different sites in the same jaw (five maxillae, six mandibles) requiring lateral ridge augmentation. The bone defects were randomly assigned to test and control treatments: the test and the control defects were both augmented with the xenogenic bone substitute and a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide). At the test sites, the xenogenic bone substitute mineral was coated with rhBMP-2 in a lyophilization process. Following implant insertion (baseline), the peri-implant bone defect height was measured from the implant shoulder to the first implant-bone contact. After an average healing period of 6 months (SD 0.17, range 5.7-6.2), the residual defects were again measured and trephine burs were used to take 22 bone biopsies from the augmented regions. The healing period was uneventful except for one implant site that showed a wound dehiscence, which spontaneously closed after 4 weeks. Later at reentry, all implants were stable. At baseline, the mean defect height was 7.0 mm (SD 2.67, range 3-12 mm) at test and 5.8 mm (SD 1.81, range 3-8 mm) at control sites. At reentry, the mean defect height decreased to 0.2 mm (SD 0.35, range 0-1 mm) at test sites (corresponding to 96% vertical defect fill) and to 0.4 mm (SD 0.66, range 0-2 mm) at the control site (vertical defect fill of 91%). Reduction in defect height from baseline to reentry for both test and control sites was statistically significant (Wilcoxon P