The Experts below are selected from a list of 2634 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Elizabeth F Loftus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory persists
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Olivier Dodier, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:On the basis of converging research, we concluded that the controversial topic of unconscious blockage of psychological trauma (i.e., Repressed Memory) remains very much alive in clinical, legal, and academic contexts. In his commentary, Brewin (this issue, p. 443) conducted a cocitation analysis and concluded that scholars do not adhere to the concept of unconscious repression. Furthermore, he argued that previous survey research did not specifically assess unconscious repression. Here, we present critical evidence that runs counter to his claims. First, we inspected his cocitation analysis and found that some scholars support notions that are closely related to unconscious repression. Furthermore, we conducted another analysis on the basis of articles' similarity. Again, we found examples of scholars specifically endorsing unconscious Repressed memories. Second, as opposed to what Brewin reports, recent survey research now exists that bears directly on people's beliefs regarding unconscious repression. This work reveals that large percentages of people (e.g., students and eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] clinicians) endorse the concept of unconscious Repressed memories. The belief in unconscious Repressed Memory can continue to contribute to harmful consequences in clinical, legal, and academic domains (e.g., false accusations of abuse).
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory is widespread a comment on brewin li ntarantana unsworth and mcneilis 2019
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Jianqin Wang, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:What does believing in Repressed Memory mean? In a recent article in this journal, Brewin, Li, Ntarantana, Unsworth, and McNeilis (2019, Study 3) argued that when people are asked to indicate their belief in Repressed Memory, they might actually think of deliberate Memory suppression rather than unconscious Repressed Memory. They further argued that in contrast to belief in unconscious Repressed Memory, belief in deliberate Memory suppression is not scientifically controversial. In this commentary, we show that they are incorrect on both counts. Although Brewin and colleagues surveyed people to indicate their belief in deliberate Memory suppression, they neglected to ask their participants whether they (also) believed in unconscious Repressed Memory. We asked people from the general population whether they believed that traumatic experiences can be unconsciously Repressed for many years and then recovered. In 2 studies of the general population, we found high endorsement rates (Study 1 [N = 230]: 59.2% [n = 45]; Study 2 [N = 79]: 67.1% [n = 53]) of the belief in unconscious Repressed Memory. These endorsement rates did not statistically differ from endorsement rates to statements on Repressed Memory and deliberate Memory suppression. In contrast to what Brewin et al. argued, belief in unconscious Repressed Memory among lay people is alive and well. Finally, we contend that Brewin et al. overstated the scientific evidence bearing on deliberate repression (suppression). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
-
Memory experts beliefs about Repressed Memory
Social Science Research Network, 2019Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mario E HerreraAbstract:What we believe about how Memory works affects the decisions we make in many aspects of life. In Patihis, Ho et al. [Patihis, L., Ho, L. Y., Tingen, I. W., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (2014). Are the “Memory wars” over? A scientist–practitioner gap in beliefs about Repressed Memory. Psychological Science, 25, 519–530.], we documented several group’s beliefs on Repressed memories and other aspects of how Memory works. Here, we present previously unreported data on the beliefs of perhaps the most credible minority in our dataset: Memory experts. We provide the statistics and written responses of the beliefs for 17 Memory experts. Although Memory experts held similarly sceptical beliefs about Repressed Memory as other researchfocused groups, they were significantly more sceptical about Repressed Memory compared to practitioners, students and the public. Although a minority of Memory experts wrote that they maintained an open mind about Repressed memories – citing research such as retrieval inhibition – all of the Memory experts emphasised the dangers of Memory distortion.
-
unconscious Repressed Memory is scientifically questionable
Psychological Science, 2014Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:Psychological Science http://pss.sagepub.com/ Unconscious Repressed Memory Is Scientifically Questionable Lawrence Patihis, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Lavina Y. Ho and Elizabeth F. Loftus Psychological Science 2014 25: 1967 originally published online 18 August 2014 DOI: 10.1177/0956797614547365 The online version of this article can be found at: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/25/10/1967 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: Association for Psychological Science Additional services and information for Psychological Science can be found at: Email Alerts: http://pss.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://pss.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Oct 8, 2014 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Aug 18, 2014 What is This? Downloaded from pss.sagepub.com at UNIV CALIFORNIA IRVINE on October 29, 2014
-
unconscious Repressed Memory is scientifically questionable
Social Science Research Network, 2014Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:Brewin and Andrews’s (2014) Commentary on our article (Patihis, Ho, Tingen, Lilienfeld, & Loftus, 2014) raises several thoughtful points with which we largely agree, but presents several criticisms that we do not believe withstand careful scrutiny. We respond briefly.
Lawrence Patihis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory persists
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Olivier Dodier, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:On the basis of converging research, we concluded that the controversial topic of unconscious blockage of psychological trauma (i.e., Repressed Memory) remains very much alive in clinical, legal, and academic contexts. In his commentary, Brewin (this issue, p. 443) conducted a cocitation analysis and concluded that scholars do not adhere to the concept of unconscious repression. Furthermore, he argued that previous survey research did not specifically assess unconscious repression. Here, we present critical evidence that runs counter to his claims. First, we inspected his cocitation analysis and found that some scholars support notions that are closely related to unconscious repression. Furthermore, we conducted another analysis on the basis of articles' similarity. Again, we found examples of scholars specifically endorsing unconscious Repressed memories. Second, as opposed to what Brewin reports, recent survey research now exists that bears directly on people's beliefs regarding unconscious repression. This work reveals that large percentages of people (e.g., students and eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] clinicians) endorse the concept of unconscious Repressed memories. The belief in unconscious Repressed Memory can continue to contribute to harmful consequences in clinical, legal, and academic domains (e.g., false accusations of abuse).
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory is widespread a comment on brewin li ntarantana unsworth and mcneilis 2019
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Jianqin Wang, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:What does believing in Repressed Memory mean? In a recent article in this journal, Brewin, Li, Ntarantana, Unsworth, and McNeilis (2019, Study 3) argued that when people are asked to indicate their belief in Repressed Memory, they might actually think of deliberate Memory suppression rather than unconscious Repressed Memory. They further argued that in contrast to belief in unconscious Repressed Memory, belief in deliberate Memory suppression is not scientifically controversial. In this commentary, we show that they are incorrect on both counts. Although Brewin and colleagues surveyed people to indicate their belief in deliberate Memory suppression, they neglected to ask their participants whether they (also) believed in unconscious Repressed Memory. We asked people from the general population whether they believed that traumatic experiences can be unconsciously Repressed for many years and then recovered. In 2 studies of the general population, we found high endorsement rates (Study 1 [N = 230]: 59.2% [n = 45]; Study 2 [N = 79]: 67.1% [n = 53]) of the belief in unconscious Repressed Memory. These endorsement rates did not statistically differ from endorsement rates to statements on Repressed Memory and deliberate Memory suppression. In contrast to what Brewin et al. argued, belief in unconscious Repressed Memory among lay people is alive and well. Finally, we contend that Brewin et al. overstated the scientific evidence bearing on deliberate repression (suppression). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
-
Memory experts beliefs about Repressed Memory
Social Science Research Network, 2019Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mario E HerreraAbstract:What we believe about how Memory works affects the decisions we make in many aspects of life. In Patihis, Ho et al. [Patihis, L., Ho, L. Y., Tingen, I. W., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (2014). Are the “Memory wars” over? A scientist–practitioner gap in beliefs about Repressed Memory. Psychological Science, 25, 519–530.], we documented several group’s beliefs on Repressed memories and other aspects of how Memory works. Here, we present previously unreported data on the beliefs of perhaps the most credible minority in our dataset: Memory experts. We provide the statistics and written responses of the beliefs for 17 Memory experts. Although Memory experts held similarly sceptical beliefs about Repressed Memory as other researchfocused groups, they were significantly more sceptical about Repressed Memory compared to practitioners, students and the public. Although a minority of Memory experts wrote that they maintained an open mind about Repressed memories – citing research such as retrieval inhibition – all of the Memory experts emphasised the dangers of Memory distortion.
-
unconscious Repressed Memory is scientifically questionable
Psychological Science, 2014Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:Psychological Science http://pss.sagepub.com/ Unconscious Repressed Memory Is Scientifically Questionable Lawrence Patihis, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Lavina Y. Ho and Elizabeth F. Loftus Psychological Science 2014 25: 1967 originally published online 18 August 2014 DOI: 10.1177/0956797614547365 The online version of this article can be found at: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/25/10/1967 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: Association for Psychological Science Additional services and information for Psychological Science can be found at: Email Alerts: http://pss.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://pss.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Oct 8, 2014 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Aug 18, 2014 What is This? Downloaded from pss.sagepub.com at UNIV CALIFORNIA IRVINE on October 29, 2014
-
unconscious Repressed Memory is scientifically questionable
Social Science Research Network, 2014Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:Brewin and Andrews’s (2014) Commentary on our article (Patihis, Ho, Tingen, Lilienfeld, & Loftus, 2014) raises several thoughtful points with which we largely agree, but presents several criticisms that we do not believe withstand careful scrutiny. We respond briefly.
Scott O Lilienfeld - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory persists
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Olivier Dodier, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:On the basis of converging research, we concluded that the controversial topic of unconscious blockage of psychological trauma (i.e., Repressed Memory) remains very much alive in clinical, legal, and academic contexts. In his commentary, Brewin (this issue, p. 443) conducted a cocitation analysis and concluded that scholars do not adhere to the concept of unconscious repression. Furthermore, he argued that previous survey research did not specifically assess unconscious repression. Here, we present critical evidence that runs counter to his claims. First, we inspected his cocitation analysis and found that some scholars support notions that are closely related to unconscious repression. Furthermore, we conducted another analysis on the basis of articles' similarity. Again, we found examples of scholars specifically endorsing unconscious Repressed memories. Second, as opposed to what Brewin reports, recent survey research now exists that bears directly on people's beliefs regarding unconscious repression. This work reveals that large percentages of people (e.g., students and eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] clinicians) endorse the concept of unconscious Repressed memories. The belief in unconscious Repressed Memory can continue to contribute to harmful consequences in clinical, legal, and academic domains (e.g., false accusations of abuse).
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory is widespread a comment on brewin li ntarantana unsworth and mcneilis 2019
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Jianqin Wang, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:What does believing in Repressed Memory mean? In a recent article in this journal, Brewin, Li, Ntarantana, Unsworth, and McNeilis (2019, Study 3) argued that when people are asked to indicate their belief in Repressed Memory, they might actually think of deliberate Memory suppression rather than unconscious Repressed Memory. They further argued that in contrast to belief in unconscious Repressed Memory, belief in deliberate Memory suppression is not scientifically controversial. In this commentary, we show that they are incorrect on both counts. Although Brewin and colleagues surveyed people to indicate their belief in deliberate Memory suppression, they neglected to ask their participants whether they (also) believed in unconscious Repressed Memory. We asked people from the general population whether they believed that traumatic experiences can be unconsciously Repressed for many years and then recovered. In 2 studies of the general population, we found high endorsement rates (Study 1 [N = 230]: 59.2% [n = 45]; Study 2 [N = 79]: 67.1% [n = 53]) of the belief in unconscious Repressed Memory. These endorsement rates did not statistically differ from endorsement rates to statements on Repressed Memory and deliberate Memory suppression. In contrast to what Brewin et al. argued, belief in unconscious Repressed Memory among lay people is alive and well. Finally, we contend that Brewin et al. overstated the scientific evidence bearing on deliberate repression (suppression). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
-
unconscious Repressed Memory is scientifically questionable
Psychological Science, 2014Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:Psychological Science http://pss.sagepub.com/ Unconscious Repressed Memory Is Scientifically Questionable Lawrence Patihis, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Lavina Y. Ho and Elizabeth F. Loftus Psychological Science 2014 25: 1967 originally published online 18 August 2014 DOI: 10.1177/0956797614547365 The online version of this article can be found at: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/25/10/1967 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: Association for Psychological Science Additional services and information for Psychological Science can be found at: Email Alerts: http://pss.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://pss.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Oct 8, 2014 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Aug 18, 2014 What is This? Downloaded from pss.sagepub.com at UNIV CALIFORNIA IRVINE on October 29, 2014
-
unconscious Repressed Memory is scientifically questionable
Social Science Research Network, 2014Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:Brewin and Andrews’s (2014) Commentary on our article (Patihis, Ho, Tingen, Lilienfeld, & Loftus, 2014) raises several thoughtful points with which we largely agree, but presents several criticisms that we do not believe withstand careful scrutiny. We respond briefly.
-
are the Memory wars over a scientist practitioner gap in beliefs about Repressed Memory
Social Science Research Network, 2013Co-Authors: Lawrence Patihis, Scott O Lilienfeld, Ian W Tingen, Elizabeth F LoftusAbstract:The “Memory wars” of the 1990s refers to the controversy between some clinicians and Memory scientists about the reliability of Repressed memories. To investigate whether such disagreement persists, we compared various groups’ beliefs about Memory and compared their current beliefs with beliefs expressed in past studies. In Study 1, we found high rates of belief in Repressed Memory among undergraduates. We also found that greater critical-thinking ability was associated with more skepticism about Repressed memories. In Study 2, we found less belief in Repressed Memory among mainstream clinicians today compared with the 1990s. Groups that contained research-oriented psychologists and Memory experts expressed more skepticism about the validity of Repressed memories relative to other groups. Thus, a substantial gap between the Memory beliefs of clinical-psychology researchers and those of practitioners persists today. These results hold implications for the potential resolution of the science-practice gap and for the dissemination of Memory research in the training of mental-health professionals.
Henry Otgaar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory persists
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Olivier Dodier, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:On the basis of converging research, we concluded that the controversial topic of unconscious blockage of psychological trauma (i.e., Repressed Memory) remains very much alive in clinical, legal, and academic contexts. In his commentary, Brewin (this issue, p. 443) conducted a cocitation analysis and concluded that scholars do not adhere to the concept of unconscious repression. Furthermore, he argued that previous survey research did not specifically assess unconscious repression. Here, we present critical evidence that runs counter to his claims. First, we inspected his cocitation analysis and found that some scholars support notions that are closely related to unconscious repression. Furthermore, we conducted another analysis on the basis of articles' similarity. Again, we found examples of scholars specifically endorsing unconscious Repressed memories. Second, as opposed to what Brewin reports, recent survey research now exists that bears directly on people's beliefs regarding unconscious repression. This work reveals that large percentages of people (e.g., students and eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] clinicians) endorse the concept of unconscious Repressed memories. The belief in unconscious Repressed Memory can continue to contribute to harmful consequences in clinical, legal, and academic domains (e.g., false accusations of abuse).
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory is widespread a comment on brewin li ntarantana unsworth and mcneilis 2019
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Jianqin Wang, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:What does believing in Repressed Memory mean? In a recent article in this journal, Brewin, Li, Ntarantana, Unsworth, and McNeilis (2019, Study 3) argued that when people are asked to indicate their belief in Repressed Memory, they might actually think of deliberate Memory suppression rather than unconscious Repressed Memory. They further argued that in contrast to belief in unconscious Repressed Memory, belief in deliberate Memory suppression is not scientifically controversial. In this commentary, we show that they are incorrect on both counts. Although Brewin and colleagues surveyed people to indicate their belief in deliberate Memory suppression, they neglected to ask their participants whether they (also) believed in unconscious Repressed Memory. We asked people from the general population whether they believed that traumatic experiences can be unconsciously Repressed for many years and then recovered. In 2 studies of the general population, we found high endorsement rates (Study 1 [N = 230]: 59.2% [n = 45]; Study 2 [N = 79]: 67.1% [n = 53]) of the belief in unconscious Repressed Memory. These endorsement rates did not statistically differ from endorsement rates to statements on Repressed Memory and deliberate Memory suppression. In contrast to what Brewin et al. argued, belief in unconscious Repressed Memory among lay people is alive and well. Finally, we contend that Brewin et al. overstated the scientific evidence bearing on deliberate repression (suppression). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Mark L Howe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory persists
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Olivier Dodier, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:On the basis of converging research, we concluded that the controversial topic of unconscious blockage of psychological trauma (i.e., Repressed Memory) remains very much alive in clinical, legal, and academic contexts. In his commentary, Brewin (this issue, p. 443) conducted a cocitation analysis and concluded that scholars do not adhere to the concept of unconscious repression. Furthermore, he argued that previous survey research did not specifically assess unconscious repression. Here, we present critical evidence that runs counter to his claims. First, we inspected his cocitation analysis and found that some scholars support notions that are closely related to unconscious repression. Furthermore, we conducted another analysis on the basis of articles' similarity. Again, we found examples of scholars specifically endorsing unconscious Repressed memories. Second, as opposed to what Brewin reports, recent survey research now exists that bears directly on people's beliefs regarding unconscious repression. This work reveals that large percentages of people (e.g., students and eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] clinicians) endorse the concept of unconscious Repressed memories. The belief in unconscious Repressed Memory can continue to contribute to harmful consequences in clinical, legal, and academic domains (e.g., false accusations of abuse).
-
belief in unconscious Repressed Memory is widespread a comment on brewin li ntarantana unsworth and mcneilis 2019
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020Co-Authors: Henry Otgaar, Elizabeth F Loftus, Mark L Howe, Scott O Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Jianqin Wang, Lawrence PatihisAbstract:What does believing in Repressed Memory mean? In a recent article in this journal, Brewin, Li, Ntarantana, Unsworth, and McNeilis (2019, Study 3) argued that when people are asked to indicate their belief in Repressed Memory, they might actually think of deliberate Memory suppression rather than unconscious Repressed Memory. They further argued that in contrast to belief in unconscious Repressed Memory, belief in deliberate Memory suppression is not scientifically controversial. In this commentary, we show that they are incorrect on both counts. Although Brewin and colleagues surveyed people to indicate their belief in deliberate Memory suppression, they neglected to ask their participants whether they (also) believed in unconscious Repressed Memory. We asked people from the general population whether they believed that traumatic experiences can be unconsciously Repressed for many years and then recovered. In 2 studies of the general population, we found high endorsement rates (Study 1 [N = 230]: 59.2% [n = 45]; Study 2 [N = 79]: 67.1% [n = 53]) of the belief in unconscious Repressed Memory. These endorsement rates did not statistically differ from endorsement rates to statements on Repressed Memory and deliberate Memory suppression. In contrast to what Brewin et al. argued, belief in unconscious Repressed Memory among lay people is alive and well. Finally, we contend that Brewin et al. overstated the scientific evidence bearing on deliberate repression (suppression). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).