The Experts below are selected from a list of 174 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Sagar Galwankar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the american college of academic international medicine 2017 consensus statement on international medical programs establishing a system of objective valuation and quantitative metrics to facilitate the recognition and incorporation of academic inter
    International journal of critical illness and injury science, 2017
    Co-Authors: Gregory L Peck, Manish Garg, Bonnie Arquilla, Vicente H Gracias, Harry L Anderson, Andrew C Miller, Bhakti Hansoti, Paula Ferrada, Michael S Firstenberg, Sagar Galwankar
    Abstract:

    The growth of academic international medicine (AIM) as a distinct field of expertise resulted in increasing participation by individual and institutional actors from both high-income and low-and-middle-income countries. This trend resulted in the gradual evolution of international medical programs (IMPs). With the growing number of students, residents, and educators who gravitate toward nontraditional forms of academic contribution, the need arose for a system of formalized metrics and quantitative assessment of AIM- and IMP-related efforts. Within this emerging paradigm, an institution's "return on investment" from faculty involvement in AIM and participation in IMPs can be measured by establishing equivalency between international work and various established academic activities that lead to greater institutional visibility and Reputational Impact. The goal of this consensus statement is to provide a basic framework for quantitative assessment and standardized metrics of professional effort attributable to active faculty engagement in AIM and participation in IMPs. Implicit to the current work is the understanding that the proposed system should be flexible and adaptable to the dynamically evolving landscape of AIM - an increasingly important subset of general academic medical activities.

  • the american college of academic international medicine 2017 consensus statement on international medical programs establishing a system of objective valuation and quantitative metrics to facilitate the recognition and incorporation of academic inter
    International Journal of Academic Medicine, 2017
    Co-Authors: Gregory L Peck, Manish Garg, Bonnie Arquilla, Vicente H Gracias, Harry L Anderson, Andrew C Miller, Bhakti Hansoti, Paula Ferrada, Michael S Firstenberg, Sagar Galwankar
    Abstract:

    The growth of academic international medicine (AIM) as a distinct field of expertise resulted in increasing participation by individual and institutional actors from both high-income and low-and-middle-income countries. This trend resulted in the gradual evolution of international medical programs (IMPs). With the growing number of students, residents, and educators who gravitate toward nontraditional forms of academic contribution, the need arose for a system of formalized metrics and quantitative assessment of AIM- and IMP-related efforts. Within this emerging paradigm, an institution's “return on investment” from faculty involvement in AIM and participation in IMPs can be measured by establishing equivalency between international work and various established academic activities that lead to greater institutional visibility and Reputational Impact. The goal of this consensus statement is to provide a basic framework for quantitative assessment and standardized metrics of professional effort attributable to active faculty engagement in AIM and participation in IMPs. Implicit to the current work is the understanding that the proposed system should be flexible and adaptable to the dynamically evolving landscape of AIM – an increasingly important subset of general academic medical activities. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care, Medical knowledge, Professionalism, Interpersonal and communication skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Systems-based practice

Paola Schwizer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Reputational losses and operational risk in banking
    The European Journal of Finance, 2012
    Co-Authors: Franco Fiordelisi, Maria Gaia Soana, Paola Schwizer
    Abstract:

    Reputation is a key asset for any company whose affairs, like those of banks, are based on trust. Despite its importance, the number of studies dealing with Reputational risk in the financial industry is still limited. We estimate the Reputational Impact of announced operational losses for a large sample of banks (both commercial and investment) in Europe and the USA between 1994 and 2008. By conducting an event study, we show that substantial Reputational losses occur following announcements of ‘pure’ operational losses. We provide evidence that ‘fraud’ is the event type that generates the greatest Reputational damage. ‘Trading and sales’ and ‘payment and settlement’ are the two business lines determining considerable Reputational losses. We also found that losses are higher in Europe than in North America.

  • Reputational Losses and Operational Risk in Banking
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: Franco Fiordelisi, Paola Schwizer, Maria Gaia Soana
    Abstract:

    Reputation is a key asset for any company whose affairs are based on trust like banks. Despite its importance, the number of studies dealing with Reputational risk in financial industry is still limited. We estimate the Reputational Impact of announced operational losses for a large sample of financial companies in Europe and in the U.S. between 1994 and 2008. By running an event study, we show that substantial Reputational losses occur following announcements of “pure” operational losses. We provide evidence that “fraud” is the event type that generates the most Reputational damage. “Trading and sales" and “payment and settlement” are the two business lines determining crucial Reputational losses. We also find that Reputational losses are higher in Europe than in North America.

  • Reputational Risk and Operating Losses: An Empirical Analysis on Listed Banks
    2010
    Co-Authors: Paola Schwizer, Maria Gaia Soana, Gabriele Maucci, Daniele Ruspantini
    Abstract:

    This paper assesses the Reputational Impact of announced operational losses for a sample of 163 listed financial companies from 1994 to 2008.Measurement of Reputational losses is carried out using the event study methodology.The results show that fraud is the event type that generates the biggest Reputational damage. Reputational losses taking place in Europe appear higher than those taking place in America. Finally the article illustrates UniCredit Group’s management and control of Reputational risk.

Maria Gaia Soana - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Reputational losses and operational risk in banking
    The European Journal of Finance, 2012
    Co-Authors: Franco Fiordelisi, Maria Gaia Soana, Paola Schwizer
    Abstract:

    Reputation is a key asset for any company whose affairs, like those of banks, are based on trust. Despite its importance, the number of studies dealing with Reputational risk in the financial industry is still limited. We estimate the Reputational Impact of announced operational losses for a large sample of banks (both commercial and investment) in Europe and the USA between 1994 and 2008. By conducting an event study, we show that substantial Reputational losses occur following announcements of ‘pure’ operational losses. We provide evidence that ‘fraud’ is the event type that generates the greatest Reputational damage. ‘Trading and sales’ and ‘payment and settlement’ are the two business lines determining considerable Reputational losses. We also found that losses are higher in Europe than in North America.

  • Reputational Losses and Operational Risk in Banking
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: Franco Fiordelisi, Paola Schwizer, Maria Gaia Soana
    Abstract:

    Reputation is a key asset for any company whose affairs are based on trust like banks. Despite its importance, the number of studies dealing with Reputational risk in financial industry is still limited. We estimate the Reputational Impact of announced operational losses for a large sample of financial companies in Europe and in the U.S. between 1994 and 2008. By running an event study, we show that substantial Reputational losses occur following announcements of “pure” operational losses. We provide evidence that “fraud” is the event type that generates the most Reputational damage. “Trading and sales" and “payment and settlement” are the two business lines determining crucial Reputational losses. We also find that Reputational losses are higher in Europe than in North America.

  • Reputational Risk and Operating Losses: An Empirical Analysis on Listed Banks
    2010
    Co-Authors: Paola Schwizer, Maria Gaia Soana, Gabriele Maucci, Daniele Ruspantini
    Abstract:

    This paper assesses the Reputational Impact of announced operational losses for a sample of 163 listed financial companies from 1994 to 2008.Measurement of Reputational losses is carried out using the event study methodology.The results show that fraud is the event type that generates the biggest Reputational damage. Reputational losses taking place in Europe appear higher than those taking place in America. Finally the article illustrates UniCredit Group’s management and control of Reputational risk.

Mihailis Diamantis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • White Collar Crime: Cases, Material, and Problems - Chapter 1 (Overview of White Collar Crime)
    2021
    Co-Authors: Kelly Strader, John P. Anderson, Mihailis Diamantis
    Abstract:

    It is hard to overstate the Impact that white collar crime has on the United States. According to recent estimates from the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the annual economic loss attributable to white collar crime is at least twenty times greater than the economic loss attributable to every other sort of crime combined: $300 billion/year (minimum) versus $15 billion/year. In an effort to curb its effects, governmental and private parties dedicate massive resources to detection, prevention, and sanction. Corporations collectively spend as much on internal compliance as the entire nation spends on municipal policing. We will see throughout this text how white collar crime bends and occasionally breaks the usual logic of criminal justice. Ordinarily, criminal conduct that causes more harm should be punished more harshly, whether for reasons of retribution or deterrence. Despite the outsized effects of white collar misconduct, many commentators question whether it really should count as crime at all. Individual white collar defendants who are convicted routinely receive more lenient sentences than street criminals, the effects of whose wrongs are often much smaller and much more contained. As to the largest corporate criminal defendants, criminal justice mechanisms often ensure an extrajudicial resolution that limits the Reputational Impact of authorities’ suspicions. This chapter highlights some of the principal issues of law and policy that arise in white collar investigations and prosecutions.

Gregory L Peck - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the american college of academic international medicine 2017 consensus statement on international medical programs establishing a system of objective valuation and quantitative metrics to facilitate the recognition and incorporation of academic inter
    International journal of critical illness and injury science, 2017
    Co-Authors: Gregory L Peck, Manish Garg, Bonnie Arquilla, Vicente H Gracias, Harry L Anderson, Andrew C Miller, Bhakti Hansoti, Paula Ferrada, Michael S Firstenberg, Sagar Galwankar
    Abstract:

    The growth of academic international medicine (AIM) as a distinct field of expertise resulted in increasing participation by individual and institutional actors from both high-income and low-and-middle-income countries. This trend resulted in the gradual evolution of international medical programs (IMPs). With the growing number of students, residents, and educators who gravitate toward nontraditional forms of academic contribution, the need arose for a system of formalized metrics and quantitative assessment of AIM- and IMP-related efforts. Within this emerging paradigm, an institution's "return on investment" from faculty involvement in AIM and participation in IMPs can be measured by establishing equivalency between international work and various established academic activities that lead to greater institutional visibility and Reputational Impact. The goal of this consensus statement is to provide a basic framework for quantitative assessment and standardized metrics of professional effort attributable to active faculty engagement in AIM and participation in IMPs. Implicit to the current work is the understanding that the proposed system should be flexible and adaptable to the dynamically evolving landscape of AIM - an increasingly important subset of general academic medical activities.

  • the american college of academic international medicine 2017 consensus statement on international medical programs establishing a system of objective valuation and quantitative metrics to facilitate the recognition and incorporation of academic inter
    International Journal of Academic Medicine, 2017
    Co-Authors: Gregory L Peck, Manish Garg, Bonnie Arquilla, Vicente H Gracias, Harry L Anderson, Andrew C Miller, Bhakti Hansoti, Paula Ferrada, Michael S Firstenberg, Sagar Galwankar
    Abstract:

    The growth of academic international medicine (AIM) as a distinct field of expertise resulted in increasing participation by individual and institutional actors from both high-income and low-and-middle-income countries. This trend resulted in the gradual evolution of international medical programs (IMPs). With the growing number of students, residents, and educators who gravitate toward nontraditional forms of academic contribution, the need arose for a system of formalized metrics and quantitative assessment of AIM- and IMP-related efforts. Within this emerging paradigm, an institution's “return on investment” from faculty involvement in AIM and participation in IMPs can be measured by establishing equivalency between international work and various established academic activities that lead to greater institutional visibility and Reputational Impact. The goal of this consensus statement is to provide a basic framework for quantitative assessment and standardized metrics of professional effort attributable to active faculty engagement in AIM and participation in IMPs. Implicit to the current work is the understanding that the proposed system should be flexible and adaptable to the dynamically evolving landscape of AIM – an increasingly important subset of general academic medical activities. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care, Medical knowledge, Professionalism, Interpersonal and communication skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Systems-based practice