The Experts below are selected from a list of 234 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Stefan Panzer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Magnifying visual target information and the role of eye movements in motor sequence learning
Acta Psychologica, 2016Co-Authors: Matthias Massing, Yannick Blandin, Stefan PanzerAbstract:An experiment investigated the influence of eye movements on learning a simple motor sequence task when the visual display was magnified. The task was to reproduce a 1300 ms spatial-temporal pattern of elbow flexions and extensions. The spatial-temporal pattern was displayed in front of the participants. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups differing on eye movements (free to use their eyes/instructed to fixate) and the visual display (small/magnified). All participants had to perform a pre-test, an acquisition phase, a delayed retention test, and a transfer test. The results indicated that participants in each practice condition increased their performance during acquisition. The participants who were permitted to use their eyes in the magnified visual display outperformed those who were instructed to fixate on the magnified visual display. When a small visual display was used, the instruction to fixate induced no performance decrements compared to participants who were permitted to use their eyes during acquisition. The findings demonstrated that a spatial-temporal pattern can be learned without eye movements, but being permitting to use eye movements facilitates the Response Production when the visual angle is increased.
-
The role of eye movements in motor sequence learning
Human Movement Science, 2015Co-Authors: Solveig Vieluf, Matthias Massing, Yannick Blandin, Peter Leinen, Stefan PanzerAbstract:An experiment that utilized a 16-element movement sequence was designed to determine the impact of eye movements on sequence learning. The participants were randomly assigned to two experimental groups: a group that was permitted to use eye movements (FREE) and a second group (FIX) that was instructed to fixate on a marker during acquisition (ACQ). A retention test (RET) was designed to provide a measure of learning, and two transfer tests were designed to determine the extent to which eye movements influenced sequence learning. The results demonstrated that both groups decreased the Response time to produce the sequence, but the participants in the FREE group performed the sequence more quickly than participants of the FIX group during the ACQ, RET and the two transfer tests. Furthermore, continuous visual control of Response execution was reduced over the course of learning. The results of the transfer tests indicated that oculomotor information regarding the sequence can be stored in memory and enhances Response Production.
Matthias Massing - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Magnifying visual target information and the role of eye movements in motor sequence learning
Acta Psychologica, 2016Co-Authors: Matthias Massing, Yannick Blandin, Stefan PanzerAbstract:An experiment investigated the influence of eye movements on learning a simple motor sequence task when the visual display was magnified. The task was to reproduce a 1300 ms spatial-temporal pattern of elbow flexions and extensions. The spatial-temporal pattern was displayed in front of the participants. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups differing on eye movements (free to use their eyes/instructed to fixate) and the visual display (small/magnified). All participants had to perform a pre-test, an acquisition phase, a delayed retention test, and a transfer test. The results indicated that participants in each practice condition increased their performance during acquisition. The participants who were permitted to use their eyes in the magnified visual display outperformed those who were instructed to fixate on the magnified visual display. When a small visual display was used, the instruction to fixate induced no performance decrements compared to participants who were permitted to use their eyes during acquisition. The findings demonstrated that a spatial-temporal pattern can be learned without eye movements, but being permitting to use eye movements facilitates the Response Production when the visual angle is increased.
-
The role of eye movements in motor sequence learning
Human Movement Science, 2015Co-Authors: Solveig Vieluf, Matthias Massing, Yannick Blandin, Peter Leinen, Stefan PanzerAbstract:An experiment that utilized a 16-element movement sequence was designed to determine the impact of eye movements on sequence learning. The participants were randomly assigned to two experimental groups: a group that was permitted to use eye movements (FREE) and a second group (FIX) that was instructed to fixate on a marker during acquisition (ACQ). A retention test (RET) was designed to provide a measure of learning, and two transfer tests were designed to determine the extent to which eye movements influenced sequence learning. The results demonstrated that both groups decreased the Response time to produce the sequence, but the participants in the FREE group performed the sequence more quickly than participants of the FIX group during the ACQ, RET and the two transfer tests. Furthermore, continuous visual control of Response execution was reduced over the course of learning. The results of the transfer tests indicated that oculomotor information regarding the sequence can be stored in memory and enhances Response Production.
Yannick Blandin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Magnifying visual target information and the role of eye movements in motor sequence learning
Acta Psychologica, 2016Co-Authors: Matthias Massing, Yannick Blandin, Stefan PanzerAbstract:An experiment investigated the influence of eye movements on learning a simple motor sequence task when the visual display was magnified. The task was to reproduce a 1300 ms spatial-temporal pattern of elbow flexions and extensions. The spatial-temporal pattern was displayed in front of the participants. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups differing on eye movements (free to use their eyes/instructed to fixate) and the visual display (small/magnified). All participants had to perform a pre-test, an acquisition phase, a delayed retention test, and a transfer test. The results indicated that participants in each practice condition increased their performance during acquisition. The participants who were permitted to use their eyes in the magnified visual display outperformed those who were instructed to fixate on the magnified visual display. When a small visual display was used, the instruction to fixate induced no performance decrements compared to participants who were permitted to use their eyes during acquisition. The findings demonstrated that a spatial-temporal pattern can be learned without eye movements, but being permitting to use eye movements facilitates the Response Production when the visual angle is increased.
-
The role of eye movements in motor sequence learning
Human Movement Science, 2015Co-Authors: Solveig Vieluf, Matthias Massing, Yannick Blandin, Peter Leinen, Stefan PanzerAbstract:An experiment that utilized a 16-element movement sequence was designed to determine the impact of eye movements on sequence learning. The participants were randomly assigned to two experimental groups: a group that was permitted to use eye movements (FREE) and a second group (FIX) that was instructed to fixate on a marker during acquisition (ACQ). A retention test (RET) was designed to provide a measure of learning, and two transfer tests were designed to determine the extent to which eye movements influenced sequence learning. The results demonstrated that both groups decreased the Response time to produce the sequence, but the participants in the FREE group performed the sequence more quickly than participants of the FIX group during the ACQ, RET and the two transfer tests. Furthermore, continuous visual control of Response execution was reduced over the course of learning. The results of the transfer tests indicated that oculomotor information regarding the sequence can be stored in memory and enhances Response Production.
Nobuyuki Matoba - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
N-Glycosylation of cholera toxin B subunit in Nicotiana benthamiana: impacts on host stress Response, Production yield and vaccine potential
Scientific reports, 2015Co-Authors: Krystal Teasley Hamorsky, Adam S. Husk, J. Calvin Kouokam, Jessica M. Jurkiewicz, Bailey Nelson, Lauren J. Moore, Hiroyuki Kajiura, Kazuhito Fujiyama, Nobuyuki MatobaAbstract:N -Glycosylation of cholera toxin B subunit in Nicotiana benthamiana : impacts on host stress Response, Production yield and vaccine potential
Hrvoje Fulgosi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
rapid transient expression of human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in two industrial cultivars of tobacco nicotiana tabacum l by agroinfiltration
Biotechnology Reports, 2015Co-Authors: Lea Vojta, Lana Ljumaskupnjak, Ankica Budimir, Slobodan Vukicevic, Hrvoje FulgosiAbstract:We report the Production of hGM-CSF cytokine in leaves of industrial tobacco cultivars DH-17 and DH-27 by using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression. We prove the concept that very high biomass industrial tobacco plants are suitable platforms for rapid, low cost Production of foreign proteins. Successful transient expression of the GM-CSF was achieved in less than three months, opening the possibility for future applications of this approach in rapid Response Production of various proteins of non-plant origin in industrial tobacco.