The Experts below are selected from a list of 387216 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Picard Arnaud - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Maxillary shape after primary cleft closure and before alveolar bone graft in two different management protocols: A comparative morphometric study
'Elsevier BV', 2019Co-Authors: Girinon François, Ketoff Serge, Hennocq Quentin, Kogane Nicolas, Ullmann Nicolas, Kadlub Natacha, Galliani Eva, Neiva-vaz Cécilia, Vasquez Marie-paule, Picard ArnaudAbstract:International audienceAIM AND SCOPE: Result Assessment in cleft surgery is a technical challenge and requires the development of dedicated morphometric tools. Two cohorts of patients managed according to two different protocols were assessed at similar ages and their palatal shape was compared using geometric morphometrics.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients (protocol No. 1) benefited from early lip closure (1-3 months) and secondary combined soft and hard palate closure (6-9 months); 11 patients (protocol No. 2) benefited from later combined lip and soft palate closure (6 months) followed by hard palate closure (18 months). Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired at 5 years of age and palatal shapes were compared between protocols No. 1 and No. 2 using geometric morphometrics.ResultS: Protocols No. 1 and No. 2 had a significantly different timing in their surgical steps but were assessed at a similar age (5 years). The inter-canine distance was significantly narrower in protocol No. 1. Geometric morphometrics showed that the premaxillary region was located more inferiorly in protocol No. 1.CONCLUSION: Functional approaches to cleft surgery (protocol No. 2) allow obtaining larger inter-canine distances and more anatomical premaxillary positions at 5 years of age when compared to protocols involving early lip closure (protocol No. 1). This is the first study comparing the intermediate Results of two cleft management protocols using 3D CBCT data and geometric morphometrics. Similar Assessments at the end of puberty are required in order to compare the long-term benefits of functional protocols
-
Maxillary shape after primary cleft closure and before alveolar bone graft in two different management protocols: A comparative morphometric study
'Elsevier BV', 2019Co-Authors: Girinon François, Ketoff Serge, Hennocq Quentin, Kogane Nicolas, Ullmann Nicolas, Kadlub Natacha, Galliani Eva, Neiva-vaz Cécilia, Vasquez Marie-paule, Picard ArnaudAbstract:AIM AND SCOPE: Result Assessment in cleft surgery is a technical challenge and requires the development of dedicated morphometric tools. Two cohorts of patients managed according to two different protocols were assessed at similar ages and their palatal shape was compared using geometric morphometrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients (protocol No. 1) benefited from early lip closure (1-3 months) and secondary combined soft and hard palate closure (6-9 months); 11 patients (protocol No. 2) benefited from later combined lip and soft palate closure (6 months) followed by hard palate closure (18 months). Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired at 5 years of age and palatal shapes were compared between protocols No. 1 and No. 2 using geometric morphometrics. ResultS: Protocols No. 1 and No. 2 had a significantly different timing in their surgical steps but were assessed at a similar age (5 years). The inter-canine distance was significantly narrower in protocol No. 1. Geometric morphometrics showed that the premaxillary region was located more inferiorly in protocol No. 1. CONCLUSION: Functional approaches to cleft surgery (protocol No. 2) allow obtaining larger inter-canine distances and more anatomical premaxillary positions at 5 years of age when compared to protocols involving early lip closure (protocol No. 1). This is the first study comparing the intermediate Results of two cleft management protocols using 3D CBCT data and geometric morphometrics. Similar Assessments at the end of puberty are required in order to compare the long-term benefits of functional protocols
Petrova Valentina Fedorovna - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Technology of Personification: Debatable Forms of Education in A Teachers' Training College
2020Co-Authors: Petrova Valentina FedorovnaAbstract:The questions of vocational training of tutors for kindergartens in the system "a teachers' training college - university" are covered in this article. Debatable forms of teaching are considered as the necessary element of the personification technology algorithm applied in the university. Debatable forms allow to realize the personified mechanism of cognition: student's decision to make an action, awareness of the mode of action and the Result Assessment from the position of a goal. In the course of a discussion students master the ability to carry on a dialogue at three levels: dialogue with the self; interaction with various valueintellectual positions (self and another); a multiple simultaneous dialogue arising in the course of problems discussion in small groups. The problem of the research is that students of a teachers' training college are often not prepared for a debatable interaction, they poorly adapt for the personified mode of education in the university
-
Technology of Personification: Debatable Forms of Education in a Teachers’ Training College
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015Co-Authors: Petrova Valentina FedorovnaAbstract:Abstract The questions of vocational training of tutors for kindergartens in the system “a teachers’ training college - university” are covered in this article. Debatable forms of teaching are considered as the necessary element of the personification technology algorithm applied in the university. Debatable forms allow to realize the personified mechanism of cognition: student's decision to make an action, awareness of the mode of action and the Result Assessment from the position of a goal. In the course of a discussion students master the ability to carry on a dialogue at three levels: dialogue with the self; interaction with various value-intellectual positions (self and another); a multiple simultaneous dialogue arising in the course of problems discussion in small groups. The problem of the research is that students of a teachers’ training college are often not prepared for a debatable interaction, they poorly adapt for the personified mode of education in the university. The developed and realized series of debatable forms in the frames of personification technology in a teachers’ training college allowed to prove their positive influence on the quality of students’ academic motivation and communicative skills development, decrease of students’ aggressiveness level in group work, increase of academic achievements.
Girinon François - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Maxillary shape after primary cleft closure and before alveolar bone graft in two different management protocols: A comparative morphometric study
'Elsevier BV', 2019Co-Authors: Girinon François, Ketoff Serge, Hennocq Quentin, Kogane Nicolas, Ullmann Nicolas, Kadlub Natacha, Galliani Eva, Neiva-vaz Cécilia, Vasquez Marie-paule, Picard ArnaudAbstract:International audienceAIM AND SCOPE: Result Assessment in cleft surgery is a technical challenge and requires the development of dedicated morphometric tools. Two cohorts of patients managed according to two different protocols were assessed at similar ages and their palatal shape was compared using geometric morphometrics.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients (protocol No. 1) benefited from early lip closure (1-3 months) and secondary combined soft and hard palate closure (6-9 months); 11 patients (protocol No. 2) benefited from later combined lip and soft palate closure (6 months) followed by hard palate closure (18 months). Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired at 5 years of age and palatal shapes were compared between protocols No. 1 and No. 2 using geometric morphometrics.ResultS: Protocols No. 1 and No. 2 had a significantly different timing in their surgical steps but were assessed at a similar age (5 years). The inter-canine distance was significantly narrower in protocol No. 1. Geometric morphometrics showed that the premaxillary region was located more inferiorly in protocol No. 1.CONCLUSION: Functional approaches to cleft surgery (protocol No. 2) allow obtaining larger inter-canine distances and more anatomical premaxillary positions at 5 years of age when compared to protocols involving early lip closure (protocol No. 1). This is the first study comparing the intermediate Results of two cleft management protocols using 3D CBCT data and geometric morphometrics. Similar Assessments at the end of puberty are required in order to compare the long-term benefits of functional protocols
-
Maxillary shape after primary cleft closure and before alveolar bone graft in two different management protocols: A comparative morphometric study
'Elsevier BV', 2019Co-Authors: Girinon François, Ketoff Serge, Hennocq Quentin, Kogane Nicolas, Ullmann Nicolas, Kadlub Natacha, Galliani Eva, Neiva-vaz Cécilia, Vasquez Marie-paule, Picard ArnaudAbstract:AIM AND SCOPE: Result Assessment in cleft surgery is a technical challenge and requires the development of dedicated morphometric tools. Two cohorts of patients managed according to two different protocols were assessed at similar ages and their palatal shape was compared using geometric morphometrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients (protocol No. 1) benefited from early lip closure (1-3 months) and secondary combined soft and hard palate closure (6-9 months); 11 patients (protocol No. 2) benefited from later combined lip and soft palate closure (6 months) followed by hard palate closure (18 months). Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired at 5 years of age and palatal shapes were compared between protocols No. 1 and No. 2 using geometric morphometrics. ResultS: Protocols No. 1 and No. 2 had a significantly different timing in their surgical steps but were assessed at a similar age (5 years). The inter-canine distance was significantly narrower in protocol No. 1. Geometric morphometrics showed that the premaxillary region was located more inferiorly in protocol No. 1. CONCLUSION: Functional approaches to cleft surgery (protocol No. 2) allow obtaining larger inter-canine distances and more anatomical premaxillary positions at 5 years of age when compared to protocols involving early lip closure (protocol No. 1). This is the first study comparing the intermediate Results of two cleft management protocols using 3D CBCT data and geometric morphometrics. Similar Assessments at the end of puberty are required in order to compare the long-term benefits of functional protocols
Doviak Richard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Phased-Array Radar System Simulator (PASIM): Development and Simulation Result Assessment
2019Co-Authors: Li Zhe, Perera Sudantha, Zhang Yan, Zhang Guifu, Doviak RichardAbstract:In this paper, a system-specific phased-array radar system simulator was developed, based on a time-domain modeling and simulation method, mainly for system performance evaluation of the future Spectrum-Efficient National Surveillance Radar (SENSR). The goal of the simulation study was to establish a complete data quality prediction method based on specific radar hardware and electronics designs. The distributed weather targets were modeled using a covariance matrix-based method. The data quality analysis was conducted using Next-Generation Radar (NEXRAD) Level-II data as a basis, in which the impact of various pulse compression waveforms and channel electronic instability on weather radar data quality was evaluated. Two typical weather scenarios were employed to assess the simulator’s performance, including a tornado case and a convective precipitation case. Also, modeling of some demonstration systems was evaluated, including a generic weather radar, a planar polarimetric phased-array radar, and a cylindrical polarimetric phased-array radar. Corresponding error statistics were provided to help multifunction phased-array radar (MPAR) designers perform trade-off studies.Funding: The work was supported by NOAA/NSSL through Grant # NA16OAR4320115.A Open access fees fees for this article provided whole or in part by OU Libraries Open Access Fund. Acknowledgments: We thank Ramesh Nepal from the Intelligent Aerospace Radar Team (IART) of School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Oklahoma as the initial user of the MATLAB Phased-Array System Toolbox for weather radar simulations at OU, who gave numerous discussions regarding PASIM implementation. We deeply thank Honglei Chen from MathWorks Inc., who provided important guidance and support to the weather radar signal statistical modeling and MATLAB tool.Ye
Ullmann Nicolas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Maxillary shape after primary cleft closure and before alveolar bone graft in two different management protocols: A comparative morphometric study
'Elsevier BV', 2019Co-Authors: Girinon François, Ketoff Serge, Hennocq Quentin, Kogane Nicolas, Ullmann Nicolas, Kadlub Natacha, Galliani Eva, Neiva-vaz Cécilia, Vasquez Marie-paule, Picard ArnaudAbstract:International audienceAIM AND SCOPE: Result Assessment in cleft surgery is a technical challenge and requires the development of dedicated morphometric tools. Two cohorts of patients managed according to two different protocols were assessed at similar ages and their palatal shape was compared using geometric morphometrics.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients (protocol No. 1) benefited from early lip closure (1-3 months) and secondary combined soft and hard palate closure (6-9 months); 11 patients (protocol No. 2) benefited from later combined lip and soft palate closure (6 months) followed by hard palate closure (18 months). Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired at 5 years of age and palatal shapes were compared between protocols No. 1 and No. 2 using geometric morphometrics.ResultS: Protocols No. 1 and No. 2 had a significantly different timing in their surgical steps but were assessed at a similar age (5 years). The inter-canine distance was significantly narrower in protocol No. 1. Geometric morphometrics showed that the premaxillary region was located more inferiorly in protocol No. 1.CONCLUSION: Functional approaches to cleft surgery (protocol No. 2) allow obtaining larger inter-canine distances and more anatomical premaxillary positions at 5 years of age when compared to protocols involving early lip closure (protocol No. 1). This is the first study comparing the intermediate Results of two cleft management protocols using 3D CBCT data and geometric morphometrics. Similar Assessments at the end of puberty are required in order to compare the long-term benefits of functional protocols
-
Maxillary shape after primary cleft closure and before alveolar bone graft in two different management protocols: A comparative morphometric study
'Elsevier BV', 2019Co-Authors: Girinon François, Ketoff Serge, Hennocq Quentin, Kogane Nicolas, Ullmann Nicolas, Kadlub Natacha, Galliani Eva, Neiva-vaz Cécilia, Vasquez Marie-paule, Picard ArnaudAbstract:AIM AND SCOPE: Result Assessment in cleft surgery is a technical challenge and requires the development of dedicated morphometric tools. Two cohorts of patients managed according to two different protocols were assessed at similar ages and their palatal shape was compared using geometric morphometrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients (protocol No. 1) benefited from early lip closure (1-3 months) and secondary combined soft and hard palate closure (6-9 months); 11 patients (protocol No. 2) benefited from later combined lip and soft palate closure (6 months) followed by hard palate closure (18 months). Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired at 5 years of age and palatal shapes were compared between protocols No. 1 and No. 2 using geometric morphometrics. ResultS: Protocols No. 1 and No. 2 had a significantly different timing in their surgical steps but were assessed at a similar age (5 years). The inter-canine distance was significantly narrower in protocol No. 1. Geometric morphometrics showed that the premaxillary region was located more inferiorly in protocol No. 1. CONCLUSION: Functional approaches to cleft surgery (protocol No. 2) allow obtaining larger inter-canine distances and more anatomical premaxillary positions at 5 years of age when compared to protocols involving early lip closure (protocol No. 1). This is the first study comparing the intermediate Results of two cleft management protocols using 3D CBCT data and geometric morphometrics. Similar Assessments at the end of puberty are required in order to compare the long-term benefits of functional protocols
