The Experts below are selected from a list of 29217 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Rachel E Dinero - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
she loves him she loves him not attachment style as a predictor of women s ambivalent sexism toward men
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2013Co-Authors: Joshua Hart, Peter Glick, Rachel E DineroAbstract:In two studies, we examined how romantic attachment style relates to women’s sexism toward men. Specifically, we applied structural equation modeling and mediation analyses to the responses of over 500 self-reported heterosexual women. Study 1 included 229 women who answered questionnaires tapping attachment anxiety and avoidance, ambivalent sexism toward men, Romanticism, and interpersonal trust. We conducted Study 2 as a replication, changing questionnaire order to gauge the robustness of results, using a new sample of 273 women. In general, women’s attachment anxiety predicted ambivalent sexism (both benevolence and hostility) toward men, whereas women’s attachment avoidance predicted univalent hostility (and lower benevolence) toward men. Romanticism mediated attachment style’s relationship to benevolence toward men, whereas lower interpersonal trust mediated attachment’s relationship to hostility toward men. The results suggest that, for women (as for men), sexist attitudes toward members of the othe...
-
he loves her he loves her not attachment style as a personality antecedent to men s ambivalent sexism
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2012Co-Authors: Joshua Hart, Jacqueline A Hung, Peter Glick, Rachel E DineroAbstract:The authors present an integrative account of how attachment insecurities relate to sexism. Two studies showed that attachment avoidance predisposes men to endorse hostile but to reject benevolent sexism (BS), whereas attachment anxiety predisposes men toward ambivalent (both hostile and benevolent) sexism. The authors also tested predicted mediators, finding that men’s social dominance orientation (a competitive intergroup ideology) mediated the avoidance to hostile sexism link. In addition, Romanticism (an idealized interpersonal ideology) mediated attachment insecurity to BS links: (a) Avoidant men tended to reject Romanticism (i.e., were cynical about romance) and, in turn, were likely to reject BS, whereas (b) anxious men tended to endorse Romanticism (i.e., were idealistic about romance) and, in turn, likely to endorse BS. The authors conclude that men’s sexism stems in part from dispositional attachment working models, both directly and through the interpersonal and intergroup ideologies they generate.
Joshua Hart - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
she loves him she loves him not attachment style as a predictor of women s ambivalent sexism toward men
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2013Co-Authors: Joshua Hart, Peter Glick, Rachel E DineroAbstract:In two studies, we examined how romantic attachment style relates to women’s sexism toward men. Specifically, we applied structural equation modeling and mediation analyses to the responses of over 500 self-reported heterosexual women. Study 1 included 229 women who answered questionnaires tapping attachment anxiety and avoidance, ambivalent sexism toward men, Romanticism, and interpersonal trust. We conducted Study 2 as a replication, changing questionnaire order to gauge the robustness of results, using a new sample of 273 women. In general, women’s attachment anxiety predicted ambivalent sexism (both benevolence and hostility) toward men, whereas women’s attachment avoidance predicted univalent hostility (and lower benevolence) toward men. Romanticism mediated attachment style’s relationship to benevolence toward men, whereas lower interpersonal trust mediated attachment’s relationship to hostility toward men. The results suggest that, for women (as for men), sexist attitudes toward members of the othe...
-
he loves her he loves her not attachment style as a personality antecedent to men s ambivalent sexism
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2012Co-Authors: Joshua Hart, Jacqueline A Hung, Peter Glick, Rachel E DineroAbstract:The authors present an integrative account of how attachment insecurities relate to sexism. Two studies showed that attachment avoidance predisposes men to endorse hostile but to reject benevolent sexism (BS), whereas attachment anxiety predisposes men toward ambivalent (both hostile and benevolent) sexism. The authors also tested predicted mediators, finding that men’s social dominance orientation (a competitive intergroup ideology) mediated the avoidance to hostile sexism link. In addition, Romanticism (an idealized interpersonal ideology) mediated attachment insecurity to BS links: (a) Avoidant men tended to reject Romanticism (i.e., were cynical about romance) and, in turn, were likely to reject BS, whereas (b) anxious men tended to endorse Romanticism (i.e., were idealistic about romance) and, in turn, likely to endorse BS. The authors conclude that men’s sexism stems in part from dispositional attachment working models, both directly and through the interpersonal and intergroup ideologies they generate.
Peter Glick - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
she loves him she loves him not attachment style as a predictor of women s ambivalent sexism toward men
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2013Co-Authors: Joshua Hart, Peter Glick, Rachel E DineroAbstract:In two studies, we examined how romantic attachment style relates to women’s sexism toward men. Specifically, we applied structural equation modeling and mediation analyses to the responses of over 500 self-reported heterosexual women. Study 1 included 229 women who answered questionnaires tapping attachment anxiety and avoidance, ambivalent sexism toward men, Romanticism, and interpersonal trust. We conducted Study 2 as a replication, changing questionnaire order to gauge the robustness of results, using a new sample of 273 women. In general, women’s attachment anxiety predicted ambivalent sexism (both benevolence and hostility) toward men, whereas women’s attachment avoidance predicted univalent hostility (and lower benevolence) toward men. Romanticism mediated attachment style’s relationship to benevolence toward men, whereas lower interpersonal trust mediated attachment’s relationship to hostility toward men. The results suggest that, for women (as for men), sexist attitudes toward members of the othe...
-
he loves her he loves her not attachment style as a personality antecedent to men s ambivalent sexism
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2012Co-Authors: Joshua Hart, Jacqueline A Hung, Peter Glick, Rachel E DineroAbstract:The authors present an integrative account of how attachment insecurities relate to sexism. Two studies showed that attachment avoidance predisposes men to endorse hostile but to reject benevolent sexism (BS), whereas attachment anxiety predisposes men toward ambivalent (both hostile and benevolent) sexism. The authors also tested predicted mediators, finding that men’s social dominance orientation (a competitive intergroup ideology) mediated the avoidance to hostile sexism link. In addition, Romanticism (an idealized interpersonal ideology) mediated attachment insecurity to BS links: (a) Avoidant men tended to reject Romanticism (i.e., were cynical about romance) and, in turn, were likely to reject BS, whereas (b) anxious men tended to endorse Romanticism (i.e., were idealistic about romance) and, in turn, likely to endorse BS. The authors conclude that men’s sexism stems in part from dispositional attachment working models, both directly and through the interpersonal and intergroup ideologies they generate.
Ferreira Bernardo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sujeito e ordem: romantismo e decisionismo no pensamento de Carl Schmitt
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2002Co-Authors: Ferreira BernardoAbstract:The objective of this article is to discuss the link in the work of Carl Schmitt between the critique of Romanticism and the reflection on the themes of sovereignty and decision. Based on an analysis of some key issues in the books Politische Romantik (Political Romanticism), Politische Theologie (Political Theology), and Die Diktatur (The Dictatorship), the article analyzes how, in Carl Schmitt, Romanticism and decisionism represent counterpoised conceptual universes, which refer to each other in various aspects. The attempt is thus to highlight both the structurally controversial nature of the German jurist?s ideas and the close ties between his legal/political theory and his critique of the liberal-bourgeois order as a synthesis of modernity
-
Sujet et ordre: romantisme et décisionnisme dans la pensée de Carl Schmitt
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), 2002Co-Authors: Ferreira BernardoAbstract:The objective of this article is to discuss the link in the work of Carl Schmitt between the critique of Romanticism and the reflection on the themes of sovereignty and decision. Based on an analysis of some key issues in the books Politische Romantik (Political Romanticism), Politische Theologie (Political Theology), and Die Diktatur (The Dictatorship), the article analyzes how, in Carl Schmitt, Romanticism and decisionism represent counterpoised conceptual universes, which refer to each other in various aspects. The attempt is thus to highlight both the structurally controversial nature of the German jurist’s ideas and the close ties between his legal/political theory and his critique of the liberal-bourgeois order as a synthesis of modernity.Dans cet article, on examine la jonction, dans l'oeuvre de Carl Schmitt, entre sa critique du romantisme et sa réflexion sur les thèmes de la souveraineté et de la décision. À partir de l'analyse de certains problèmes centraux de ses livres Politische Romantik (Romantisme Politique), Politische Theologie (Théologie Politique) et Die Diktatur (LaDictature), on essaie de dégager comment romantisme et décisionnisme composent, chez Carl Schmitt, des univers conceptuels opposés, qui, sous plusieurs aspects, se renvoient les uns aux autres. On cherche ainsi à souligner, d'un côté, la nature structurellement polémique de la construction des idées chez ce juriste allemand et, d'un autre, les liens étroits entre sa théorie juridico-politique et sa critique de l'ordre libéral-bourgeois en tant que synthèse de la modernité
David L Perkins - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Romanticism and animal rights
2003Co-Authors: David L PerkinsAbstract:Preface Acknowledgements 1. In the beginning of animal rights 2. Grounds of argument 3. Keeping pets: William Cowper and his hares 4. Barbarian pleasures: against hunting 5. Savage amusements of the poor: John Clare's badger sonnets 6. Work animals, slaves, servants: Coleridge's young ass 7. The slaughterhouse and the kitchen: Charles Lamb's 'Dissertation upon Roast Pig' 8. Caged birds and wild Notes Bibliographical essay Index.
-
Romanticism and animal rights
2003Co-Authors: David L PerkinsAbstract:In England in the second half of the eighteenth century an unprecedented amount of writing urged kindness to animals. This theme was carried in many genres, from sermons to encyclopedias, from scientific works to literature for children, and in the poetry of Cowper, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Clare and others. Romanticism and Animal Rights discusses the arguments writers used, and the particular meanings of these arguments in a social and economic context so different from the present. After introductory chapters, the material is divided according to specific practices that particularly influenced feeling or aroused protest: pet keeping, hunting, baiting, working animals, eating them, and the various harms inflicted on wild birds. The book shows how extensively English Romantic writing took up issues of what we now call animal rights. In this respect it joins the growing number of studies that seek precedents or affinities in English Romanticism for our own ecological concerns.
