The Experts below are selected from a list of 43176 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Tobias Heikamp - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Kindergarten children's attachment security, inhibitory control, and the internalization of Rules of Conduct.
Frontiers in psychology, 2013Co-Authors: Tobias Heikamp, Gisela Trommsdorff, Michel D. Druey, Ronald Hübner, Antje Von SuchodoletzAbstract:Starting from research on relations between attachment and the development of self-regulation, the present study aimed to investigate research questions on relations among inhibitory control, internalization of Rules of Conduct (i.e., behavior regulation, concern occasioned by others transgressions, confession, reparation after wrongdoing), and attachment security. Attachment security and internalization of Rules of Conduct of German kindergarten children (N = 82) were assessed by maternal reports. Children’s inhibitory control was measured with the Stop-task. Regression analyses revealed that inhibitory control was positively related to attachment security and to internalization of Rules of Conduct. Mediational analysis using a bootstrapping approach indicated an indirect effect of attachment security on internalization processes via inhibitory control. Implications for further research on the development of inhibitory control and internalization of Rules of Conduct are discussed.
-
Linking maternal warmth and responsiveness to children's self-regulation
Social Development, 2011Co-Authors: Antje Von Suchodoletz, Gisela Trommsdorff, Tobias HeikampAbstract:The present study demonstrated that a more differentiated view of positive parenting practices is necessary in the study of children's acquisition of self-regulation. Here, the unique contributions of maternal warmth and responsiveness to distress to children's self-regulation were tested in a sample of 102 German mothers and their kindergarten children (51 girls and 51 boys). Behavior regulation and internalization of Rules of Conduct were examined as specific components of children's self-regulation. As expected, maternal warmth was positively related to the child's behavior regulation. Responsiveness to distress was positively linked to the child's internalization of Rules of Conduct. No significant interactions between maternal parenting and either the child's gender or effortful control were found. The results are discussed with regard to the unique functions that different parenting practices have for children's self-regulation.
-
Linking Maternal Warmth and Responsiveness to Children's Self‐regulation
Social Development, 2011Co-Authors: Antje Von Suchodoletz, Gisela Trommsdorff, Tobias HeikampAbstract:The present study demonstrated that a more differentiated view of positive parenting practices is necessary in the study of children's acquisition of self‐regulation. Here, the unique contributions of maternal warmth and responsiveness to distress to children's self‐regulation were tested in a sample of 102 German mothers and their kindergarten children (51 girls and 51 boys). Behavior regulation and internalization of Rules of Conduct were examined as specific components of children's self‐regulation. As expected, maternal warmth was positively related to the child's behavior regulation. Responsiveness to distress was positively linked to the child's internalization of Rules of Conduct. No significant interactions between maternal parenting and either the child's gender or effortful control were found. The results are discussed with regard to the unique functions that different parenting practices have for children's self‐regulation.
Antje Von Suchodoletz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Kindergarten children's attachment security, inhibitory control, and the internalization of Rules of Conduct.
Frontiers in psychology, 2013Co-Authors: Tobias Heikamp, Gisela Trommsdorff, Michel D. Druey, Ronald Hübner, Antje Von SuchodoletzAbstract:Starting from research on relations between attachment and the development of self-regulation, the present study aimed to investigate research questions on relations among inhibitory control, internalization of Rules of Conduct (i.e., behavior regulation, concern occasioned by others transgressions, confession, reparation after wrongdoing), and attachment security. Attachment security and internalization of Rules of Conduct of German kindergarten children (N = 82) were assessed by maternal reports. Children’s inhibitory control was measured with the Stop-task. Regression analyses revealed that inhibitory control was positively related to attachment security and to internalization of Rules of Conduct. Mediational analysis using a bootstrapping approach indicated an indirect effect of attachment security on internalization processes via inhibitory control. Implications for further research on the development of inhibitory control and internalization of Rules of Conduct are discussed.
-
Linking maternal warmth and responsiveness to children's self-regulation
Social Development, 2011Co-Authors: Antje Von Suchodoletz, Gisela Trommsdorff, Tobias HeikampAbstract:The present study demonstrated that a more differentiated view of positive parenting practices is necessary in the study of children's acquisition of self-regulation. Here, the unique contributions of maternal warmth and responsiveness to distress to children's self-regulation were tested in a sample of 102 German mothers and their kindergarten children (51 girls and 51 boys). Behavior regulation and internalization of Rules of Conduct were examined as specific components of children's self-regulation. As expected, maternal warmth was positively related to the child's behavior regulation. Responsiveness to distress was positively linked to the child's internalization of Rules of Conduct. No significant interactions between maternal parenting and either the child's gender or effortful control were found. The results are discussed with regard to the unique functions that different parenting practices have for children's self-regulation.
-
Linking Maternal Warmth and Responsiveness to Children's Self‐regulation
Social Development, 2011Co-Authors: Antje Von Suchodoletz, Gisela Trommsdorff, Tobias HeikampAbstract:The present study demonstrated that a more differentiated view of positive parenting practices is necessary in the study of children's acquisition of self‐regulation. Here, the unique contributions of maternal warmth and responsiveness to distress to children's self‐regulation were tested in a sample of 102 German mothers and their kindergarten children (51 girls and 51 boys). Behavior regulation and internalization of Rules of Conduct were examined as specific components of children's self‐regulation. As expected, maternal warmth was positively related to the child's behavior regulation. Responsiveness to distress was positively linked to the child's internalization of Rules of Conduct. No significant interactions between maternal parenting and either the child's gender or effortful control were found. The results are discussed with regard to the unique functions that different parenting practices have for children's self‐regulation.
Valentina Moscon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Digital Markets, Rules of Conduct, and Liability of Online Intermediaries—Analysis of Two Case Studies: Unfair Commercial Practices and Trade Secrets Infringement
Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, 2020Co-Authors: Reto M. Hilty, Valentina MosconAbstract:This chapter will explore the liability of online intermediaries (OIs) under European law, with a focus on infringements of rights and legal interests other than IPRs. The main research question is whether European law adopts a consistent regulatory approach with regard to content hosted by OIs against Rules on market functioning that do not assign exclusive rights but simply impose Rules of Conduct (e.g. Rules on unfair commercial practices). This chapter investigate whether and under which conditions OIs are liable and—beyond the liability of OIs—whether the interests protected by European laws governing the functioning of the market receive the same level of protection in different contexts. To carry on such analysis, the chapter takes into consideration as case studies two bodies of the law, the first one dealing with online unfair commercial practices (UCPs) and the second one with the unlawful acquisition, use, and disclosure of trade secrets. After having summarized the distinguishing features of the safe harbour regime and its interplay with injunctive relief, the chapter will focus on the UCPs and Trade Secrets Directives in relation to the position of OIs. Reference is made to the criteria of interpretation of European law in order to assess the relationship between specific provisions and the concurrent regime set forth in the e-Commerce Directive. Finally, this chapter assesses the emerging results, highlighting the issues which hinder the creation of a coherent and satisfying legal framework.
-
digital markets Rules of Conduct and liability of online intermediaries analysis of two case studies unfair commercial practices and trade secrets infringement
Social Science Research Network, 2020Co-Authors: Reto M. Hilty, Valentina MosconAbstract:This chapter will explore the liability of online intermediaries (OIs) under European law, with a focus on infringements of rights and legal interests other than IPRs. The main research question is whether European law adopts a consistent regulatory approach with regard to content hosted by OIs against Rules on market functioning that do not assign exclusive rights but simply impose Rules of Conduct (e.g. Rules on unfair commercial practices). This chapter investigate whether and under which conditions OIs are liable and—beyond the liability of OIs—whether the interests protected by European laws governing the functioning of the market receive the same level of protection in different contexts. To carry on such analysis, the chapter takes into consideration as case studies two bodies of the law, the first one dealing with online unfair commercial practices (UCPs) and the second one with the unlawful acquisition, use, and disclosure of trade secrets. After having summarized the distinguishing features of the safe harbour regime and its interplay with injunctive relief, the chapter will focus on the UCPs and Trade Secrets Directives in relation to the position of OIs. Reference is made to the criteria of interpretation of European law in order to assess the relationship between specific provisions and the concurrent regime set forth in the e-Commerce Directive. Finally, this chapter assesses the emerging results, highlighting the issues which hinder the creation of a coherent and satisfying legal framework.
Reto M. Hilty - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Digital Markets, Rules of Conduct, and Liability of Online Intermediaries—Analysis of Two Case Studies: Unfair Commercial Practices and Trade Secrets Infringement
Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, 2020Co-Authors: Reto M. Hilty, Valentina MosconAbstract:This chapter will explore the liability of online intermediaries (OIs) under European law, with a focus on infringements of rights and legal interests other than IPRs. The main research question is whether European law adopts a consistent regulatory approach with regard to content hosted by OIs against Rules on market functioning that do not assign exclusive rights but simply impose Rules of Conduct (e.g. Rules on unfair commercial practices). This chapter investigate whether and under which conditions OIs are liable and—beyond the liability of OIs—whether the interests protected by European laws governing the functioning of the market receive the same level of protection in different contexts. To carry on such analysis, the chapter takes into consideration as case studies two bodies of the law, the first one dealing with online unfair commercial practices (UCPs) and the second one with the unlawful acquisition, use, and disclosure of trade secrets. After having summarized the distinguishing features of the safe harbour regime and its interplay with injunctive relief, the chapter will focus on the UCPs and Trade Secrets Directives in relation to the position of OIs. Reference is made to the criteria of interpretation of European law in order to assess the relationship between specific provisions and the concurrent regime set forth in the e-Commerce Directive. Finally, this chapter assesses the emerging results, highlighting the issues which hinder the creation of a coherent and satisfying legal framework.
-
digital markets Rules of Conduct and liability of online intermediaries analysis of two case studies unfair commercial practices and trade secrets infringement
Social Science Research Network, 2020Co-Authors: Reto M. Hilty, Valentina MosconAbstract:This chapter will explore the liability of online intermediaries (OIs) under European law, with a focus on infringements of rights and legal interests other than IPRs. The main research question is whether European law adopts a consistent regulatory approach with regard to content hosted by OIs against Rules on market functioning that do not assign exclusive rights but simply impose Rules of Conduct (e.g. Rules on unfair commercial practices). This chapter investigate whether and under which conditions OIs are liable and—beyond the liability of OIs—whether the interests protected by European laws governing the functioning of the market receive the same level of protection in different contexts. To carry on such analysis, the chapter takes into consideration as case studies two bodies of the law, the first one dealing with online unfair commercial practices (UCPs) and the second one with the unlawful acquisition, use, and disclosure of trade secrets. After having summarized the distinguishing features of the safe harbour regime and its interplay with injunctive relief, the chapter will focus on the UCPs and Trade Secrets Directives in relation to the position of OIs. Reference is made to the criteria of interpretation of European law in order to assess the relationship between specific provisions and the concurrent regime set forth in the e-Commerce Directive. Finally, this chapter assesses the emerging results, highlighting the issues which hinder the creation of a coherent and satisfying legal framework.
Gisela Trommsdorff - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Kindergarten children's attachment security, inhibitory control, and the internalization of Rules of Conduct.
Frontiers in psychology, 2013Co-Authors: Tobias Heikamp, Gisela Trommsdorff, Michel D. Druey, Ronald Hübner, Antje Von SuchodoletzAbstract:Starting from research on relations between attachment and the development of self-regulation, the present study aimed to investigate research questions on relations among inhibitory control, internalization of Rules of Conduct (i.e., behavior regulation, concern occasioned by others transgressions, confession, reparation after wrongdoing), and attachment security. Attachment security and internalization of Rules of Conduct of German kindergarten children (N = 82) were assessed by maternal reports. Children’s inhibitory control was measured with the Stop-task. Regression analyses revealed that inhibitory control was positively related to attachment security and to internalization of Rules of Conduct. Mediational analysis using a bootstrapping approach indicated an indirect effect of attachment security on internalization processes via inhibitory control. Implications for further research on the development of inhibitory control and internalization of Rules of Conduct are discussed.
-
Linking maternal warmth and responsiveness to children's self-regulation
Social Development, 2011Co-Authors: Antje Von Suchodoletz, Gisela Trommsdorff, Tobias HeikampAbstract:The present study demonstrated that a more differentiated view of positive parenting practices is necessary in the study of children's acquisition of self-regulation. Here, the unique contributions of maternal warmth and responsiveness to distress to children's self-regulation were tested in a sample of 102 German mothers and their kindergarten children (51 girls and 51 boys). Behavior regulation and internalization of Rules of Conduct were examined as specific components of children's self-regulation. As expected, maternal warmth was positively related to the child's behavior regulation. Responsiveness to distress was positively linked to the child's internalization of Rules of Conduct. No significant interactions between maternal parenting and either the child's gender or effortful control were found. The results are discussed with regard to the unique functions that different parenting practices have for children's self-regulation.
-
Linking Maternal Warmth and Responsiveness to Children's Self‐regulation
Social Development, 2011Co-Authors: Antje Von Suchodoletz, Gisela Trommsdorff, Tobias HeikampAbstract:The present study demonstrated that a more differentiated view of positive parenting practices is necessary in the study of children's acquisition of self‐regulation. Here, the unique contributions of maternal warmth and responsiveness to distress to children's self‐regulation were tested in a sample of 102 German mothers and their kindergarten children (51 girls and 51 boys). Behavior regulation and internalization of Rules of Conduct were examined as specific components of children's self‐regulation. As expected, maternal warmth was positively related to the child's behavior regulation. Responsiveness to distress was positively linked to the child's internalization of Rules of Conduct. No significant interactions between maternal parenting and either the child's gender or effortful control were found. The results are discussed with regard to the unique functions that different parenting practices have for children's self‐regulation.
