Scale Trial

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 136167 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

M. Victoria Moreno-arribas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • A winery-Scale Trial of the use of antimicrobial plant phenolic extracts as preservatives during wine ageing in barrels
    Food Control, 2013
    Co-Authors: E. González-rompinelli, Juan José Rodríguez-bencomo, Almudena García-ruiz, Fernando Sánchez-patán, Pedro J. Martín-Álvarez, Begoña Bartolomé, M. Victoria Moreno-arribas
    Abstract:

    Antimicrobial plant extracts rich in polyphenols have recently been proposed as a total or partial alternative to sulfites during winemaking. This paper reports a first winery-Scale Trial of the addition of antimicrobial plant extracts during wine ageing in wood. Before being distributed in oak barrels, a Verdejo wine was treated with either a SO2 regular dose (160 mg/L) or with a SO2 half-dose (80 mg/L), together with two phenolic-rich extracts from eucalyptus leaves and almond skins (100 mg/L). Some of the wine was also stored in a stainless steel tank for comparison. After 6 months of ageing, the wine treated with the phenolic extracts remained microbiologically stable and showed correct enological parameters. Also, the volatile and phenolic composition of the wine was specifically determined to ascertain whether the addition of these phenolic extracts would affect the organoleptic properties of the wine. Although the addition of both eucalyptus and almond extracts led to statistically significant changes (p < 0.05) in the concentration of several esters, C13 norisoprenoids, volatile phenols and furanic compounds in the wine, only the concentration of some of these compounds was higher than their odor threshold. With regard to phenolics, addition of both extracts did not significantly modify their content, except for a lower content of hydroxycinnamic acids and esters and flavan-3-ols, which predicts minor changes in wine astringency. As seen from a PCA analysis of all volatile and phenolic data, wines were mainly differentiated by the ageing process itself, by the addition of extracts, and even by the barrel used. Finally, a triangle test showed no significant differences in the global sensory appreciation between wines treated and not treated with the antimicrobial phenolic extracts. These results demonstrated the potential applicability of phenolic extracts as a partial alternative to sulfur dioxide during the ageing of white wines in oak barrels.

Mauricio S. Baptista - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Martin T Wells - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • innovative approaches to weight loss in a high risk population the small changes and lasting effects Scale Trial
    Obesity, 2017
    Co-Authors: Erica Phillips, Ginger Winston, Janey C Peterson, Brian Wansink, Carol M Devine, Elaine Wethington, Martin T Wells, Rosio Ramos, Mary E Charlson
    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a small change behavioral weight loss intervention with or without a positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) component on weight loss at 12 months. Methods Black and Hispanic adults (N = 405) with body mass index 25-50 kg/m2 selected one of ten small change eating strategies and a physical activity goal, randomly with/without PA/SA. Participants were followed by community health workers at set intervals (weekly in months 1-3; biweekly in months 4-9; once monthly in months 10-12). Results There was no difference in weight loss at 12 months between participants in the small change approach alone (1.1%) versus the small change PA/SA intervention (1.2%). During treatment, 9% of participants lost at least 7% of their initial body weight. Participants who reported more interval life events had a lower likelihood of losing weight (P < 0.0001). However, those randomized to the small change PA/SA intervention gained less weight (+0.3% vs. 2.3% gain; P < 0.0001). Conclusions The small change PA/SA intervention did not lead to a significant difference in weight loss in comparison to the small change approach alone. It did, however, decrease the negative impact of psychosocial stressors on weight gain among participants with more interval life events.

  • small changes and lasting effects Scale Trial the formation of a weight loss behavioral intervention using evolve
    Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2015
    Co-Authors: Erica Phillipscaesar, Ginger Winston, Janey C Peterson, Brian Wansink, Carol M Devine, Balavanketsh Kanna, Walid Michelin, Elaine Wethington, Martin T Wells, James P Hollenberg
    Abstract:

    Background Obesity is a major health problem that disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic adults. This paper presents the rationale and innovative design of a small change eating and physical activity intervention (SC) combined with a positive affect and self-affirmation (PA/SA) intervention versus the SC intervention alone for weight loss.

Elaine Wethington - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • innovative approaches to weight loss in a high risk population the small changes and lasting effects Scale Trial
    Obesity, 2017
    Co-Authors: Erica Phillips, Ginger Winston, Janey C Peterson, Brian Wansink, Carol M Devine, Elaine Wethington, Martin T Wells, Rosio Ramos, Mary E Charlson
    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a small change behavioral weight loss intervention with or without a positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) component on weight loss at 12 months. Methods Black and Hispanic adults (N = 405) with body mass index 25-50 kg/m2 selected one of ten small change eating strategies and a physical activity goal, randomly with/without PA/SA. Participants were followed by community health workers at set intervals (weekly in months 1-3; biweekly in months 4-9; once monthly in months 10-12). Results There was no difference in weight loss at 12 months between participants in the small change approach alone (1.1%) versus the small change PA/SA intervention (1.2%). During treatment, 9% of participants lost at least 7% of their initial body weight. Participants who reported more interval life events had a lower likelihood of losing weight (P < 0.0001). However, those randomized to the small change PA/SA intervention gained less weight (+0.3% vs. 2.3% gain; P < 0.0001). Conclusions The small change PA/SA intervention did not lead to a significant difference in weight loss in comparison to the small change approach alone. It did, however, decrease the negative impact of psychosocial stressors on weight gain among participants with more interval life events.

  • small changes and lasting effects Scale Trial the formation of a weight loss behavioral intervention using evolve
    Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2015
    Co-Authors: Erica Phillipscaesar, Ginger Winston, Janey C Peterson, Brian Wansink, Carol M Devine, Balavanketsh Kanna, Walid Michelin, Elaine Wethington, Martin T Wells, James P Hollenberg
    Abstract:

    Background Obesity is a major health problem that disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic adults. This paper presents the rationale and innovative design of a small change eating and physical activity intervention (SC) combined with a positive affect and self-affirmation (PA/SA) intervention versus the SC intervention alone for weight loss.

Carol M Devine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • innovative approaches to weight loss in a high risk population the small changes and lasting effects Scale Trial
    Obesity, 2017
    Co-Authors: Erica Phillips, Ginger Winston, Janey C Peterson, Brian Wansink, Carol M Devine, Elaine Wethington, Martin T Wells, Rosio Ramos, Mary E Charlson
    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a small change behavioral weight loss intervention with or without a positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) component on weight loss at 12 months. Methods Black and Hispanic adults (N = 405) with body mass index 25-50 kg/m2 selected one of ten small change eating strategies and a physical activity goal, randomly with/without PA/SA. Participants were followed by community health workers at set intervals (weekly in months 1-3; biweekly in months 4-9; once monthly in months 10-12). Results There was no difference in weight loss at 12 months between participants in the small change approach alone (1.1%) versus the small change PA/SA intervention (1.2%). During treatment, 9% of participants lost at least 7% of their initial body weight. Participants who reported more interval life events had a lower likelihood of losing weight (P < 0.0001). However, those randomized to the small change PA/SA intervention gained less weight (+0.3% vs. 2.3% gain; P < 0.0001). Conclusions The small change PA/SA intervention did not lead to a significant difference in weight loss in comparison to the small change approach alone. It did, however, decrease the negative impact of psychosocial stressors on weight gain among participants with more interval life events.

  • small changes and lasting effects Scale Trial the formation of a weight loss behavioral intervention using evolve
    Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2015
    Co-Authors: Erica Phillipscaesar, Ginger Winston, Janey C Peterson, Brian Wansink, Carol M Devine, Balavanketsh Kanna, Walid Michelin, Elaine Wethington, Martin T Wells, James P Hollenberg
    Abstract:

    Background Obesity is a major health problem that disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic adults. This paper presents the rationale and innovative design of a small change eating and physical activity intervention (SC) combined with a positive affect and self-affirmation (PA/SA) intervention versus the SC intervention alone for weight loss.