The Experts below are selected from a list of 109350 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Bridget Ellis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
physiotherapy extended Scope of Practice who is doing what and why
Physiotherapy, 2007Co-Authors: Paula Kersten, Kath Mcpherson, Valerie Lattimer, Steve George, Alice Breton, Bridget EllisAbstract:Abstract Objectives To explore the range, drivers and perspectives of extended or enhanced practitioner roles within physiotherapy. Data sources Nineteen electronic databases, hand searches, bibliography scanning and personal contact were used to identify published and unpublished resources. Review methods A systematic review using an expanded approach. Resources were included if they discussed extended Scope of Practice (intervention) in physiotherapy (profession) and outcome (for patients, other health professionals, and health services delivery) irrespective of patient group, language, year of publication (up to 2005), study design, or health care systems evaluated. All resources were screened against formal inclusion criteria for relevance. Information from relevant resources was extracted and details were entered into an Access database. Results One hundred and fifty-two physiotherapy-related resources were identified, including seven which met appropriate quality standards (using Cochrane methodology). A meta-analysis was not performed due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials. Conclusions Drivers for the roles in the 152 resources mainly included local or national service demands (34%). Most extended Scope of Practice roles reported included a form of non-invasive assessment (47%) or non-invasive treatment (37%) of patients that was more traditionally carried out by medical colleagues. None of the resources including data was (a) unsupportive of extended Scope of Practice or (b) mainly expressing concerns. This review has demonstrated overwhelming support for extended Scope of Practice; the vast majority of resources were supportive despite being largely descriptive or discursive in nature (76%). There is an urgent need for robust research in order to evaluate the expansion of extended Scope of Practice roles, underpin further development of those roles, and strengthen the evidence base of extended Scope of Practice in physiotherapy.
-
Physiotherapy extended Scope of Practice – who is doing what and why?
Physiotherapy, 2007Co-Authors: Paula Kersten, Kath Mcpherson, Valerie Lattimer, Steve George, Alice Breton, Bridget EllisAbstract:Abstract Objectives To explore the range, drivers and perspectives of extended or enhanced practitioner roles within physiotherapy. Data sources Nineteen electronic databases, hand searches, bibliography scanning and personal contact were used to identify published and unpublished resources. Review methods A systematic review using an expanded approach. Resources were included if they discussed extended Scope of Practice (intervention) in physiotherapy (profession) and outcome (for patients, other health professionals, and health services delivery) irrespective of patient group, language, year of publication (up to 2005), study design, or health care systems evaluated. All resources were screened against formal inclusion criteria for relevance. Information from relevant resources was extracted and details were entered into an Access database. Results One hundred and fifty-two physiotherapy-related resources were identified, including seven which met appropriate quality standards (using Cochrane methodology). A meta-analysis was not performed due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials. Conclusions Drivers for the roles in the 152 resources mainly included local or national service demands (34%). Most extended Scope of Practice roles reported included a form of non-invasive assessment (47%) or non-invasive treatment (37%) of patients that was more traditionally carried out by medical colleagues. None of the resources including data was (a) unsupportive of extended Scope of Practice or (b) mainly expressing concerns. This review has demonstrated overwhelming support for extended Scope of Practice; the vast majority of resources were supportive despite being largely descriptive or discursive in nature (76%). There is an urgent need for robust research in order to evaluate the expansion of extended Scope of Practice roles, underpin further development of those roles, and strengthen the evidence base of extended Scope of Practice in physiotherapy.
Krista Jablonski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
academy of nutrition and dietetics revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the registered dietitian nutritionist
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2018Co-Authors: Denise Andersen, Shari Baird, Tracey Bates, Denise L Chapel, Alana D Cline, Shyamala N Ganesh, Margaret Garner, Barbara L Grant, Kathryn K Hamilton, Krista JablonskiAbstract:Abstract The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) is the world's largest organization of food and nutrition professionals and the association that represents credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners—registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and nutrition and dietetics technicians, registered (NDTRs). RDNs integrate research, professional development, and Practice to stimulate innovation and discovery; collaborate to solve the greatest food and nutrition challenges now and in the future; focus on systemswide impact across the food, wellness, and health sectors; have a global impact in eliminating all forms of malnutrition; and amplify the contribution of nutrition and dietetics practitioners and expand workforce capacity and capability. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the RDN reflects the position of the Academy on the essential role of the RDN in the direction and delivery of food and nutrition services. The Scope of Practice for the RDN is composed of education and credentialing, Practice resources, Academy Standards of Practice and Professional Performance, codes of ethics, accreditation standards, state and federal regulations, national guidelines, and organizational policy and procedures. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the RDN is used in conjunction with the Revised 2017 Standards of Practice (SOP) in Nutrition Care and the Standards of Professional Performance (SOPP) for RDNs. The SOP address activities related to direct patient and client care. The SOPP address behaviors related to the professional role of RDNs. These standards reflect the minimum competent level of nutrition and dietetics Practice and professional performance for RDNs. A companion document addresses the Scope of Practice for the NDTR.
-
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017Co-Authors: Denise Andersen, Shari Baird, Tracey Bates, Denise L Chapel, Alana D Cline, Shyamala N Ganesh, Margaret Garner, Barbara L Grant, Kathryn K Hamilton, Krista JablonskiAbstract:Abstract The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) is the world's largest organization of food and nutrition professionals and the association that represents credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners—nutrition and dietetics technicians, registered (NDTRs) and registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). An NDTR's Scope of Practice in nutrition and dietetics has flexible boundaries to capture the depth and breadth of the individual's Practice. The NDTR's Practice expands with advances in many areas, including nutrition, food production, food safety, food systems management, health care, public health, community health, and information and communication technology. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the NDTR reflects the position of the Academy on the essential role of the NDTR in the management and delivery of food and nutrition services. The Scope of Practice for the NDTR is composed of education and credentialing, Practice resources, Academy Standards of Practice and Standards of Professional Performance, codes of ethics, accreditation standards, state and federal regulations, national guidelines, and organizational policy and procedures. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the NDTR is used in conjunction with the Revised 2017 Standards of Practice in Nutrition Care and the Standards of Professional Performance for NDTRs. The Standards of Practice address activities related to direct patient and client care. The Standards of Professional Performance address behaviors related to the technical role of NDTRs. These standards reflect the minimum competent level of nutrition and dietetics Practice and professional performance for NDTRs. A companion document addresses the Scope of Practice for the RDN.
Kath Mcpherson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
physiotherapy extended Scope of Practice who is doing what and why
Physiotherapy, 2007Co-Authors: Paula Kersten, Kath Mcpherson, Valerie Lattimer, Steve George, Alice Breton, Bridget EllisAbstract:Abstract Objectives To explore the range, drivers and perspectives of extended or enhanced practitioner roles within physiotherapy. Data sources Nineteen electronic databases, hand searches, bibliography scanning and personal contact were used to identify published and unpublished resources. Review methods A systematic review using an expanded approach. Resources were included if they discussed extended Scope of Practice (intervention) in physiotherapy (profession) and outcome (for patients, other health professionals, and health services delivery) irrespective of patient group, language, year of publication (up to 2005), study design, or health care systems evaluated. All resources were screened against formal inclusion criteria for relevance. Information from relevant resources was extracted and details were entered into an Access database. Results One hundred and fifty-two physiotherapy-related resources were identified, including seven which met appropriate quality standards (using Cochrane methodology). A meta-analysis was not performed due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials. Conclusions Drivers for the roles in the 152 resources mainly included local or national service demands (34%). Most extended Scope of Practice roles reported included a form of non-invasive assessment (47%) or non-invasive treatment (37%) of patients that was more traditionally carried out by medical colleagues. None of the resources including data was (a) unsupportive of extended Scope of Practice or (b) mainly expressing concerns. This review has demonstrated overwhelming support for extended Scope of Practice; the vast majority of resources were supportive despite being largely descriptive or discursive in nature (76%). There is an urgent need for robust research in order to evaluate the expansion of extended Scope of Practice roles, underpin further development of those roles, and strengthen the evidence base of extended Scope of Practice in physiotherapy.
-
Physiotherapy extended Scope of Practice – who is doing what and why?
Physiotherapy, 2007Co-Authors: Paula Kersten, Kath Mcpherson, Valerie Lattimer, Steve George, Alice Breton, Bridget EllisAbstract:Abstract Objectives To explore the range, drivers and perspectives of extended or enhanced practitioner roles within physiotherapy. Data sources Nineteen electronic databases, hand searches, bibliography scanning and personal contact were used to identify published and unpublished resources. Review methods A systematic review using an expanded approach. Resources were included if they discussed extended Scope of Practice (intervention) in physiotherapy (profession) and outcome (for patients, other health professionals, and health services delivery) irrespective of patient group, language, year of publication (up to 2005), study design, or health care systems evaluated. All resources were screened against formal inclusion criteria for relevance. Information from relevant resources was extracted and details were entered into an Access database. Results One hundred and fifty-two physiotherapy-related resources were identified, including seven which met appropriate quality standards (using Cochrane methodology). A meta-analysis was not performed due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials. Conclusions Drivers for the roles in the 152 resources mainly included local or national service demands (34%). Most extended Scope of Practice roles reported included a form of non-invasive assessment (47%) or non-invasive treatment (37%) of patients that was more traditionally carried out by medical colleagues. None of the resources including data was (a) unsupportive of extended Scope of Practice or (b) mainly expressing concerns. This review has demonstrated overwhelming support for extended Scope of Practice; the vast majority of resources were supportive despite being largely descriptive or discursive in nature (76%). There is an urgent need for robust research in order to evaluate the expansion of extended Scope of Practice roles, underpin further development of those roles, and strengthen the evidence base of extended Scope of Practice in physiotherapy.
Paula Kersten - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
physiotherapy extended Scope of Practice who is doing what and why
Physiotherapy, 2007Co-Authors: Paula Kersten, Kath Mcpherson, Valerie Lattimer, Steve George, Alice Breton, Bridget EllisAbstract:Abstract Objectives To explore the range, drivers and perspectives of extended or enhanced practitioner roles within physiotherapy. Data sources Nineteen electronic databases, hand searches, bibliography scanning and personal contact were used to identify published and unpublished resources. Review methods A systematic review using an expanded approach. Resources were included if they discussed extended Scope of Practice (intervention) in physiotherapy (profession) and outcome (for patients, other health professionals, and health services delivery) irrespective of patient group, language, year of publication (up to 2005), study design, or health care systems evaluated. All resources were screened against formal inclusion criteria for relevance. Information from relevant resources was extracted and details were entered into an Access database. Results One hundred and fifty-two physiotherapy-related resources were identified, including seven which met appropriate quality standards (using Cochrane methodology). A meta-analysis was not performed due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials. Conclusions Drivers for the roles in the 152 resources mainly included local or national service demands (34%). Most extended Scope of Practice roles reported included a form of non-invasive assessment (47%) or non-invasive treatment (37%) of patients that was more traditionally carried out by medical colleagues. None of the resources including data was (a) unsupportive of extended Scope of Practice or (b) mainly expressing concerns. This review has demonstrated overwhelming support for extended Scope of Practice; the vast majority of resources were supportive despite being largely descriptive or discursive in nature (76%). There is an urgent need for robust research in order to evaluate the expansion of extended Scope of Practice roles, underpin further development of those roles, and strengthen the evidence base of extended Scope of Practice in physiotherapy.
-
Physiotherapy extended Scope of Practice – who is doing what and why?
Physiotherapy, 2007Co-Authors: Paula Kersten, Kath Mcpherson, Valerie Lattimer, Steve George, Alice Breton, Bridget EllisAbstract:Abstract Objectives To explore the range, drivers and perspectives of extended or enhanced practitioner roles within physiotherapy. Data sources Nineteen electronic databases, hand searches, bibliography scanning and personal contact were used to identify published and unpublished resources. Review methods A systematic review using an expanded approach. Resources were included if they discussed extended Scope of Practice (intervention) in physiotherapy (profession) and outcome (for patients, other health professionals, and health services delivery) irrespective of patient group, language, year of publication (up to 2005), study design, or health care systems evaluated. All resources were screened against formal inclusion criteria for relevance. Information from relevant resources was extracted and details were entered into an Access database. Results One hundred and fifty-two physiotherapy-related resources were identified, including seven which met appropriate quality standards (using Cochrane methodology). A meta-analysis was not performed due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials. Conclusions Drivers for the roles in the 152 resources mainly included local or national service demands (34%). Most extended Scope of Practice roles reported included a form of non-invasive assessment (47%) or non-invasive treatment (37%) of patients that was more traditionally carried out by medical colleagues. None of the resources including data was (a) unsupportive of extended Scope of Practice or (b) mainly expressing concerns. This review has demonstrated overwhelming support for extended Scope of Practice; the vast majority of resources were supportive despite being largely descriptive or discursive in nature (76%). There is an urgent need for robust research in order to evaluate the expansion of extended Scope of Practice roles, underpin further development of those roles, and strengthen the evidence base of extended Scope of Practice in physiotherapy.
Denise Andersen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
academy of nutrition and dietetics revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the registered dietitian nutritionist
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2018Co-Authors: Denise Andersen, Shari Baird, Tracey Bates, Denise L Chapel, Alana D Cline, Shyamala N Ganesh, Margaret Garner, Barbara L Grant, Kathryn K Hamilton, Krista JablonskiAbstract:Abstract The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) is the world's largest organization of food and nutrition professionals and the association that represents credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners—registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and nutrition and dietetics technicians, registered (NDTRs). RDNs integrate research, professional development, and Practice to stimulate innovation and discovery; collaborate to solve the greatest food and nutrition challenges now and in the future; focus on systemswide impact across the food, wellness, and health sectors; have a global impact in eliminating all forms of malnutrition; and amplify the contribution of nutrition and dietetics practitioners and expand workforce capacity and capability. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the RDN reflects the position of the Academy on the essential role of the RDN in the direction and delivery of food and nutrition services. The Scope of Practice for the RDN is composed of education and credentialing, Practice resources, Academy Standards of Practice and Professional Performance, codes of ethics, accreditation standards, state and federal regulations, national guidelines, and organizational policy and procedures. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the RDN is used in conjunction with the Revised 2017 Standards of Practice (SOP) in Nutrition Care and the Standards of Professional Performance (SOPP) for RDNs. The SOP address activities related to direct patient and client care. The SOPP address behaviors related to the professional role of RDNs. These standards reflect the minimum competent level of nutrition and dietetics Practice and professional performance for RDNs. A companion document addresses the Scope of Practice for the NDTR.
-
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017Co-Authors: Denise Andersen, Shari Baird, Tracey Bates, Denise L Chapel, Alana D Cline, Shyamala N Ganesh, Margaret Garner, Barbara L Grant, Kathryn K Hamilton, Krista JablonskiAbstract:Abstract The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) is the world's largest organization of food and nutrition professionals and the association that represents credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners—nutrition and dietetics technicians, registered (NDTRs) and registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). An NDTR's Scope of Practice in nutrition and dietetics has flexible boundaries to capture the depth and breadth of the individual's Practice. The NDTR's Practice expands with advances in many areas, including nutrition, food production, food safety, food systems management, health care, public health, community health, and information and communication technology. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the NDTR reflects the position of the Academy on the essential role of the NDTR in the management and delivery of food and nutrition services. The Scope of Practice for the NDTR is composed of education and credentialing, Practice resources, Academy Standards of Practice and Standards of Professional Performance, codes of ethics, accreditation standards, state and federal regulations, national guidelines, and organizational policy and procedures. The Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the NDTR is used in conjunction with the Revised 2017 Standards of Practice in Nutrition Care and the Standards of Professional Performance for NDTRs. The Standards of Practice address activities related to direct patient and client care. The Standards of Professional Performance address behaviors related to the technical role of NDTRs. These standards reflect the minimum competent level of nutrition and dietetics Practice and professional performance for NDTRs. A companion document addresses the Scope of Practice for the RDN.
