The Experts below are selected from a list of 25866 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Sebastien F M Chastin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background: The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Amy E. Latimer-cheung, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
meta analysis of the relationship between breaks in Sedentary Behavior and cardiometabolic health
Obesity, 2015Co-Authors: Sebastien F M Chastin, Thorlene Egerton, Calum F Leask, Emmanuel StamatakisAbstract:Objective The concept of “breaks” in Sedentary Behavior has emerged as a potential modifier of detrimental effects on adiposity caused by Sedentary Behavior. The existing research investigating the relationship between breaks in Sedentary Behavior with adiposity and cardiometabolic health in adults was systematically reviewed and quantitatively synthesized by this study. Methods Observational and experimental studies that examined the relationships between the frequency of interruptions of Sedentary Behavior and markers of adiposity and cardiometabolic health in adults were identified by a systematic search of the literature. A meta-analysis was conducted by using the inverse variance method for experimental trials and a Bayesian posterior probability of existence of an association between breaks with adiposity and cardiometabolic markers for observational studies. Results: It was revealed by the pooled results from nine experimental studies that breaks in Sedentary periods of at least light intensity may have a positive effect on glycemia but not on lipidemia for adults. It is unclear whether this effect is independent of total sitting time. However, the 10 identified observational studies showed an association with breaks, which was independent of total Sedentary time, but only for obesity metrics. Conclusions The theory that interrupting bouts of Sedentary Behavior with light-intensity activity might help control adiposity and postprandial glycemia was supported by the evidence. Further investigations with better methods of measuring Sedentary Behavior patterns and improved study designs are necessary to confirm this preliminary evidence.
-
Sedentary Behavior in the first year after stroke a longitudinal cohort study with objective measures
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2015Co-Authors: Zoe Tieges, Gillian Mead, Michael Allerhand, Fiona Duncan, Frederike Van Wijck, Claire Fitzsimons, Carolyne Greig, Sebastien F M ChastinAbstract:Abstract Objective To quantify longitudinal changes in Sedentary Behavior (ie, nonexercise seated or lying Behavior) after stroke to ascertain whether reducing Sedentary Behavior might be a new therapeutic target. Design Longitudinal cohort study of patients with acute stroke who were followed over 1 year. Setting Acute teaching hospital or outpatient clinic, and the community after discharge. Participants A convenience sample of patients with acute stroke (N=96; median age, 72y, interquartile range [IQR]=64–80y; 67% men; median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score=2, IQR=1–3) who were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months after stroke. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Objective measures of amount and pattern of time spent in Sedentary Behavior: total Sedentary time, weighted median Sedentary bout length, and fragmentation index. Results Stroke survivors were highly Sedentary, spending on average 81% of the time per day in Sedentary Behavior: median=19.9 hours (IQR=18.4–22.1h), 19.1 hours (17.8–20.8h), and 19.3 hours (17.3–20.9h) at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Longitudinal changes in Sedentary Behavior were estimated using linear mixed effects models. Covariates were age, sex, stroke severity (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score), physical capacity (6-minute walk distance), and functional independence (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire score). Higher stroke severity and less functional independence were associated cross-sectionally with more Sedentary Behavior (β=.11, SE=.05, P =.020 and β=−.11, SE=.01, P Conclusions Stroke survivors were highly Sedentary and remained so a year after stroke independently of their functional ability. Developing interventions to reduce Sedentary Behavior might be a potential new therapeutic target in stroke rehabilitation.
Mai J M Chinapaw - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background: The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Amy E. Latimer-cheung, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
Mark S Tremblay - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background: The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Amy E. Latimer-cheung, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
systematic review of Sedentary Behavior and cognitive development in early childhood
Preventive Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: Valerie Carson, Mark S Tremblay, Nicholas Kuzik, Stephen Hunter, Sandra A Wiebe, John C Spence, Alinda Friedman, Linda Slater, Trina HinkleyAbstract:Abstract Objective To comprehensively review observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between Sedentary Behavior and cognitive development during early childhood (birth to 5 years). Method Electronic databases were searched in July, 2014 and no limits were imposed on the search. Included studies had to be peer-reviewed, published, and meet the a priori determined population (apparently healthy children aged birth to 5 years), intervention (duration, types, and patterns of Sedentary Behavior), comparator (various durations, types, or patterns of Sedentary Behavior), and outcome (cognitive development) study criteria. Data extraction occurred in October and November 2014 and study quality and risk of bias were assessed in December 2014. Results A total of 37 studies, representing 14,487 participants from nine different countries were included. Thirty-one studies used observational study designs and six studies used experimental study designs. Across study designs, increased or higher screen time (most commonly assessed as television viewing (TV)), reading, child-specific TV content, and adult-specific TV content had detrimental (negative) associations with cognitive development outcomes for 38%, 0%, 8%, and 25% of associations reported, respectively, and beneficial (positive) associations with cognitive development outcomes for 6%, 60%, 13%, and 3% of associations reported, respectively. Ten studies were moderate quality and 27 studies were weak quality. Conclusions The type of Sedentary Behavior, such as TV versus reading, may have different impacts on cognitive development in early childhood. Future research with reliable and valid tools and adequate sample sizes that examine multiple cognitive domains (e.g., language, spatial cognition, executive function, memory) are needed. Registration no. CRD42014010004.
Valerie Carson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background: The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Amy E. Latimer-cheung, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
systematic review of Sedentary Behavior and cognitive development in early childhood
Preventive Medicine, 2015Co-Authors: Valerie Carson, Mark S Tremblay, Nicholas Kuzik, Stephen Hunter, Sandra A Wiebe, John C Spence, Alinda Friedman, Linda Slater, Trina HinkleyAbstract:Abstract Objective To comprehensively review observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between Sedentary Behavior and cognitive development during early childhood (birth to 5 years). Method Electronic databases were searched in July, 2014 and no limits were imposed on the search. Included studies had to be peer-reviewed, published, and meet the a priori determined population (apparently healthy children aged birth to 5 years), intervention (duration, types, and patterns of Sedentary Behavior), comparator (various durations, types, or patterns of Sedentary Behavior), and outcome (cognitive development) study criteria. Data extraction occurred in October and November 2014 and study quality and risk of bias were assessed in December 2014. Results A total of 37 studies, representing 14,487 participants from nine different countries were included. Thirty-one studies used observational study designs and six studies used experimental study designs. Across study designs, increased or higher screen time (most commonly assessed as television viewing (TV)), reading, child-specific TV content, and adult-specific TV content had detrimental (negative) associations with cognitive development outcomes for 38%, 0%, 8%, and 25% of associations reported, respectively, and beneficial (positive) associations with cognitive development outcomes for 6%, 60%, 13%, and 3% of associations reported, respectively. Ten studies were moderate quality and 27 studies were weak quality. Conclusions The type of Sedentary Behavior, such as TV versus reading, may have different impacts on cognitive development in early childhood. Future research with reliable and valid tools and adequate sample sizes that examine multiple cognitive domains (e.g., language, spatial cognition, executive function, memory) are needed. Registration no. CRD42014010004.
Teatske M Altenburg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background: The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior research network sbrn terminology consensus project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Amy E Latimercheung, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
-
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017Co-Authors: Mark S Tremblay, Salome Aubert, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Valerie Carson, Sebastien F M Chastin, Teatske M Altenburg, Amy E. Latimer-cheung, Mai J M ChinapawAbstract:Background The prominence of Sedentary Behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in Sedentary Behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary Behavior, Sedentary Behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based Sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, Sedentary Behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to Sedentary Behaviors.
