The Experts below are selected from a list of 264 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Monika Janda - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Evaluation of a Skin Self-Examination Programme: a Four-Stage Recursive Model
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2017Co-Authors: David Rowell, Kim-huong Nguyen, Peter D Baade, Monika JandaAbstract:Background: Effective skin Self-Examination can enable early diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer, which otherwise could result in significant morbidity and mortality. We compare the effects of watching a DVD and reading printed materials on Self skin Examination. Methods: Longitudinal data from the Randomized Skin Awareness Trial were analysed (n=984). The control group were provided with written materials describing how to conduct effective skin Self-Examination. The intervention group received additional instruction from a DVD. It was hypothesized that Self skin Examination may be confounded by unobserved variables. A recursive model was specified to control for this potential source of bias. Results: At six months only watching the DVD had a statistically significant effect on diagnosed skin cancer. By 12 months both interventions were statistically significant; reading the printed materials was 63% as effective as watching the DVD. Conclusion: Watching a DVD was associated with the largest increase in diagnosed skin cancer. However, reading written materials was also associated with an increase in diagnosed skin cancer. Both visual and written communication should be considered when designing an effective skin Self-Examination programme.
-
evaluation of a skin Self Examination attitude scale using an item response theory model approach
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2014Co-Authors: Monika Janda, Ngadiman Djaja, Philippa H Youl, Joanne F AitkenAbstract:The Skin Self-Examination Attitude Scale (SSEAS) is a brief measure that allows for the assessment of attitudes in relation to skin Self-Examination. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the SSEAS using Item Response Theory (IRT) methods in a large sample of men ≥ 50 years in Queensland, Australia. A sample of 831 men (420 intervention and 411 control) completed a telephone assessment at the 13-month follow-up of a randomized-controlled trial of a video-based intervention to improve skin Self-Examination (SSE) behaviour. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, item–total correlations, and Cronbach’s alpha) were compiled and difficulty parameters were computed with Winsteps using the polytomous Rasch Rating Scale Model (RRSM). An item person (Wright) map of the SSEAS was examined for content coverage and item targeting. The SSEAS have good psychometric properties including good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.80), fit with the model and no evidence for differential item functioning (DIF) due to experimental trial grouping was detected. The present study confirms the SSEA scale as a brief, useful and reliable tool for assessing attitudes towards skin Self-Examination in a population of men 50 years or older in Queensland, Australia. The 8-item scale shows unidimensionality, allowing levels of SSE attitude, and the item difficulties, to be ranked on a single continuous scale. In terms of clinical practice, it is very important to assess skin cancer Self-Examination attitude to identify people who may need a more extensive intervention to allow early detection of skin cancer.
-
evaluation of a skin Self Examination attitude scale using an item response theory model approach
Centre for Health Research; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, 2014Co-Authors: Ngadiman Djaja, Philippa H Youl, Joanne F Aitken, Monika JandaAbstract:Introduction The Skin Self-Examination Attitude Scale (SSEAS) is a brief measure that allows for the assessment of attitudes in relation to skin Self-Examination. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the SSEAS using Item Response Theory (IRT) methods in a large sample of men ≥ 50 years in Queensland, Australia. Methods A sample of 831 men (420 intervention and 411 control) completed a telephone assessment at the 13-month follow-up of a randomized-controlled trial of a video-based intervention to improve skin Self-Examination (SSE) behaviour. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, item–total correlations, and Cronbach’s alpha) were compiled and difficulty parameters were computed with Winsteps using the polytomous Rasch Rating Scale Model (RRSM). An item person (Wright) map of the SSEAS was examined for content coverage and item targeting. Results The SSEAS have good psychometric properties including good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.80), fit with the model and no evidence for differential item functioning (DIF) due to experimental trial grouping was detected. Conclusions The present study confirms the SSEA scale as a brief, useful and reliable tool for assessing attitudes towards skin Self-Examination in a population of men 50 years or older in Queensland, Australia. The 8-item scale shows unidimensionality, allowing levels of SSE attitude, and the item difficulties, to be ranked on a single continuous scale. In terms of clinical practice, it is very important to assess skin cancer Self-Examination attitude to identify people who may need a more extensive intervention to allow early detection of skin cancer.
Dhekra Hamoud Al-naggar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Perceptions and Opinions about Male Breast Cancer and Male Breast Self-Examination: A Qualitative Study
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2012Co-Authors: Redhwan Ahmed Al-naggar, Dhekra Hamoud Al-naggarAbstract:Objective: While the relatively common nature of female breast cancer has resulted in a high level of general awareness, male breast cancer is still comparatively unknown to the general public and to healthcare professionals. The objective of this study is to explore the perceptions and opinions about male breast cancer and male breast Self-Examination among male university students. Methodology: In-depth interviews were conducted among 36 male university students from the Management and Science University, Malaysia, selected by simple random sampling. The themes of the interview were: knowledge of male breast cancer and male breast Self-Examination, sources of knowledge and attitudes towards male BSE. The data obtained were classified into various categories and analyzed manually. Results: The majority of participants mentioned that there is a low possibility for males to get breast cancer. They also believed that the cause of breast cancer among men is due to the carcinogens from cigarettes. The majority of participants mentioned that they know about breast Self-Examination from the mass media and that the presence of a lump in the breast is the main symptom of breast cancer in men. The majority of participants mentioned that they encourage their family members to practice breast Self-Examination but considered that BSE is not important for men because they have a low probability of getting breast cancer. Conclusions: Misconceptions regarding male breast cancer and breast Self-Examination among men still exist among male university students. Therefore especial attention should be given to educate men about male breast cancer and male BSE.
Nancy N. Baxter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Breast Self-Examination
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2002Co-Authors: Nancy N. BaxterAbstract:The debate around the publication of our recommendations[1][1] regarding the routine teaching of breast Self-Examination to Canadian women has certainly been lively. Our objectives were to systematically review the published evidence relating to the effectiveness of routine teaching of breast Self-
Mustafa Degirmenci - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Effectiveness of Online Education in Teaching Breast Self- Examination
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2014Co-Authors: Arzu Tuna, Elif Ünsal Avdal, Sebnem Cinar Yucel, Nursel Alp Dal, Aklime Dicle, Arife Özkan, Handan Sezgin, Aysun Babacan Gümüş, Ayse San Turgay, Mustafa DegirmenciAbstract:Background: This research evaluated the effectiveness of an online education model in teaching breast SelfExamination to university staff and students. Materials and Methods: 1,679 women participated in a breast Self-Examination online training program. Breast Self-Examination knowledge evaluation forms developed by Maurer (1997) were used in the research and were evaluated on a 100 point scale. Paired t-test and McNemar’s Test statistics were employed. Results: The participants scored an average of 46.5 (14.0%) on knowledge on breast Self-Examination before training, but 77.4 (11.0%) one month after education and 76.7 (9.52%) after six months. There was a clear significant difference between these knowledge levels (p
Vera Rososlowich - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Breast Self-Examination.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2006Co-Authors: Vera Rosolowich, Robert H. Lea, Pierre Lévesque, Fay Weisberg, James Graham, Lynne Mcleod, Vera RososlowichAbstract:Abstract Objective To examine the value of teaching regular breast Self-Examination (BSE). Outcome Reduction of benign biopsy rates. Benefits To provide better advice for women about the risks and benefits of BSE, and to ensure that women who choose to practise BSE are taught to perform it proficiently. Summary Statement Routine teaching of BSE does not reduce mortality and likely increases benign biopsy rates. (I) Recommendations 1.Breast Self-Examination should not be routinely taught to women. (ID) 2.A full discussion of breast Self-Examination, including risks, should be provided for the woman who requests it. (IMA) 3.If a woman makes an informed decision to practise BSE, care providers should ensure she is taught the skills and that she performs Self-Examination proficiently. (IMA) Validation This committee opinion was developed by the Breast Disease Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. It was approved by the Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Sponsor The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.