The Experts below are selected from a list of 18180 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Gillian Burkhardt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a qualitative analysis of decision making among women with sexual violence related pregnancies in conflict affected eastern democratic republic of the congo
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2018Co-Authors: Jennifer Scott, Colleen Mullen, Shada A Rouhani, Gillian Burkhardt, Monica Adhiambo Onyango, Sadia Haider, Katherine AlbuttAbstract:Sexual violence is prevalent in conflict-affected settings and may result in sexual violence-related pregnancies (SVRPs). There are limited data on how women with SVRPs make decisions about pregnancy continuation or termination, especially in contexts with limited or restricted access to comprehensive reproductive health services. A qualitative study was conducted in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) as part of a larger mixed methods study in 2012. Utilizing respondent-driven sampling (RDS), adult women who self-reported sexual violence and a resultant SVRP were enrolled into two study subgroups: 1) women currently raising a child from an SVRP (parenting group) and 2) women who terminated an SVRP (termination group). Trained female research assistants conducted semi-structured interviews with a subset of women in a private setting and responses were manually recorded. Interview notes were translated and uploaded to a qualitative software program, coded, and thematic content analysis was conducted. A total of 55 women were interviewed: 38 in the parenting group and 17 in the termination group. There were a myriad of expressed attitudes, beliefs, and emotional responses toward SVRPs and the termination of SVRPs with three predominant influences on decision-making, including: 1) the biologic, ethnic, and Social identities of the fetus and/or future child; 2) Social reactions, including fear of Social Stigmatization and/or rejection; and 3) the power of religious beliefs and moral considerations on women’s autonomy in the decision-making process. Findings from women who continued and women who terminated SVRPs reveal the complexities of decision-making related to SVRPs, including the emotional reasoning and responses, and the Social, moral, and religious dimensions of the decision-making processes. It is important to consider these multi-faceted influences on decision-making for women with SVRPs in conflict-affected settings in order to improve provision of health services and to offer useful insights for subsequent programmatic and policy decisions.
-
a qualitative analysis of psychoSocial outcomes among women with sexual violence related pregnancies in eastern democratic republic of congo
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 2017Co-Authors: Jennifer Scott, Colleen Mullen, Shada A Rouhani, Philipp Kuwert, Ashley L Greiner, Katherine Albutt, Gillian BurkhardtAbstract:Sexual violence is prevalent in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and has potentially devastating psychoSocial consequences. Previous studies have reported on sexual violence and its impact on the mental health of survivors, but there are few studies conducted among women with sexual violence-related pregnancies (SVRPs). Women with SVRPs may be at greater risk of complex psychoSocial outcomes, including Social Stigmatization. This study aimed to describe psychoSocial outcomes among this subgroup of sexual violence survivors in order to inform future interventions. A mixed methods study was conducted in Bukavu, DRC in 2012 among adult women who self-reported an SVRP and either (1) were currently raising a child from an SVRP (parenting group) or (2) had terminated an SVRP (termination group). This manuscript presents qualitative findings from the mixed methods study. Participants were recruited using respondent-driven sampling and a proportion engaged in semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted by trained female interviewers. Thematic content analysis was conducted and key themes were identified. In total, 55 women were interviewed, of whom 38 were in the parenting group and 17 in the termination group. Women with SVRPs experienced a myriad of emotional responses as they navigated their Social environments following the SVRPs. Negative reactions, including Social Stigmatization and/or Social rejection, toward women with SVRPs and toward children born from SVRPs were important influences on psychological well-being. Women expressed both internalized emotionality intertwined with externalized experiences in the Social environment. Many women demonstrated resilience, or what could be termed post-traumatic growth, identifying avenues of agency to advance the Social conditions for women. The findings from the qualitative study, and in particular, the respondents’ needs and suggested strategies, may be useful to inform future research, programs, and policies for women with SVRPs in eastern DRC. Future research could move beyond cross-sectional assessments to utilize innovative research methodologies to assess processes of psychological adaptation among women with SVRPs. Multi-dimensional psychoSocial programs for women with SVRPs should consider basic needs such as shelter, food, and health care within the broader framework of trauma-informed care. Participatory programming, guided by beneficiaries, could provide further avenues for agency to advance Social conditions for women with SVRPs in eastern DRC.
Hadi Indriono - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Dampak Psikologis dalam Memberikan Perawatan dan Layanan Kesehatan Pasien COVID-19 pada Tenaga Profesional Kesehatan
'Poltekkes Kemenkes Kendari', 2021Co-Authors: Rosyanti Lilin, Hadi IndrionoAbstract:Stress and anxiety are reactions to threatening and unpredictable situations such as in a coronavirus pandemic outbreak. Health workers are the most vulnerable to this. Stress-related reactions include changes in concentration, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, reduced productivity, and interpersonal conflict, in subsequent cases, they will experience more severe psychiatric conditions, separation from family, abnormal situation, increased exposure, increased exposure exposure, fear of transmission of COVID-19, feeling of failure in handling a poor prognosis, inadequate technical facilities, PPE, tools and equipment, to help treat patients. Health workers have difficulty maintaining physical and mental health conditions that are at risk of experiencing psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety, severe stress, and fatigue. Other risk factors identified are feelings of being unsupported, concerns about personal health, fear of bringing infections and transmitting them to family members or others, isolated, feeling uncertain, Social Stigmatization, excessive workload, and feeling insecure when providing care and health in COVID -19 patients.Stres dan kecemasan adalah reaksi terhadap situasi yang mengancam dan tak terduga seperti dalam wabah pandemi koronavirus. Petugas kesehatan adalah yang paling rentan terhadap hal tersebut. Reaksi terkait stres meliputi perubahan konsentrasi, lekas marah, cemas, susah tidur, berkurangnya produktivitas, dan konflik antarpribadi, dalam kasus selanjutnya, mereka akan mengalami kondisi kejiwaan yang lebih parah, pemisahan dari keluarga, situasi abnormal, peningkatan paparan, ketakutan akan penularan COVID-19, perasaan gagal dalam menangani prognosis yang buruk, fasilitas teknis yang tidak memadai, APD, alat dan peralatan, untuk membantu merawat pasien. Petugas kesehatan mengalami kesulitan mempertahankan kondisi kesehatan fisik dan mental yang berisiko mengalami gangguan psikologis seperti depresi, kecemasan, stres berat, dan kelelahan. Faktor risiko lain yang diidentifikasi adalah perasaan tidak didukung, kekhawatiran tentang kesehatan pribadi, takut membawa infeksi dan menularkannya kepada anggota keluarga atau orang lain, diisolasi, perasaan tidak pasti, stigmatisasi sosial, beban kerja yang berlebihan, dan merasa tidak aman ketika memberikan layanan perawatan dan kesehatan pada pasien COVID-19
-
Dampak Psikologis dalam Memberikan Perawatan dan Layanan Kesehatan Pasien COVID-19 pada Tenaga Profesional Kesehatan
'Poltekkes Kemenkes Kendari', 2020Co-Authors: Rosyanti Lilin, Hadi IndrionoAbstract:Stress and anxiety are reactions to threatening and unpredictable situations such as in a coronavirus pandemic outbreak. Health workers are the most vulnerable to this. Stress-related reactions include changes in concentration, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, reduced productivity, and interpersonal conflict, in subsequent cases, they will experience more severe psychiatric conditions, separation from family, abnormal situation, increased exposure, increased exposure exposure, fear of transmission of COVID-19, feeling of failure in handling a poor prognosis, inadequate technical facilities, PPE, tools and equipment, to help treat patients. Health workers have difficulty maintaining physical and mental health conditions that are at risk of experiencing psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety, severe stress, and fatigue. Other risk factors identified are feelings of being unsupported, concerns about personal health, fear of bringing infections and transmitting them to family members or others, isolated, feeling uncertain, Social Stigmatization, excessive workload, and feeling insecure when providing care and health in COVID -19 patients. Catatan PenerbitPolekkes Kemenkes Kendari menyatakan tetap netral sehubungan dengan klaim dari perspektif atau buah pikiran yang diterbitkan dan dari afiliasi institusional manapun. PendanaanPenulis tidak menerima pendanaan yang sifatnya spesifik untuk kajian ini.Stres dan kecemasan adalah reaksi terhadap situasi yang mengancam dan tak terduga seperti dalam wabah pandemi koronavirus. Petugas kesehatan adalah yang paling rentan terhadap hal tersebut. Reaksi terkait stres meliputi perubahan konsentrasi, lekas marah, cemas, susah tidur, berkurangnya produktivitas, dan konflik antarpribadi, dalam kasus selanjutnya, mereka akan mengalami kondisi kejiwaan yang lebih parah, pemisahan dari keluarga, situasi abnormal, peningkatan paparan, ketakutan akan penularan COVID-19, perasaan gagal dalam menangani prognosis yang buruk, fasilitas teknis yang tidak memadai, APD, alat dan peralatan, untuk membantu merawat pasien. Petugas kesehatan mengalami kesulitan mempertahankan kondisi kesehatan fisik dan mental yang berisiko mengalami gangguan psikologis seperti depresi, kecemasan, stres berat, dan kelelahan. Faktor risiko lain yang diidentifikasi adalah perasaan tidak didukung, kekhawatiran tentang kesehatan pribadi, takut membawa infeksi dan menularkannya kepada anggota keluarga atau orang lain, diisolasi, perasaan tidak pasti, stigmatisasi sosial, beban kerja yang berlebihan, dan merasa tidak aman ketika memberikan layanan perawatan dan kesehatan pada pasien COVID-19. Catatan PenerbitPolekkes Kemenkes Kendari menyatakan tetap netral sehubungan dengan klaim dari perspektif atau buah pikiran yang diterbitkan dan dari afiliasi institusional manapun. PendanaanPenulis tidak menerima pendanaan yang sifatnya spesifik untuk kajian ini
Selva Pareja Laia - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
La donación de gametos y su registro en la reproducción humana asistida. Aspectos bioéticos, Sociales y legales
'Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona', 2019Co-Authors: Selva Pareja LaiaAbstract:[spa] Como consecuencia del estilo de vida y de factores no fácilmente cuantificables, cada vez se retrasan más la paternidad y la maternidad, lo que deriva con frecuencia en problemas de fertilidad. Con objeto de evitar el denominado Permanent Involuntary Childlessness y sus efectos colaterales, como la estigmatización Social o la frustración personal, quienes desean tener descendencia a pesar de las dificultadas citadas recurren a las Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida. La infertilidad y/o los nuevos modelos de familia conllevan que a veces se recurra a la donación de gametos, lo que genera una casuística enorme. En efecto, estas donaciones, efectuadas en un marco jurídico no siempre explícito e incluso a veces oscilante, arrastran tras de sí numerosas implicaciones Sociales y éticas, extendiendo la relación de los usuarios de estas TRHA a terceros, esto es, a los donantes y a los menores que nacen con las técnicas que comentamos. De hecho, conciliar el anonimato con el derecho a conocer los orígenes es uno de los grandes retos por resolver. Pues bien, con esta tesis nos planteamos conocer la realidad bioética, Social y legal del proceso de donación. Para ello, contrastaremos las opiniones de los estudiantes universitarios de la Facultat de Dret, Economia i Turisme, y la Facultat d’Infermeria i Fisioteràpia de la Universitat de Lleida, con un grupo de investigadoras de diversos campos del conocimiento. Dada la dificultad inherente a analizar dichos conocimientos y actitudes, y ante la ausencia de instrumentos adecuados para hacerlo, hemos decidido diseñar, elaborar y validar un cuestionario al que denominamos Cuestionario LSP2016. Nuestro enfoque es tanto cualitativo como cuantitativo. Hemos iniciado nuestro trabajo con una revisión de la bibliografía para el desarrollo argumental y una scoping review sobre los instrumentos que existen; a continuación, hemos realizado una revisión sistemática de las páginas webs de las clínicas con programas de donación de Barcelona, así como un estudio etnográfico. Para la validación del cuestionario, hemos empleado la técnica Delphi, una discusión con expertas, una prueba piloto y un test-retest con una muestra heterogénea para que el cuestionario quede validado para la población general. Al desarrollo cualitativo de estas metodologías le acompañan diferentes pruebas estadísticas para la validación de contenido, constructo y criterio, y para evaluar su confiabilidad. Finalmente, hemos realizado el trabajo de campo con la propuesta final del Cuestionario LSP2016, así como las pruebas estadísticas pertinentes para la obtención de resultados. Por último, hemos procedido a la discusión de todos los apartados por separado, finalizando con las conclusiones pertinentes. Sin perjuicio de la lectura de las mismas, podemos destacar la enorme diferencia existente, en cuanto al enfoque, entre las expertas y los resultados del trabajo de campo realizado con los estudiantes.[cat] Com a conseqüència de l’estil de vida i de factors que no són fàcilment quantificables, cada vegada es retarda més la paternitat i maternitat, la qual cosa deriva amb freqüència en problemes de fertilitat. Per tal d’evitar el denominat Permanent Involuntary Childlessness i els seus efectes col·laterals, com són l’estigmatització Social o la frustració personal, aquelles persones que desitgen tenir descendència malgrat les dificultats nombrades, recorren a les Tècniques de Reproducció Humana Assistida. La infertilitat i/o els nous models de família comporten que, de vegades, es recorri a la donació de gàmetes, el que genera una gran casuística. En efecte, aquestes donacions, efectuades en un marc jurídic no sempre explícit i inclús, de vegades oscil·lant, comporten nombroses implicacions Socials i ètiques, duent la relació dels usuaris d’aquestes TRHA a terceres persones, és a dir, als donants i als menors que neixen mitjançant aquestes tècniques que comentem. De fet, conciliar l’anonimat amb el dret a conèixer els orígens és un dels grans repte per resoldre. Per tant, amb aquesta tesi ens plantegem conèixer la realitat bioètica, Social i legal del procés de donació. Per fer-ho, contrarestarem les opinions dels estudiants universitaris de la Facultat de Dret, Economia i Turisme, i la Facultat d’Infermeria i Fisioteràpia de la Universitat de Lleida, amb un grup d’investigadors de diferents camps de coneixement. Donada la dificultat inherent d’analitzar aquests coneixements i actituds, i davant l’absència d’instruments idonis per dur-ho a terme, hem decidit dissenyar, elaborar i validar al que denominem Cuestionario LSP2016. El nostre enfocament és tant qualitatiu com quantitatiu. Hem iniciat el nostre treball amb una revisió de la bibliografia per redactar el desenvolupament argumental i una scoping review sobre els instruments que existeixen; a continuació, hem realitzat una revisió sistemàtica de les pàgines webs de les clíniques amb programes de donació de Barcelona, així com un estudi etnogràfic. Per dur a terme la validació del qüestionari, hem realitzat la tècnica Delphi, una discussió amb expertes, una prova pilot i un test-retest amb una mostra heterogènia per tal de que el qüestionari estigui validat per a la població general. Al desenvolupament qualitatiu d’aquestes metodologies l’acompanyen diferents proves estadístiques per la validació del contingut, constructe, criteri, i per avaluar la confiabilitat. Finalment, hem realitzat el treball de camp amb la proposta final del Cuestionario LSP2016, així com les proves estadístiques pertinents per l’obtenció de resultats. Per últim, hem dut a terme la discussió de tots els apartats per separat, finalitzant amb les conclusions pertinents. Sense prejudicis de la lectura de les mateixes, podem destacar la gran diferència existent, entre les expertes i els resultats del treball de camp realitzat amb els estudiants.[eng] The paternity and maternity are increasingly retarded year on year as a consequence of the lifestyle and non-easily quantifiable factors. This fact often leads to fertility issues. All aimed to avoid the Permanent Involuntary Childlessness and its collateral effects, such as the Social Stigmatization or the personal frustration, the ones who desire having offspring they turn to Assisted Reproductive Technology despite the mentioned difficulties. Infertility and new family types usually lead to the donation of gametes, which creates a huge casuistry. In effect, these donations generate debates over legal, Social and bioethical dilemmas by the community experts around the world. Nowadays, one of the major challenges to resolve is, in fact, the reconciliation of the anonymity by getting to know their origins. This thesis aims at knowing the bioethical, Social and legal reality of the donation process. In order to achieve it we will be contrasting the students’ opinions of the Facultat de Dret, Economia i Turisme and Facultat d’Infermeria i Fisioteràpia of Universitat de Lleida with a group of researches in the various fields of knowledge. Nevertheless, given the inherent difficulty with analysing knowledge and attitudes, and the lack of appropriate instruments to carry it out, we have designed, elaborated and validated a questionnaire entitled as Cuestionario LSP2016. During the process, we have combined qualitative and quantitative approaches. Firstly, we have looked over literature, which facilitate us the development of arguments and a scoping review about the available instruments. Secondly, we systematically reviewed Barcelona fertility clinics, which are involved in the recruitment of egg donors by analysing their websites, as well as an ethnographic study. Delphi technique has been used for the questionnaire validation, apart from an experts’ discussion, a pilot study and a test-retest including a heterogeneous group in order to get the questionnaire validated for the general population. The qualitative development of these methods is formed by different statistical analysis, which are going to be used for the content, construct and criterion-related validity and reliability. Lastly, we have done a research work considering the final proposal of the Cuestionario LSP2016 and the corresponding statistical analysis in order to obtain the results. Finally, we proceed with a discussion for each section and the appropriate conclusions. Without prejudice of the lecture, we highlight the enormous difference, in terms of approaches, between the experts and the students’ research work
-
La donación de gametos y su registro en la reproducción humana asistida. Aspectos bioéticos, Sociales y legales
'Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona', 2019Co-Authors: Selva Pareja LaiaAbstract:Como consecuencia del estilo de vida y de factores no fácilmente cuantificables, cada vez se retrasan más la paternidad y la maternidad, lo que deriva con frecuencia en problemas de fertilidad. Con objeto de evitar el denominado Permanent Involuntary Childlessness y sus efectos colaterales, como la estigmatización Social o la frustración personal, quienes desean tener descendencia a pesar de las dificultadas citadas recurren a las Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida. La infertilidad y/o los nuevos modelos de familia conllevan que a veces se recurra a la donación de gametos, lo que genera una casuística enorme. En efecto, estas donaciones, efectuadas en un marco jurídico no siempre explícito e incluso a veces oscilante, arrastran tras de sí numerosas implicaciones Sociales y éticas, extendiendo la relación de los usuarios de estas TRHA a terceros, esto es, a los donantes y a los menores que nacen con las técnicas que comentamos. De hecho, conciliar el anonimato con el derecho a conocer los orígenes es uno de los grandes retos por resolver. Pues bien, con esta tesis nos planteamos conocer la realidad bioética, Social y legal del proceso de donación. Para ello, contrastaremos las opiniones de los estudiantes universitarios de la Facultat de Dret, Economia i Turisme, y la Facultat d’Infermeria i Fisioteràpia de la Universitat de Lleida, con un grupo de investigadoras de diversos campos del conocimiento. Dada la dificultad inherente a analizar dichos conocimientos y actitudes, y ante la ausencia de instrumentos adecuados para hacerlo, hemos decidido diseñar, elaborar y validar un cuestionario al que denominamos Cuestionario LSP2016. Nuestro enfoque es tanto cualitativo como cuantitativo. Hemos iniciado nuestro trabajo con una revisión de la bibliografía para el desarrollo argumental y una scoping review sobre los instrumentos que existen; a continuación, hemos realizado una revisión sistemática de las páginas webs de las clínicas con programas de donación de Barcelona, así como un estudio etnográfico. Para la validación del cuestionario, hemos empleado la técnica Delphi, una discusión con expertas, una prueba piloto y un test-retest con una muestra heterogénea para que el cuestionario quede validado para la población general. Al desarrollo cualitativo de estas metodologías le acompañan diferentes pruebas estadísticas para la validación de contenido, constructo y criterio, y para evaluar su confiabilidad. Finalmente, hemos realizado el trabajo de campo con la propuesta final del Cuestionario LSP2016, así como las pruebas estadísticas pertinentes para la obtención de resultados. Por último, hemos procedido a la discusión de todos los apartados por separado, finalizando con las conclusiones pertinentes. Sin perjuicio de la lectura de las mismas, podemos destacar la enorme diferencia existente, en cuanto al enfoque, entre las expertas y los resultados del trabajo de campo realizado con los estudiantes.Com a conseqüència de l’estil de vida i de factors que no són fàcilment quantificables, cada vegada es retarda més la paternitat i maternitat, la qual cosa deriva amb freqüència en problemes de fertilitat. Per tal d’evitar el denominat Permanent Involuntary Childlessness i els seus efectes col·laterals, com són l’estigmatització Social o la frustració personal, aquelles persones que desitgen tenir descendència malgrat les dificultats nombrades, recorren a les Tècniques de Reproducció Humana Assistida. La infertilitat i/o els nous models de família comporten que, de vegades, es recorri a la donació de gàmetes, el que genera una gran casuística. En efecte, aquestes donacions, efectuades en un marc jurídic no sempre explícit i inclús, de vegades oscil·lant, comporten nombroses implicacions Socials i ètiques, duent la relació dels usuaris d’aquestes TRHA a terceres persones, és a dir, als donants i als menors que neixen mitjançant aquestes tècniques que comentem. De fet, conciliar l’anonimat amb el dret a conèixer els orígens és un dels grans repte per resoldre. Per tant, amb aquesta tesi ens plantegem conèixer la realitat bioètica, Social i legal del procés de donació. Per fer-ho, contrarestarem les opinions dels estudiants universitaris de la Facultat de Dret, Economia i Turisme, i la Facultat d’Infermeria i Fisioteràpia de la Universitat de Lleida, amb un grup d’investigadors de diferents camps de coneixement. Donada la dificultat inherent d’analitzar aquests coneixements i actituds, i davant l’absència d’instruments idonis per dur-ho a terme, hem decidit dissenyar, elaborar i validar al que denominem Cuestionario LSP2016. El nostre enfocament és tant qualitatiu com quantitatiu. Hem iniciat el nostre treball amb una revisió de la bibliografia per redactar el desenvolupament argumental i una scoping review sobre els instruments que existeixen; a continuació, hem realitzat una revisió sistemàtica de les pàgines webs de les clíniques amb programes de donació de Barcelona, així com un estudi etnogràfic. Per dur a terme la validació del qüestionari, hem realitzat la tècnica Delphi, una discussió amb expertes, una prova pilot i un test-retest amb una mostra heterogènia per tal de que el qüestionari estigui validat per a la població general. Al desenvolupament qualitatiu d’aquestes metodologies l’acompanyen diferents proves estadístiques per la validació del contingut, constructe, criteri, i per avaluar la confiabilitat. Finalment, hem realitzat el treball de camp amb la proposta final del Cuestionario LSP2016, així com les proves estadístiques pertinents per l’obtenció de resultats. Per últim, hem dut a terme la discussió de tots els apartats per separat, finalitzant amb les conclusions pertinents. Sense prejudicis de la lectura de les mateixes, podem destacar la gran diferència existent, entre les expertes i els resultats del treball de camp realitzat amb els estudiants.The paternity and maternity are increasingly retarded year on year as a consequence of the lifestyle and non-easily quantifiable factors. This fact often leads to fertility issues. All aimed to avoid the Permanent Involuntary Childlessness and its collateral effects, such as the Social Stigmatization or the personal frustration, the ones who desire having offspring they turn to Assisted Reproductive Technology despite the mentioned difficulties. Infertility and new family types usually lead to the donation of gametes, which creates a huge casuistry. In effect, these donations generate debates over legal, Social and bioethical dilemmas by the community experts around the world. Nowadays, one of the major challenges to resolve is, in fact, the reconciliation of the anonymity by getting to know their origins. This thesis aims at knowing the bioethical, Social and legal reality of the donation process. In order to achieve it we will be contrasting the students’ opinions of the Facultat de Dret, Economia i Turisme and Facultat d’Infermeria i Fisioteràpia of Universitat de Lleida with a group of researches in the various fields of knowledge. Nevertheless, given the inherent difficulty with analysing knowledge and attitudes, and the lack of appropriate instruments to carry it out, we have designed, elaborated and validated a questionnaire entitled as Cuestionario LSP2016. During the process, we have combined qualitative and quantitative approaches. Firstly, we have looked over literature, which facilitate us the development of arguments and a scoping review about the available instruments. Secondly, we systematically reviewed Barcelona fertility clinics, which are involved in the recruitment of egg donors by analysing their websites, as well as an ethnographic study. Delphi technique has been used for the questionnaire validation, apart from an experts’ discussion, a pilot study and a test-retest including a heterogeneous group in order to get the questionnaire validated for the general population. The qualitative development of these methods is formed by different statistical analysis, which are going to be used for the content, construct and criterion-related validity and reliability. Lastly, we have done a research work considering the final proposal of the Cuestionario LSP2016 and the corresponding statistical analysis in order to obtain the results. Finally, we proceed with a discussion for each section and the appropriate conclusions. Without prejudice of the lecture, we highlight the enormous difference, in terms of approaches, between the experts and the students’ research work
Zhanyuan Yin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Stigmatization in Social media documenting and analyzing hate speech for covid 19 on twitter
Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020Co-Authors: Lizhou Fan, Zhanyuan YinAbstract:As the COVID-19 pandemic has unfolded, Hate Speech on Social media about China and Chinese people has encouraged Social Stigmatization. For the historical and humanistic purposes, this history-in-the-making needs to be archived and analyzed. Using the query "china+and+coronavirus" to scrape from the Twitter API, we have obtained 3,457,402 key tweets about China relating to COVID-19. In this archive, in which about 40% of the tweets are from the U.S., we identify 25,467 Hate Speech occurrences and analyze them according to lexicon-based emotions and demographics using machine learning and network methods. The results indicate that there are substantial associations between the amount of Hate Speech and demonstrations of sentiments, and state demographics factors. Sentiments of surprise and fear associated with poverty and unemployment rates are prominent. This digital archive and the related analyses are not simply historical, therefore. They play vital roles in raising public awareness and mitigating future crises. Consequently, we regard our research as a pilot study in methods of analysis that might be used by other researchers in various fields.
Shada A Rouhani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a qualitative analysis of decision making among women with sexual violence related pregnancies in conflict affected eastern democratic republic of the congo
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2018Co-Authors: Jennifer Scott, Colleen Mullen, Shada A Rouhani, Gillian Burkhardt, Monica Adhiambo Onyango, Sadia Haider, Katherine AlbuttAbstract:Sexual violence is prevalent in conflict-affected settings and may result in sexual violence-related pregnancies (SVRPs). There are limited data on how women with SVRPs make decisions about pregnancy continuation or termination, especially in contexts with limited or restricted access to comprehensive reproductive health services. A qualitative study was conducted in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) as part of a larger mixed methods study in 2012. Utilizing respondent-driven sampling (RDS), adult women who self-reported sexual violence and a resultant SVRP were enrolled into two study subgroups: 1) women currently raising a child from an SVRP (parenting group) and 2) women who terminated an SVRP (termination group). Trained female research assistants conducted semi-structured interviews with a subset of women in a private setting and responses were manually recorded. Interview notes were translated and uploaded to a qualitative software program, coded, and thematic content analysis was conducted. A total of 55 women were interviewed: 38 in the parenting group and 17 in the termination group. There were a myriad of expressed attitudes, beliefs, and emotional responses toward SVRPs and the termination of SVRPs with three predominant influences on decision-making, including: 1) the biologic, ethnic, and Social identities of the fetus and/or future child; 2) Social reactions, including fear of Social Stigmatization and/or rejection; and 3) the power of religious beliefs and moral considerations on women’s autonomy in the decision-making process. Findings from women who continued and women who terminated SVRPs reveal the complexities of decision-making related to SVRPs, including the emotional reasoning and responses, and the Social, moral, and religious dimensions of the decision-making processes. It is important to consider these multi-faceted influences on decision-making for women with SVRPs in conflict-affected settings in order to improve provision of health services and to offer useful insights for subsequent programmatic and policy decisions.
-
a qualitative analysis of psychoSocial outcomes among women with sexual violence related pregnancies in eastern democratic republic of congo
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 2017Co-Authors: Jennifer Scott, Colleen Mullen, Shada A Rouhani, Philipp Kuwert, Ashley L Greiner, Katherine Albutt, Gillian BurkhardtAbstract:Sexual violence is prevalent in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and has potentially devastating psychoSocial consequences. Previous studies have reported on sexual violence and its impact on the mental health of survivors, but there are few studies conducted among women with sexual violence-related pregnancies (SVRPs). Women with SVRPs may be at greater risk of complex psychoSocial outcomes, including Social Stigmatization. This study aimed to describe psychoSocial outcomes among this subgroup of sexual violence survivors in order to inform future interventions. A mixed methods study was conducted in Bukavu, DRC in 2012 among adult women who self-reported an SVRP and either (1) were currently raising a child from an SVRP (parenting group) or (2) had terminated an SVRP (termination group). This manuscript presents qualitative findings from the mixed methods study. Participants were recruited using respondent-driven sampling and a proportion engaged in semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted by trained female interviewers. Thematic content analysis was conducted and key themes were identified. In total, 55 women were interviewed, of whom 38 were in the parenting group and 17 in the termination group. Women with SVRPs experienced a myriad of emotional responses as they navigated their Social environments following the SVRPs. Negative reactions, including Social Stigmatization and/or Social rejection, toward women with SVRPs and toward children born from SVRPs were important influences on psychological well-being. Women expressed both internalized emotionality intertwined with externalized experiences in the Social environment. Many women demonstrated resilience, or what could be termed post-traumatic growth, identifying avenues of agency to advance the Social conditions for women. The findings from the qualitative study, and in particular, the respondents’ needs and suggested strategies, may be useful to inform future research, programs, and policies for women with SVRPs in eastern DRC. Future research could move beyond cross-sectional assessments to utilize innovative research methodologies to assess processes of psychological adaptation among women with SVRPs. Multi-dimensional psychoSocial programs for women with SVRPs should consider basic needs such as shelter, food, and health care within the broader framework of trauma-informed care. Participatory programming, guided by beneficiaries, could provide further avenues for agency to advance Social conditions for women with SVRPs in eastern DRC.