The Experts below are selected from a list of 309 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

X Y Han - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work Literature 1990 2003 evidence that constitutes a wake up call
    Research on Social Work Practice, 2005
    Co-Authors: Daniel T L Shek, Vera M Y Tang, X Y Han
    Abstract:

    Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work Literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social Workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in Social Work should be cautious and Social Workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quali...

  • Evaluation of Evaluation Studies Using Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Work Literature (1990-2003): Evidence That Constitutes a Wake-Up Call
    Research on Social Work Practice, 2005
    Co-Authors: Daniel T L Shek, Vera M Y Tang, X Y Han
    Abstract:

    Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work Literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social Workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in Social Work should be cautious and Social Workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for Social Workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out.

Tony Mcginn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systematic Literature Searching in Social Work: A Practical Guide with Database Appraisal: Increasing efficiency in Social Work Literature searching
    Research on Social Work Practice, 2021
    Co-Authors: Katheryn Margaret Pascoe, Bethany Waterhouse-bradley, Tony Mcginn
    Abstract:

    Context:In response to the growth of evidence-based practice in Social Work, systematic Literature reviews offer significant value to Social Work but are often met with concerns of time scarcity.Pu...

  • Social Work Literature Searching: Current Issues With Databases and Online Search Engines
    Research on Social Work Practice, 2014
    Co-Authors: Tony Mcginn, Brian J Taylor, Mary Mccolgan, Janice Mcquilkan
    Abstract:

    Objectives:To compare the performance of a range of search facilities; and to illustrate the execution of a comprehensive Literature search for qualitative evidence in Social Work.Context:Developments in Literature search methods and comparisons of search facilities help facilitate access to the best available evidence for Social Workers.Method:The performance of 14 databases and web search engines was appraised, by applying a search formula for articles relating to perpetrators of intimate partner violence and the process of change.Results:Seventy-two out of seventy-eight relevant articles were found on just six of the search facilities used. Social Services Abstracts performed the best. Web search engines did not contribute any unique hits.Conclusion:The need to use a range of databases was confirmed. Databases have performed inconsistently across case studies to date. New approaches to pilot-testing facilities and search terms proved useful. Accessing qualitative evidence to inform practice must become...

Kirsten Stalker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Daniel T L Shek - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work Literature 1990 2003 evidence that constitutes a wake up call
    Research on Social Work Practice, 2005
    Co-Authors: Daniel T L Shek, Vera M Y Tang, X Y Han
    Abstract:

    Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work Literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social Workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in Social Work should be cautious and Social Workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quali...

  • Evaluation of Evaluation Studies Using Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Work Literature (1990-2003): Evidence That Constitutes a Wake-Up Call
    Research on Social Work Practice, 2005
    Co-Authors: Daniel T L Shek, Vera M Y Tang, X Y Han
    Abstract:

    Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work Literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the Social Work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social Workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in Social Work should be cautious and Social Workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for Social Workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out.

Liang Shang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.