The Experts below are selected from a list of 4137 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Qin Zhang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
geological characteristics main challenges and future prospect of shale gas
Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017Co-Authors: Caineng Zou, Qun Zhao, Dazhong Dong, Zhi Yang, Zhen Qiu, Feng Liang, Nan Wang, Yong Huang, Anxiang Duan, Qin ZhangAbstract:Abstract The development of shale gas in the United States has made a breakthrough, profoundly changed the pattern of oil and gas supply. It created the “shale gas revolution” on a global scale. Based on the practice of shale gas development in China and abroad, this paper aims to: (1) Summarize 5 basic characteristics, which are shale gas resource distribution, reservoir space, sweet spot area (section), hydrocarbon type and development mode. (2) Divide China shale development into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. (3) Identify 4 challenges in the future development of China shale gas industry. It includes non-marine shale gas potential, core technology and equipment for resource deep than 3500 m, complex surface “factory mode” production, human geography and other non-technical factors. (4) Process economic evaluation under the conditions of government financial subsidies. China's shale gas project FIRR is about 8.0%–9.0%. Considering the global shale gas resources, consumer demand and other factors, it global shale gas production is expected to reach 1.1 × 1012m3 by 2040.
-
Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas
Elsevier, 2017Co-Authors: Caineng Zou, Qun Zhao, Dazhong Dong, Zhi Yang, Zhen Qiu, Feng Liang, Nan Wang, Yong Huang, Anxiang Duan, Qin ZhangAbstract:The development of shale gas in the United States has made a breakthrough, profoundly changed the pattern of oil and gas supply. It created the “shale gas revolution” on a global scale. Based on the practice of shale gas development in China and abroad, this paper aims to: (1) Summarize 5 basic characteristics, which are shale gas resource distribution, reservoir space, sweet spot area (section), hydrocarbon type and development mode. (2) Divide China shale development into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. (3) Identify 4 challenges in the future development of China shale gas industry. It includes non-marine shale gas potential, core technology and equipment for resource deep than 3500 m, complex surface “factory mode” production, human geography and other non-technical factors. (4) Process economic evaluation under the conditions of government financial subsidies. China's shale gas project FIRR is about 8.0%–9.0%. Considering the global shale gas resources, consumer demand and other factors, it global shale gas production is expected to reach 1.1 × 1012m3 by 2040. Keywords: Shale gas, Black shale, Shale gas revolution, Nano pore, Sweet spot area, Sweet spot section, Artificial gas reservoi
Fred Spoor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative anatomy of the middle ear ossicles of extant hominids introducing a geometric morphometric protocol
Journal of Human Evolution, 2016Co-Authors: Alexander Stoessel, Philipp Gunz, Romain David, Fred SpoorAbstract:The presence of three interconnected auditory ossicles in the middle ear is a defining characteristic of mammals, and aspects of ossicle morphology are related to hearing sensitivity. However, analysis and comparison of ossicles are complicated by their minute size and complex three-dimensional shapes. Here we introduce a geometric morphometric measurement protocol for 3D shape analysis based on landmarks and semilandmarks obtained from μCT images and apply it to ossicles of extant hominids (great apes and humans). We show that the protocol is reliable and reproducible over a range of voxel resolutions, and captures even subtle shape differences. Using this approach it is possible to distinguish the hominid taxa by mean shapes of their malleus and incus (p < 0.01). The Stapes appears less diagnostic, although this may in part be related to the small sample size available. Using ancestral state estimation, we show that, within hominids, Homo sapiens is derived with respect to its malleus (short manubrium, long corpus, head anterior-posterior flattened, articular facet shape), incus (wide intercrural curvature, long incudal processes, articular facet shape) and Stapes (high Stapes with kidney-shaped footplate). H. sapiens also shows a number of plesiomorphic shape traits whereas Gorilla and Pan possess a number of autapomorphic characteristics. The Pongo ossicles appear to be close to the plesiomorphic hominid condition. The malleus shows little difference in size among hominids, and allometry is thus of little importance. In contrast, the incus and Stapes are more variable in size, and their shape is more strongly related to size differences. Although the form-function relationships in the middle ear are not fully understood, some aspects of ossicle morphology suggest that interspecific differences in hearing capacities are present among hominids. Finally, the results of this study provide a comparative framework for morphometric studies analyzing ossicles of extinct hominids, with a bearing on taxonomy, phylogeny and auditory function.
Caineng Zou - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
geological characteristics main challenges and future prospect of shale gas
Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017Co-Authors: Caineng Zou, Qun Zhao, Dazhong Dong, Zhi Yang, Zhen Qiu, Feng Liang, Nan Wang, Yong Huang, Anxiang Duan, Qin ZhangAbstract:Abstract The development of shale gas in the United States has made a breakthrough, profoundly changed the pattern of oil and gas supply. It created the “shale gas revolution” on a global scale. Based on the practice of shale gas development in China and abroad, this paper aims to: (1) Summarize 5 basic characteristics, which are shale gas resource distribution, reservoir space, sweet spot area (section), hydrocarbon type and development mode. (2) Divide China shale development into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. (3) Identify 4 challenges in the future development of China shale gas industry. It includes non-marine shale gas potential, core technology and equipment for resource deep than 3500 m, complex surface “factory mode” production, human geography and other non-technical factors. (4) Process economic evaluation under the conditions of government financial subsidies. China's shale gas project FIRR is about 8.0%–9.0%. Considering the global shale gas resources, consumer demand and other factors, it global shale gas production is expected to reach 1.1 × 1012m3 by 2040.
-
Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas
Elsevier, 2017Co-Authors: Caineng Zou, Qun Zhao, Dazhong Dong, Zhi Yang, Zhen Qiu, Feng Liang, Nan Wang, Yong Huang, Anxiang Duan, Qin ZhangAbstract:The development of shale gas in the United States has made a breakthrough, profoundly changed the pattern of oil and gas supply. It created the “shale gas revolution” on a global scale. Based on the practice of shale gas development in China and abroad, this paper aims to: (1) Summarize 5 basic characteristics, which are shale gas resource distribution, reservoir space, sweet spot area (section), hydrocarbon type and development mode. (2) Divide China shale development into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. The United States is divided into three stages: scientific exploration, technological breakthrough and mature development. (3) Identify 4 challenges in the future development of China shale gas industry. It includes non-marine shale gas potential, core technology and equipment for resource deep than 3500 m, complex surface “factory mode” production, human geography and other non-technical factors. (4) Process economic evaluation under the conditions of government financial subsidies. China's shale gas project FIRR is about 8.0%–9.0%. Considering the global shale gas resources, consumer demand and other factors, it global shale gas production is expected to reach 1.1 × 1012m3 by 2040. Keywords: Shale gas, Black shale, Shale gas revolution, Nano pore, Sweet spot area, Sweet spot section, Artificial gas reservoi
Alexander Stoessel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative anatomy of the middle ear ossicles of extant hominids introducing a geometric morphometric protocol
Journal of Human Evolution, 2016Co-Authors: Alexander Stoessel, Philipp Gunz, Romain David, Fred SpoorAbstract:The presence of three interconnected auditory ossicles in the middle ear is a defining characteristic of mammals, and aspects of ossicle morphology are related to hearing sensitivity. However, analysis and comparison of ossicles are complicated by their minute size and complex three-dimensional shapes. Here we introduce a geometric morphometric measurement protocol for 3D shape analysis based on landmarks and semilandmarks obtained from μCT images and apply it to ossicles of extant hominids (great apes and humans). We show that the protocol is reliable and reproducible over a range of voxel resolutions, and captures even subtle shape differences. Using this approach it is possible to distinguish the hominid taxa by mean shapes of their malleus and incus (p < 0.01). The Stapes appears less diagnostic, although this may in part be related to the small sample size available. Using ancestral state estimation, we show that, within hominids, Homo sapiens is derived with respect to its malleus (short manubrium, long corpus, head anterior-posterior flattened, articular facet shape), incus (wide intercrural curvature, long incudal processes, articular facet shape) and Stapes (high Stapes with kidney-shaped footplate). H. sapiens also shows a number of plesiomorphic shape traits whereas Gorilla and Pan possess a number of autapomorphic characteristics. The Pongo ossicles appear to be close to the plesiomorphic hominid condition. The malleus shows little difference in size among hominids, and allometry is thus of little importance. In contrast, the incus and Stapes are more variable in size, and their shape is more strongly related to size differences. Although the form-function relationships in the middle ear are not fully understood, some aspects of ossicle morphology suggest that interspecific differences in hearing capacities are present among hominids. Finally, the results of this study provide a comparative framework for morphometric studies analyzing ossicles of extinct hominids, with a bearing on taxonomy, phylogeny and auditory function.
David C Berliner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
re analysis of naep math and reading scores in states with and without high stakes tests response to rosenshine
Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2003Co-Authors: Audrey Amreinbeardsley, David C BerlinerAbstract:Here we address the criticism of our NAEP analyses by Rosenshine (2003). On the basis of his thoughtful critique we redid some of the analyses on which he focused. Our findings contradict his. This is no fault of his, the reasons for which are explained in this paper. Our findings do support our position that high-stakes tests do not do much to improve academic achievement. The extent to which states with high-stakes tests outperform states without high-stakes tests is, at best, indeterminable. Using 1994-1998 NAEP reading and 1996-2000 NAEP math data and accounting for NAEP exemption rates for the same years, we found that states with high-stakes tests are not outperforming states without high-stakes tests in reading in the 4th grade or math in the 8th grade at a statistically significant level. States with high-stakes tests are, however, outperforming states without high-stakes tests in math in the 4th grade at a statistically significant level. Our findings also support our earlier stance that states with high-stakes tests are exempting more students from participating in the NAEP than are states without high-stakes tests. This is more prevalent the more recent the NAEP test administration. This is illustrated in the tables below.
