The Experts below are selected from a list of 79200 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ludwin E Molina - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
ethnic minority majority asymmetry in national attitudes around the world a multilevel analysis
Political Psychology, 2010Co-Authors: Christian Staerkle, Jim Sidanius, Eva G T Green, Ludwin E MolinaAbstract:Using data from the International Social Survey Programme, this research investigated asymmetric attitudes of ethnic minorities and majorities towards their country and explored the impact of human development, ethnic diversity, and social inequality as country-level moderators of national attitudes. In line with the general hypothesis of ethnic asymmetry, we found that ethnic, linguistic, and religious majorities were more identified with the nation and more strongly endorsed nationalist ideology than minorities (H1, 33 countries). Multilevel analyses revealed that this pattern of asymmetry was moderated by country-level characteristics: the difference between minorities and majorities was greatest in ethnically diverse countries and in egalitarian, low inequality contexts. We also observed a larger positive correlation between ethnic subgroup identification and both national identification and nationalism for majorities than for minorities (H2, 20 countries). A stronger overall relationship between ethnic and national identification was observed in countries with a low level of human development. The greatest minority-majority differences in the relationship between ethnic identification and national attitudes were found in egalitarian countries with a strong welfare State Tradition.
Christian Staerkle - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
ethnic minority majority asymmetry in national attitudes around the world a multilevel analysis
Political Psychology, 2010Co-Authors: Christian Staerkle, Jim Sidanius, Eva G T Green, Ludwin E MolinaAbstract:Using data from the International Social Survey Programme, this research investigated asymmetric attitudes of ethnic minorities and majorities towards their country and explored the impact of human development, ethnic diversity, and social inequality as country-level moderators of national attitudes. In line with the general hypothesis of ethnic asymmetry, we found that ethnic, linguistic, and religious majorities were more identified with the nation and more strongly endorsed nationalist ideology than minorities (H1, 33 countries). Multilevel analyses revealed that this pattern of asymmetry was moderated by country-level characteristics: the difference between minorities and majorities was greatest in ethnically diverse countries and in egalitarian, low inequality contexts. We also observed a larger positive correlation between ethnic subgroup identification and both national identification and nationalism for majorities than for minorities (H2, 20 countries). A stronger overall relationship between ethnic and national identification was observed in countries with a low level of human development. The greatest minority-majority differences in the relationship between ethnic identification and national attitudes were found in egalitarian countries with a strong welfare State Tradition.
Kaarlo Tuori - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
whose voluntas what ratio law in the State Tradition
International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2018Co-Authors: Kaarlo TuoriAbstract:Post-national developments have questioned the dominance of State will and lead to an increasing separation of the institutional locus of legal voluntarism and coercion. However, this article discusses “State Tradition” as a legal mind-set; as an ingrained approach to law, which may linger in our legal Vorverstandnis long after post-national developments have challenged its seemingly self-evident premises. The article examines the Kelsenian and the Hartian variants of legal positivism as theoretical expressions of this Tradition. The article also argues that State Tradition has been, and still is, much more powerful in public than private law. Finally, it is suggested that although the State Tradition is unable to chart the post-national lawscape, it may still be of use in the construction of an ideal-typical general concept of law which we need when embarking on an examination of a legal world inhabited by instances of not only State law but non-State law as well.
Eva G T Green - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
ethnic minority majority asymmetry in national attitudes around the world a multilevel analysis
Political Psychology, 2010Co-Authors: Christian Staerkle, Jim Sidanius, Eva G T Green, Ludwin E MolinaAbstract:Using data from the International Social Survey Programme, this research investigated asymmetric attitudes of ethnic minorities and majorities towards their country and explored the impact of human development, ethnic diversity, and social inequality as country-level moderators of national attitudes. In line with the general hypothesis of ethnic asymmetry, we found that ethnic, linguistic, and religious majorities were more identified with the nation and more strongly endorsed nationalist ideology than minorities (H1, 33 countries). Multilevel analyses revealed that this pattern of asymmetry was moderated by country-level characteristics: the difference between minorities and majorities was greatest in ethnically diverse countries and in egalitarian, low inequality contexts. We also observed a larger positive correlation between ethnic subgroup identification and both national identification and nationalism for majorities than for minorities (H2, 20 countries). A stronger overall relationship between ethnic and national identification was observed in countries with a low level of human development. The greatest minority-majority differences in the relationship between ethnic identification and national attitudes were found in egalitarian countries with a strong welfare State Tradition.
Jim Sidanius - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
ethnic minority majority asymmetry in national attitudes around the world a multilevel analysis
Political Psychology, 2010Co-Authors: Christian Staerkle, Jim Sidanius, Eva G T Green, Ludwin E MolinaAbstract:Using data from the International Social Survey Programme, this research investigated asymmetric attitudes of ethnic minorities and majorities towards their country and explored the impact of human development, ethnic diversity, and social inequality as country-level moderators of national attitudes. In line with the general hypothesis of ethnic asymmetry, we found that ethnic, linguistic, and religious majorities were more identified with the nation and more strongly endorsed nationalist ideology than minorities (H1, 33 countries). Multilevel analyses revealed that this pattern of asymmetry was moderated by country-level characteristics: the difference between minorities and majorities was greatest in ethnically diverse countries and in egalitarian, low inequality contexts. We also observed a larger positive correlation between ethnic subgroup identification and both national identification and nationalism for majorities than for minorities (H2, 20 countries). A stronger overall relationship between ethnic and national identification was observed in countries with a low level of human development. The greatest minority-majority differences in the relationship between ethnic identification and national attitudes were found in egalitarian countries with a strong welfare State Tradition.