The Experts below are selected from a list of 16509 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ruth E Malone - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
policy coherence integration and proportionality in tobacco control should tobacco sales be limited to government outlets
Journal of Public Health Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Elizabeth A Smith, Patricia A Mcdaniel, Heikki Hiilamo, Ruth E MaloneAbstract:Multiple factors, including marijuana decriminalization/legalization, tobacco endgame discourse, and alcohol industry pressures, suggest that the retail regulatory environment for psychoactive or addictive Substances is a dynamic one in which new options may be considered. In most countries, the Regulation of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol is neither coherent, nor integrated, nor proportional to the potential harms caused by these Substances. We review the possible consequences of restricting tobacco sales to outlets run by government-operated alcohol retail monopolies, as well as the likely obstacles to such a policy. Such a move would allow governments more options for regulating tobacco sales, and increase coherence, integration, and proportionality of Substance Regulation. It might also serve as an incremental step toward an endgame goal of eliminating sales of commercial combustible tobacco.
Elizabeth A Smith - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
policy coherence integration and proportionality in tobacco control should tobacco sales be limited to government outlets
Journal of Public Health Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Elizabeth A Smith, Patricia A Mcdaniel, Heikki Hiilamo, Ruth E MaloneAbstract:Multiple factors, including marijuana decriminalization/legalization, tobacco endgame discourse, and alcohol industry pressures, suggest that the retail regulatory environment for psychoactive or addictive Substances is a dynamic one in which new options may be considered. In most countries, the Regulation of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol is neither coherent, nor integrated, nor proportional to the potential harms caused by these Substances. We review the possible consequences of restricting tobacco sales to outlets run by government-operated alcohol retail monopolies, as well as the likely obstacles to such a policy. Such a move would allow governments more options for regulating tobacco sales, and increase coherence, integration, and proportionality of Substance Regulation. It might also serve as an incremental step toward an endgame goal of eliminating sales of commercial combustible tobacco.
Heikki Hiilamo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
policy coherence integration and proportionality in tobacco control should tobacco sales be limited to government outlets
Journal of Public Health Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Elizabeth A Smith, Patricia A Mcdaniel, Heikki Hiilamo, Ruth E MaloneAbstract:Multiple factors, including marijuana decriminalization/legalization, tobacco endgame discourse, and alcohol industry pressures, suggest that the retail regulatory environment for psychoactive or addictive Substances is a dynamic one in which new options may be considered. In most countries, the Regulation of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol is neither coherent, nor integrated, nor proportional to the potential harms caused by these Substances. We review the possible consequences of restricting tobacco sales to outlets run by government-operated alcohol retail monopolies, as well as the likely obstacles to such a policy. Such a move would allow governments more options for regulating tobacco sales, and increase coherence, integration, and proportionality of Substance Regulation. It might also serve as an incremental step toward an endgame goal of eliminating sales of commercial combustible tobacco.
Patricia A Mcdaniel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
policy coherence integration and proportionality in tobacco control should tobacco sales be limited to government outlets
Journal of Public Health Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Elizabeth A Smith, Patricia A Mcdaniel, Heikki Hiilamo, Ruth E MaloneAbstract:Multiple factors, including marijuana decriminalization/legalization, tobacco endgame discourse, and alcohol industry pressures, suggest that the retail regulatory environment for psychoactive or addictive Substances is a dynamic one in which new options may be considered. In most countries, the Regulation of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol is neither coherent, nor integrated, nor proportional to the potential harms caused by these Substances. We review the possible consequences of restricting tobacco sales to outlets run by government-operated alcohol retail monopolies, as well as the likely obstacles to such a policy. Such a move would allow governments more options for regulating tobacco sales, and increase coherence, integration, and proportionality of Substance Regulation. It might also serve as an incremental step toward an endgame goal of eliminating sales of commercial combustible tobacco.
K.l. Palmer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Incentive-based approaches to regulating toxic Substances
1992Co-Authors: M.k. Macauley, K.l. PalmerAbstract:Applying incentive-based strategies to toxic Substance Regulation can be complicated. Potential risks to health and the environment can occur at many stages in the life cycle of a toxic Substance, and the risks vary among different products and uses of products containing toxic Substances. Thus researchers at Resources for the Future recommend that regulatory intervention be focused on specific stages in the life cycle of toxic Substances, but warn that intervention must be broad enough to mitigate incentives to adopt production processes and products that could pose greater risks than the processes and products they replace . Despite this and other potential pitfalls, they find that incentive-based strategies such as product labeling and deposit-refund schemes may be desirable for regulating certain stages of the life cycle of some chemicals.
