Tatlockia Micdadei

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 9 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

B J Tindall - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • taking a closer look at the valid publication and authorship of legionella bozemanae brenner et al 1980 fluoribacter bozemanae garrity et al 1980 legionella pittsburghensis pasculle et al 1980 legionella Micdadei hebert et al 1980 and Tatlockia micda
    Current Microbiology, 2020
    Co-Authors: B J Tindall
    Abstract:

    The names Legionella bozemanae Brenner et al. 1980, Fluoribacter bozemanae Garrity et al. 1980, Legionella pittsburghensis Pasculle et al. 1980, Legionella Micdadei Hebert et al. 1980 and Tatlockia Micdadei (Hebert et al. 1980) Garrity et al. 1980, all appeared in the same issue of the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. Fluoribacter bozemanae Garrity et al. 1980 appeared as the name of new taxon at the rank of species and Tatlockia Micdadei (Hebert et al. 1980) Garrity et al. 1980 as a new combination, both in the same original article in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. The names Legionella bozemanae Brenner et al. 1980 (originally published as Legionella bozemanii) Legionella pittsburghensis Pasculle et al. 1980 (originally published as Legionella pittsburgensis) and Legionella Micdadei Hebert et al. 1980, all appeared initially in effective publications outside of the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology and were validly published by inclusion in Validation List no 5. While it is evident from the inclusion of the names Legionella bozemanae Brenner et al. 1980, Legionella pittsburghensis Pasculle et al. 1980 and Legionella Micdadei Hebert et al. 1980 on Validation List no. 5 that the authors were following the 1975 revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria, the wording of Garrity et al. 1980 indicates that they were following the interpretation found in the 1966 revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Changes to the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria between the 1966 and 1975 revisions introduced new criteria for the valid publication of names. In particular, there was a change from all effective publications being accepted as the publication in which valid publication of a name could occur to only one journal being accepted as the publication in which valid publication could occur (the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, now the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology). This change has a direct effect on the order of valid publication of the names Legionella bozemanae Brenner et al. 1980, Fluoribacter bozemanae Garrity et al. 1980, Legionella pittsburghensis Pasculle et al. 1980, Legionella Micdadei Hebert et al. 1980 and Tatlockia Micdadei (Hebert et al. 1980) Garrity et al. 1980, their authorships, as well as determining which names should be treated as names of new taxa at the rank of species (sp. nov.) vs new combinations (comb. nov.) based on the names of existing taxa. Given the fact that Legionella pittsburghensis Pasculle et al. 1980, Legionella Micdadei Hebert et al. 1980 and Tatlockia Micdadei (Hebert et al. 1980) Garrity et al. 1980 share the same nomenclatural type, this also has an influence on which epithet has priority and which epithet is illegitimate.

A Brown - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • properties of the genus Tatlockia differentiation of Tatlockia legionella maceachernii and Micdadei from each other and from other legionellae
    Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1993
    Co-Authors: K F Fox, A Brown
    Abstract:

    The biochemical reactions, carbohydrate content, and 16S-rRNA sequences of Tatlockia (Legionella) maceachernii and Tatlockia Micdadei strains were studied. Except for catalase activity, Tatlockia strains were relatively inert in the biochemical tests commonly used in clinical laboratories. Phenotypically, the two Tatlockia species could be distinguished from other legionellae by the presence of yersiniose A, by their inability to hydrolyze hippurate or starch, by the absence of colony or media fluorescence, and by the absence of distinct browning of tyrosine-containing medium. These two species differed from one another by the production of acetoin by T. Micdadei but not by T. maceachernii. Gelatinase activity, which had been reported in T. maceachernii, was observed in only one of the four strains studied. The 16S-rRNA sequences and carbohydrate profiles of T. maceachernii and T. Micdadei were essentially identical. In preparing the RNA for study, it was noted that the 23S rRNA was fragmented in all T. m...

K F Fox - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • properties of the genus Tatlockia differentiation of Tatlockia legionella maceachernii and Micdadei from each other and from other legionellae
    Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1993
    Co-Authors: K F Fox, A Brown
    Abstract:

    The biochemical reactions, carbohydrate content, and 16S-rRNA sequences of Tatlockia (Legionella) maceachernii and Tatlockia Micdadei strains were studied. Except for catalase activity, Tatlockia strains were relatively inert in the biochemical tests commonly used in clinical laboratories. Phenotypically, the two Tatlockia species could be distinguished from other legionellae by the presence of yersiniose A, by their inability to hydrolyze hippurate or starch, by the absence of colony or media fluorescence, and by the absence of distinct browning of tyrosine-containing medium. These two species differed from one another by the production of acetoin by T. Micdadei but not by T. maceachernii. Gelatinase activity, which had been reported in T. maceachernii, was observed in only one of the four strains studied. The 16S-rRNA sequences and carbohydrate profiles of T. maceachernii and T. Micdadei were essentially identical. In preparing the RNA for study, it was noted that the 23S rRNA was fragmented in all T. m...

T. Martin Embley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the use of 16s ribosomal rna analyses to investigate the phylogeny of the family legionellaceae
    Microbiology, 1991
    Co-Authors: S Warwick, N A Saunders, T. Martin Embley
    Abstract:

    The 16S ribosomal RNA sequences of Legionella pneumophila, L. erythra, L. hackeliae, L. spiritensis, L. longbeachae, L. bozemanii (Fluoribacter bozemanae) and L. Micdadei (Tatlockia Micdadei) were determined using reverse transcriptase. The sequences were compared with published sequences for Gram-negative bacteria and phylogenetic trees were constructed. The data confirm previous work which showed that the family Legionellaceae forms a monophyletic subgroup within the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria. The data show that all of the legionellae studied are highly related (> 95 %) on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences and do not support the division of the family Legionellaceae into three genera.

S Warwick - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the use of 16s ribosomal rna analyses to investigate the phylogeny of the family legionellaceae
    Microbiology, 1991
    Co-Authors: S Warwick, N A Saunders, T. Martin Embley
    Abstract:

    The 16S ribosomal RNA sequences of Legionella pneumophila, L. erythra, L. hackeliae, L. spiritensis, L. longbeachae, L. bozemanii (Fluoribacter bozemanae) and L. Micdadei (Tatlockia Micdadei) were determined using reverse transcriptase. The sequences were compared with published sequences for Gram-negative bacteria and phylogenetic trees were constructed. The data confirm previous work which showed that the family Legionellaceae forms a monophyletic subgroup within the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria. The data show that all of the legionellae studied are highly related (> 95 %) on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences and do not support the division of the family Legionellaceae into three genera.