Theoretical Reflection

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 143841 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Uroš Lobnik - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Avner Greif - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • cultural beliefs and the organization of society a historical and Theoretical Reflection on collectivist and individualist societies
    Journal of Political Economy, 1994
    Co-Authors: Avner Greif
    Abstract:

    This paper integrates game-Theoretical and sociological concepts to conduct a comparative historical analysis of the relations between culture and institutions. It indicates the importance of culture, and in particular cultural beliefs, in determining institutions, in institutional path dependence, and in forestalling intersociety successful adoption of institutions. Examination of institutional change in two premodern societies from the Muslim and the Latin worlds yields that their distinct institutional structures resemble those found by social psychologists to differentiate contemporary developing and developed economies. This suggests the historical importance of distinct cultures and the related societal organizations in economic development. Copyright 1994 by University of Chicago Press.

Avihay Dorfman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Case Against External Explanations of Tort Law: Can Antecedent Values Divine the Deep Structure of Tort Law?
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
    Co-Authors: Avihay Dorfman
    Abstract:

    In this paper I discuss the prevailing approach in Theoretical Reflection about tort law, namely, the tendency to explain its normative structure by reference to values and goals that do not distinctively originate in the engagements that tort law engenders between its constituents. I seek to show that this form of explanation – external explanation – suffers from an important structural deficiency. In particular, I argue that external explanations may lack the normative resources to explain tort law, even on their own respective terms. My analysis reveals that the key to the deep structure of tort law might not be found in abstract economic models or ideals of justice. Rather, it may be found in the freestanding value of the relationship that tort law engenders between care-discharger and cared-for and between defendant-tortfeasor and plaintiff-victim.

Peter Šenk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Michael Burawoy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.