The Experts below are selected from a list of 180 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Sun Choi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • anti angiogenic activity of Thienopyridine Derivative lcb03 0110 by targeting vegfr 2 and jak stat3 signalling
    Experimental Dermatology, 2015
    Co-Authors: Beomseok Yang, Youngguen Kwon, Sun Choi
    Abstract:

    : Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling are important for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this study, we identified (3-(2-(3-(morpholinomethyl)phenyl)thieno[3,2-b]pyridin-7-ylamino)phenol (LCB03-0110) as a potent angiogenesis inhibitor. LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling in primary cultured human endothelial cells and cancer cells. An in vitro kinase assay and molecular modelling revealed that LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2 kinase activity via preferential binding at the ATP-binding site of their kinases. LCB03-0110 successfully occupied the hydrophobic pocket of VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2. LCB03-0110 also inhibited hypoxia-induced HIF/STAT3 and EGF- or angiopoietin-induced signalling cascades. In addition, LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGF-induced proliferation, viability, migration and capillary-like tube formation. LCB03-0110 also suppressed the sprouting of endothelial cells in the rat aorta and the formation of new blood vessels in the mouse Matrigel plug assay, but also suppressed pulmonary metastasis and tumor xenograft in mice. Our results suggest that LCB03-0110 is a potential candidate small molecule for blocking angiogenesis mediated by aberrant activation of VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling.

Beomseok Yang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • anti angiogenic activity of Thienopyridine Derivative lcb03 0110 by targeting vegfr 2 and jak stat3 signalling
    Experimental Dermatology, 2015
    Co-Authors: Beomseok Yang, Youngguen Kwon, Sun Choi
    Abstract:

    : Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling are important for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this study, we identified (3-(2-(3-(morpholinomethyl)phenyl)thieno[3,2-b]pyridin-7-ylamino)phenol (LCB03-0110) as a potent angiogenesis inhibitor. LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling in primary cultured human endothelial cells and cancer cells. An in vitro kinase assay and molecular modelling revealed that LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2 kinase activity via preferential binding at the ATP-binding site of their kinases. LCB03-0110 successfully occupied the hydrophobic pocket of VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2. LCB03-0110 also inhibited hypoxia-induced HIF/STAT3 and EGF- or angiopoietin-induced signalling cascades. In addition, LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGF-induced proliferation, viability, migration and capillary-like tube formation. LCB03-0110 also suppressed the sprouting of endothelial cells in the rat aorta and the formation of new blood vessels in the mouse Matrigel plug assay, but also suppressed pulmonary metastasis and tumor xenograft in mice. Our results suggest that LCB03-0110 is a potential candidate small molecule for blocking angiogenesis mediated by aberrant activation of VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling.

  • Anti‐angiogenic activity of Thienopyridine Derivative LCB03‐0110 by targeting VEGFR‐2 and JAK/STAT3 Signalling
    Experimental Dermatology, 2015
    Co-Authors: Beomseok Yang, Youngguen Kwon
    Abstract:

    : Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling are important for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this study, we identified (3-(2-(3-(morpholinomethyl)phenyl)thieno[3,2-b]pyridin-7-ylamino)phenol (LCB03-0110) as a potent angiogenesis inhibitor. LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling in primary cultured human endothelial cells and cancer cells. An in vitro kinase assay and molecular modelling revealed that LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2 kinase activity via preferential binding at the ATP-binding site of their kinases. LCB03-0110 successfully occupied the hydrophobic pocket of VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2. LCB03-0110 also inhibited hypoxia-induced HIF/STAT3 and EGF- or angiopoietin-induced signalling cascades. In addition, LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGF-induced proliferation, viability, migration and capillary-like tube formation. LCB03-0110 also suppressed the sprouting of endothelial cells in the rat aorta and the formation of new blood vessels in the mouse Matrigel plug assay, but also suppressed pulmonary metastasis and tumor xenograft in mice. Our results suggest that LCB03-0110 is a potential candidate small molecule for blocking angiogenesis mediated by aberrant activation of VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling.

Graeme J. Hankey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Thienopyridine Derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
    Co-Authors: Cathie Sudlow, Gillian Mason, James Maurice, Catherine J Wedderburn, Graeme J. Hankey
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events, reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter. Thienopyridine Derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of Thienopyridine Derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death) in patients at high risk, and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the trials registers of the Stroke, Heart and Peripheral Vascular Diseases Cochrane Review Groups (last searched July 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2008). We also searched reference lists of relevant papers, and contacted other researchers and the pharmaceutical company Sanofi-BMS (December 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double blind, randomised trials directly comparing a Thienopyridine Derivative with aspirin in high vascular risk patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We sought additional data from the principal investigators of the largest trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials involving 26,865 high vascular risk patients. The trials were generally of high quality. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in nine trials (7633 patients) and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients). Compared with aspirin, allocation to a Thienopyridine produced a modest, just statistically significant, reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event (11.6% versus 12.5%; odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.99), corresponding to the avoidance of 10 (95% CI 0 to 20) serious vascular events per 1000 patients treated for about two years. However, the wide confidence interval includes the possibility of negligible additional benefit. Compared with aspirin, Thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, Thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea, ticlopidine more than clopidogrel. Allocation to ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, significantly increased the odds of neutropenia. In patients with TIA/ischaemic stroke, the results were similar to those for all patients combined. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The Thienopyridine Derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk, and possibly somewhat more so. However, the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible. Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the Thienopyridine of choice. It should be used as an alternative to aspirin in patients genuinely intolerant of or allergic to aspirin.

  • The Cochrane Library - Thienopyridine Derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients.
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
    Co-Authors: Cathie Sudlow, Gillian Mason, Catherine J Wedderburn, James B. Maurice, Graeme J. Hankey
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events, reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter. Thienopyridine Derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of Thienopyridine Derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death) in patients at high risk, and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the trials registers of the Stroke, Heart and Peripheral Vascular Diseases Cochrane Review Groups (last searched July 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2008). We also searched reference lists of relevant papers, and contacted other researchers and the pharmaceutical company Sanofi-BMS (December 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double blind, randomised trials directly comparing a Thienopyridine Derivative with aspirin in high vascular risk patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We sought additional data from the principal investigators of the largest trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials involving 26,865 high vascular risk patients. The trials were generally of high quality. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in nine trials (7633 patients) and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients). Compared with aspirin, allocation to a Thienopyridine produced a modest, just statistically significant, reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event (11.6% versus 12.5%; odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.99), corresponding to the avoidance of 10 (95% CI 0 to 20) serious vascular events per 1000 patients treated for about two years. However, the wide confidence interval includes the possibility of negligible additional benefit. Compared with aspirin, Thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, Thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea, ticlopidine more than clopidogrel. Allocation to ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, significantly increased the odds of neutropenia. In patients with TIA/ischaemic stroke, the results were similar to those for all patients combined. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The Thienopyridine Derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk, and possibly somewhat more so. However, the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible. Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the Thienopyridine of choice. It should be used as an alternative to aspirin in patients genuinely intolerant of or allergic to aspirin.

Youngguen Kwon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • anti angiogenic activity of Thienopyridine Derivative lcb03 0110 by targeting vegfr 2 and jak stat3 signalling
    Experimental Dermatology, 2015
    Co-Authors: Beomseok Yang, Youngguen Kwon, Sun Choi
    Abstract:

    : Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling are important for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this study, we identified (3-(2-(3-(morpholinomethyl)phenyl)thieno[3,2-b]pyridin-7-ylamino)phenol (LCB03-0110) as a potent angiogenesis inhibitor. LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling in primary cultured human endothelial cells and cancer cells. An in vitro kinase assay and molecular modelling revealed that LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2 kinase activity via preferential binding at the ATP-binding site of their kinases. LCB03-0110 successfully occupied the hydrophobic pocket of VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2. LCB03-0110 also inhibited hypoxia-induced HIF/STAT3 and EGF- or angiopoietin-induced signalling cascades. In addition, LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGF-induced proliferation, viability, migration and capillary-like tube formation. LCB03-0110 also suppressed the sprouting of endothelial cells in the rat aorta and the formation of new blood vessels in the mouse Matrigel plug assay, but also suppressed pulmonary metastasis and tumor xenograft in mice. Our results suggest that LCB03-0110 is a potential candidate small molecule for blocking angiogenesis mediated by aberrant activation of VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling.

  • Anti‐angiogenic activity of Thienopyridine Derivative LCB03‐0110 by targeting VEGFR‐2 and JAK/STAT3 Signalling
    Experimental Dermatology, 2015
    Co-Authors: Beomseok Yang, Youngguen Kwon
    Abstract:

    : Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling are important for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this study, we identified (3-(2-(3-(morpholinomethyl)phenyl)thieno[3,2-b]pyridin-7-ylamino)phenol (LCB03-0110) as a potent angiogenesis inhibitor. LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling in primary cultured human endothelial cells and cancer cells. An in vitro kinase assay and molecular modelling revealed that LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2 kinase activity via preferential binding at the ATP-binding site of their kinases. LCB03-0110 successfully occupied the hydrophobic pocket of VEGFR-2, c-SRC and TIE-2. LCB03-0110 also inhibited hypoxia-induced HIF/STAT3 and EGF- or angiopoietin-induced signalling cascades. In addition, LCB03-0110 inhibited VEGF-induced proliferation, viability, migration and capillary-like tube formation. LCB03-0110 also suppressed the sprouting of endothelial cells in the rat aorta and the formation of new blood vessels in the mouse Matrigel plug assay, but also suppressed pulmonary metastasis and tumor xenograft in mice. Our results suggest that LCB03-0110 is a potential candidate small molecule for blocking angiogenesis mediated by aberrant activation of VEGFR-2 and JAK/STAT3 signalling.

Cathie Sudlow - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Thienopyridine Derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
    Co-Authors: Cathie Sudlow, Gillian Mason, James Maurice, Catherine J Wedderburn, Graeme J. Hankey
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events, reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter. Thienopyridine Derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of Thienopyridine Derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death) in patients at high risk, and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the trials registers of the Stroke, Heart and Peripheral Vascular Diseases Cochrane Review Groups (last searched July 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2008). We also searched reference lists of relevant papers, and contacted other researchers and the pharmaceutical company Sanofi-BMS (December 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double blind, randomised trials directly comparing a Thienopyridine Derivative with aspirin in high vascular risk patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We sought additional data from the principal investigators of the largest trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials involving 26,865 high vascular risk patients. The trials were generally of high quality. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in nine trials (7633 patients) and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients). Compared with aspirin, allocation to a Thienopyridine produced a modest, just statistically significant, reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event (11.6% versus 12.5%; odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.99), corresponding to the avoidance of 10 (95% CI 0 to 20) serious vascular events per 1000 patients treated for about two years. However, the wide confidence interval includes the possibility of negligible additional benefit. Compared with aspirin, Thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, Thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea, ticlopidine more than clopidogrel. Allocation to ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, significantly increased the odds of neutropenia. In patients with TIA/ischaemic stroke, the results were similar to those for all patients combined. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The Thienopyridine Derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk, and possibly somewhat more so. However, the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible. Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the Thienopyridine of choice. It should be used as an alternative to aspirin in patients genuinely intolerant of or allergic to aspirin.

  • The Cochrane Library - Thienopyridine Derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients.
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
    Co-Authors: Cathie Sudlow, Gillian Mason, Catherine J Wedderburn, James B. Maurice, Graeme J. Hankey
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events, reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter. Thienopyridine Derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of Thienopyridine Derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death) in patients at high risk, and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the trials registers of the Stroke, Heart and Peripheral Vascular Diseases Cochrane Review Groups (last searched July 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2008). We also searched reference lists of relevant papers, and contacted other researchers and the pharmaceutical company Sanofi-BMS (December 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double blind, randomised trials directly comparing a Thienopyridine Derivative with aspirin in high vascular risk patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We sought additional data from the principal investigators of the largest trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials involving 26,865 high vascular risk patients. The trials were generally of high quality. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in nine trials (7633 patients) and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients). Compared with aspirin, allocation to a Thienopyridine produced a modest, just statistically significant, reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event (11.6% versus 12.5%; odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.99), corresponding to the avoidance of 10 (95% CI 0 to 20) serious vascular events per 1000 patients treated for about two years. However, the wide confidence interval includes the possibility of negligible additional benefit. Compared with aspirin, Thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, Thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea, ticlopidine more than clopidogrel. Allocation to ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, significantly increased the odds of neutropenia. In patients with TIA/ischaemic stroke, the results were similar to those for all patients combined. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The Thienopyridine Derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk, and possibly somewhat more so. However, the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible. Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the Thienopyridine of choice. It should be used as an alternative to aspirin in patients genuinely intolerant of or allergic to aspirin.