Unit Vector Field

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 114 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Fabiano G B Brito - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Arghir Zarnescu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • orientability and energy minimization in liquid crystal models
    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2011
    Co-Authors: J M Ball, Arghir Zarnescu
    Abstract:

    Uniaxial nematic liquid crystals are modelled in the Oseen–Frank theory through a Unit Vector Field n. This theory has the apparent drawback that it does not respect the head-to-tail symmetry in which n should be equivalent to −n. This symmetry is preserved in the constrained Landau–de Gennes theory that works with the tensor \({Q=s \left(n\otimes n-\frac{1}{3} Id\right)}\). We study the differences and the overlaps between the two theories. These depend on the regularity class used as well as on the topology of the underlying domain. We show that for simply-connected domains and in the natural energy class W1,2 the two theories coincide, but otherwise there can be differences between the two theories, which we identify. In the case of planar domains with holes and various boundary conditions, for the simplest form of the energy functional, we completely characterise the instances in which the predictions of the constrained Landau–de Gennes theory differ from those of the Oseen–Frank theory.

  • orientability and energy minimization in liquid crystal models
    arXiv: Analysis of PDEs, 2010
    Co-Authors: J M Ball, Arghir Zarnescu
    Abstract:

    Uniaxial nematic liquid crystals are modelled in the Oseen-Frank theory through a Unit Vector Field $n$. This theory has the apparent drawback that it does not respect the head-to-tail symmetry in which $n$ should be equivalent to -$n$. This symmetry is preserved in the constrained Landau-de Gennes theory that works with the tensor $Q=s\big(n\otimes n- \frac{1}{3} Id\big)$.We study the differences and the overlaps between the two theories. These depend on the regularity class used as well as on the topology of the underlying domain. We show that for simply-connected domains and in the natural energy class $W^{1,2}$ the two theories coincide, but otherwise there can be differences between the two theories, which we identify. In the case of planar domains we completely characterise the instances in which the predictions of the constrained Landau-de Gennes theory differ from those of the Oseen-Frank theory.

Alexander Yampolsky - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • On the mean curvature of a Unit Vector Field.
    arXiv: Differential Geometry, 2005
    Co-Authors: Alexander Yampolsky
    Abstract:

    We present an explicit formula for the mean curvature of a Unit Vector Field on a Riemannian manifold, using a special but natural frame. As applications, we treat some known and new examples of minimal Unit Vector Fields. We also give an example of a Vector Field of constant mean curvature on the Lobachevsky (n + 1) space.

  • On the intrinsic geometry of a Unit Vector Field
    arXiv: Differential Geometry, 2005
    Co-Authors: Alexander Yampolsky
    Abstract:

    We study the geometrical properties of a Unit Vector Field on a Riemannian 2-manifold, considering the Field as a local imbedding of the manifold into its tangent sphere bundle with the Sasaki metric. For the case of constant curvature K, we give a description of the totally geodesic Unit Vector Fields for K=0 and K=1 and prove a non-existence result for K not equal to 0 and 1. We also found a family of Vector Fields on the hyperbolic 2-plane L^2 of curvature -c^2 which generate foliations on Unit tangent bundle over L^2 with leaves of constant intrinsic curvature -c^2 and of constant extrinsic curvature -c^2/4.

  • on the intrinsic geometry of a Unit Vector Field
    Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, 2002
    Co-Authors: Alexander Yampolsky
    Abstract:

    We study the geometrical properties of a Unit Vector Field on a Riemannian 2-manifold, considering the Field as a local imbedding of the manifold into its tangent sphere bundle with the Sasaki metric. For the case of constant curvature K, we give a description of the totally geodesic Unit Vector Fields for K = 0 and K = 1 and prove a non-existence result for K 6 0,1. We also found a family �! of Vector Fields on the hyperbolic 2-plane L 2 of curvature −c 2 which generate foliations on T1L 2 with leaves of constant intrinsic curvature −c 2 and of constant extrinsic curvature − c 2 4 .

Adriana V. Nicoli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

J M Ball - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • orientability and energy minimization in liquid crystal models
    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2011
    Co-Authors: J M Ball, Arghir Zarnescu
    Abstract:

    Uniaxial nematic liquid crystals are modelled in the Oseen–Frank theory through a Unit Vector Field n. This theory has the apparent drawback that it does not respect the head-to-tail symmetry in which n should be equivalent to −n. This symmetry is preserved in the constrained Landau–de Gennes theory that works with the tensor \({Q=s \left(n\otimes n-\frac{1}{3} Id\right)}\). We study the differences and the overlaps between the two theories. These depend on the regularity class used as well as on the topology of the underlying domain. We show that for simply-connected domains and in the natural energy class W1,2 the two theories coincide, but otherwise there can be differences between the two theories, which we identify. In the case of planar domains with holes and various boundary conditions, for the simplest form of the energy functional, we completely characterise the instances in which the predictions of the constrained Landau–de Gennes theory differ from those of the Oseen–Frank theory.

  • orientability and energy minimization in liquid crystal models
    arXiv: Analysis of PDEs, 2010
    Co-Authors: J M Ball, Arghir Zarnescu
    Abstract:

    Uniaxial nematic liquid crystals are modelled in the Oseen-Frank theory through a Unit Vector Field $n$. This theory has the apparent drawback that it does not respect the head-to-tail symmetry in which $n$ should be equivalent to -$n$. This symmetry is preserved in the constrained Landau-de Gennes theory that works with the tensor $Q=s\big(n\otimes n- \frac{1}{3} Id\big)$.We study the differences and the overlaps between the two theories. These depend on the regularity class used as well as on the topology of the underlying domain. We show that for simply-connected domains and in the natural energy class $W^{1,2}$ the two theories coincide, but otherwise there can be differences between the two theories, which we identify. In the case of planar domains we completely characterise the instances in which the predictions of the constrained Landau-de Gennes theory differ from those of the Oseen-Frank theory.