Ureterolithotomy

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 2985 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Asif Akhtar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy a prospective randomized comparison study
    The Journal of Urology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Asif Akhtar
    Abstract:

    Purpose: We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p <0.05 considered statistically significant.Results: The difference in visual pain analog score and mean tramadol requirement on days 1 and 2 between the 2 groups was statistically significant, a...

  • Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study
    The Journal of urology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Asif Akhtar
    Abstract:

    Purpose: We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p

Vishwajeet Singh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • prospective randomized comparison of open versus transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy experience of a single center from northern india
    Current Urology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Manish Garg, Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Manoj Kumar, Satya Narayan Sankhwar, Amit Kumar, Jai Prakash, Pradeep Kumar, Mohit Pandey
    Abstract:

    Aim: Prospective randomized study on transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy (TPLU) versus open Ureterolithotomy (OU) for treatment of large impacted ureter

  • transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy a prospective randomized comparison study
    The Journal of Urology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Asif Akhtar
    Abstract:

    Purpose: We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p <0.05 considered statistically significant.Results: The difference in visual pain analog score and mean tramadol requirement on days 1 and 2 between the 2 groups was statistically significant, a...

  • Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study
    The Journal of urology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Asif Akhtar
    Abstract:

    Purpose: We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p

Jae Sung Lim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Efficacy of Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Upper Ureter Stone
    Korean Journal of Urology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Kang Sup Kim, Chong Koo Sul, Jae Sung Lim
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Ureter stones are the most common urological disease. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the results, efficacy, and safety rates of laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the treatment of large, upper ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: Between April 2006 and February 2008, we conducted laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in 7 patients with upper ureter stones (L2-3). Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy was conducted in 5 patients as a salvage procedure after failed shock wave lithotripsy, in 1 patient as the primary procedure for a large stone (28mm), and in 1 patient for treatment of a radiolucent matrix stone. Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy was conducted via a transperitoneal approach. The mean stone size was 20.7±5.9mm. Results: Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy was successful in 7 patients, and none of the patients required an open procedure. All patients were rendered stone-free after a single procedure. The mean operative duration, mean postoperative hospital stay, and mean estimated blood loss were 142±49 min, 6±2.2 days and 85±29.5ml, respectively. Conclusions: Although the majority of patients with ureter stones can be rendered stone-free via shock wave lithotripsy and endourological procedures, open surgery is required for large and upper ureter stones. In cases of large and upper ureter stones, laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy may be considered for a limited group, although many will require open surgery. (Korean J Urol 2008;49:727-732)

P S Albert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Manoj Kumar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • prospective randomized comparison of open versus transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy experience of a single center from northern india
    Current Urology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Manish Garg, Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Manoj Kumar, Satya Narayan Sankhwar, Amit Kumar, Jai Prakash, Pradeep Kumar, Mohit Pandey
    Abstract:

    Aim: Prospective randomized study on transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy (TPLU) versus open Ureterolithotomy (OU) for treatment of large impacted ureter

  • transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy a prospective randomized comparison study
    The Journal of Urology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Asif Akhtar
    Abstract:

    Purpose: We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p <0.05 considered statistically significant.Results: The difference in visual pain analog score and mean tramadol requirement on days 1 and 2 between the 2 groups was statistically significant, a...

  • Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study
    The Journal of urology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Vishwajeet Singh, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Asif Akhtar
    Abstract:

    Purpose: We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p

Related terms

Ureterolithotomy - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts