The Experts below are selected from a list of 35352 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Bijendra Patel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Background Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. Methods A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Results Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components ( p = 0.004) but not the checklist components ( p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.
Surgical endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components (p = 0.004) but not the checklist components (p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
Jonathan Halim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Background Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. Methods A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Results Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components ( p = 0.004) but not the checklist components ( p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.
Surgical endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components (p = 0.004) but not the checklist components (p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
Michelle A. Blackmore - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The moderated effects of Video Feedback for social anxiety disorder.
Journal of anxiety disorders, 2010Co-Authors: Thomas L. Rodebaugh, Richard G. Heimberg, Luke T. Schultz, Michelle A. BlackmoreAbstract:Despite initially positive results, Video Feedback for social anxiety has never been shown to reduce social anxiety in a controlled experiment with diagnosed participants, and only once with undiagnosed participants. Previous studies arguably did not detect such an effect because of limited assessment of anxiety and potential moderators. We tested Video Feedback with cognitive preparation among treatment-seeking participants with a primary diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. In Session 1, participants gave an extemporaneous speech and either received the intervention or not. In Session 2, 6-14 days later, participants gave a second extemporaneous speech. The intervention improved self-perception of performance, particularly for those participants with the most unrealistically negative impressions of their performance (i.e., high self-observer discrepancy). In addition, the intervention reduced anticipatory anxiety for the second speech for participants with high self-observer discrepancy. These findings extend previous results regarding Video Feedback and suggest that the intervention may be useful for people with social anxiety disorder and higher self-observer discrepancies for a specific task.
Marcus Ornstein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Background Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. Methods A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Results Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components ( p = 0.004) but not the checklist components ( p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.
Surgical endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components (p = 0.004) but not the checklist components (p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
Ningning Zhang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Background Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. Methods A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Results Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components ( p = 0.004) but not the checklist components ( p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
-
The effect of verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.
Surgical endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Jonathan Halim, Joshua Jelley, Ningning Zhang, Marcus Ornstein, Bijendra PatelAbstract:Laparoscopic skill acquisition involves a steep learning curve and laparoscopic suturing is an exceptionally challenging task. By improving the way Feedback is given, trainees can learn these skills more effectively. This study aims to establish the most effective form of structured Feedback on laparoscopic suturing skill acquisition in novices, by comparing the effects of expert verbal Feedback, Video review with expert Feedback (Video Feedback), and Video review with self-assessment. A prospective randomized blinded trial comparing verbal Feedback, Video Feedback, and self-assessment. Novices in laparoscopic surgery were tasked with performing laparoscopic suturing with intracorporeal knot tying. Time was given for practice, and pre- and post-Feedback assessments were undertaken. Suturing performance was measured using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. A post-study questionnaire was used to measure participant-perceived confidence, knowledge, and experience levels. Fifty-one participants were randomized and allocated equally into the three groups. Performance in all three groups improved significantly from baseline. Video Feedback had the largest improvement margin with checklist and global score improvements of 17.1% (± 9.9%) and 14.7% (± 9.3%), respectively. Performance improvements between groups were statistically significant in the global components (p = 0.004) but not the checklist components (p = 0.186). Global score improvement was significantly better in the Video Feedback group but was statistically insignificant between the self-assessment and verbal Feedback groups. Questionnaire responses demonstrated positive results in confidence, knowledge, and experience levels, across all three study groups, with no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Structured Video Feedback facilitates reflection and self-directed learning, which improves the ability to develop proficiency in surgical skills. Combining both self-assessment and Video Feedback may be beneficial over verbal Feedback alone due to the advantages of Video review. These techniques should therefore be considered for implementation into surgical education curricula.
