Volume of Work

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 273 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

A. S. Zemtsov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Niiamoo F Dodoo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • men matter additive and interactive gendered preferences and reproductive behavior in kenya
    Demography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Niiamoo F Dodoo
    Abstract:

    The extent of men’s roles in reproductive decision-making in Africa is a subject of contention. Despite the Volume of Work on the roles men play in fertility decisions, there have been few attempts to derive direct empirical estimates of the effect of men’s preferences on reproductive behavior. I employ 1989 and 1993 Kenya Demographic and Health Surveys to examine the relative roles of the reproductive preferences of males and females on contraceptive use. Additive and interactive measures of preferences document a significant effect of men’s preferences, which may eclipse women’s preferences. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Ciaran B J Woodman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • influence of Volume of Work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer
    British Journal of Surgery, 1999
    Co-Authors: Jayne Parry, Stuart Collins, J Mathers, N A Scott, Ciaran B J Woodman
    Abstract:

    Background: Recent recommendations for the reorganization of cancer services emphasize the importance of a ‘minimal acceptable Volume of Work’. The influence of both hospital and surgical Workload has been examined using a population-based series of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Nine hundred and twenty-seven patients with primary colorectal cancer diagnosed during the period 1 January to 30 June 1993 were identified from the North Western Regional Cancer Registry. Case notes were reviewed for information on patient age and sex, histological diagnosis, disease stage, degree of tumour differentiation, mode of admission, identity of operating surgeon, timing of operative procedure, and use of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was then constructed to examine, simultaneously, the effects of patient-, disease- and health service-related variables on survival. Results: Age, tumour stage and differentiation, and mode of admission were revealed as significant independent prognostic variables. After adjusting for these variables, neither operator grade (consultant versus junior), consultant Workload nor hospital throughput were identified as independently influencing patient survival. Conclusion: The results of this study do not support an association between Volume of Work and patient outcome. © 1999 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd

Bonnie C. Yankaskas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Kathy Rowan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Is there a relationship between the Volume of Work carried out in intensive care and its outcome
    International journal of technology assessment in health care, 1995
    Co-Authors: Jeremy Jones, Kathy Rowan
    Abstract:

    This paper reports the results of a study of the association between Volume of activity and patient outcome in 26 intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Hospital fatality rates showed a statistically significant (p = .016) negative association with Volume. However, mean APACHE II scores, as a measure of the severity of case mix, were also negatively associated with Volume (p = .021). Thus, one explanation of the lower death rates at higher Volumes is that larger units admit less severely ill patients. For patients admitted immediately after surgery, the correlation between severity standardized mortality ratios and Volume (while not significant, p < .1) suggests there may be a Volume-output effect unexplained by severity.