The Experts below are selected from a list of 21690 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
N Bellamy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Clinimetric properties of WOMAC Index in Greek knee osteoarthritis patients: comparisons with both self-reported and physical performance measures.
Rheumatology international, 2014Co-Authors: George Papathanasiou, Sophia Stasi, Leon Oikonomou, Ioanna Roussou, Effie Papageorgiou, Efstathios Chronopoulos, Nectarios Korres, N BellamyAbstract:This observational study aimed to examine the clinimetric properties of the Greek for Greece translation of the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC®). One hundred and twenty-three patients with knee osteoarthritis (mean age 69.5 years) participated in the study. An extensive reliability study was carried out to assess WOMAC’s internal consistency and repeatability (8-day interval). In addition, we examined the construct (convergent, nomological and known-groups) and criterion-related (concurrent and predictive) validity of the index against both self-report [SF-36 and combined visual analog/faces pain scale-revised (VAS/FPS-R)] and physical performance measures [timed up and go test (TUG)]. The internal consistency of the WOMAC subscales ranged from high (0.804) to excellent (0.956). Intra-class correlation coefficients for test–retest reliability were excellent, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95. Partial correlation analysis, adjusted for age and use of an assistive device, showed that WOMAC scores were significantly associated with all validation criteria, presenting fair to strong (−0.33 to −0.86) correlation coefficients. WOMAC-function was strongly associated with SF36-function (−0.86) and TUG (0.71), WOMAC-pain to VAS/FPS-R (0.71) and SF36-pain (−0.67). Of all WOMAC outcomes, stiffness subscale had the lowest, though still significant, correlations with all validation criteria. Multiple linear regression analyses indicated that WOMAC-function was a significant factor for TUG, WOMAC-pain for VAS/FPS-R and both for SF36-function and SF36-pain. The WOMAC LK3.1 Greek for Greece Index is a reliable and valid assessment tool for the evaluation of individuals with knee osteoarthritis, showing excellent reliability and significant validity properties.
-
Validity and reliability of the Persian versions of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index
Clinical rheumatology, 2012Co-Authors: Haidar Nadrian, Nasrin Moghimi, Elham Nadrian, Rahmatollah Moradzadeh, Kaveh Bahmanpour, Abedin Iranpour, N BellamyAbstract:The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index have not been translated and validated for Iranian patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. The aim of this study was to validate the Persian form of WOMAC OA Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index and to assess their test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Forward/backward translations and consensus panels were conducted to obtain the Persian versions of WOMAC OA Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index. A non-probability sample of 116 patients with knee/hip osteoarthritis was asked to complete the WOMAC OA Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index as well as Medical Outcomes Study-20-Item Short Form (SF-20) questionnaires, a visual analogue scales (VAS) of pain and demographic information form. Internal consistency (using Cronbach's alpha) and convergent validity (by examining the Pearson's correlation coefficients) were evaluated to determine the psychometric properties of the questionnaires. In order to evaluate test-retest reliability, 20 randomly selected patients completed the questionnaires, on a second occasion, 7-10 days later. Cronbach's alpha coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients for the WOMAC OA Index and Algofunctional Index subscales ranged from 0.63 to 0.94 and from 0.53 to 0.96, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between WOMAC OA Index, Algofunctional Index and SF-20 subscales and VAS for pain. The Persian version of WOMAC demonstrated a more acceptable validity, internal consistency and reliability compared with the Lequesne Algofunctional Index. However, both indices are valid and reliable instruments for evaluating the OA severity of knee/hip in Iran.
-
Population-Based Normative Values for the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index: Part I
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2011Co-Authors: N Bellamy, Cecilia Wilson, Joan HendrikzAbstract:Objectives To develop population-based age- and gender-specific normative values for the pain, stiffness, and physical function subscales of the WOMAC Index for benchmarking applications. Methods A scannable survey questionnaire capable of capturing WOMAC Index data and demographic information was developed, pretested, and distributed to a stratified random sample of 36,000 members of the Australian general public generated by the Australian Electoral Commission. Results Age- and gender-specific WOMAC normative values were estimated based on approximately 7300 subjects. Age-related differences were noted in all 3 WOMAC subscales. In general, pain, stiffness, and difficulty with physical function percentiles increased with age. Conclusions WOMAC normative values provide opportunity for benchmarking the health status of individuals with hip and knee osteoarthritis against their age- and gender-matched peers in the general population. These normative values provide unique opportunities for using the WOMAC Index in benchmarking applications in both clinical practice and research.
-
osteoarthritis index delivered by mobile phone m WOMAC is valid reliable and responsive
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, 2011Co-Authors: N Bellamy, Cecilia Wilson, Joan Hendrikz, Sarah L Whitehouse, Bipin Patel, Simon Dennison, Timothy A DavisAbstract:Objectives: To evaluate the validity, reliability and responsiveness of EDC using the WOMAC® NRS 3.1 Index on Motorola V3 mobile phones. ---------- Methods: Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee joint replacement surgery were assessed pre-operatively and 3-4 months post-operatively. Patients completed the WOMAC® Index in paper (p-WOMAC®) and electronic (m-WOMAC®) format in random order. ---------- Results: 24 men and 38 women with hip and knee OA participated and successfully completed the m-WOMAC® questionnaire. Pearson correlations between the summated total index scores for the p-WOMAC® and m-WOMAC® pre- and post-surgery were 0.98 and 0.99 (p<0.0001). There was no clinically important or statistically significant between-method difference in the adjusted total summated scores, pre- and post-surgery (adjusted mean difference = 4.44, p = 0.474 and 1.73, p = 0.781). Internal consistency estimates of m-WOMAC® reliability were 0.87 – 0.98. The m-WOMAC® detected clinically important, statistically significant (p<0.0001) improvements in pain, stiffness, function and total index score. ---------- Conclusions: Sixty-two patients with hip and knee OA successfully completed EDC by Motorola V3 mobile phone using the m-WOMAC® NRS3.1 Index; completion times averaging only 1-1.5 minutes longer than the p-WOMAC® Index. Data were successfully and securely transmitted from patients in Australia to a server in the USA. There was close agreement and no significant differences between m-WOMAC® and p-WOMAC® scores. This study confirms the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Exco InTouch engineered, Java-based m-WOMAC® Index application. EDC with the m-WOMAC® Index provides unique opportunities for using quantitative measurement in clinical research and practice.
-
Osteoarthritis Index delivered by mobile phone (m-WOMAC) is valid, reliable, and responsive
2011Co-Authors: N Bellamy, Cecilia Wilson, Joan Hendrikz, Sarah L Whitehouse, Bipin Patel, Simon Dennison, Timothy A DavisAbstract:Objectives: To evaluate the validity, reliability and responsiveness of EDC using the WOMAC® NRS 3.1 Index on Motorola V3 mobile phones. ---------- Methods: Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee joint replacement surgery were assessed pre-operatively and 3-4 months post-operatively. Patients completed the WOMAC® Index in paper (p-WOMAC®) and electronic (m-WOMAC®) format in random order. ---------- Results: 24 men and 38 women with hip and knee OA participated and successfully completed the m-WOMAC® questionnaire. Pearson correlations between the summated total index scores for the p-WOMAC® and m-WOMAC® pre- and post-surgery were 0.98 and 0.99 (p
Jay R. Lieberman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of the Responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
The Journal of arthroplasty, 2007Co-Authors: Nelson F. Soohoo, Raj M. Vyas, David B. Samimi, Ricardo A. Molina, Jay R. LiebermanAbstract:This study examines the responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Eighty-nine patients completed the WOMAC and SF-36 preoperatively and postoperatively. Standardized response means (SRMs) and effect sizes (ES) were used to measure responsiveness. Mean follow-up was 17 months. The SRMs for the WOMAC ranged from -0.93 to -1.49, and the ES ranged from -1.02 to -1.53. The SRMs for the SF-36 ranged from 0.22 to 1.64, and the ES ranged from 0.20 to 1.97. The highest values occurred with the physical functioning, bodily pain, and Physical Component Summary Scales. This study demonstrates a similar level of responsiveness of the WOMAC and several components of the SF-36. This suggests that the isolated use of the SF-36 may be adequate to monitor outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. There may still be a role for the WOMAC when comparing outcomes of specific designs or techniques of total hip arthroplasty.
-
Hip function in patients >55 years old: Population reference values
Journal of Arthroplasty, 2001Co-Authors: Jay R. Lieberman, Gillian A. Hawker, James G. WrightAbstract:Abstract The purpose of this study was to establish population values for hip function for patients of different ages using the validated WOMAC scoring system and the traditional Harris hip scoring system. A random sample of 184 individuals who had no prior history of hip or knee pain or pathology was evaluated. The average WOMAC scores for pain, function, and stiffness were 0.01, 1.8, and 0.4. The average Harris hip score was 94 ± 8.2. No significant correlation was noted between the summary WOMAC score, the WOMAC stiffness or pain subscales, or the overall Harris hip score for any of the 3 age groups studied. Patients with complaints in other joints, such as the back and neck, had lower WOMAC and Harris hip scores. Adults who are healthy and do not have a prior history of hip or knee pathology do not show a significant decline in hip function as they grow older. A deterioration in the function of a total hip arthroplasty over time cannot be attributed solely to the aging process.
Philippe Ravaud - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Individualising the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale: incorporating patient priorities for improvement to measure functional impairment in hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2008Co-Authors: Raphaèle Seror, Florence Tubach, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Falissard, Isabelle Logeart, Maxime Dougados, Philippe RavaudAbstract:OBJECTIVE: Recommended outcome measures in osteoarthritis are standardised scales identical for each patient. As patient-specific scales are of increasing interest when considering patient priorities in outcome assessment, this study aims to validate individualised forms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WOMAC function subscale data were prospectively obtained from 1218 outpatients with hip or knee osteoarthritis requiring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients also rated the importance to remove disability in each activity of the WOMAC function subscale, and selected the five activities they considered the most important to be improved upon. After treatment, patients again completed the WOMAC function subscale. Several individualisation methods were evaluated: methods whereby the score of each item is multiplied by, or added to, its importance, and methods based on the five most important activities (WOMAC top 5). Psychometric properties of individualised scales were compared to those of the WOMAC function subscale. RESULTS: The missing data rate was 11%, 13% and 2% for the WOMAC function, its individualised forms and the WOMAC top 5, respectively. Combining severity and importance of each item did not improve the properties of the scales. The WOMAC top 5 was the most responsive scale (standardised response mean: 0.96 vs 0.80, p
-
individualising the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index WOMAC function subscale incorporating patient priorities for improvement to measure functional impairment in hip or knee osteoarthritis
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2007Co-Authors: Raphaèle Seror, Florence Tubach, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Falissard, Isabelle Logeart, Maxime Dougados, Philippe RavaudAbstract:OBJECTIVE: Recommended outcome measures in osteoarthritis are standardised scales identical for each patient. As patient-specific scales are of increasing interest when considering patient priorities in outcome assessment, this study aims to validate individualised forms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WOMAC function subscale data were prospectively obtained from 1218 outpatients with hip or knee osteoarthritis requiring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients also rated the importance to remove disability in each activity of the WOMAC function subscale, and selected the five activities they considered the most important to be improved upon. After treatment, patients again completed the WOMAC function subscale. Several individualisation methods were evaluated: methods whereby the score of each item is multiplied by, or added to, its importance, and methods based on the five most important activities (WOMAC top 5). Psychometric properties of individualised scales were compared to those of the WOMAC function subscale. RESULTS: The missing data rate was 11%, 13% and 2% for the WOMAC function, its individualised forms and the WOMAC top 5, respectively. Combining severity and importance of each item did not improve the properties of the scales. The WOMAC top 5 was the most responsive scale (standardised response mean: 0.96 vs 0.80, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Because of its better responsiveness, ease of use, low missing data rate and ability to highlight patient priorities, the WOMAC top 5 could be an interesting tool in therapeutic evaluation in hip or knee osteoarthritis.
-
Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis.
Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2007Co-Authors: Gabriel Baron, Florence Tubach, Isabelle Logeart, Philippe Ravaud, Maxime DougadosAbstract:OBJECTIVE: A short version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function scale has recently been developed to enhance the applicability of the scale in routine practice and clinical research for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. The goal of the present study was to validate this short form. METHODS: We conducted a prospective 4-week cohort study of 1,036 outpatients. Performance on the WOMAC function long form (LF) and short form (SF) was compared. Agreement between responses on the 2 forms was examined according to a Bland-Altman plot. Responsiveness to change (by standardized response mean [SRM]), reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) were computed for both forms. Construct validity was assessed based on functional impairment as measured on a numerical rating scale. RESULTS: At baseline, 24% of patients who completed the WOMAC LF had missing data for at least 1 item as compared with only 6% of patients who completed the WOMAC SF. The mean WOMAC SF score was greater than the mean WOMAC LF score (mean +/- SD difference -4.3 +/- 4.8 on a 0-100 scale). SRMs were 0.61 and 0.73, ICCs were 0.76 and 0.68, and Cronbach's alphas were 0.93 and 0.85 for the WOMAC LF and SF, respectively. The 2 forms had comparable correlation with functional impairment. CONCLUSION: The WOMAC function short form has a low rate of missing data and is a responsive, reproducible, and valid measure. The mean SF score was 4 points higher than the mean LF score.
-
Using patients’ and rheumatologists’ opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale
Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2005Co-Authors: Florence Tubach, N Bellamy, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Falissard, Isabelle Logeart, Maxime Dougados, Philippe RavaudAbstract:Background: The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) function subscale is widely used in clinical trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Reducing the number of items of the subscale would enhance efficiency and compliance, particularly for use in clinical practice applications. Objective: To develop a short form of the WOMAC function subscale based on patients' and experts' opinions (WOMAC function short form). Methods: WOMAC function subscale data (Likert version) were obtained from 1218 outpatients with painful hip or knee osteoarthritis. These patients and their rheumatologists selected the five items that they considered most in need of improvement. The rheumatologists were asked to select the five items for which patients in general are the most impaired. Items that were least important to patients and experts, those with a high proportion of missing data, and those with a response distribution showing a floor or ceiling response were excluded, along with one of a pair of items with a correlation coefficient .0.75. Results: The WOMAC function short form included items 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 15 of the long form. The short form did not differ substantially from the long form in responsiveness (standardised response mean of 0.84 v 0.80). Conclusions: A short form of the WOMAC function subscale was developed according to the views of patients and rheumatologists, based on the responses of 1218 patients and 399 rheumatologists. The clinical relevance and applicability of this WOMAC function subscale short form require further evaluation.
Amaia Bilbao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Validation of a proposed WOMAC short form for patients with hip osteoarthritis.
Health and quality of life outcomes, 2011Co-Authors: Amaia Bilbao, Antonio Escobar, José M. Quintana, Carlota Las Hayas, Miren OriveAbstract:Background: The aims of this study were to propose a Spanish Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) short form based on previously shortened versions and to study its validity, reliability, and responsiveness for patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement (THR). Methods: Prospective observational study of two independent cohorts (788 and 445 patients, respectively). Patients completed the WOMAC and the Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaires before THR and 6 months afterward. Patients received the questionnaires by mailing, and two reminder letters were sent to patients who had not replied the questionnaire. Based on two studies from the literature, we selected the two shortened domains, the pain domain composed of three items and the function domain composed of eight items. Thus, we proposed an 11-items WOMAC short form. A complete validation process was performed, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis, and a study of reliability, responsiveness, and agreement measured by the Bland-Altman approach. Results: The mean age was about 69 years and about 49% were women. CFA analyses confirmed the two-factor model. The pain and function domains fit the Rasch model. Stability was supported with similar results in both cohorts. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were high, 0.74 and 0.88. The highest correlations in convergent validity were found with the bodily pain and physical function SF-36 domains. Significant differences were found according to different pain and function severity scales, supporting known-groups validity. Responsiveness parameters showed large changes (effect sizes, 2.11 and 2.29). Agreement between the WOMAC long and short forms was adequate. Conclusions: Since short questionnaires result in improved patient compliance and response rates, it is very useful to have a shortened WOMAC version with the same good psychometric properties as the original version. The Spanish WOMAC short form is valid, reliable, and responsive for patients undergoing THR, and most importantly, the first WOMAC short version proposed in Spanish. Because of its simplicity and ease of application, the short form is a good alternative to the original WOMAC questionnaire and it would further enhance its acceptability and usefulness in clinical research, clinical trials, and in routine practice within the orthopaedic community.
-
Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement.
Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2006Co-Authors: Antonio Escobar, J M Quintana, Amaia Bilbao, Inmaculada Arostegui, Iratxe Lafuente, I VidaurretaAbstract:To study responsiveness and establish the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and minimal detectable change (MDC) in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Prospective observational study in three public hospitals of all consecutive patients on waiting lists to undergo TKR intervention with diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients were asked to complete before the intervention and at 6 months and 2 years afterward the SF-36 and the WOMAC health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQoL), and additional transition questions which measured the changes in their joint at 6 months. In both questionnaires the possible range of values is from 0 to 100 points. In WOMAC improvement at 6 months after a TKR was between 27 (stiffness) and 31 points (pain). The SF-36 showed improvements between the 28.3 points of role physical and 2.79 of general health. From 6 months to 2 years, WOMAC improvements were between 2 and 6 points. The MCID ranged from 14.52 (stiffness) to 22.87 (pain) on the WOMAC and in the physical domains of SF-36 from 11.56 (physical function) to 16.86 (bodily pain). On the WOMAC, the MDC ranged from 13.11 (function) to 29.12 (stiffness), and on SF-36 from 19.50 (physical function) to 41.23 (social functioning). The MCID for TKR is around 15 on WOMAC, while with the SF-36 of at least 10 points. These values should not be considered as absolute thresholds.
-
responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and sf 36 after hip joint replacement
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2005Co-Authors: J M Quintana, Antonio Escobar, Amaia Bilbao, Inmaculada Arostegui, Iratxe Lafuente, I VidaurretaAbstract:Summary Objectives To study responsiveness and establish the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and minimal detectable change (MDC) in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Methods Prospective observational study in three public hospitals of all consecutive patients on waiting lists to undergo TKR intervention with diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients were asked to complete before the intervention and at 6 months and 2 years afterward the SF-36 and the WOMAC health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQoL), and additional transition questions which measured the changes in their joint at 6 months. In both questionnaires the possible range of values is from 0 to 100 points. Results In WOMAC improvement at 6 months after a TKR was between 27 (stiffness) and 31 points (pain). The SF-36 showed improvements between the 28.3 points of role physical and 2.79 of general health. From 6 months to 2 years, WOMAC improvements were between 2 and 6 points. The MCID ranged from 14.52 (stiffness) to 22.87 (pain) on the WOMAC and in the physical domains of SF-36 from 11.56 (physical function) to 16.86 (bodily pain). On the WOMAC, the MDC ranged from 13.11 (function) to 29.12 (stiffness), and on SF-36 from 19.50 (physical function) to 41.23 (social functioning). Conclusions The MCID for TKR is around 15 on WOMAC, while with the SF-36 of at least 10 points. These values should not be considered as absolute thresholds.
Maxime Dougados - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Individualising the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale: incorporating patient priorities for improvement to measure functional impairment in hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2008Co-Authors: Raphaèle Seror, Florence Tubach, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Falissard, Isabelle Logeart, Maxime Dougados, Philippe RavaudAbstract:OBJECTIVE: Recommended outcome measures in osteoarthritis are standardised scales identical for each patient. As patient-specific scales are of increasing interest when considering patient priorities in outcome assessment, this study aims to validate individualised forms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WOMAC function subscale data were prospectively obtained from 1218 outpatients with hip or knee osteoarthritis requiring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients also rated the importance to remove disability in each activity of the WOMAC function subscale, and selected the five activities they considered the most important to be improved upon. After treatment, patients again completed the WOMAC function subscale. Several individualisation methods were evaluated: methods whereby the score of each item is multiplied by, or added to, its importance, and methods based on the five most important activities (WOMAC top 5). Psychometric properties of individualised scales were compared to those of the WOMAC function subscale. RESULTS: The missing data rate was 11%, 13% and 2% for the WOMAC function, its individualised forms and the WOMAC top 5, respectively. Combining severity and importance of each item did not improve the properties of the scales. The WOMAC top 5 was the most responsive scale (standardised response mean: 0.96 vs 0.80, p
-
individualising the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index WOMAC function subscale incorporating patient priorities for improvement to measure functional impairment in hip or knee osteoarthritis
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2007Co-Authors: Raphaèle Seror, Florence Tubach, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Falissard, Isabelle Logeart, Maxime Dougados, Philippe RavaudAbstract:OBJECTIVE: Recommended outcome measures in osteoarthritis are standardised scales identical for each patient. As patient-specific scales are of increasing interest when considering patient priorities in outcome assessment, this study aims to validate individualised forms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WOMAC function subscale data were prospectively obtained from 1218 outpatients with hip or knee osteoarthritis requiring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients also rated the importance to remove disability in each activity of the WOMAC function subscale, and selected the five activities they considered the most important to be improved upon. After treatment, patients again completed the WOMAC function subscale. Several individualisation methods were evaluated: methods whereby the score of each item is multiplied by, or added to, its importance, and methods based on the five most important activities (WOMAC top 5). Psychometric properties of individualised scales were compared to those of the WOMAC function subscale. RESULTS: The missing data rate was 11%, 13% and 2% for the WOMAC function, its individualised forms and the WOMAC top 5, respectively. Combining severity and importance of each item did not improve the properties of the scales. The WOMAC top 5 was the most responsive scale (standardised response mean: 0.96 vs 0.80, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Because of its better responsiveness, ease of use, low missing data rate and ability to highlight patient priorities, the WOMAC top 5 could be an interesting tool in therapeutic evaluation in hip or knee osteoarthritis.
-
Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis.
Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2007Co-Authors: Gabriel Baron, Florence Tubach, Isabelle Logeart, Philippe Ravaud, Maxime DougadosAbstract:OBJECTIVE: A short version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function scale has recently been developed to enhance the applicability of the scale in routine practice and clinical research for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. The goal of the present study was to validate this short form. METHODS: We conducted a prospective 4-week cohort study of 1,036 outpatients. Performance on the WOMAC function long form (LF) and short form (SF) was compared. Agreement between responses on the 2 forms was examined according to a Bland-Altman plot. Responsiveness to change (by standardized response mean [SRM]), reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) were computed for both forms. Construct validity was assessed based on functional impairment as measured on a numerical rating scale. RESULTS: At baseline, 24% of patients who completed the WOMAC LF had missing data for at least 1 item as compared with only 6% of patients who completed the WOMAC SF. The mean WOMAC SF score was greater than the mean WOMAC LF score (mean +/- SD difference -4.3 +/- 4.8 on a 0-100 scale). SRMs were 0.61 and 0.73, ICCs were 0.76 and 0.68, and Cronbach's alphas were 0.93 and 0.85 for the WOMAC LF and SF, respectively. The 2 forms had comparable correlation with functional impairment. CONCLUSION: The WOMAC function short form has a low rate of missing data and is a responsive, reproducible, and valid measure. The mean SF score was 4 points higher than the mean LF score.
-
Using patients’ and rheumatologists’ opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale
Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2005Co-Authors: Florence Tubach, N Bellamy, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Falissard, Isabelle Logeart, Maxime Dougados, Philippe RavaudAbstract:Background: The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) function subscale is widely used in clinical trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Reducing the number of items of the subscale would enhance efficiency and compliance, particularly for use in clinical practice applications. Objective: To develop a short form of the WOMAC function subscale based on patients' and experts' opinions (WOMAC function short form). Methods: WOMAC function subscale data (Likert version) were obtained from 1218 outpatients with painful hip or knee osteoarthritis. These patients and their rheumatologists selected the five items that they considered most in need of improvement. The rheumatologists were asked to select the five items for which patients in general are the most impaired. Items that were least important to patients and experts, those with a high proportion of missing data, and those with a response distribution showing a floor or ceiling response were excluded, along with one of a pair of items with a correlation coefficient .0.75. Results: The WOMAC function short form included items 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 15 of the long form. The short form did not differ substantially from the long form in responsiveness (standardised response mean of 0.84 v 0.80). Conclusions: A short form of the WOMAC function subscale was developed according to the views of patients and rheumatologists, based on the responses of 1218 patients and 399 rheumatologists. The clinical relevance and applicability of this WOMAC function subscale short form require further evaluation.
