The Experts below are selected from a list of 24300 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

غانم هديل عبدالله أحمد الشياب عبدالحليم - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Mag Jerusalem W Negash - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Anthropological Field researches in the 21st century scope challenges and ethics
    Social Science Research Network, 2008
    Co-Authors: Wondwosen Teshomebahiru, Mag Jerusalem W Negash
    Abstract:

    The aim of this paper is to explore the scope, trends, challenges and research ethics of Anthropological (mainly, Medical Anthropology) Fieldworks in the developing countries in the 21st century. The paper also assesses the impacts of the major features of this century such as globalization, urbanization, migration and cultural pluralism on the Anthropological researches in the world. It also discusses the obligations of anthropologists during Field researches in this period of globalization, where the information technology has turned the world in to "a global village". Furthermore, it tries to answer questions like: How do anthropologists exercise the principle of ethics in the Field? What do the indigenous people get out of Field works? Concerning research ethics in this age of globalization, there are researchers who argue that a research done on indigenous people, but is not designed to help them is unethical. On the other hand, other researchers argue that as long as the research result benefits the other sections of humanity, (even if it might not help the research population directly) and as long as it embraced informed consent, it is ethical. The paper explores both sides of these arguments and gives recommendations.

Wondwosen Teshomebahiru - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Anthropological Field researches in the 21st century scope challenges and ethics
    Social Science Research Network, 2008
    Co-Authors: Wondwosen Teshomebahiru, Mag Jerusalem W Negash
    Abstract:

    The aim of this paper is to explore the scope, trends, challenges and research ethics of Anthropological (mainly, Medical Anthropology) Fieldworks in the developing countries in the 21st century. The paper also assesses the impacts of the major features of this century such as globalization, urbanization, migration and cultural pluralism on the Anthropological researches in the world. It also discusses the obligations of anthropologists during Field researches in this period of globalization, where the information technology has turned the world in to "a global village". Furthermore, it tries to answer questions like: How do anthropologists exercise the principle of ethics in the Field? What do the indigenous people get out of Field works? Concerning research ethics in this age of globalization, there are researchers who argue that a research done on indigenous people, but is not designed to help them is unethical. On the other hand, other researchers argue that as long as the research result benefits the other sections of humanity, (even if it might not help the research population directly) and as long as it embraced informed consent, it is ethical. The paper explores both sides of these arguments and gives recommendations.

Danai Kaplanidi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • an olive tree in the Anthropological Field
    2018
    Co-Authors: Danai Kaplanidi
    Abstract:

    In der Masterarbeit werden die Darstellungsformen von Olivenbaumen in fruheren und aktuellen anthropologische Studien behandelt. Die Frage, was diese Darstellungen uns uber andere Lebewesen unserer Umwelt sagen konnen, steht im Zentrum der Arbeit. Auserdem liegt ein Forschungsinteresse auf der Thematik, ob ein Wechsel des Blickwinkels zu einem nicht-menschlichen Objekts, wie dem Olivenbaum, fur anthropologische Forschung relevant sein kann. Zuletzt vergleiche ich die Darstellungen von Olivenbaumen in der Kultur- und Sozialanthropologie mit denen in den Disziplinen der Archaologie und der Umweltstudien, um zu untersuchen, ob sich die Darstellungen und die Methoden der Darstellung unterscheiden. Die Idee und der theoretische Hintergrund der Forschung stammen aus der Umweltanthropologie und den Diskursen der posthumanistischen Philosophie und sogar aus der Multispieces Ethnography. Diese Fachrichtungen beschaftigen sich damit, wie das Leben gefuhrt werden kann bzw. mit den Beziehungen verschiedener Lebewesen aus unserer Umwelt. Auch hier ist der Vergleich mit anderen Disziplinen kurz thematisiert, um die Multidisziplinaritat zu betonen, die fur eine solche Forschung benotigt wird. Danach wird eine Meta-Analyse durchgefuhrt, bei der auf Referenzen uber Olivenbaume aus fruheren und aktuellen anthropologischen Studien Bezug genommen wird. Diese Daten werden dann mit Hilfe eines Kodierungsprozesses analysiert, um den allgemeinen Referenzrahmen festzustellen.

Diane M Hoffman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • turning power inside out reflections on resistance from the Anthropological Field
    International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1999
    Co-Authors: Diane M Hoffman
    Abstract:

    Drawing from recent Anthropological critiques of the notion of resistance, this paper argues that the concept is often sanitized and overextended in educational analysis. More nuanced and useful approaches to the idea of resistance in cultural contexts must take into account the ways in which cultural views of self inform the practices of power/resistance. On the one hand, certain individualist ideologies of self implicitly privilege views of agency that make resistance "inevitable"; yet there exist alternative views of self that give primacy to intimacy and self-other identification, as well as to domains of the inner self that subvert external appearances and operations of resistance. This paper argues that culturally shaped discourses on self and person ought to be more central to critical inquiry into themes of power and resistance.