The Experts below are selected from a list of 30849 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
G C Perry - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a model for predicting the age at sexual maturity for growing pullets of layer strains given a single change in photoperiod
The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2002Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, T. R. Morris, G C PerryAbstract:A model is presented which will predict mean age at first egg (AFE) for pullets of laying strains reared under non-limiting environmental conditions but exposed to a single change in photoperiod during the rearing stage. An initial analysis of 12 previously reported trials involving a wide range of genotypes showed that the response to an increase in photoperiod is not simply the inverse of the response to an equal decrease in photoperiod applied at the same age. Maximum sensitivity to a reduction in photoperiod was found shortly before onset of lay, whereas maximum sensitivity to an increment in photoperiod was observed at around 10 weeks of age. Two experiments were conducted to provide further data. The first compared the effect of 3-h increases in photoperiod from 8 h to 11 h or from 11 h to 14 h with the double increment from 8 h to 14 h and also tested a reduction from 11 h to 8 h, all imposed at 17 weeks of age. AFE was advanced to a similar extent by the changes from 8 to 11 h and from 11 to 14 h (9.8 and 10.9 days respectively). Response to the double increment was not additive: AFE on this treatment was 13.3 days earlier than for constant 8 h controls. Reduction in photoperiod from 11 to 8 h at 17 weeks delayed AFE by 18.7 days compared with constant 11-h controls. In the second experiment, pullets of two strains were transferred from 8 to 16-h photoperiods and from 16 to 8 h at 5, 7, 9, 15, 17 and 19 weeks of age. Controls were kept on constant 8 and constant 16-h days. Transfer from 8 to 16-h photoperiods at 5 weeks of age had no effect on AFE. At 7 weeks there was a bimodal response with some pullets subsequently showing advanced maturity and others not. Maximum stimulation of early maturity (31 days on average for the two genotypes) was obtained at 9 weeks of age and response to stimulation declined linearly with age thereafter. The delay in AFE resulting from a reduction in photoperiod (16 to 8 h) increased linearly between 0 and 15 weeks. At 17 and 19 weeks, the response was bimodal, with some pullets maturing at the same age as long-day controls and others showing delayed maturity. Using all this evidence and some other unpublished data, a model is developed to predict AFE as a function of mean photoperiod and change in photoperiod during the rearing phase. Elements are incorporated to allow for the insensitivity of pullets younger than 50 days to an increase in photoperiod and the effect observed late in rearing when a change in photoperiod comes too late to alter AFE for the most precocious individuals in a flock. Two coefficients are required to adjust for genotype. One describes mean AFE for the genotype when reared on constant daylength and the other defines the rate at which age effects the response to a single change in photoperiod.
-
a model for predicting the age at sexual maturity for growing pullets of layer strains given a single change in photoperiod
The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2002Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, T. R. Morris, G C PerryAbstract:A model is presented which will predict mean age at first egg (AFE) for pullets of laying strains reared under non-limiting environmental conditions but exposed to a single change in photoperiod during the rearing stage. An initial analysis of 12 previously reported trials involving a wide range of genotypes showed that the response to an increase in photoperiod is not simply the inverse of the response to an equal decrease in photoperiod applied at the same age. Maximum sensitivity to a reduction in photoperiod was found shortly before onset of lay, whereas maximum sensitivity to an increment in photoperiod was observed at around 10 weeks of age. Two experiments were conducted to provide further data. The first compared the effect of 3-h increases in photoperiod from 8 h to 11 h or from 11 h to 14 h with the double increment from 8 h to 14 h and also tested a reduction from 11 h to 8 h, all imposed at 17 weeks of age. AFE was advanced to a similar extent by the changes from 8 to 11 h and from 11 to 14 h (9.8 and 10.9 days respectively). Response to the double increment was not additive: AFE on this treatment was 13.3 days earlier than for constant 8 h controls. Reduction in photoperiod from 11 to 8 h at 17 weeks delayed AFE by 18.7 days compared with constant 11-h controls. In the second experiment, pullets of two strains were transferred from 8 to 16-h photoperiods and from 16 to 8 h at 5, 7, 9, 15, 17 and 19 weeks of age. Controls were kept on constant 8 and constant 16-h days. Transfer from 8 to 16-h photoperiods at 5 weeks of age had no effect on AFE. At 7 weeks there was a bimodal response with some pullets subsequently showing advanced maturity and others not. Maximum stimulation of early maturity (31 days on average for the two genotypes) was obtained at 9 weeks of age and response to stimulation declined linearly with age thereafter. The delay in AFE resulting from a reduction in photoperiod (16 to 8 h) increased linearly between 0 and 15 weeks. At 17 and 19 weeks, the response was bimodal, with some pullets maturing at the same age as long-day controls and others showing delayed maturity. Using all this evidence and some other unpublished data, a model is developed to predict AFE as a function of mean photoperiod and change in photoperiod during the rearing phase. Elements are incorporated to allow for the insensitivity of pullets younger than 50 days to an increase in photoperiod and the effect observed late in rearing when a change in photoperiod comes too late to alter AFE for the most precocious individuals in a flock. Two coefficients are required to adjust for genotype. One describes mean AFE for the genotype when reared on constant daylength and the other defines the rate at which age effects the response to a single change in photoperiod.
-
effect of constant and of changing photoperiods on age at first egg and related traits in pullets
British Poultry Science, 1996Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, G C Perry, T. R. MorrisAbstract:Abstract 1. The effects of constant photoperiods and of single (5 h) changes in photoperiod applied at 12 or 17 weeks of age upon age at first egg (AFE) were studied using ISA Brown and Shaver 288 pullets. 2. Birds reared from 2 d of age until after maturity on constant 10 h photoperiods matured 8 d earlier than birds reared on constant 8 h and 5 d earlier than the average for 13 or 18 h photoperiods. 3. A single increment in photoperiod from 8 to 13 h advanced AFE by 23 d (compared to 8 h constant day controls) when applied at 84 d, but by only 6 d when given at 119 d. An increase in photoperiod from 13 to 18 h advanced AFE by only 4 d, averaged across breeds and age at increase. A reduction in photoperiod from 13 to 8 h delayed AFE by 22 d when given at 84 d and by 16 d at 119 d. A similar 5 h reduction in photoperiod, but from 18 to 13 h, retarded maturity by 11 d in ISA Brown pullets, but only when given at 84 d, and delayed AFE in Shaver 288 by 12 d, but only when given at 119 d. This interaction may...
Manuel Don - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
maturation of human central auditory system activity separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling
Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002Co-Authors: Curtis W Ponton, Jos J Eggermont, Betty Kwong, Deepak Khosla, Manuel DonAbstract:Abstract Objectives : Previous studies have shown that observed patterns of auditory evoked potential (AEP) maturation depend on the scalp location of the recording electrodes. Dipole source modeling incorporates the AEP information recorded at all electrode locations. This should provide a more robust description of auditory system maturation based on age-related changes in AEPs. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate central auditory system maturation based dipole modeling of multi-electrode long-latency AEPs recordings. Methods : AEPs were recorded at 30 scalp-electrode locations from 118 subjects between 5 and 20 years of age. Regional dipole source analysis, using symmetrically located sources, was used to generate a spatio-temporal source model of age-related changes in AEP latency and magnitude. Results : The regional dipole source model separated the AEPs into distinct groups depending on the orientation of the component dipoles. The sagittally oriented dipole sources contained two AEP peaks, comparable in latency to Pa and Pb of the middle latency response (MLR). Although some magnitude changes were noted, latencies of Pa and Pb showed no evidence of age-related change. The tangentially oriented sources contained activity comparable to P 1 , N 1b , and P 2 . There were various age-related changes in the latency and magnitude of the AEPs represented in the tangential sources. The radially oriented sources contained activity comparable to the T-complex, including Ta, and Tb, that showed only small latency changes with age. In addition, a long-latency component labeled TP 200 was observed. Conclusions : It is possible to distinguish 3 maturation groups: one group reaching maturity at age 6 and comprising the MLR components Pa and Pb, P 2 , and the T-complex. A second group that was relatively fast to mature (50%/year) was represented by N 2 . A third group was characterized by a slower pattern of maturation with a rate of 11–17%/year and included the AEP peaks P 1 , N 1b , and TP 200 . The observed latency differences combined with the differences in maturation rate indicate that P 2 is not identical to TP 200 . The results also demonstrated the independence of the T-complex components, represented in the radial dipoles, from the P 1 , N 1b , and P 2 components, contained in the tangentially oriented dipole sources.
-
maturation of human central auditory system activity evidence from multi channel evoked potentials
Clinical Neurophysiology, 2000Co-Authors: Curtis W Ponton, Jos J Eggermont, Betty Kwong, Manuel DonAbstract:Abstract Objective : The purpose of this study was to evaluate central auditory system maturation based on detailed data from multi-electrode recordings of long-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Methods : AEPs were measured at 30 scalp-electrode locations from 118 subjects between 5 and 20 years of age. Analyses focused on age-related latency and amplitude changes in the P 1 , N 1b , P 2 , and N 2 peaks of the AEPs generated by a brief train of clicks presented to the left ear. Results : Substantial and unexpected changes that extend well into adolescence were found for both the amplitude and latency of the AEP components. While the maturational changes in latency followed a pattern of gradual change, amplitude changes tended to be more abrupt and step-like. Age-related latency decreases were largest for the P 1 and N 1b peaks. In contrast, P 2 latency did not change significantly and the N 2 peak increased in latency as a function of age. Abrupt changes in P 1 , P 1 -N 1b , and N 2 peak amplitude (also RMS amplitude) were observed around age 10 at the lateral electrode locations C3 and C4, but not at the midline electrodes Cz and Fz. These changes in amplitude coincided with a sharp increase and plateau in AEP peak and RMS amplitude variability from 9 to 11 years of age. Conclusions : These analyses demonstrated that the observed pattern of AEP maturation depends on the scalp location at which the responses are recorded. The distinct maturational time courses observed for individual AEP peaks support a model of AEP generation in which activity originates from two or more at least partly independent central nervous system pathways. A striking parallel was observed between previously reported maturational changes in auditory cortex synaptic density and, in particular, the age-related changes in P 1 amplitude. The results indicate that some areas of the brain activated by sound stimulation have a maturational time course that extends into adolescence. Maturation of certain auditory processing skills such as speech recognition in noise also has a prolonged time course. This raises the possibility that the emergence of adult-like auditory processing skills may be governed by the same maturing neural processes that affect AEP latency and amplitude.
Josep Call - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Thirty years of great Ape gestures
Animal Cognition, 2019Co-Authors: Michael Tomasello, Josep CallAbstract:We and our colleagues have been doing studies of great Ape gestural communication for more than 30 years. Here we attempt to spell out what we have learned. Some aspects of the process have been reliably established by multiple researchers, for example, its intentional structure and its sensitivity to the attentional state of the recipient. Other aspects are more controversial. We argue here that it is a mistake to assimilate great Ape gestures to the species-typical displays of other mammals by claiming that they are fixed action patterns, as there are many differences, including the use of attention-getters. It is also a mistake, we argue, to assimilate great Ape gestures to human gestures by claiming that they are used referentially and declaratively in a human-like manner, as Apes’ “pointing” gesture has many limitations and they do not gesture iconically. Great Ape gestures constitute a unique form of primate communication with their own unique qualities.
Beatrice H Hahn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Ape origins of human malaria
Annual Review of Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Paul M Sharp, Lindsey J Plenderleith, Beatrice H HahnAbstract:African Apes harbor at least twelve Plasmodium species, some of which have been a source of human infection. It is now well established that Plasmodium falciparum emerged following the transmission of a gorilla parasite, perhaps within the last 10,000 years, while Plasmodium vivax emerged earlier from a parasite lineage that infected humans and Apes in Africa before the Duffy-negative mutation eliminated the parasite from humans there. Compared to their Ape relatives, both human parasites have greatly reduced genetic diversity and an excess of nonsynonymous mutations, consistent with severe genetic bottlenecks followed by rapid population expansion. A putative new Plasmodium species widespread in chimpanzees, gorillas, and bonobos places the origin of Plasmodium malariae in Africa. Here, we review what is known about the origins and evolutionary history of all human-infective Plasmodium species, the time and circumstances of their emergence, and the diversity, host specificity, and zoonotic potential of their Ape counterparts.
-
Ape parasite origins of human malaria virulence genes
Nature Communications, 2015Co-Authors: Daniel B Larremore, Paul M Sharp, Lindsey J Plenderleith, Sesh A Sundararaman, Weimin Liu, William R Proto, Aaron Clauset, Dorothy E Loy, Sheri Speede, Beatrice H HahnAbstract:Antigens encoded by the var gene family are major virulence factors of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, exhibiting enormous intra- and interstrain diversity. Here we use network analysis to show that var architecture and mosaicism are conserved at multiple levels across the Laverania subgenus, based on var-like sequences from eight single-species and three multi-species Plasmodium infections of wild-living or sanctuary African Apes. Using select whole-genome amplification, we also find evidence of multi-domain var structure and synteny in Plasmodium gaboni, one of the Ape Laverania species most distantly related to P. falciparum, as well as a new class of Duffy-binding-like domains. These findings indicate that the modular genetic architecture and sequence diversity underlying var-mediated host-parasite interactions evolved before the radiation of the Laverania subgenus, long before the emergence of P. falciparum.
P. D. Lewis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
research note amendments to the model for predicting age at sexual maturity for growing pullets of layer strains following changes in photoperiod
The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2004Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, T. R. MorrisAbstract:A model was published by Lewis et al . (2002) to predict the mean age at first egg (AFE) for pullets of laying strains reared under non-limiting environmental conditions and exposed to a single change in photoperiod during the rearing stage. Subsequently, Lewis et al . (2003) reported the effects of two opposing changes in photoperiod, which showed that the first change appears to alter the pullet's physiological age so that it responds to the second change as though it had been given at an earlier age (if photoperiod was decreased), or later age (if photoperiod was increased) than the true chronological age. During the construction of a computer model based on these two publications, it became apparent that some of the components of the models needed adjustment. The amendments relate to (1) the standard deviation ( S . D .) used for calculating the proportion of a young flock that has attained photosensitivity, (2) the equation for calculating the slope of the line relating AFE to age at transfer from one photoperiod to another, (3) the equation used for estimating the distribution of AFE as a function of the mean value, (4) the point of no return when pullets which have started spontaneous maturation in response to the current photoperiod can no longer respond to a late change in photoperiod and (5) the equations used for calculating the distribution of AFE when the trait is bimodal.
-
a model for predicting the age at sexual maturity for growing pullets of layer strains given a single change in photoperiod
The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2002Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, T. R. Morris, G C PerryAbstract:A model is presented which will predict mean age at first egg (AFE) for pullets of laying strains reared under non-limiting environmental conditions but exposed to a single change in photoperiod during the rearing stage. An initial analysis of 12 previously reported trials involving a wide range of genotypes showed that the response to an increase in photoperiod is not simply the inverse of the response to an equal decrease in photoperiod applied at the same age. Maximum sensitivity to a reduction in photoperiod was found shortly before onset of lay, whereas maximum sensitivity to an increment in photoperiod was observed at around 10 weeks of age. Two experiments were conducted to provide further data. The first compared the effect of 3-h increases in photoperiod from 8 h to 11 h or from 11 h to 14 h with the double increment from 8 h to 14 h and also tested a reduction from 11 h to 8 h, all imposed at 17 weeks of age. AFE was advanced to a similar extent by the changes from 8 to 11 h and from 11 to 14 h (9.8 and 10.9 days respectively). Response to the double increment was not additive: AFE on this treatment was 13.3 days earlier than for constant 8 h controls. Reduction in photoperiod from 11 to 8 h at 17 weeks delayed AFE by 18.7 days compared with constant 11-h controls. In the second experiment, pullets of two strains were transferred from 8 to 16-h photoperiods and from 16 to 8 h at 5, 7, 9, 15, 17 and 19 weeks of age. Controls were kept on constant 8 and constant 16-h days. Transfer from 8 to 16-h photoperiods at 5 weeks of age had no effect on AFE. At 7 weeks there was a bimodal response with some pullets subsequently showing advanced maturity and others not. Maximum stimulation of early maturity (31 days on average for the two genotypes) was obtained at 9 weeks of age and response to stimulation declined linearly with age thereafter. The delay in AFE resulting from a reduction in photoperiod (16 to 8 h) increased linearly between 0 and 15 weeks. At 17 and 19 weeks, the response was bimodal, with some pullets maturing at the same age as long-day controls and others showing delayed maturity. Using all this evidence and some other unpublished data, a model is developed to predict AFE as a function of mean photoperiod and change in photoperiod during the rearing phase. Elements are incorporated to allow for the insensitivity of pullets younger than 50 days to an increase in photoperiod and the effect observed late in rearing when a change in photoperiod comes too late to alter AFE for the most precocious individuals in a flock. Two coefficients are required to adjust for genotype. One describes mean AFE for the genotype when reared on constant daylength and the other defines the rate at which age effects the response to a single change in photoperiod.
-
a model for predicting the age at sexual maturity for growing pullets of layer strains given a single change in photoperiod
The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2002Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, T. R. Morris, G C PerryAbstract:A model is presented which will predict mean age at first egg (AFE) for pullets of laying strains reared under non-limiting environmental conditions but exposed to a single change in photoperiod during the rearing stage. An initial analysis of 12 previously reported trials involving a wide range of genotypes showed that the response to an increase in photoperiod is not simply the inverse of the response to an equal decrease in photoperiod applied at the same age. Maximum sensitivity to a reduction in photoperiod was found shortly before onset of lay, whereas maximum sensitivity to an increment in photoperiod was observed at around 10 weeks of age. Two experiments were conducted to provide further data. The first compared the effect of 3-h increases in photoperiod from 8 h to 11 h or from 11 h to 14 h with the double increment from 8 h to 14 h and also tested a reduction from 11 h to 8 h, all imposed at 17 weeks of age. AFE was advanced to a similar extent by the changes from 8 to 11 h and from 11 to 14 h (9.8 and 10.9 days respectively). Response to the double increment was not additive: AFE on this treatment was 13.3 days earlier than for constant 8 h controls. Reduction in photoperiod from 11 to 8 h at 17 weeks delayed AFE by 18.7 days compared with constant 11-h controls. In the second experiment, pullets of two strains were transferred from 8 to 16-h photoperiods and from 16 to 8 h at 5, 7, 9, 15, 17 and 19 weeks of age. Controls were kept on constant 8 and constant 16-h days. Transfer from 8 to 16-h photoperiods at 5 weeks of age had no effect on AFE. At 7 weeks there was a bimodal response with some pullets subsequently showing advanced maturity and others not. Maximum stimulation of early maturity (31 days on average for the two genotypes) was obtained at 9 weeks of age and response to stimulation declined linearly with age thereafter. The delay in AFE resulting from a reduction in photoperiod (16 to 8 h) increased linearly between 0 and 15 weeks. At 17 and 19 weeks, the response was bimodal, with some pullets maturing at the same age as long-day controls and others showing delayed maturity. Using all this evidence and some other unpublished data, a model is developed to predict AFE as a function of mean photoperiod and change in photoperiod during the rearing phase. Elements are incorporated to allow for the insensitivity of pullets younger than 50 days to an increase in photoperiod and the effect observed late in rearing when a change in photoperiod comes too late to alter AFE for the most precocious individuals in a flock. Two coefficients are required to adjust for genotype. One describes mean AFE for the genotype when reared on constant daylength and the other defines the rate at which age effects the response to a single change in photoperiod.
-
effect of constant and of changing photoperiods on age at first egg and related traits in pullets
British Poultry Science, 1996Co-Authors: P. D. Lewis, G C Perry, T. R. MorrisAbstract:Abstract 1. The effects of constant photoperiods and of single (5 h) changes in photoperiod applied at 12 or 17 weeks of age upon age at first egg (AFE) were studied using ISA Brown and Shaver 288 pullets. 2. Birds reared from 2 d of age until after maturity on constant 10 h photoperiods matured 8 d earlier than birds reared on constant 8 h and 5 d earlier than the average for 13 or 18 h photoperiods. 3. A single increment in photoperiod from 8 to 13 h advanced AFE by 23 d (compared to 8 h constant day controls) when applied at 84 d, but by only 6 d when given at 119 d. An increase in photoperiod from 13 to 18 h advanced AFE by only 4 d, averaged across breeds and age at increase. A reduction in photoperiod from 13 to 8 h delayed AFE by 22 d when given at 84 d and by 16 d at 119 d. A similar 5 h reduction in photoperiod, but from 18 to 13 h, retarded maturity by 11 d in ISA Brown pullets, but only when given at 84 d, and delayed AFE in Shaver 288 by 12 d, but only when given at 119 d. This interaction may...