The Experts below are selected from a list of 441 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Kruszewski Tomasz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Uzależnienie od gier internetowych – opis badania i propozycja korekty postaw
'Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska', 2018Co-Authors: Cyrklaff-gorczyca Magdalena, Kruszewski TomaszAbstract:Wstęp. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie badań potencjalnych determinant uzależnienia od gier internetowych. Materiał i metody. Badanie przeprowadzono wśród grupy 98 studentów kierunków architektura informacji (AI) oraz zarządzanie informacją i bibliologia (ZIB) na Uniwersytecie Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Sondaż wykonano skróconym Kwestionariuszem do Badania Uzależnienia od Gier Internetowych. Następnie wskazano, jaką rolę powinny pełnić biblioteki w obliczu tego problemu. Wyniki i wnioski. Studenci AI wykazują podobne zaangażowanie w granie jak studenci ZIB. 10 respondentów odczuwało silną potrzebę codziennego grania, a 3 studentki ZIB oraz 1 studentka AI mają zawsze lub często bezskuteczne próby poradzenia sobie z ograniczeniem czasu grania. Trzy z nich wymagają wsparcia profesjonalistów w tym zakresie. Oprócz tego, pewną rolę uzupełniającą wobec pracy terapeutów zajmujących się problemem uzależnienia, posiadają instytucje usługowe, działające w obszarach kultury i edukacji, w tym biblioteki.Introduction. The aim of the article is to present research on potential determinants of gaming disorder. Material and methods. The survey was conducted among a group of 98 students of information architecture (AI) and information management and Bibliology (ZIB) in the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. Next, role the libraries in facing the problem was shown. The study was carried out using a shortened Questionnaire for Internet Addiction Research. Results and conclusions. AI students show similar involvement in playing games as students of ZIB. 10 respondents felt a strong need to play every day, and 3 ZIB students and 1 AI student have always been or often are ineffective in coping with the problem of limiting their playing time. Three of them require the support of professionals in dealing with this
-
Uzależnienie od gier internetowych - opis badania i propozycja korekty postaw (prezentacja z konferencji)
2018Co-Authors: Cyrklaff-gorczyca Magdalena, Kruszewski TomaszAbstract:Celem wystąpienia było przedstawienie badań potencjalnych determinant uzależnienia od gier internetowych, które przeprowadzono wśród grupy 98 studentów kierunków architektura informacji (AI) oraz zarządzanie informacją i bibliologia (ZIB) na Uniwersytecie Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Sondaż wykonano skróconym Kwestionariuszem do Badania Uzależnienia od Gier Internetowych. Okazało się, że studenci AI wykazują podobne zaangażowanie w granie jak studenci ZIB. 10 respondentów odczuwało silną potrzebę codziennego grania, a 3 studentki ZIB oraz 1 studentka AI mają zawsze lub często bezskuteczne próby poradzenia sobie z ograniczeniem czasu grania. Trzy z nich wymagają wsparcia profesjonalistów w tym zakresie. Po analizie wyników wskazano, jaką rolę, oprócz profesjonalnych terapeutów, powinny pełnić w profilaktyce i terapii tego typu zaburzeń instytucje usługowe działające w obszarach kultury i edukacji, w tym biblioteki.The aim of the presentation was to present research on potential determinants of Internet game addiction, which was conducted among a group of 98 students of Information Architecture (AI) and Information Management and Bibliology (IMB) at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. The survey was carried out using a shortened Questionnaire for Internet Addiction Research. It turned out that AI students show similar involvement in playing as students of IMB. 10 respondents felt a strong need to play every day, and 3 IMB students and 1 AI student have always or often ineffective attempts to cope with the limitation of playing time. Three of them require the support of professionals in this area. After the analysis of the results, it was indicated what role, in addition to professional therapists, should be played by service institutions operating in the areas of culture and education, including the library
Larisa Dovnar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
BELARUSIAN Bibliology AND NATIONAL REVIVAL IN 1920s
2015Co-Authors: Larisa DovnarAbstract:Setting oneself the determination of the Belarusian Bibliology development directions in the NATIONAL revival context as an object of the report and solving a problem of the definite reconstruction of the book knowledge in 1920s the author notes that the knowledge was one of the basic rests of the Belarusian national identification. Development of the Belarusian Bibliology in the 1920s was connected closely with the second wave of the national revival in 1918–1929 (BSSR) and 1921–1939 (the Western Belarus). This period might be called the most fruitful period of the Belarusian nation development. Achievements of the short period surpass the whole 19th century. The first Belarusian Bibliology significant achievements are connected with the first Belarusian scientific establishment “Inbelkult” (1922–1929) activities. The year of 1926 was full up the events when the solid two bibliological works were published: “400 years of Belarusian press, 1525–1925” and “Belarusian (Kryvian) book history” by Vatslav Lastovski. In the same year the Belarusian society of bibliophiles was established. The society first began to research a number of bibliological problems: Belarusian book culture, book press history, book art. A number of prominent scientists and Belarusian national revival figures paid great attention to bibliological problems. There were E. Karski, V. Picheta, B. Epimah-Shinila, M. Dovnar-Zapolski, V. Lastovski, A. Shliubski N. Shchekotichin, D. Dovgialo, S. Nekrashevich, M. Meleshko, N. Kasperovich, D. Zhelunovich, A. Stankevich. These figures were the pioneers in the field of Belarusian Bibliology theory and history. After the State BSSR library opening the scientific-bibliographical and library science fields were started to be researched (I. Simanovski, J. Bibila). There was scientific discussion of Professional periodical press creation too. The study of local lore (“Nash krai”) and socio-literary (“Polymia”, “Uzvysha”) magazines as well as “The Inbelkult humanities department works» became the basic Belarusian bibliological tribune. However the Belarusian revival period was too short. In the end of the 1929s – in the beginning of the 1930s the Belarusian intellectuals tragedy took place. Many of them were called “natsdems” and prisoned or executed by the Soviet authorities. Right up to the beginning of the 1960s the Belarusian Bibliology was in stagnation. The main lessons of the 1920s Belarusian bibliological heritage: in form: documental heritage is the most important constituent of national development; activities of special scientific and social centres are the powerful tools of the intellectual power concentration and progress in bibliological theory, methodology and history; professional bibliological printing is the essential tool of the knowledge development and dissemination; scientific staff training is the essential condition of successful bibiliological projects; in content: bibliological investigations became a section of historical, archival, study of local lore, philological, culturological complexes; the investigations basic directions are fixed: source study, historiography, preservation of memorials of book culture, book and book printing history, study of Skaryna, ancient book printing art, library science and bibliography, bibliophilia (ex-libristics), book culture; the research directions are defined: principles and criterions of national document identification; book typology, methods and methodology of Bibliology. But the Belarusian book science achievements of the 1920s are very important. They shows the definite culture independence of Belarus.
-
BALTARUSIJOS KNYGOTYRA IR NACIONALINIS ATGIMIMAS TREČIAJAME XX AMŽIAUS DEŠIMTMETYJE
Knygotyra, 2015Co-Authors: Larisa DovnarAbstract:Setting oneself the determination of the Belarusian Bibliology development directions in the NATIONAL revival context as an object of the report and solving a problem of the definite reconstruction of the book knowledge in 1920s the author notes that the knowledge was one of the basic rests of the Belarusian national identification. Development of the Belarusian Bibliology in the 1920s was connected closely with the second wave of the national revival in 1918–1929 (BSSR) and 1921–1939 (the Western Belarus). This period might be called the most fruitful period of the Belarusian nation development. Achievements of the short period surpass the whole 19th century. The first Belarusian Bibliology significant achievements are connected with the first Belarusian scientific establishment “Inbelkult” (1922–1929) activities. The year of 1926 was full up the events when the solid two bibliological works were published: “400 years of Belarusian press, 1525–1925” and “Belarusian (Kryvian) book history” by Vatslav Lastovski. In the same year the Belarusian society of bibliophiles was established. The society first began to research a number of bibliological problems: Belarusian book culture, book press history, book art. A number of prominent scientists and Belarusian national revival figures paid great attention to bibliological problems. There were E. Karski, V. Picheta, B. Epimah-Shinila, M. Dovnar-Zapolski, V. Lastovski, A. Shliubski N. Shchekotichin, D. Dovgialo, S. Nekrashevich, M. Meleshko, N. Kasperovich, D. Zhelunovich, A. Stankevich. These figures were the pioneers in the field of Belarusian Bibliology theory and history. After the State BSSR library opening the scientific-bibliographical and library science fields were started to be researched (I. Simanovski, J. Bibila). There was scientific discussion of Professional periodical press creation too. The study of local lore (“Nash krai”) and socio-literary (“Polymia”, “Uzvysha”) magazines as well as “The Inbelkult humanities department works» became the basic Belarusian bibliological tribune. However the Belarusian revival period was too short. In the end of the 1929s – in the beginning of the 1930s the Belarusian intellectuals tragedy took place. Many of them were called “natsdems” and prisoned or executed by the Soviet authorities. Right up to the beginning of the 1960s the Belarusian Bibliology was in stagnation. The main lessons of the 1920s Belarusian bibliological heritage: in form: documental heritage is the most important constituent of national development; activities of special scientific and social centres are the powerful tools of the intellectual power concentration and progress in bibliological theory, methodology and history; professional bibliological printing is the essential tool of the knowledge development and dissemination; scientific staff training is the essential condition of successful bibiliological projects; in content: bibliological investigations became a section of historical, archival, study of local lore, philological, culturological complexes; the investigations basic directions are fixed: source study, historiography, preservation of memorials of book culture, book and book printing history, study of Skaryna, ancient book printing art, library science and bibliography, bibliophilia (ex-libristics), book culture; the research directions are defined: principles and criterions of national document identification; book typology, methods and methodology of Bibliology. But the Belarusian book science achievements of the 1920s are very important. They shows the definite culture independence of Belarus.
Krzysztof Migoñ - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
RYTŲ EUROPOS KNYGOTYROS BRUOŽAI IR NACIONALINIŲ MOKYKLŲ KŪRIMASIS PRIEŠ ANTRĄJĮ PASAULINĮ KARĄ
Knygotyra, 2015Co-Authors: Krzysztof MigoñAbstract:The appearance of book science as an autonomous discipline of science can be traced back in Eastern Europe to the beginnings of the 19th century. It was evolving from bibliography, history of literature, editorial, bookselling and library activities and practice, and from educational needs. Its further growth has been enhanced by the rapid increase of book world, institutional and professional developments in book culture, and realization of a multitude of benefits arising from bibliological studies. The latter could have been identified in the field of science, development of ideas, social and political relations. Initially, theoretical background of East European Bibliology was influenced by Western European concepts, particularly French and German. Afterwards, however, original concepts and specific approaches to book science have been developed in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, followed by other countries. There has been a significant degree of unification observed in views and thoughts about book and book science, resultant from the largely common past of book culture in Eastern Europe, shared historical experience, political, language and religious situation, and fairly continuous exchange of scientific ideas. Nevertheless, local circumstances related to dissimilar traditions in book studies, variable influence of ideology and politics, uneven potential of scientific communities, and uneven recognition of the discipline in different countries, have left their clear imprint too. Their result is the variety of research paradigms, different focus points in book studies, and the development of various research schools, some of them specific for certain countries. The notion of ‘national research schools’, present in the science about science, was introduced by Robert Estivals, who wrote in the encyclopaedia Les sciences de l’ecrit (1993): “The French school of Bibliology is undoubtedly one the most important schools, besides the Belgian, Polish, Russian, and Swiss one. They are so much unlike the Anglo-saxon school, which tends to brings bibliography and Bibliology together, that one may speak about the continental European bibliological school, different from English and North American concepts”. The essence of a national research school usually shows through a larger number of variables considered, convincing facts and evidence, but it also involves a certain degree of subjectivity, so that proper explanation is only achieved after considering opinions and emotions as well. In addition, the perception of research schools varies depending on the observer, whether from inside, through the eyes of representatives or supporters, or from outside. In the former case, there is a trend towards emphasizing differences in fundamental views about a given discipline or research direction. Consequently, different criteria of school identification are used (e.g. narrower subjects, influential persons or institutions), and the number of schools appears to grow. In the latter, though, a trend towards generalization and synthesis at broader spatial and temporal scales prevails. Breakthrough events in the development of national research schools in Eastern Europe include the origin and re-establishment of independent states after the World War I (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Czechoslovakia), and later the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991, when Baltic states, Byelorussia and Ukraine have become independent, and substantial political and social changes occurred in all countries formerly belonging to the communist block. The characteristic features of book science in Eastern European countries – before and later after the World War II – appear to include the following: 1. focus on the history and present-day of own national cultures as a part of a wider framework of bibliological studies; 2. intensive theoretical research on book as a means of communication and as a cultural factor; 3. construction of numerous theoretical and methodological models of Bibliology; 4. extensive development of historical studies, focused on the history of book culture;5. close links between bibliological studies and other disciplines;6. application of bibliological theory and history in the shaping of ontemporary book system.
-
THE SPECIFITY OF BOOK SCIENCE IN EASTERN EUROPE AND FORMATION OF NATIONAL RESEARCH SCHOOLS TILL WORLD WAR II
2015Co-Authors: Krzysztof MigoñAbstract:The appearance of book science as an autonomous discipline of science can be traced back in Eastern Europe to the beginnings of the 19th century. It was evolving from bibliography, history of literature, editorial, bookselling and library activities and practice, and from educational needs. Its further growth has been enhanced by the rapid increase of book world, institutional and professional developments in book culture, and realization of a multitude of benefits arising from bibliological studies. The latter could have been identified in the field of science, development of ideas, social and political relations. Initially, theoretical background of East European Bibliology was influenced by Western European concepts, particularly French and German. Afterwards, however, original concepts and specific approaches to book science have been developed in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, followed by other countries. There has been a significant degree of unification observed in views and thoughts about book and book science, resultant from the largely common past of book culture in Eastern Europe, shared historical experience, political, language and religious situation, and fairly continuous exchange of scientific ideas. Nevertheless, local circumstances related to dissimilar traditions in book studies, variable influence of ideology and politics, uneven potential of scientific communities, and uneven recognition of the discipline in different countries, have left their clear imprint too. Their result is the variety of research paradigms, different focus points in book studies, and the development of various research schools, some of them specific for certain countries. The notion of ‘national research schools’, present in the science about science, was introduced by Robert Estivals, who wrote in the encyclopaedia Les sciences de l’ecrit (1993): “The French school of Bibliology is undoubtedly one the most important schools, besides the Belgian, Polish, Russian, and Swiss one. They are so much unlike the Anglo-saxon school, which tends to brings bibliography and Bibliology together, that one may speak about the continental European bibliological school, different from English and North American concepts”. The essence of a national research school usually shows through a larger number of variables considered, convincing facts and evidence, but it also involves a certain degree of subjectivity, so that proper explanation is only achieved after considering opinions and emotions as well. In addition, the perception of research schools varies depending on the observer, whether from inside, through the eyes of representatives or supporters, or from outside. In the former case, there is a trend towards emphasizing differences in fundamental views about a given discipline or research direction. Consequently, different criteria of school identification are used (e.g. narrower subjects, influential persons or institutions), and the number of schools appears to grow. In the latter, though, a trend towards generalization and synthesis at broader spatial and temporal scales prevails. Breakthrough events in the development of national research schools in Eastern Europe include the origin and re-establishment of independent states after the World War I (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Czechoslovakia), and later the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991, when Baltic states, Byelorussia and Ukraine have become independent, and substantial political and social changes occurred in all countries formerly belonging to the communist block. The characteristic features of book science in Eastern European countries – before and later after the World War II – appear to include the following: 1. focus on the history and present-day of own national cultures as a part of a wider framework of bibliological studies; 2. intensive theoretical research on book as a means of communication and as a cultural factor; 3. construction of numerous theoretical and methodological models of Bibliology; 4. extensive development of historical studies, focused on the history of book culture; 5. close links between bibliological studies and other disciplines; 6. application of bibliological theory and history in the shaping of ontemporary book system.
Cyrklaff-gorczyca Magdalena - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Uzależnienie od gier internetowych – opis badania i propozycja korekty postaw
'Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska', 2018Co-Authors: Cyrklaff-gorczyca Magdalena, Kruszewski TomaszAbstract:Wstęp. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie badań potencjalnych determinant uzależnienia od gier internetowych. Materiał i metody. Badanie przeprowadzono wśród grupy 98 studentów kierunków architektura informacji (AI) oraz zarządzanie informacją i bibliologia (ZIB) na Uniwersytecie Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Sondaż wykonano skróconym Kwestionariuszem do Badania Uzależnienia od Gier Internetowych. Następnie wskazano, jaką rolę powinny pełnić biblioteki w obliczu tego problemu. Wyniki i wnioski. Studenci AI wykazują podobne zaangażowanie w granie jak studenci ZIB. 10 respondentów odczuwało silną potrzebę codziennego grania, a 3 studentki ZIB oraz 1 studentka AI mają zawsze lub często bezskuteczne próby poradzenia sobie z ograniczeniem czasu grania. Trzy z nich wymagają wsparcia profesjonalistów w tym zakresie. Oprócz tego, pewną rolę uzupełniającą wobec pracy terapeutów zajmujących się problemem uzależnienia, posiadają instytucje usługowe, działające w obszarach kultury i edukacji, w tym biblioteki.Introduction. The aim of the article is to present research on potential determinants of gaming disorder. Material and methods. The survey was conducted among a group of 98 students of information architecture (AI) and information management and Bibliology (ZIB) in the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. Next, role the libraries in facing the problem was shown. The study was carried out using a shortened Questionnaire for Internet Addiction Research. Results and conclusions. AI students show similar involvement in playing games as students of ZIB. 10 respondents felt a strong need to play every day, and 3 ZIB students and 1 AI student have always been or often are ineffective in coping with the problem of limiting their playing time. Three of them require the support of professionals in dealing with this
-
Uzależnienie od gier internetowych - opis badania i propozycja korekty postaw (prezentacja z konferencji)
2018Co-Authors: Cyrklaff-gorczyca Magdalena, Kruszewski TomaszAbstract:Celem wystąpienia było przedstawienie badań potencjalnych determinant uzależnienia od gier internetowych, które przeprowadzono wśród grupy 98 studentów kierunków architektura informacji (AI) oraz zarządzanie informacją i bibliologia (ZIB) na Uniwersytecie Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Sondaż wykonano skróconym Kwestionariuszem do Badania Uzależnienia od Gier Internetowych. Okazało się, że studenci AI wykazują podobne zaangażowanie w granie jak studenci ZIB. 10 respondentów odczuwało silną potrzebę codziennego grania, a 3 studentki ZIB oraz 1 studentka AI mają zawsze lub często bezskuteczne próby poradzenia sobie z ograniczeniem czasu grania. Trzy z nich wymagają wsparcia profesjonalistów w tym zakresie. Po analizie wyników wskazano, jaką rolę, oprócz profesjonalnych terapeutów, powinny pełnić w profilaktyce i terapii tego typu zaburzeń instytucje usługowe działające w obszarach kultury i edukacji, w tym biblioteki.The aim of the presentation was to present research on potential determinants of Internet game addiction, which was conducted among a group of 98 students of Information Architecture (AI) and Information Management and Bibliology (IMB) at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. The survey was carried out using a shortened Questionnaire for Internet Addiction Research. It turned out that AI students show similar involvement in playing as students of IMB. 10 respondents felt a strong need to play every day, and 3 IMB students and 1 AI student have always or often ineffective attempts to cope with the limitation of playing time. Three of them require the support of professionals in this area. After the analysis of the results, it was indicated what role, in addition to professional therapists, should be played by service institutions operating in the areas of culture and education, including the library
Dovnar Larisa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
BALTARUSIJOS KNYGOTYRA IR NACIONALINIS ATGIMIMAS TREČIAJAME XX AMŽIAUS DEŠIMTMETYJE
'Vilnius University Press', 2015Co-Authors: Dovnar LarisaAbstract:Setting oneself the determination of the Belarusian Bibliology development directions in the NATIONAL revival context as an object of the report and solving a problem of the definite reconstruction of the book knowledge in 1920s the author notes that the knowledge was one of the basic rests of the Belarusian national identification. Development of the Belarusian Bibliology in the 1920s was connected closely with the second wave of the national revival in 1918–1929 (BSSR) and 1921–1939 (the Western Belarus). This period might be called the most fruitful period of the Belarusian nation development. Achievements of the short period surpass the whole 19th century. The first Belarusian Bibliology significant achievements are connected with the first Belarusian scientific establishment “Inbelkult” (1922–1929) activities. The year of 1926 was full up the events when the solid two bibliological works were published: “400 years of Belarusian press, 1525–1925” and “Belarusian (Kryvian) book history” by Vatslav Lastovski. In the same year the Belarusian society of bibliophiles was established. The society first began to research a number of bibliological problems: Belarusian book culture, book press history, book art. A number of prominent scientists and Belarusian national revival figures paid great attention to bibliological problems. There were E. Karski, V. Picheta, B. Epimah-Shinila, M. Dovnar-Zapolski, V. Lastovski, A. Shliubski N. Shchekotichin, D. Dovgialo, S. Nekrashevich, M. Meleshko, N. Kasperovich, D. Zhelunovich, A. Stankevich. These figures were the pioneers in the field of Belarusian Bibliology theory and history. After the State BSSR library opening the scientific-bibliographical and library science fields were started to be researched (I. Simanovski, J. Bibila). There was scientific discussion of Professional periodical press creation too. The study of local lore (“Nash krai”) and socio-literary (“Polymia”, “Uzvysha”) magazines as well as “The Inbelkult humanities department works» became the basic Belarusian bibliological tribune. However the Belarusian revival period was too short. In the end of the 1929s – in the beginning of the 1930s the Belarusian intellectuals tragedy took place. Many of them were called “natsdems” and prisoned or executed by the Soviet authorities. Right up to the beginning of the 1960s the Belarusian Bibliology was in stagnation. The main lessons of the 1920s Belarusian bibliological heritage: in form: documental heritage is the most important constituent of national development; activities of special scientific and social centres are the powerful tools of the intellectual power concentration and progress in bibliological theory, methodology and history; professional bibliological printing is the essential tool of the knowledge development and dissemination; scientific staff training is the essential condition of successful bibiliological projects; in content: bibliological investigations became a section of historical, archival, study of local lore, philological, culturological complexes; the investigations basic directions are fixed: source study, historiography, preservation of memorials of book culture, book and book printing history, study of Skaryna, ancient book printing art, library science and bibliography, bibliophilia (ex-libristics), book culture; the research directions are defined: principles and criterions of national document identification; book typology, methods and methodology of Bibliology. But the Belarusian book science achievements of the 1920s are very important. They shows the definite culture independence of Belarus.Siekdama nustatyti Baltarusijos bibliologijos plėtros kryptį nacionalinio atgimimo kontekste ir išspręsti trečiojo dešimtmečio knygotyros rekonstrukcijos problemą autorė pripažįsta, kad žinios – tai svarbiausias išlikęs Baltarusijos nacionalinės tapatybės elementas.Trečiojo dešimtmečio Baltarusijos bibliologijos raida buvo glaudžiai susijusi su antrąja nacionalinio atgimimo banga 1918–1929 metais Baltarusijoje ir 1921–1939 metais Vakarų Baltarusijoje. Tai vaisingiausias Baltarusijos nacionalinės plėtros laikotarpis. Nors jis ir labai trumpas, jo laimėjimai lenkia viso XIX amžiaus laimėjimus.Pirmieji reikšmingi Baltarusijos bibliologijos rezultatai siejami su pirmąja šalies moksline draugija „Inbelkult“ (1922–1929) ir jos veikla. 1926 metai buvo kupini įvykių: išleisti du solidūs Vaclavo Lastovskio darbai (400 metų Baltarusijos spaudai, 1525–1925 ir Baltarusijos (krivičių) knygos istorija), įkurta Baltarusijos bibliofilų draugija, pradėjusi tyrinėti bibliologijos problemas (Baltarusijos knygos kultūrą, knygos leidybos istoriją, knygos meną). Nemažai žymių Baltarusijos mokslininkų ir nacionalinio atgimimo veikėjų domėjosi knygotyros problemomis (E. Karskis, V. Pičeta, B. Epimah-Šinila, M. Dovnaras-Zapolskis, V. Lastovskis, A. Šliubskis, N. Ščekotichinas, D. Dovgialo, S. Nekraševičius, M. Meleško, N. Kasperovičius, D. Želunovičius, A. Stankevičius). Jie buvo Baltarusijos knygotyros teorijos ir istorijos pionieriai. Naujos Baltarusijos SSR bibliotekos darbuotojai pradėjo bibliografijos ir bibliotekininkystės tyrimus (I. Simanovskis, J. Bibila). Pradėta diskusija dėl profesinės periodikos. Baltarusijos knygotyros forumais tapo žurnalai „Nash krai“, „Polymia“, „Uzvysha“ ir „Inbelkult humanitarinių mokslų darbų leidinys“. Tačiau Baltarusijos atgimimo laikotarpis buvo labai trumpas: 1929 m. pabaigoje – 1930 m. pradžioje įvyko didžioji Baltarusijos intelektualų tragedija. Dauguma buvo apšaukti „nacdemais“ ir įkalinti arba nužudyti. Iki pat septintojo dešimtmečio Baltarusijos knygotyrą buvo apėmęs sąstingis.Trečiojo dešimtmečio Baltarusijos knygotyros paveldas moko, kad:1) dokumentinis paveldas yra svarbiausia sudedamoji nacionalinės raidos dalis; specializuotų mokslo ir socialinės veiklos centrų veikla yra galingas įrankis, telkiantis intelektualines pajėgas, ir knygotyros teorijos, metodologijos bei istorijos pažangos variklis; profesinė knygotyros spauda yra svarbi žinių kūrybos ir sklaidos priemonė; mokslo darbuotojų ugdymas – svarbiausia sėkmingų knygotyros projektų įgyvendinimo sąlyga;2) knygotyros tyrimai tampa istorijos, archyvistikos, kraštotyros, filologijos, kultūrologijos komplekso dalimi; svarbiausios tyrimų sritys yra šios: šaltiniotyra, istoriografija, knygos kultūros paminklų išsaugojimas, knygos ir leidybos istorija, P. Skorinos senųjų knygų spaudos studijos, bibliotekininkystė ir bibliografija; bibliofilija, knygos kultūra; tyrimo kryptys apima nacionalinių dokumentų identifikacijos tyrimus, knygos tipologiją, bibliologijos metodus ir metodologiją.Baltarusijos knygotyros laimėjimai trečiajame XX a. dešimtmetyje yra labai svarbūs. Jie rodo akivaizdžią Baltarusijos kultūros autonomiją