The Experts below are selected from a list of 1998 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Béatrice Plottu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A participatory decision support system for contaminated Brownfield Redevelopment: a case study from France
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2019Co-Authors: Marjorie Tendero, Béatrice PlottuAbstract:Currently, participatory evaluation processes using multicriteria decision aids are barely used in the context of contaminated sites, even though they are a powerful tool for supporting land-use decision-making. The aim of this paper is to show how to apply such a participatory evaluation process (mixed methods) to the Redevelopment of a contaminated Brownfield site in France. Following the Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation (MODE), we designed a participatory process that enabled stakeholder empowerment to implement participatory multicriteria evaluations. We show that the (Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality) ELECTRE I method can be used to select consensus-based Brownfield Redevelopment projects and that such a participatory process can be implemented to ensure that feasible, coherent, and transparent choices are made for other Brownfield Redevelopment processes.
-
How to implement a participatory decision support for contaminated Brownfield? A case study from France
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2019Co-Authors: Marjorie Tendero, Béatrice PlottuAbstract:Currently, participatory evaluation processes using multicriteria decision aids are barely used in the context of contaminated sites, even though they are a powerful tool for supporting land-use decision-making. The aim of this paper is to show how to apply such a participatory evaluation process (mixed methods) to the Redevelopment of a contaminated Brownfield site in France. Following the Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation (MODE), we designed a participatory process that enabled stakeholder empowerment to implement participatory multicriteria evaluations. We show that the (Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality) ELECTRE I method can be used to select consensus-based Brownfield Redevelopment projects and that such a participatory process can be implemented to ensure that feasible, coherent, and transparent choices are made for other Brownfield Redevelopment processes.
Marjorie Tendero - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A participatory decision support system for contaminated Brownfield Redevelopment: a case study from France
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2019Co-Authors: Marjorie Tendero, Béatrice PlottuAbstract:Currently, participatory evaluation processes using multicriteria decision aids are barely used in the context of contaminated sites, even though they are a powerful tool for supporting land-use decision-making. The aim of this paper is to show how to apply such a participatory evaluation process (mixed methods) to the Redevelopment of a contaminated Brownfield site in France. Following the Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation (MODE), we designed a participatory process that enabled stakeholder empowerment to implement participatory multicriteria evaluations. We show that the (Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality) ELECTRE I method can be used to select consensus-based Brownfield Redevelopment projects and that such a participatory process can be implemented to ensure that feasible, coherent, and transparent choices are made for other Brownfield Redevelopment processes.
-
How to implement a participatory decision support for contaminated Brownfield? A case study from France
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2019Co-Authors: Marjorie Tendero, Béatrice PlottuAbstract:Currently, participatory evaluation processes using multicriteria decision aids are barely used in the context of contaminated sites, even though they are a powerful tool for supporting land-use decision-making. The aim of this paper is to show how to apply such a participatory evaluation process (mixed methods) to the Redevelopment of a contaminated Brownfield site in France. Following the Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation (MODE), we designed a participatory process that enabled stakeholder empowerment to implement participatory multicriteria evaluations. We show that the (Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality) ELECTRE I method can be used to select consensus-based Brownfield Redevelopment projects and that such a participatory process can be implemented to ensure that feasible, coherent, and transparent choices are made for other Brownfield Redevelopment processes.
-
" Empty lands " ? Social representations of contaminated Brownfields in France
2018Co-Authors: Marjorie Tendero, Cécile BazartAbstract:What first comes to mind when you think of contaminated Brownfields? The information and ideas we hold about Brownfield Redevelopment can strongly influence discussions on this issue, the impacts we associate with it, and the types of regulation we view as appropriate. This study makes is based on the social representations theory, a process to decode reality by analyzing social representations associated with contaminated Brownfield sites in France and isolate what influences individual's behaviors and acceptance of Brownfield management programs today in France. It proceeds in particular with textual analyzes from data collected through open-ended questions from a cross-sectional survey administered among 803 individuals living nearby a contaminated Brownfield site. Results show awareness regarding potential contamination of Brownfields sites. However, this pollution is associated to visible elements but is disconnected from main pollutants the can be found on the site. We also observe regional disparities regarding contaminated Brownfields representations, which are linked to historical activities in former industrial regions. This allows us to drawn some lines of recommendation for communication and management of future Brownfield Redevelopment programs.
łukasz Bugalski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
reshaping the gdansk shipyard the birthplace of the solidarity movement the complexity of adaptive reuse in the heritage context
Sustainability, 2021Co-Authors: Piotr Lorens, łukasz BugalskiAbstract:The Gdansk Shipyard—the birthplace of the Solidarity movement—is host to a unique example of a multi-layered Brownfield Redevelopment project, an area that is burdened by a complex history, overlapping heritage, and multiple memories. These circumstances require an integrated yet differentiated approach to the site’s heritage and make the creation of one homogeneous narration of its future impossible. At the same time, the size of the area, as well as its location within Gdansk city centre, has meant that its future has been the subject of numerous discussions and speculations conducted over the last 20 years—starting from the creation of a large-scale open-air museum and continuing to the localization of the new Central Business District of the city. Consequently, that broad discussion carried out regarding the scope of Redevelopment projects has been rooted in the possible introduction of diverse models of adaptive reuse. This variety of possible approaches also includes discussion on the mode of integrating heritage in the Redevelopment processes. The goal of this paper—written just before the initiation of the final stage of the conceptual part of the project—is to present the complexity of approaches to issues related to Redevelopment and heritage preservation.
-
Reshaping the Gdańsk Shipyard—The Birthplace of the Solidarity Movement. The Complexity of Adaptive Reuse in the Heritage Context
'MDPI AG', 2021Co-Authors: Piotr Lorens, łukasz BugalskiAbstract:The Gdańsk Shipyard—the birthplace of the Solidarity movement—is host to a unique example of a multi-layered Brownfield Redevelopment project, an area that is burdened by a complex history, overlapping heritage, and multiple memories. These circumstances require an integrated yet differentiated approach to the site’s heritage and make the creation of one homogeneous narration of its future impossible. At the same time, the size of the area, as well as its location within Gdańsk city centre, has meant that its future has been the subject of numerous discussions and speculations conducted over the last 20 years—starting from the creation of a large-scale open-air museum and continuing to the localization of the new Central Business District of the city. Consequently, that broad discussion carried out regarding the scope of Redevelopment projects has been rooted in the possible introduction of diverse models of adaptive reuse. This variety of possible approaches also includes discussion on the mode of integrating heritage in the Redevelopment processes. The goal of this paper—written just before the initiation of the final stage of the conceptual part of the project—is to present the complexity of approaches to issues related to Redevelopment and heritage preservation
Tendero Marjorie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A participatory decision support system for contaminated Brownfield Redevelopment: a case study from France
Taylor & Francis (Routledge): STM Behavioural Science and Public Health Titles, 2019Co-Authors: Tendero Marjorie, Plottu BéatriceAbstract:International audienceCurrently, participatory evaluation processes using multicriteria decision aids are barely used in the context of contaminated sites, even though they are a powerful tool for supporting land-use decision-making. The aim of this paper is to show how to apply such a participatory evaluation process (mixed methods) to the Redevelopment of a contaminated Brownfield site in France. Following the Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation (MODE), we designed a participatory process that enabled stakeholder empowerment to implement participatory multicriteria evaluations. We show that the (Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality) ELECTRE I method can be used to select consensus-based Brownfield Redevelopment projects and that such a participatory process can be implemented to ensure that feasible, coherent, and transparent choices are made for other Brownfield Redevelopment processes
-
Sustainable contaminated Brownfield Redevelopment : implementation of a participatory multicriteriadecision aid support system
2018Co-Authors: Tendero MarjorieAbstract:La reconversion des friches urbaines est unepriorité pour préserver les sols. Ce sont souvent des sitespollués ; ce qui engendre de nombreux obstacles pour lesreconvertir. Les bénéfices découlant de la reconversionsont sous-estimés tandis que les coûts sont surestimés parles opérateurs techniques et fonciers. L’impact de lastigmatisation du site amène les riverains à ne pass’approprier les nouveaux usages. Le choix de ces usagespeut être à l'origine de conflits entre les parties prenantes.Cette thèse s'intéresse à la reconversion des frichespolluées en tenant compte à la fois de lamultidimensionnalité des parties prenantes, de leurspréférences, et de leurs perceptions. Nous étudions lesobstacles et les leviers pouvant être mobilisés pourpromouvoir leur reconversion à partir d’une enquête auprès de 76 opérateurs techniques et fonciers dans unepremière partie.Dans la seconde, nous analysonsl’importance des stigmates associés aux friches polluéesauprès des riverains et futurs usagers. Une premièreenquête, menée au niveau national (803 observations)analyse leurs perceptions, représentations et préférencesvis-à-vis de ces sites. Ces dernières sont précisées à l’aided’une expérience à choix discrets (338 observations)administrée sur cinq communes impactées par ce type desite. Dans une troisième partie, nous appliquons unedémarche d’aide multicritère à la décision participativedans le cas d’une friche urbaine polluée. Elle identifie lesprojets les plus consensuels en regroupant l’ensemble desparties prenantes. Ils correspondeBrownfield Redevelopment is a key priority topreserve soils. Brownfields are often contaminated yet.Therefore, it creates numerous obstacles to reuse them.Firstly, Brownfields Redevelopment’s benefits areunderestimated whereas costs are overestimated bydevelopers. Secondly, Brownfields are plagued with thestigma effect. This effect persists even after remediationprocess (e.g., individuals may not use facilities on aformer contaminated Brownfield). Thirdly, new uses cancause conflicts between the stakeholders. As such, thisthesis deals with contaminated BrownfieldRedevelopment taking into account both themultidimensionality of stakeholders, their preferencesand their perceptions. developers. In a first part, we study barriers to BrownfieldRedevelopment and how to tackle them using a surveyamong 76 French developers.In a second part, weanalyse the importance of the stigma associated withcontaminated Brownfields. A first survey (803observations), conducted at national level, investigatesindividuals’ perceptions, representations and preferencesregarding Brownfield Redevelopment. A second survey(338 observations), conducted among five municipalitiesimpacted by such sites, specifies their preferences usinga discrete choice experiment. In the third part, we applya participatory multicriteria decision aid. It determinesthe most consensual projects in the case of acontaminated site. They correspond to individuals’preferences that were previously analysed
-
Reconversion et aménagement durable des friches urbaines polluées - Élaboration d'une méthode participative d'aide multicritère à la décision
HAL CCSD, 2018Co-Authors: Tendero MarjorieAbstract:Brownfield Redevelopment is a key priority to preserve soils. Brownfields are often contaminated yet. Therefore, it creates numerous obstacles to reuse them. Firstly, Brownfields Redevelopment’s benefits are underestimated whereas costs are overestimated by developers. Secondly, Brownfields are plagued with the stigma effect. This effect persists even after remediation process (e.g., individuals may not use facilities on a former contaminated Brownfield). Thirdly, new uses can cause conflicts between the stakeholders. As such, this thesis deals with contaminated Brownfield Redevelopment taking into account both the multidimensionality of stakeholders, their preferences and their perceptions. In a first part, we study barriers to Brownfield Redevelopment and how to tackle them using a survey among 76 French developers. In a second part, we analyse the importance of the stigma associated with contaminated Brownfields. A first survey (803 observations), conducted at national level, investigates individuals’ perceptions, representations and preferences regarding Brownfield Redevelopment. A second survey (338 observations), conducted among five municipalities impacted by such sites, specifies their preferences using a discrete choice experiment. In the third part, we apply a participatory multicriteria decision aid. It determines the most consensual projects in the case of a contaminated site. They correspond to individuals’ preferences that were previously analysed.La reconversion des friches urbaines est une priorité pour préserver les sols. Ce sont souvent des sites pollués ; ce qui engendre de nombreux obstacles pour les reconvertir. Les bénéfices découlant de la reconversion sont sous-estimés tandis que les coûts sont surestimés par les opérateurs techniques et fonciers. L’impact de la stigmatisation du site amène les riverains à ne pas s’approprier les nouveaux usages. Le choix de ces usages peut être à l'origine de conflits entre les parties prenantes. Cette thèse s'intéresse à la reconversion des friches polluées en tenant compte à la fois de la multidimensionnalité des parties prenantes, de leurs préférences, et de leurs perceptions. Nous étudions les obstacles et les leviers pouvant être mobilisés pour promouvoir leur reconversion à partir d’une enquête auprès de 76 opérateurs techniques et fonciers dans une première partie. Dans la seconde, nous analysons l’importance des stigmates associés aux friches polluées auprès des riverains et futurs usagers. Une première enquête, menée au niveau national (803 observations) analyse leurs perceptions, représentations et préférences vis-à-vis de ces sites. Ces dernières sont précisées à l’aide d’une expérience à choix discrets (338 observations) administrée sur cinq communes impactées par ce type de site. Dans une troisième partie, nous appliquons une démarche d’aide multicritère à la décision participative dans le cas d’une friche urbaine polluée. Elle identifie les projets les plus consensuels en regroupant l’ensemble des parties prenantes. Ils correspondent aux préférences individuelles identifiées dans les précédents chapitres
-
Reconversion et aménagement durable des friches urbaines polluées : élaboration d'une méthode participative d'évaluation et d'aide multicritère à la décision
HAL CCSD, 2018Co-Authors: Tendero MarjorieAbstract:Brownfield Redevelopment is a key priority topreserve soils. Brownfields are often contaminated yet.Therefore, it creates numerous obstacles to reuse them.Firstly, Brownfields Redevelopment’s benefits areunderestimated whereas costs are overestimated bydevelopers. Secondly, Brownfields are plagued with thestigma effect. This effect persists even after remediationprocess (e.g., individuals may not use facilities on aformer contaminated Brownfield). Thirdly, new uses cancause conflicts between the stakeholders. As such, thisthesis deals with contaminated BrownfieldRedevelopment taking into account both themultidimensionality of stakeholders, their preferencesand their perceptions. developers. In a first part, we study barriers to BrownfieldRedevelopment and how to tackle them using a surveyamong 76 French developers.In a second part, weanalyse the importance of the stigma associated withcontaminated Brownfields. A first survey (803observations), conducted at national level, investigatesindividuals’ perceptions, representations and preferencesregarding Brownfield Redevelopment. A second survey(338 observations), conducted among five municipalitiesimpacted by such sites, specifies their preferences usinga discrete choice experiment. In the third part, we applya participatory multicriteria decision aid. It determinesthe most consensual projects in the case of acontaminated site. They correspond to individuals’preferences that were previously analysed.La reconversion des friches urbaines est unepriorité pour préserver les sols. Ce sont souvent des sitespollués ; ce qui engendre de nombreux obstacles pour lesreconvertir. Les bénéfices découlant de la reconversionsont sous-estimés tandis que les coûts sont surestimés parles opérateurs techniques et fonciers. L’impact de lastigmatisation du site amène les riverains à ne pass’approprier les nouveaux usages. Le choix de ces usagespeut être à l'origine de conflits entre les parties prenantes.Cette thèse s'intéresse à la reconversion des frichespolluées en tenant compte à la fois de lamultidimensionnalité des parties prenantes, de leurspréférences, et de leurs perceptions. Nous étudions lesobstacles et les leviers pouvant être mobilisés pourpromouvoir leur reconversion à partir d’une enquête auprès de 76 opérateurs techniques et fonciers dans unepremière partie.Dans la seconde, nous analysonsl’importance des stigmates associés aux friches polluéesauprès des riverains et futurs usagers. Une premièreenquête, menée au niveau national (803 observations)analyse leurs perceptions, représentations et préférencesvis-à-vis de ces sites. Ces dernières sont précisées à l’aided’une expérience à choix discrets (338 observations)administrée sur cinq communes impactées par ce type desite. Dans une troisième partie, nous appliquons unedémarche d’aide multicritère à la décision participativedans le cas d’une friche urbaine polluée. Elle identifie lesprojets les plus consensuels en regroupant l’ensemble desparties prenantes. Ils correspond
-
Acceptabilité des choix d’aménagements des friches urbaines polluées
Armand Colin, 2017Co-Authors: Plottu Béatrice, Tendero MarjorieAbstract:International audienceBrownfield Redevelopment provides opportunities to build sustainable cities for the future. However, potential benefits of Brownfield Redevelopment are underestimated whereas costs are overestimated; Brownfields are therefore barelyreused. Besides, economic valuation methods are struggling to determine ex ante benefits and in particularly collective benefits and those which are related to non-direct use. In order to address these limitations, we develop an original methodological framework which combines economic valuation techniques that are available. Focus groups and discrete choice experiment are first employed to assess individual risk attitudes and preferences, and then multi-criteria decision analysis is used to compare individual preferences with collective preferences in order to determine a consensual solution in the case of a Brownfield Redevelopment project. This methodological approach should improve ex-antestakeholders’ involvement and hence social acceptability of land-use plans.La reconversion de friches urbaines est une solution pour aménager la ville durable de demain. Or, la sous-estimation des bénéfices liés aux usages futurs d’une friche par rapport à ses coûts contribue à freiner la réutilisation de ce type de foncier potentiellement pollué. Les méthodes d’évaluation existantes peinent à valoriser ex ante les bénéfices potentiels, en particulier collectifs et non liés à un usage direct. Pour répondre à ces limites, nous proposons une démarche méthodologique originale articulant des outils interrogeant les préférences individuelles et d’autres participatifs. D’une part, les expériences à choix discrets sont utilisées pour appréhender les préférences et perceptions des individus vis-à-vis de différentes caractéristiques d’un projet de reconversion, et, d’autre part, l’analyse multicritère d’aide à la décision est employée pour confronter les préférences individuelles précédemment obtenues avec les préférences collectives afin de retenir une solution consensuelle à mettre en œuvre
Hamil Pearsall - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
superfund me a study of resistance to gentrification in new york city
Urban Studies, 2013Co-Authors: Hamil PearsallAbstract:Municipal governments have incorporated Brownfield Redevelopment programmes into urban sustainability plans to encourage the Redevelopment of these sites into productive uses. The combination of government support and developer initiatives indicates potential for the gentrification of Brownfields. However, developer proposals to expedite the conversion of contaminated properties along the Gowanus Canal in New York City into residential and commercial venues resulted in the addition of the canal to the US National Priorities List (NPL) of uncontrolled hazardous sites, rendering the site less attractive to developers. It is argued that the listing process became an effective tool in the struggle to resist gentrification in the Gowanus Canal neighbourhood. Place stigmatisation slowed developer-driven Redevelopment and the NPL designation allows for a comprehensive remediation approach and increases opportunities for community input. This study provides an interesting case study of resistance to developer-driven ‘smart-city’ planning that represents a meaningful departure from neoliberal urbanism.
-
from brown to green assessing social vulnerability to environmental gentrification in new york city
Environment and Planning C-government and Policy, 2010Co-Authors: Hamil PearsallAbstract:Although urban sustainability programs frequently include measures that focus on the environmental and economic components of sustainability, the social dimension of sustainability remains underrepresented. An analytical vulnerability approach from global change vulnerability research provides one way to evaluate the distributional impacts and procedural aspects of sustainability initiatives. I apply the vulnerability approach to a study of one contemporary sustainability initiative in New York City, Brownfield Redevelopment, and identify populations who are vulnerable to the negative impacts of the Redevelopment process: elderly residents, renters, and residents receiving government assistance. The results of the case study suggest that the vulnerability approach provides a way to develop indicators of social sustainability for inclusion in existing urban sustainability indicator projects.
